Predicting Miner Localization in Underground Mine Emergencies Using a Hybrid CNN-LSTM Model with Data from Delay-Tolerant Network Databases
Source abstract
Abstract
Underground mining environments are highly hazardous, often prone to gas explosions, cave-ins, and fires that may trap miners during emergencies. The accurate, real-time localization of miners is vital for effective self-escape and rescue operations. Although the Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response (MINER) Act of 2006 mandates communication and tracking systems, most current solutions rely on low-power devices and line-of-sight methods that are ineffective in GPS-denied, dynamic subsurface conditions. Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) has emerged as a promising alternative by supporting message relay through intermittent links. In this work, we propose a deep learning framework that combines Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks to predict miner locations using simulated DTN-based movement data. The model was trained on a simulated dataset of 1,048,575 miner movement entries, predicting miner locations across 26 pillar classes. It achieved an 89% accuracy, an 89% recall, and an 83% F1-score, demonstrating strong performance for real-time underground miner localization. These results demonstrate the model’s potential for the real-time localization of trapped miners in GPS-denied environments, supporting enhanced self-escape and rescue operations. Future work will focus on validating the model with real-world data and deploying it for operational use in mines.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications · Fire Detection and Safety Systems · Earthquake Detection and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mining and Explosive Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA
Funding
Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) · National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. (2025, June 14). Mine Safety and Health at a Glance: Fiscal Year. Mine Health and Safety Administration, Available online: https://www.msha.gov/mine-safety-and-health-glance-fiscal-year.
2. (2025, June 14). Coal Mining Fatality Statistics: 1900–2019, Available online: https://arlweb.msha.gov/stats/centurystats/coalstats.asp.
3. United States Congress (2025, March 04). Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response Act of 2006 (MINER Act), Public Law 109-236, Available online: https://www.congress.gov/109/plaws/publ236/PLAW-109publ236.pdf.
4. A Delay-Tolerant Network Architecture for Challenged Internets
5. Delay and Disruption Tolerant Networking for Terrestrial and TCP/IP Applications: A Systematic Literature Review10.3390/network4030012 ↗
6. Tsaoussidis, V. (2024). All about Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) Contributions to Future Internet. Future Internet, 16.10.3390/fi16040129 ↗
7. Comprehensive Literature Review on Delay Tolerant Network (DTN) Framework for Improving the Efficiency of Internet Connection in Rural Regions of Malaysia10.1007/s13198-022-01632-2 ↗
8. NASA (2025, January 10). Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networking, Available online: https://www.nasa.gov/communicating-with-missions/delay-disruption-tolerant-networking.
9. Wireless Sensor Network Based Miner Localization in Underground Coal Mines10.1007/978-981-19-1018-0_11 ↗
10. Delay-Tolerant Networking: An Approach to Interplanetary Internet10.1109/MCOM.2003.1204759 ↗
11. Gradient-Based Learning Applied to Document Recognition10.1109/5.726791 ↗
12. A Hybrid CNN-LSTM Model for Predicting PM2.5 in Beijing Based on Spatiotemporal Correlation. Environ10.1007/s10651-021-00501-8 ↗
13. Spatio-Temporal Characterisation and Compensation Method Based on CNN and LSTM for Residential Travel Data10.7717/peerj-cs.2035 ↗
14. Long Short-Term Memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
15. Graves, A. (2012). Supervised Sequence Labelling with Recurrent Neural Networks, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-24797-2 ↗
16. Kamdem De Teyou, G., Tarabalka, Y., Manighetti, I., Almar, R., and Tripod, S. (2020). Deep Neural Networks for Automatic Extraction of Features in Time Series Satellite Images. arXiv, Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.08432.
17. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning, MIT Press.
18. (2024, December 18). Deep Learning. In Wikipedia. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_learning.
19. Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting
20. Efficient Processing of Deep Neural Networks: A Tutorial and Survey10.1109/JPROC.2017.2761740 ↗
21. A Systematic Review on Overfitting Control in Shallow and Deep Neural Networks10.1007/s10462-021-09975-1 ↗
22. Doshi-Velez, F., and Kim, B. (2017). Towards a Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning. arXiv, Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08608.
23. Gao, X., Zhang, D., Wang, D., Liu, J., and Duan, J. (2025). Assessing the Performance and Interpretability of the CNN-LSTM Model in Streamflow Forecasting. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-84810-5 ↗
24. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, L., and Polosukhin, I. (2017, January 4–9). Attention is All You Need. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Long Beach, CA, USA.
25. Gu, A., and Dao, T. (2023). Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces. arXiv.
26. Parmar, N., Vaswani, A., Uszkoreit, J., Kaiser, Ł., Shazeer, N., Ku, A., and Tran, D. (2018, January 10–15). Image Transformer. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), Stockholm, Sweden.
27. A survey on the edge computing for the Internet of Things10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2778504 ↗
28. Li, Y., Guo, A., Liu, S., Gao, Y., and Zheng, Y.T. (2018). A Geographical Location Prediction Method Based on Continuous Time Series Markov Model. PLoS ONE, 13.10.1371/journal.pone.0207063 ↗
29. Reconstructing Activity Location Sequences from Incomplete Check-In Data: A Semi-Markov Continuous-Time Bayesian Network Model
30. Goyal, A., Madria, S., and Frimpong, S. (2022, January 1–4). MinerFinder. Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (SIGSPATIAL ′22), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1145/3557915.3561024 ↗
31. Wu, F., Fu, K., Wang, Y., Xiao, Z., and Fu, X. (2017). A Spatial-Temporal-Semantic Neural Network Algorithm for Location Prediction on Moving Objects. Algorithms, 10.10.3390/a10020037 ↗
32. iRoad: A Framework for Scalable Predictive Query Processing on Road Networks10.14778/2536274.2536291 ↗
33. Liu, Q., Wu, S., Wang, L., and Tan, T. (2016, January 12–17). Predicting the Next Location: A Recurrent Model with Spatial and Temporal Contexts. Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-16), Phoenix, AZ, USA.10.1609/aaai.v30i1.9971 ↗
34. Brownlee, J. (2025, July 22). Deep Learning for Time Series Forecasting: Predict the Future with MLPs, CNNs and LSTMs in Python, Machine Learning Mastery. Available online: https://books.google.com/books?id=o5qnDwAAQBAJ.
35. Phung, V.H., and Rhee, E.J. (2019). A High-Accuracy Model Average Ensemble of Convolutional Neural Networks for Classification of Cloud Image Patches on Small Datasets. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9214500 ↗
36. A Hybrid CNN-LSTM Model for Aircraft 4D Trajectory Prediction10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3010963 ↗