Technological Innovation and the Role of Smart Surveys in the Industrial Context
Source abstract
Abstract
Technological innovation has significantly transformed the field of statistics, not only in data analysis but also in data collection. Traditional methods based on direct observation have evolved into hybrid approaches that combine passively collected data (e.g., from GPS or accelerometers) with active user input through digital interfaces. This evolution has led to Smart Surveys—next-generation tools that leverage smart devices, such as smartphones and wearables, to collect data actively (via questionnaires or images) and passively (via embedded sensors). Smart Surveys offer strategic value in industrial contexts by enabling real-time data collection on worker behavior, environments, and operational conditions. However, the heterogeneity of such data poses challenges in management, integration, and quality assurance. This study proposes a modular system architecture incorporating gamification elements to enhance user participation, particularly among hard-to-reach worker segments, such as mobile or shift workers. By leveraging motivational strategies and interactive feedback mechanisms, the system seeks to foster greater engagement while addressing critical data security and privacy concerns within industrial Internet of Things (IoT) environments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Technology Adoption and User Behaviour · Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing · Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Economics, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 81043 Capua, Italy
Department of Economics and Law, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy
University Consortium on Systems and Methods for Competitive Enterprises—CUSSMAC, 84048 Fisciano, Italy
Department of Mathematics and Applications “Renato Caccioppoli”, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80126 Naples, Italy
Department of Economics, University of Naples “Parthenope”, 80132 Naples, Italy
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. Artificial intelligence in Internet of things
2. Dorsemaine, B., Gaulier, J.P., Wary, J.P., Kheir, N., and Urien, P. (2015, January 9–11). Internet of Things: A Definition & Taxonomy. Proceedings of the 2015 9th International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services and Technologies, Cambridge, UK.10.1109/NGMAST.2015.71 ↗
3. Vailshery, L.S. (2025, August 07). Number of IoT Connections Worldwide 2022–2034. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1101442/iot-number-of-connected-devices-worldwide/.
4. Industrial IoT and AI implementation in vehicular logistics and supply chain management for vehicle mediated transportation systems10.1007/s13198-021-01581-2 ↗
5. The influence of the Industrial Internet of Things on business models of established manufacturing companies—A business level perspective10.1016/j.technovation.2017.09.003 ↗
6. On the use of Internet of things and Web 2.0 in inventory Management
7. Hou, J., and Li, B. (2020). The Evolutionary Game for Collaborative Innovation of the IoT Industry under Government Leadership in China: An IoT Infrastructure Perspective. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12093648 ↗
8. Internet of Things(IOT) applications and challenges: A review
9. IoT and AI for the Analysis of Emotional Intelligence
10. Microsoft Kinect Sensor and Its Effect10.1109/MMUL.2012.24 ↗
11. He, M., Luo, H., Chang, Z., and Hui, B. (2017). Pedestrian Detection with Semantic Regions of Interest. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17112699 ↗
12. Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010 ↗
13. An introduction to biometric recognition10.1109/TCSVT.2003.818349 ↗
14. Industry 4.0: Machinery integration with supply chain and logistics in compliance with Italian regulations10.1016/j.mex.2023.102269 ↗
15. The ethical metaverse: Quality, tokens, and social responsibility in blockchain environments
16. Babbie, E.R. (2013). The Basics of Social Research, Wadsworth. [6th ed.].
17. The Limitations of Online Surveys10.1177/0253717620957496 ↗
18. Perez, M., Cipparrone, S., D’Amen, B., De Cicco, F., Lorè, B., Nuccitelli, A., and Porciani, L. (2022). Primi Passi Verso le Smart Surveys Nella Statistica Ufficiale: L’esperienza ISTAT e la Percezione Della Popolazione, ISTAT. Presentazione o Rapporto Interno.
19. Vitiis, D.D., Fausti, F.D., Inglese, F., and Perez, M. (2024, January 6–7). Smart Surveys: Methodological issues and challenges for Official Statistics. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Methodologies for Official Statistics, Rome, Italy.
20. Non-Response in Household Interview Surveys
21. The Use and Effects of Incentives in Surveys10.1177/0002716212458082 ↗
22. Dillman, D., Smyth, J., and Christian, L. (2024). Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, Wiley.
23. Tourangeau, R., Rips, L.J., and Rasinski, K. (2000). The Psychology of Survey Response, Cambridge University Press. [10th ed.].10.1017/CBO9780511819322 ↗
24. The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias: A Meta-Analysis10.1093/poq/nfn011 ↗
25. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 ↗
26. Bucher, H., Keusch, F., De Vitiis, C., Fausti, F., Inglese, F., van Tienoven, T.P., McCool, D., Lugtig, P., and Struminskaya, B. (2023). Smart Survey Implementation Workpackage 2: Research Methodology Deliverable M6: Review Stage, European Commission.
