User Comment-Guided Cross-Modal Attention for Interpretable Multimodal Fake News Detection
Source abstract
Abstract
In order to address the pressing challenge posed by the proliferation of fake news in the digital age, we emphasize its profound and harmful impact on societal structures, including the misguidance of public opinion, the erosion of social trust, and the exacerbation of social polarization. Current fake news detection methods are largely limited to superficial text analysis or basic text–image integration, which face significant limitations in accurately identifying deceptive information. To bridge this gap, we propose the UC-CMAF framework, which comprehensively integrates news text, images, and user comments through an adaptive co-attention fusion mechanism. The UC-CMAF workflow consists of four key subprocesses: multimodal feature extraction, cross-modal adaptive collaborative attention fusion of news text and images, cross-modal attention fusion of user comments with news text and images, and finally, input of fusion features into a fake news detector. Specifically, we introduce multi-head cross-modal attention heatmaps and comment importance visualizations to provide interpretability support for the model’s predictions, revealing key semantic areas and user perspectives that influence judgments. Through the cross-modal adaptive collaborative attention mechanism, UC-CMAF achieves deep semantic alignment between news text and images and uses social signals from user comments to build an enhanced credibility evaluation path, offering a new paradigm for interpretable fake information detection. Experimental results demonstrate that UC-CMAF consistently outperforms 15 baseline models across two benchmark datasets, achieving F1 Scores of 0.894 and 0.909. These results validate the effectiveness of its adaptive cross-modal attention mechanism and the incorporation of user comments in enhancing both detection accuracy and interpretability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Misinformation and Its Impacts · Topic Modeling · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Cyber Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
Research Institute, Shenzhen Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518057, China
Funding
Major Research Plan of Hubei Province · project of Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality of China
References (69)
Show source-provided references
1. A survey on fake news and rumour detection10.1016/j.ins.2019.05.035 ↗
2. Fake news detection on social media: A data mining perspective10.1145/3137597.3137600 ↗
3. Zhang, J., Dong, B., and Yu, P.S. (2020, January 20–24). FakeLocator: Robust localization of fake news via semantic analysis. Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020, Taipei, Taiwan.
4. A survey of fake news: Fundamental theories, detection methods, and opportunities
5. Deep learning and fusion mechanism-based multimodal fake news detection methodologies: A review
6. Deep learning for fake news detection: A comprehensive survey
7. Detecting fake news for reducing misinformation risks using analytics approaches10.1016/j.ejor.2019.06.022 ↗
8. Yang, Y., Zheng, L., Zhang, J., Cui, Q., Li, Z., and Yu, P.S. (2018). TI-CNN: Convolutional neural networks for fake news detection. arXiv.
9. Guo, Y., Ge, H., and Li, J. (2023). A two-branch multimodal fake news detection model based on multimodal bilinear pooling and attention mechanism. Front. Comput. Sci., 5.10.3389/fcomp.2023.1159063 ↗
10. Singhal, S., Shah, R.R., Chakraborty, T., Kumaraguru, P., and Satoh, S. (2019, January 11–13). SpotFake: A multi-modal framework for fake news detection. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Multimedia Big Data, Singapore.10.1109/BigMM.2019.00-44 ↗
11. Multimodal fake news detection incorporating external knowledge and user interaction feature10.1155/2023/8836476 ↗
12. Dellys, H.N., Mokeddem, H., and Sliman, L. (2023). On the integration of social context for enhanced fake news detection using multimodal fusion attention mechanism. AI, 6.10.3390/ai6040078 ↗
13. Helmstetter, S., and Paulheim, H. (2018, January 28–31). Weakly supervised learning for fake news detection on Twitter. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, Barcelona, Spain.10.1109/ASONAM.2018.8508520 ↗
14. Riedel, B., Augenstein, I., Spithourakis, G.P., and Riedel, S. (2017). A simple but tough-to-beat baseline for the Fake News Challenge stance detection task. arXiv.
15. Wang, Y., Ma, F., Jin, Z., Yuan, Y., Xun, G., Jha, K., Su, L., and Gao, J. (2018, January 19–23). EANN: Event adversarial neural networks for multi-modal fake news detection. Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, London, UK.10.1145/3219819.3219903 ↗
16. Khattar, D., Goud, J.S., Gupta, M., and Varma, V. (2019, January 13–17). MVAE: Multimodal variational autoencoder for fake news detection. Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/3308558.3313552 ↗
17. Qi, P., Cao, J., Yang, T., Guo, J., and Li, J. (2019, January 8–11). Exploiting multi-domain visual information for fake news detection. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Beijing, China.10.1109/ICDM.2019.00062 ↗
18. Towards automatically filtering fake news in Portuguese10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113199 ↗
19. From word to sense embeddings: A survey on vector representations of meaning10.1613/jair.1.11259 ↗
20. Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052 ↗
21. Molnar, C. (2020). Interpretable Machine Learning, Lulu.com.
22. Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). Why should I trust you? Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939778 ↗
23. Lundberg, S.M., and Lee, S.I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, MIT Press.
24. A survey of methods for explaining black box models
25. Pérez-Rosas, V., Kleinberg, B., Lefevre, A., and Mihalcea, R. (2018, January 20–26). Automatic detection of fake news. Proceedings of the COLING 2018, Santa Fe, NM, USA.
