journal article·2025-08-05Open access

Optimization of Dust Spray Parameters for Simulated LiDAR Sensor Contamination in Autonomous Vehicles Using a Face-Centered Composite Design

Sungho Son, Hyunmi Lee, Jiwoong Yang, Jungki Lee, Jeongah Jang, Charyung Kim, Joonho Jun, Hyungwon Park, Sunyoung Park, Woongsu Lee

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 15

Abstract

Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) provides three-dimensional environmental information that is critical for maintaining the safety and reliability of autonomous driving systems. However, dust accumulation on the LiDAR window can cause detection errors and degrade performance. This study determined the optimal spray conditions for accumulating dust to evaluate LiDAR sensor cleaning performance. A primary optimization experiment using spray pressure, spray speed, spray distance, and the number of sprays as variables showed that spray pressure and number of sprays had the most significant influence on the kinetic energy and distribution of dust particles. Notably, the interaction between spray distance and number of sprays—related to curvature effects—was identified as a key variable increasing process sensitivity. A supplementary experiment, which added spray angle as a variable, indicated that while spray pressure remained the most significant factor, spray angle and number of sprays had an indirect influence through interaction terms. Both experiments used the same response variable (point cloud data) interactions to stepwise analyze particle transfer and spatial diffusion. The resulting optimal conditions offer a standard basis for evaluating LiDAR cleaning performance and may help improve cleaning efficiency and maintenance strategies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma · Vehicle emissions and performance · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Future Vehicle Research, Korea Automobile Testing and Research Institute, Hwaseong 18247, Republic of Korea

TOD Based Transportation Research Center, Ajou University, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea

Department of Autonomous Driving Division, Korea Automobile Testing and Research Institute, Hwaseong 18247, Republic of Korea

Korea Automobile Testing and Research Institute, Hwaseong 18247, Republic of Korea

Department of Automotive Engineering, Seoul National University of Science & Technology, Seoul 01811, Republic of Korea

Funding

Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA) · Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Liu, H., Wu, C., and Wang, H. (2023). Real time object detection using LiDAR and camera fusion for autonomous driving. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-023-35170-z ↗
2. When the Dust Settles: The Four Behaviors of LiDAR in the Presence of Fine Airborne Particulates10.1002/rob.21701 ↗
3. LIDAROC: Realistic LiDAR Cover Contamination Dataset for Enhancing Autonomous Vehicle Perception Reliability10.1109/LSENS.2024.3434624 ↗
4. Göktürk, K., and Jönsson, A. (2019). Developing a Resource-Efficient Sensor Cleaning System for Autonomous Heavy Vehicles, KTH.
5. Contaminations on LiDAR Sensor Covers: Performance Degradation Including Fault Detection and Modeling as Potential Applications10.1109/OJITS.2022.3214094 ↗
6. Hadj-Bachir, M., de Souza, P., Nordqvist, P., and Roy, N. (2021). Modelling of LIDAR sensor disturbances by solid airborne particles. arXiv.
7. A Study on Optimization of LiDAR Cleaning Parameters Using Experimental Design
8. Son, S., Lee, W., Jung, H., Lee, J., Kim, C., Lee, H., Park, H., Lee, H., Jang, J., and Cho, S. (2023). Evaluation of camera recognition performance under blockage using virtual test drive toolchain. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23198027 ↗
9. Son, S., Lee, W., Lee, J., Lee, J., Lee, H., Jang, J., Cha, H., Bae, S., and Ryu, H.C. (2024). Examining the optimization of spray cleaning performance for LiDAR. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14188340 ↗
10. Optimizing laser cleaning quality for composite paint layer on aluminum alloy surface using response surface methodology10.1016/j.optlastec.2024.112386 ↗
11. (2016). Road Vehicles—Test Contaminants for Filter Evaluation—Part 1: Arizona Test Dust (Standard No. ISO 12103-1:2016-03).
12. (2022, July 04). Kau Spray Coating Guns. Spraying Systems CO. Available online: www.spray.co.kr.
13. Son, S.H., Lee, W.S., Jung, H.G., Lee, J.K., Kim, C.R., Lee, H.W., Cho, S.W., Jang, J.A., Lee, M., and Ryu, H.C. (2023). Experimental analysis of various blockage performance for LiDAR sensor cleaning evaluation. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23052752 ↗
14. Myers, R.H., Montgomery, D.C., and Anderson-Cook, C.M. (2016). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, Wiley. [4th ed.].
15. Montgomery, D.C. (2020). Design and Analysis of Experiments, Wiley. [9th ed.].
16. Kutner, M.H., Nachtsheim, C.J., Neter, J., and Li, W. (2004). Applied Linear Statistical Models, McGraw-Hill Education. [5th ed.].
17. ASRSM: A sequential experimental design for response surface optimization10.1002/qre.1306 ↗
18. Process optimization using sequential design of experiment: A case study10.1080/08982112.2018.1539232 ↗