27. The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach10.1023/A:1015630930326 ↗
28. Employee engagement and performance: A systematic literature review
29. Hybrid triboelectric-piezoelectric nanogenerator assisted intelligent condition monitoring for aero-engine pipeline system10.1016/j.cej.2025.165121 ↗
30. Gamification in HR management: Increasing Employee Motivation and Competence Through an Interactive Approach10.62872/w0408b69 ↗
31. Leveraging Gamification to Boost Employee Emotional Engagement10.21512/jggag.v10i1.11663 ↗
32. Game on! A state-of-the-art overview of doing business with gamification10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122988 ↗
33. Sharma, P., Manjula, H.K., and Kumar, D. (2023, January 2–3). Impact of Gamification on Employee Engagement- An Empirical Study with Special Reference to IT Industry in Bengaluru. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Reinventing Business Practices, Start-Ups and Sustainability (ICRBSS 2023), Chennai, India.
34. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., and Nacke, L. (2011, January 29–30). From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining Gamification. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, MindTrek, Tampere, Finland.10.1145/2181037.2181040 ↗
35. Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., and Sarsa, H. (2014, January 6–9). Does Gamification Work?—A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification. Proceedings of the 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, HI, USA.10.1109/HICSS.2014.377 ↗
36. A Review on Gamification and its Potential to Motivate and Engage Employees and Customers: Employee Engagement through Gamification10.4018/IJSKD.2017010103 ↗
37. Gamification of employee training and development: Gamification of employee training10.1111/ijtd.12124 ↗
38. Understanding applicants’ reactions to gamified recruitment10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.041 ↗
39. Incentive design and gamification for knowledge management10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.009 ↗
40. Thom-Santelli, J., Millen, D., and DiMicco, J. (2012, January 11–15). Removing gamification from an enterprise SNS. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work CSCW, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1145/2145204.2145362 ↗
41. Morschheuser, B., Alt, R., and Henzi, C. (2015, January 5–8). Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Proceedings of the Increasing Intranet Usage Through Gamification—Insights from an Experiment in the Banking HI, Kauai, HI, USA.10.1109/HICSS.2015.83 ↗
42. Afentoulidis, G., Szlávik, Z., Yang, J., and Bozzon, A. (2018, January 27–30). Social Gamification in Enterprise Crowdsourcing. Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.10.1145/3201064.3201094 ↗
43. Dynamic, interactive survey questions can increase survey data quality10.1080/10548408.2013.827546 ↗
44. Myths and realities of respondent engagement in online surveys10.2501/IJMR-54-5-613-633 ↗
45. Hoekstra, W. (2020). Your Data, Your Choice? Exploring the Relations Between Citizens’ Willingness to Share Data, Awareness, Trust, and Demographics in a Virtual Smart City. [Master’s Thesis, Leiden University].
46. A Review of Issues in Gamified Surveys10.1177/0894439315608451 ↗
47. Doing Research With a Gamified Survey: Reflections From Smart City Research10.1177/08944393211073508 ↗
48. Dan, O.M., and Lai, J.W. (2013, January 16–19). How am I doing?. The effects of gamification and social sharing on user engagement. In Proceedings of Survey Research Methods Section, Boston, MA, USA.
49. Microprocessor-Based Television Games, Exercises, and Evaluation Procedures for the Physically and Mentally Handicapped10.1109/MEMB.1985.5006227 ↗
50. Internet-of-Gamification: A Review of Literature on IoT-enabled Gamification for User Engagement10.1080/10447318.2021.1990517 ↗
51. A deep learning and gamification approach to improving human-building interaction and energy efficiency in smart infrastructure10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.065 ↗
52. Franco, A. (2020). Balancing user comfort and energy efficiency in public buildings through social interaction by ICT systems. Systems, 8.10.3390/systems8030029 ↗
53. A gamification platform to foster energy efficiency in office buildings10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110101 ↗
54. Rocha, I.G.D., Silva, J.E.C.G., De Araújo, T.A.S., Gomes, D.C., and Júnior, A.G.S. (2025, January 28–30). IoT Solution for Physical Activity Monitoring with Gamification and Machine Learning. Proceedings of the 2025 Brazilian Conference on Robotics (CROS), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.10.1109/CROS66186.2025.11066111 ↗
55. User engaging practices for energy saving in buildings: Critical review and new enhanced procedure10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.05.010 ↗
56. Paone, A., and Bacher, J.P. (2018). The Impact of Building Occupant Behavior on Energy Efficiency and Methods to Influence It: A Review of the State of the Art. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11040953 ↗
57. Reducing residential energy consumption through a marketized behavioral intervention: The approach of Household Energy Saving Option (HESO)10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110621 ↗
58. Meng, Y., and Sun, Y. (2025). From Biometrics to Environmental Control: AI-Enhanced Digital Twins for Personalized Health Interventions in Healing Landscapes. arXiv.
59. Preneel, B., and Ikonomou, D. (2014). Designing Privacy-by-Design. Annual Privacy Forum, Springer.
60. Choi, S., Sim, J., and Choi, G. (2025). Synthetic Text as Data: On Usefulness and Limitations. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15105460 ↗
61. Synthetic data generation methods in healthcare: A review on open-source tools and methods10.1016/j.csbj.2024.07.005 ↗