journal article·2025-08-29Open access

Orthognathic Surgery in Adults with Craniofacial Clefts: Evaluating the Need for Maxillary Advancement and Facial Aesthetic Improvement

Irina Isufi, Algen Isufi, Aida Meto, Adela Alushi, Rosa Esposito, Michele Tepedino

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 17

Abstract

Background: Craniofacial clefts represent the most common congenital malformation in the head and neck region. Although most patients undergo primary cleft repair in childhood, many still present midfacial growth deficiencies in adulthood. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the incidence and indications for orthognathic surgery in adult patients with cleft lip (CL), cleft lip and alveolus (CLA), cleft lip and palate (CLP), and isolated cleft palate (CP). Materials and Methods: Sixty adult cleft patients (36 males and 24 females) born with a cleft and with a mean age of 19.51 ± 1.83 years were retrospectively enrolled in this study. All patients had undergone primary lip and palate repair during childhood at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Service of “Mother Teresa” University Hospital Centre in Tirana. Clinical records, orthodontic documentation, and cephalometric data were reviewed to determine the indication for orthognathic surgery. Results: The statistical analysis showed that orthognathic surgery was deemed necessary in 30% patients, including ten males (56%) and eight females (44%). The most prevalent type of cleft was CLP, accounting for 35% of all patients, and it showed the highest surgical indication rate (83.3%). Cleft patients and the need for orthognathic surgery were evaluated according to the skeletal malocclusion in three planes. The need for surgery was more prevalent in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion with maxillary hypoplasia (83.3% of surgical cases), those with anterior and posterior crossbite (21.7% of all patients), and in deep bite patients (16.7% of all patients). Additionally, all patients with facial asymmetry (15%) required orthognathic surgery, highlighting the strong association between asymmetry and surgical indication. Conclusions: Patients with craniofacial cleft, especially those with CLP and combined maxillary deficiencies, demonstrate a significantly higher need for orthognathic surgery. Quantitative assessment supports the necessity of a multidisciplinary treatment approach to address persistent skeletal discrepancies and optimize functional and aesthetic outcomes in adult cleft patients.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cleft Lip and Palate Research · Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments · Sexual Differentiation and Disorders

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Aldent, 1007 Tirana, Albania

Department of Oro-Maxillo Facial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Aldent, 1007 Tirana, Albania

OMF Surgery Service, “Mother Theresa” University Hospital Centre, 1000 Tirana, Albania

Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Aldent, 1007 Tirana, Albania

Department of Surgery, Medicine, Dentistry and Morphological Sciences with Interest in Transplant, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy

Department of Dental Research Cell, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune 411018, Maharashtra, India

Department of Science and Technology for Sustainable Development, University “G. d’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara, 66013 Chieti, Italy

Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Global prevalence of cleft palate, cleft lip and cleft palate and lip: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.jormas.2021.05.008 ↗
2. Cervical vertebrae anomalies and cleft lip and palate: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1259/dmfr.20190085 ↗
3. Cleft lip and palate10.1016/j.clp.2018.07.006 ↗
4. Patient Factors Influencing Speech Outcomes in Velopharyngeal Function Following Initial Cleft Palate Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1177/10556656231191384 ↗
5. Lippen-Kiefer-Gaumen-Spalten [Cleft lip and palate]10.1007/s00292-017-0313-x ↗
6. An update on the aetiology of orofacial clefts
7. Cleft lip repair: Are outcomes between unilateral and bilateral clefts comparable?10.1080/2000656X.2019.1661848 ↗
8. Primary Repair in Patients With Unilateral Complete Cleft of Lip and Primary Palate: Assessment of Outcomes10.1097/SAP.0000000000001307 ↗
9. Classification of cleft Lip/palate: Then and Now10.1597/14-080 ↗
10. Influence of the primary cleft palate closure on the future need for orthognathic surgery in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181ef2eed ↗
11. Evaluation of airway volume in cleft lip and palate following nasoalveolar molding10.1097/SCS.0000000000004681 ↗
12. The need for orthognathic surgery in patients with repaired complete unilateral and complete bilateral cleft lip and palate10.1597/08-176.1 ↗
13. Defining subphenotypes for oral clefts based on dental development10.1177/154405910708601013 ↗
14. Prevalence of dental anomalies in patients with nonsyndromic cleft lip and/or palate in a Brazilian population10.1597/11-029 ↗
15. Dental anomalies of number in the permanent dentition of patients with bilateral cleft lip: Radiographic study10.1597/06-099.1 ↗
16. Prevalence of dental anomalies in a population of cleft lip and palate patients10.1597/08-275.1 ↗
17. Outcome of Patients with Complete Cleft Lip and Alveolus: 20-Year Follow-Up10.1097/PRS.0000000000011622 ↗
18. Ghodasra, R., and Brizuela, M. (2025). Orthodontics, Malocclusion. StatPearls [Internet], StatPearls Publishing.
19. Proffit, W.R., and Fields, H.W. (2001). Modern Orthodontics, Mosby-Year Book.
20. Cleft lip and palate: A review for dentists
21. Cleft lip and palate: Current status from the literature and our experience10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181b0daa3 ↗
22. A Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes between Unilateral and Bilateral Palatoplasty: Analysis of 2015–2020 Pediatric NSQIP Data10.1177/10556656231190517 ↗
23. Le schisi submucose del palato [Submucosal cleft of the palate]
24. A study of Class III treatment: Orthodontic camouflage vs orthognathic surgery
25. Staderini, E., Patini, R., Camodeca, A., Guglielmi, F., and Gallenzi, P. (2019). Three-Dimensional Assessment of Morphological Changes Following Nasoalveolar Molding Therapy in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: A Case Report. Dent. J., 7.10.3390/dj7010027 ↗
26. Treatment decision in adult patients with class III malocclusion: Surgery versus orthodontics10.1186/s40510-018-0218-0 ↗
27. Dental and facial asymmetries: A review
28. Dental development in children with cleft lip and palate: A comparison between unilateral and bilateral clefts
29. Evaluation of the orthodontic treatment need in a paediatric sample from Southern Italy and its importance among paediatricians for improving oral health in pediatric dentistry
30. Adherence to Orthodontic Treatment in Youth With Cleft Lip and/or Palate10.1177/1055665619867556 ↗
31. Prediction of orthognathic surgery need in children with unilateral cleft lip palate: Dental arch relationships and 5-year-olds’ index10.1111/ocr.12467 ↗
32. The impact of artificial intelligence on orthodontics: A systematic review of applications and implications
33. Meto, A., and Halilaj, G. (2025). The Integration of Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Artificial Intelligence, Augmented Reality, and Virtual Reality in Dental Diagnostics, Surgical Planning, and Education: A Narrative Review. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15116308 ↗