Shared Product Architectures for Engineering-to-Order Buyers and Suppliers: Insights from a Case Study
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper explores the potential for engineer-to-order (ETO) companies to capitalise financially on their modular product architectures by sharing them with their suppliers. Few scholars have studied product architectures being shared across buyers (ETO companies) and suppliers. While the topic’s relevance has previously been demonstrated, scholars tend to leave out details on how the shared elements of architectures, respectively, benefit the company and with what financial effect. The study aims to develop a framework for describing a shared architecture and to test it in a case study of an ETO company and two of its tier-one suppliers. The framework is built on existing research and the case work of this paper. The study identifies three key aspects of a shared product architecture: a common system decomposition, modules and interfaces that are financially driven by interorganisational alignment of key design characteristics, and a series of coordinated activities that are consistent and mutually beneficial for both organisations. The results show that the ETO company saw 10–35% cost saving on supplier scope after developing the shared architecture. The study contributes to the literature on product architectures and provides insights for ETO companies aiming to enhance financial performance through modular architectures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Product Development and Customization · Design Education and Practice · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
References (69)
Show source-provided references
1. Production Management Systems for One-of-a-Kind Products10.1016/0166-3615(92)90008-B ↗
2. The Project-Based Organisation: An Ideal Form for Managing Complex Products and Systems?10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00110-4 ↗
3. Product Life Cycle Management in Engineer-to-Order Industries10.1504/IJTM.2009.024913 ↗
4. An Analysis of Company Structure and Business Processes in the Capital Goods Industry in the UK10.1109/17.895337 ↗
5. A Dynamic Analysis of a Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Different On-Line Platform Smart Recycling and Selling Models10.1016/j.cie.2024.110748 ↗
6. Creating Modular Platforms for Strategic Flexibility
7. Su, C., Zha, X., Ma, J., Li, B., and Wang, X. (2025). Dynamic Optimal Control Strategy of CCUS Technology Innovation in Coal Power Stations Under Environmental Protection Tax. Systems, 13.10.3390/systems13030193 ↗
8. A Framework for Determining Product Modularity Levels10.1177/1687814017719420 ↗
9. Foehr, M., Gepp, M., and Vollmar, J. (2015, January 9–12). Challenges of System Integration in the Engineer-to-Order Business. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON), Yokohama, Japan.10.1109/IECON.2015.7392078 ↗
10. Creating a Competitive Advantage by Developing an Innovative Tool to Assess Suppliers in Agri-Food Complex
11. Creating Value by Delivering Integrated Solutions10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.01.001 ↗
12. Improving the Design Phase Through Interorganisational Product Knowledge Models10.1080/00207543.2012.663108 ↗
13. Harlou, U. (2006). Developing Product Families Based on Architectures: Contribution to a Theory of Product Families, Technical University of Denmark.
14. Hubka, V., and Eder, W.E. (1988). Theory of Technical Systems: A Total Concept Theory for Engineering Design, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-52121-8 ↗
15. Modelling the Customer—Supplier Interface over the World-Wide Web to Facilitate Early Supplier Involvement in the New Product Development10.1243/0954405001517829 ↗
16. WeBid: A Web-Based Framework to Support Early Supplier Involvement in New Product Development10.1016/S0736-5845(00)00005-3 ↗
17. Peter, M. (1996). Early Supplier Involvement (ESI) in Product Development, Universitaet St. Gallen—Hochschule fuer Wirtschafts-, Rechts-und Sozialwissenschaften.
18. Roy, M.-A., and Abdul-Nour, G. (2024). Integrating Modular Design Concepts for Enhanced Efficiency in Digital and Sustainable Manufacturing: A Literature Review. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14114539 ↗
19. The Design Structure System: A Method for Managing the Design of Complex Systems10.1109/TEM.1981.6448589 ↗
20. Pakala, P.K., and Allada, V. (, January 5–10). Effective Supplier Involvement in Product Development Projects. Proceedings of the International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Chicago, IL, USA.
21. Cross Domain Modularization Tool: Mechanics, Electronics, and Software10.1177/1063293X211000331 ↗
22. Methodical Support for the New Development of Cyber-Physical Product Families10.1017/pds.2022.51 ↗
23. A General Framework of Mechatronic Modular Architecture10.1155/2013/969304 ↗
24. Interface Diagram: Design Tool for Supporting the Development of Modularity in Complex Product Systems10.1177/1063293X13516329 ↗
25. A Method for Optimizing Product Architectures for the Management of Disturbance Factors10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.179 ↗
26. Impact of Modularity Decisions on a Firm’s Economic Objectives10.1115/1.4044914 ↗
27. Coping Asynchronous Modular Product Design by Modelling a Systems-in-System10.1017/pds.2022.258 ↗
28. Modularity-the Basis for Product and Factory Reengineering10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63005-4 ↗
29. Simpson, T.W., Siddique, Z., and Jiao, J.R. (2006). Determining Product Platform Extent. Product Platform and Product Family Design: Methods and Applications, Springer.10.1007/0-387-29197-0 ↗
30. Siiskonen, M., Malmqvist, J., and Folestad, S. (2021). Pharmaceutical Product Modularization as a Mass Customization Strategy to Increase Patient Benefit Cost-Efficiently. Systems, 9.10.3390/systems9030059 ↗
31. Modelling the Cost-Benefit Impact of Integrated Product Modularisation and Postponement in the Supply Chain for Pharmaceutical Mass Customisation10.1080/09544828.2023.2266330 ↗
32. Brownfield Process: A Method for Modular Product Family Development Aiming for Product Configuration10.1016/j.destud.2016.04.004 ↗
33. Towards Best Practices in the Engineer-To-Order Business: A Framework for the Structured Analysis of Commissioning Processes10.1017/dsd.2020.122 ↗
34. Design for Test and Qualification Through Activity-Based Modelling in Product Architecture Design10.1080/09544828.2021.1950656 ↗
35. Elstner, S., and Krause, D. (2012, January 21–24). Towards an Early Consideration of Ramp-Up Phase in the Product Development of Complex Products. Proceedings of the 12th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
36. Halfmann, N., Elstner, S., and Krause, D. (2011, January 15–18). Product and Process Evaluation in the Context of Modularization for Assembly. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11), Impacting Society Through Engineering Design, Lyngby/Copenhagen, Denmark.
