DFF: Sequential Dual-Branch Feature Fusion for Maritime Radar Object Detection and Tracking via Video Processing
Source abstract
Abstract
Robust maritime radar object detection and tracking in maritime clutter environments is critical for maritime safety and security. Conventional Constant False Alarm Rate (CFAR) detectors have limited performance in processing complex-valued radar echoes, especially in complex scenarios where phase information is critical and in the real-time processing of successive echo pulses, while existing deep learning methods usually lack native support for complex-valued data and have inherent shortcomings in real-time compared to conventional methods. To overcome these limitations, we propose a dual-branch sequence feature fusion (DFF) detector designed specifically for complex-valued continuous sea-clutter signals, drawing on commonly used methods in video pattern recognition. The DFF employs dual parallel complex-valued U-Net branches to extract multilevel spatiotemporal features from distance profiles and Doppler features from distance–Doppler spectrograms, preserving the critical phase–amplitude relationship. Subsequently, the sequential feature-extraction module (SFEM) captures the temporal dependence in both feature streams. Next, the Adaptive Weight Learning (AWL) module dynamically fuses these multimodal features by learning modality-specific weights. Finally, the detection module generates the object localisation output. Extensive evaluations on the IPIX and SDRDSP datasets show that DFF performs well. On SDRDSP, DFF achieves 98.76% accuracy and 68.75% in F1 score, which significantly outperforms traditional CFAR methods and state-of-the-art deep learning models in terms of detection accuracy and false alarm rate (FAR). These results validate the effectiveness of DFF for reliable maritime object detection in complex clutter environments through multimodal feature fusion and sequence-dependent modelling.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Advanced Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China
School of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
North Information Control Research Academy Group Company Limited, Nanjing 211153, China
School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China
College of Computer Science, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
Funding
External Research Project of Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University · Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Adaptive CA-CFAR threshold for non-coherent IR-UWB energy detector receivers10.1109/LCOMM.2009.12.091579 ↗
2. False alarm analysis of the envelope detection GO-CFAR processor10.1109/7.303754 ↗
3. An End-to-End Blind Image Quality Assessment Method Using a Recurrent Network and Self-Attention10.1109/TBC.2022.3215249 ↗
4. A deep learning method for predicting the minimum inhibitory concentration of antimicrobial peptides against Escherichia coli using Multi-Branch-CNN and Attention10.1128/msystems.00345-23 ↗
5. Aircraft Target Classification Method Based on EEMD and Multifractal10.2528/PIERM20101802 ↗
6. Capturing Temporal-Dependence in Radar Echo for Spatial-temporal Sparse Target Detection
7. Zilberman, E.R., and Pace, P.E. (2006, January 8–11). Autonomous Time-Frequency Morphological Feature Extraction Algorithm for LPI Radar Modulation Classification. Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Image Processing, Atlanta, GA, USA.10.1109/ICIP.2006.312851 ↗
8. Weak Target Detection in the Presence of Sea Clutter Using Radon-Fractional Fourier Transform Canceller10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3078723 ↗
9. Adaptive Target Extraction Method in Sea Clutter Based on Fractional Fourier Filtering10.1109/TGRS.2022.3192893 ↗
10. Detection and Extraction of Target With Micromotion in Spiky Sea Clutter Via Short-Time Fractional Fourier Transform10.1109/TGRS.2013.2246574 ↗
11. A Sea Clutter Suppression Method Based on Machine Learning Approach for Marine Surveillance Radar10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3167410 ↗
12. Pan, M., Chen, J., Wang, S., and Dong, Z. (2019, January 19–21). A Novel Approach for Marine Small Target Detection Based on Deep Learning. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 4th International Conference on Signal and Image Processing (ICSIP), Wuxi, China.10.1109/SIPROCESS.2019.8868862 ↗
13. Maritime Radar Target Detection in Sea Clutter Based on CNN With Dual-Perspective Attention
14. Maritime Radar Target Detection Model Self-Evolution Based on Semisupervised Learning
15. Gao, T., Sheng, W., Zhou, M., Fang, B., Luo, F., and Li, J. (2020). Method for Fault Diagnosis of Temperature-Related MEMS Inertial Sensors by Combining Hilbert–Huang Transform and Deep Learning. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20195633 ↗
16. Recent Advances in Rate Control: From Optimization to Implementation and Beyond10.1109/TCSVT.2023.3287561 ↗
17. Cross-Frame Transformer-Based Spatio-Temporal Video Super-Resolution10.1109/TBC.2022.3147145 ↗
18. Target Detection Method Based on Complex-Valued Deep Neural Network
19. Deep Learning-based Marine Target Detection Method with Multiple Feature Fusion
