journal article·2025-08-16Open access

Classification of Rockburst Intensity Grades: A Method Integrating k-Medoids-SMOTE and BSLO-RF

Qinzheng Wu, Bing Dai, Danli Li, Hanwen Jia, Penggang Li

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 16

Abstract

Precise forecasting of rockburst intensity categories is vital to safeguarding operational safety and refining design protocols in deep underground engineering. This study proposes an intelligent forecasting framework through the integration of k-medoids-SMOTE and the BSLO-optimized Random Forest (BSLO-RF) algorithm. A curated dataset encompassing 351 rockburst instances, stratified into four intensity grades, was compiled via systematic literature synthesis. To mitigate data imbalance and outlier interference, z-score normalization and k-medoids-SMOTE oversampling were implemented, with t-SNE visualization confirming improved inter-class distinguishability. Notably, the BSLO algorithm was utilized for hyperparameter tuning of the Random Forest model, thereby strengthening its global search and local refinement capabilities. Comparative analyses revealed that the optimized BSLO-RF framework outperformed conventional machine learning methods (e.g., BSLO-SVM, BSLO-BP), achieving an average prediction accuracy of 89.16% on the balanced dataset—accompanied by a recall of 87.5% and F1-score of 0.88. It exhibited superior performance in predicting extreme grades: 93.3% accuracy for Level I (no rockburst) and 87.9% for Level IV (severe rockburst), exceeding BSLO-SVM (75.8% for Level IV) and BSLO-BP (72.7% for Level IV). Field validation via the Zhongnanshan Tunnel project further corroborated its reliability, yielding an 80% prediction accuracy (four out of five cases correctly classified) and verifying its adaptability to complex geological settings. This research introduces a robust intelligent classification approach for rockburst intensity, offering actionable insights for risk assessment and mitigation in deep mining and tunneling initiatives.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Landslides and related hazards · Drilling and Well Engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Deep Mining Laboratory of Shandong Gold Group Co., Ltd., Yantai 261400, China

Shandong Gold Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250101, China

School of Resource Environment and Safety Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China

Funding

National Science and Technology Major Project · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Risk Assessment of Rockburst via an Extended MABAC Method under Fuzzy Environment10.1016/j.tust.2018.09.037 ↗
2. Rockburst Characteristics of Several Hard Brittle Rocks: A True Triaxial Experimental Study10.1016/j.jrmge.2019.07.013 ↗
3. Novel Rockburst Criterion Based on the TBM Tunnel Construction of the Neelum–Jhelum (NJ) Hydroelectric Project in Pakistan10.1016/j.tust.2018.06.032 ↗
4. Some New Q-Value Correlations to Assist in Site Characterisation and Tunnel Design10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00011-4 ↗
5. Rockburst Support in Shallow-Dipping Tabular Stopes at Great Depth10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.10.026 ↗
6. Rockburst Proneness Criteria for Rock Materials: Review and New Insights10.1007/s11771-020-4511-y ↗
7. Evaluation of Rockburst Occurrence and Intensity in Underground Structures Using Decision Tree Approach10.1007/s00366-018-00695-9 ↗
8. Predicting Rock Burst Hazard with Incomplete Data Using Bayesian Networks10.1016/j.tust.2016.09.010 ↗
9. Short-Term Rockburst Damage Assessment in Burst-Prone Mines: An Explainable XGBOOST Hybrid Model with SCSO Algorithm10.1007/s00603-023-03522-w ↗
10. Ensemble Stacking Rockburst Prediction Model Based on Yeo–Johnson, K-Means SMOTE, and Optimal Rockburst Feature Dimension Determination10.1038/s41598-022-19669-5 ↗
11. Performance Evaluation of Rockburst Prediction Based on PSO-SVM, HHO-SVM, and MFO-SVM Hybrid Models
12. Li, D., Liu, Z., Armaghani, D.J., Xiao, P., and Zhou, J. (2022). Novel Ensemble Tree Solution for Rockburst Prediction Using Deep Forest. Mathematics, 10.10.3390/math10050787 ↗
13. Analysis of Rock Cuttability Based on Excavation Parameters of TBM10.1007/s40948-023-00628-x ↗
14. Rock Mechanics Applied to the Study of Rockbursts
15. Aubertin, M., Gill, D., and Simon, R. (2025, August 05). On the Use of the Brittleness Index Modified (BIM) to Estimate the Post-Peak Behavior of Rocks. Available online: https://scispace.com/papers/on-the-use-of-the-brittleness-index-modified-bim-to-estimate-3ckb47y2cn.
16. Brown, E.T., and Hoek, E. (1980). Underground Excavations in Rock, CRC Press.10.1201/9781482288926 ↗
17. Rockburst in High Ground Stress Area and Its Identification
18. Li, D., Chen, Y., Dai, B., Wang, Z., and Liang, H. (2023). Numerical Study of Dig Sequence Effects during Large-Scale Excavation. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132011342 ↗
19. Machine Learning Methods for Rockburst Prediction-State-of-the-Art Review10.1016/j.ijmst.2019.06.009 ↗
20. Predicting Rockburst with Database Using Particle Swarm Optimization and Extreme Learning Machine10.1016/j.tust.2020.103287 ↗
21. Real-Time Prediction of Rockburst Intensity Using an Integrated CNN-Adam-BO Algorithm Based on Microseismic Data and Its Engineering Application10.1016/j.tust.2021.104133 ↗
22. Ullah, B., Kamran, M., and Rui, Y. (2022). Predictive Modeling of Short-Term Rockburst for the Stability of Subsurface Structures Using Machine Learning Approaches: T-SNE, K-Means Clustering and XGBoost. Mathematics, 10.10.3390/math10030449 ↗
23. Liu, Y., and Hou, S. (October, January 29). Rockburst Prediction Based on Particle Swarm Optimization and Machine Learning Algorithm. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information Technology in Geo-Engineering, Guimarães, Portugal.
24. Analysis and Prediction of Rockburst Intensity Using Improved DS Evidence Theory Based on Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms10.1016/j.tust.2023.105331 ↗
25. Sun, Y., Li, G., and Yang, S. (2021). Rockburst Interpretation by a Data-Driven Approach: A Comparative Study. Mathematics, 9.10.3390/math9222965 ↗
26. Investigating the Effective Parameters on the Risk Levels of Rockburst Phenomena by Developing a Hybrid Heuristic Algorithm10.1007/s00366-019-00908-9 ↗
27. Rockburst prediction model using machine learning based on microseismic parameters of Qinling water conveyance tunnel10.1007/s11771-023-5233-8 ↗
28. Classified Prediction Model of Rockburst Using Rough Sets-Normal Cloud10.1007/s00521-018-3859-5 ↗
29. Rockburst Prediction in Kimberlite with Unsupervised Learning Method and Support Vector Classifier10.1016/j.tust.2019.04.019 ↗
30. A Two-Step Comprehensive Evaluation Model for Rockburst Prediction Based on Multiple Empirical Criteria10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105515 ↗
31. A Strength-Stress Coupling Criterion for Rockburst: Inspirations from 1114 Rockburst Cases in 197 Underground Rock Projects10.1016/j.tust.2023.105396 ↗
32. Wang, J., Ma, H., and Yan, X. (2023). Rockburst Intensity Classification Prediction Based on Multi-Model Ensemble Learning Algorithms. Mathematics, 11.10.3390/math11040838 ↗
33. Blood-Sucking Leech Optimizer10.1016/j.advengsoft.2024.103696 ↗
34. Rock Burst Prediction in Deep Shaft Based on RBF-AR Model