37. Modular Product Design Based on the Supply Chain Network10.1177/1687814017732308 ↗
38. Brosch, M., Beckmann, G., and Krause, D. (2011, January 15–18). Approach to Visualize the Supply Chain Complexity Induced by Product Variety. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11), Impacting Society Through Engineering Design, Lyngby/Copenhagen, Denmark.
39. Blees, C. (2011). Eine Methode Zur Entwicklung Modularer Produktfamilien [A Method for Developing Modular Product Families]. [Ph.D. Thesis, Hamburg University of Technology].
40. Greve, E., Fuchs, C., Hamraz, B., Windheim, M., Schwede, L.-N., and Krause, D. (2020, January 14–17). Investigating the Effects of Modular Product Structures to Support Design Decisions in Modularization Projects. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Singapore.10.1109/IEEM45057.2020.9309820 ↗
41. Simpson, T.W., Jiao, J.R., Siddique, Z., and Hölttä-Otto, K. (2014). Integrated Development of Modular Product Families: A Methods Toolkit. Advances in Product Family and Product Platform Design: Methods & Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-7937-6 ↗
42. Wagenmann, S., Krause, A., Rall, J., Kaeske, J., Schoeck, M., Bursac, N., and Albers, A. (2023, January 18–21). Reference Architecture for Metadata Management—A Case Study on Data Mining in the Development of Cyber-Physical Systems. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Singapore.10.1109/IEEM58616.2023.10406413 ↗
43. Assessing the Cost Saving Potential of Shared Product Architectures10.1177/1063293X15624133 ↗
44. Global Views on Modular Design Research: Linking Alternative Methods to Support Modular Product Family Concept Development10.1115/1.4033654 ↗
45. Initial Integral Product and Assembly Structuring: A Case Study10.1017/dsd.2020.88 ↗
46. Assessing the Influence of Generational Variety on Product Family Structures10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.237 ↗
47. The Use of the Case Study Method in Theory Testing: The Example of Steel Emarketplaces
48. Case Research in Operations Management10.1108/01443570210414329 ↗
49. (2024, October 06). Eurostat Industrial Producer Price Index Overview. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Industrial_producer_price_index_overview.
50. Braha, D., Minai, A.A., and Bar-Yam, Y. (2006). Modularity in the Design of Complex Engineering Systems. Complex Engineered Systems: Science Meets Technology, Springer.10.1007/3-540-32834-3 ↗
51. Product Family Design and Platform-Based Product Development: A State-of-the-Art Review10.1007/s10845-007-0003-2 ↗
52. Eisner, H. (2011). Systems Engineering: Building Successful Systems, Morgan & Claypool Publishers.10.1007/978-3-031-79336-3 ↗
53. Managing Complex Technology Projects10.1080/08956308.2008.11657493 ↗
54. Meadows, D.H. (2009). Thinking in Systems: A Primer, Earthscan.
55. Eppinger, S.D. (1997, January 19–21). A Planning Method for Integration of Large-Scale Engineering Systems. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, Tampere, Finland.
56. Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management in Product and Organization Design10.1002/smj.4250171107 ↗
57. (2009). Industrial Systems, Installations and Equipment and Industrial Products-Structuring Principles and Reference Designations-Part 1: Basic Rules (Standard No. IEC 81346-1:2009).
58. Mueller, G.O., Mangum, W.D., and Mortensen, N.H. (2020, January 23–25). A Method for Revealing Misalignment in Engineer-To-Order Products and Process Structures. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Mass Customization and Personalization–Community of Europe (MCP-CE 2020), Novi Sad, Serbia.
59. Sanchez, R. (2005). Product and Process Architectures in the Management of Knowledge Resources. Resources, Technology and Strategy, Taylor and Francis.10.4324/9780203982259-6 ↗
60. Bertram, C.A. (2021). Variation Management in Project-Based Design. [Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Denmark].
61. Hvam, L., Mortensen, N.H., and Riis, J. (2008). Product Customization, Springer.
62. Risk, Risk Aversion and the Optimal Time to Produce10.1080/07408170600735512 ↗
63. Manufacturing Best Practice and Performance Studies: A Critique10.1108/01443570210417597 ↗
64. Supplier Integration and NPD Outcomes: Conditional Moderation Effects of Modular Design Competence10.1111/j.1745-493x.2012.03275.x ↗
65. The Impact of Modular Designs on New Product Development Outcomes: The Moderating Effect of Supply Chain Involvement10.1108/SCM-01-2018-0021 ↗
66. Knowledge Partitioning in the Interfirm Division of Labor: The Case of Automotive Product Development10.1287/orsc.13.3.321.2779 ↗
67. Modularization and the Impact on Supply Relationships10.1108/01443570710830593 ↗
68. Why Engineer-To-Order Portfolio Rationalization Stalls: Challenges in Standardization, Modularization, Platform Design and Mass Customization10.1017/dsd.2020.45 ↗
69. Measuring the Financial Benefits of Cross-Functional Integration Influences Management’s Behavior10.1111/jbl.12068 ↗