20. Radar CFAR Thresholding in Clutter and Multiple Target Situations10.1109/TAES.1983.309350 ↗
21. Joshi, S.K., Baumgartner, S.V., da Silva, A.B.C., and Krieger, G. (2019). Range-Doppler Based CFAR Ship Detection with Automatic Training Data Selection. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11111270 ↗
22. False-Alarm-Controllable Radar Detection for Marine Target Based on Multi Features Fusion via CNNs10.1109/JSEN.2021.3054744 ↗
23. Performance analysis of a modified CFAR based radar detector under pearson distributed clutter10.21917/ijct.2014.0144 ↗
24. Performance of CA-CFAR detectors in nonhomogeneous positive alpha-stable clutter10.1109/TAES.2015.140043 ↗
25. Lu, Z., and Shi, Y. (2021, January 8–11). A Novel Target Detector of Marine Radar Based on HOG Feature. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), Takamatsu, Japan.10.1109/ICMA52036.2021.9512766 ↗
26. Althnian, A., AlSaeed, D., Al-Baity, H., Samha, A., Dris, A., Alzakari, N., Abou Elwafa, A., and Kurdi, H. (2021). Impact of Dataset Size on Classification Performance: An Empirical Evaluation in the Medical Domain. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11020796 ↗
27. Floating Small Target Detection in Sea Clutter Using Mean Spectral Radius10.1109/LGRS.2022.3165163 ↗
28. Low-Light Image Enhancement via a Frequency-Based Model with Structure and Texture Decomposition10.1145/3590965 ↗
29. DSRPH: Deep semantic-aware ranking preserving hashing for efficient multi-label image retrieval10.1016/j.ins.2020.05.114 ↗
30. Recognition method of ship target in complex SAR image based on improved ResNet network
31. Fuchs, A., Rock, J., Toth, M., Meissner, P., and Pernkopf, F. (2021, January 7–14). Complex-valued Convolutional Neural Networks for Enhanced Radar Signal Denoising and Interference Mitigation. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf21), Atlanta, GA, USA.10.1109/RadarConf2147009.2021.9455296 ↗
32. Complex-Valued Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Survey10.1109/JAS.2022.105743 ↗
33. Boundary-Aware Feature Fusion With Dual-Stream Attention for Remote Sensing Small Object Detection10.1109/TGRS.2024.3514376 ↗
34. Xue, M., He, J., Wang, W., and Zhou, M. (2024). Low-light Image Enhancement via CLIP-Fourier Guided Wavelet Diffusion. arXiv.
35. Multi-Modal Fusion Sensing: A Comprehensive Review of Millimeter-Wave Radar and Its Integration With Other Modalities10.1109/COMST.2024.3398004 ↗
36. Pei, Y., Li, Q., Wu, Y., Peng, X., Guo, S., Ye, C., and Wang, T. (2024). MAFNet: Multimodal Asymmetric Fusion Network for Radar Echo Extrapolation. Remote Sens., 16.10.3390/rs16193597 ↗
37. Yan, J., Zhang, B., Zhou, M., Kwok, H.F., and Siu, S.W. (2022). Multi-Branch-CNN: Classification of ion channel interacting peptides using multi-branch convolutional neural network. Comput. Biol. Med., 147.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105717 ↗
38. Blind Image Quality Assessment: Exploring Content Fidelity Perceptibility via Quality Adversarial Learning10.1007/s11263-024-02338-7 ↗
39. Sea-detecting Radar Experiment and Target Feature Data Acquisition for Dual Polarization Multistate Scattering Dataset of Marine Targets (in English)
40. Graph-Represented Distribution Similarity Index for Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment10.1109/TIP.2024.3390565 ↗
41. Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W.M., and Frangi, A.F. (2015). U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015, Proceedings of the 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, 5–9 October 2015, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-24553-9 ↗
42. Trabelsi, C., Bilaniuk, O., Zhang, Y., Serdyuk, D., Subramanian, D., Santos, J.F., Mehri, S., Rostamzadeh, N., Bengio, Y., and Pal, C.J. (May, January 30). Deep Complex Networks. Proceedings of the ICLR 2018 Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
43. A complex gradient operator and its application in adaptive array theory10.1049/ip-f-1.1983.0003 ↗
44. Analysis of deep complex-valued convolutional neural networks for MRI reconstruction and phase-focused applications10.1002/mrm.28733 ↗
45. Complexity Correlation-Based CTU-Level Rate Control with Direction Selection for HEVC10.1145/3107616 ↗
46. Kerbaa, T.H., Mezache, A., and Oudira, H. (2022, January 26–27). Improved Decentralized SO-CFAR and GO-CFAR Detectors via Moth Flame Algorithm. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference of Advanced Technology in Electronic and Electrical Engineering (ICATEEE), M’Sila, Algeria.10.1109/ICATEEE57445.2022.10093725 ↗
47. Ball, J.E. (2014, January 19–23). Low signal-to-noise ratio radar target detection using Linear Support Vector Machines (L-SVM). Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Radar Conference, Cincinnati, OH, USA.10.1109/RADAR.2014.6875798 ↗
48. Sequence-Feature Detection of Small Targets in Sea Clutter Based on Bi-LSTM10.1109/TGRS.2022.3198124 ↗
49. Low-Light Enhancement Method Based on a Retinex Model for Structure Preservation10.1109/TMM.2023.3268867 ↗
50. EF-DETR: A Lightweight Transformer-Based Object Detector with an Encoder-Free Neck10.1109/TII.2024.3431044 ↗