26. Zhou, X., Wu, J., and Zafarani, R. (2020, January 11–14). SAFE: Similarity-aware multi-modal fake news detection. Proceedings of the PAKDD 2020, Singapore.10.1007/978-3-030-47436-2_27 ↗
27. Rashkin, H., Choi, E., Jang, J.Y., Volkova, S., and Choi, Y. (2017, January 7–11). Truth of varying shades: Analyzing language in fake news and political fact-checking. Proceedings of the EMNLP 2017, Copenhagen, Denmark.10.18653/v1/D17-1317 ↗
28. Wang, W.Y. (August, January 30). Liar, liar pants on fire: A new benchmark dataset for fake news detection. Proceedings of the ACL 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.18653/v1/P17-2067 ↗
29. Zhou, X., Liang, W., Shimizu, K.I., Ma, J., and Jin, Q. (2022, January 23–29). MFAN: Multi-modal feature-enhanced attention networks for rumor detection. Proceedings of the IJCAI 2022, Vienna, Austria.
30. Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., and Poblete, B. (April, January 28). Information credibility on twitter. Proceedings of the WWW 2011, Hyderabad, India.10.1145/1963405.1963500 ↗
31. Kwon, S., Cha, M., Jung, K., Chen, W., and Wang, Y. (2013, January 7–10). Prominent features of rumor propagation in online social media. Proceedings of the ICDM 2013, Dallas, TX, USA.10.1109/ICDM.2013.61 ↗
32. The spread of true and false news online10.1126/science.aap9559 ↗
33. Jin, Z., Cao, J., Guo, H., Zhang, Y., and Luo, J. (2016, January 12–17). News verification by exploiting conflicting social viewpoints in microblogs. Proceedings of the AAAI 2016, Phoenix, AZ, USA.10.1609/aaai.v30i1.10382 ↗
34. Tacchini, G., Ballarin, G., Della Vedova, M.L., Moret, S., and de Alfaro, L. (2017, January 19–21). Some like it hoax: Automated fake news detection in social networks. Proceedings of the DSAA 2017, Tokyo, Japan.
35. Guo, H., Cao, J., Zhang, Y., Guo, J., and Li, J. (2018, January 22–26). Rumor detection with hierarchical social attention network. Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Torino, Italy.10.1145/3269206.3271709 ↗
36. Liu, Y., and Wu, Y.F.B. (2018, January 2–7). Early detection of fake news on social media through propagation path classification with recurrent and convolutional networks. Proceedings of the AAAI 2018, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11268 ↗
37. Ma, J., Gao, W., Mitra, P., Kwon, S., Jansen, B.J., Wong, K.F., and Cha, M. (2016, January 9–15). Detecting rumors from microblogs with recurrent neural networks. Proceedings of the IJCAI 2016, New York, NY, USA.
38. Tensor Factorization with Sparse and Graph Regularization for Fake News Detection on Social Networks10.1109/TCSS.2023.3296479 ↗
39. Shu, K., Cui, L., Wang, S., Lee, D., and Liu, H. (2019, January 4–8). dEFEND: Explainable fake news detection. Proceedings of the KDD 2019, Anchorage, AK, USA.
40. Shang, L., Kou, Z., Zhang, Y., and Wang, D. (2022, January 25–29). A duo-generative approach to explainable multimodal COVID-19 misinformation detection. Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022, Virtual.10.1145/3485447.3512257 ↗
41. Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., and Bengio, Y. (2015, January 7–9). Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. Proceedings of the ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA.
42. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, Ł., and Polosukhin, I. (2017, January 4–9). Attention is all you need. Proceedings of the NIPS 2017, Long Beach, CA, USA.
43. Cross-modal attention for multi-modal fake news detection
44. Improving multimodal fake news detection by leveraging cross-modal content correlation
45. Xu, K., Ba, J., Kiros, R., Cho, K., Courville, A., Salakhudinov, R., Zemel, R., and Bengio, Y. (2015, January 6–11). Show, attend and tell: Neural image caption generation with visual attention. Proceedings of the ICML 2015, Lille, France.
46. Anderson, P., He, X., Buehler, C., Teney, D., Johnson, M., Gould, S., and Zhang, L. (2018, January 18–23). Bottom-up and top-down attention for image captioning and visual question answering. Proceedings of the CVPR 2018, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00636 ↗
47. Beyond bilinear: Generalized multimodal factorized high-order pooling for visual question answering
48. Lu, J., Batra, D., Parikh, D., and Lee, S. (2019, January 8–14). ViLBERT: Pretraining task-agnostic visiolinguistic representations for vision-and-language tasks. Proceedings of the NeurIPS 2019, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
49. Li, L.H., Yatskar, M., Yin, D., Hsieh, C.J., and Chang, K.W. (2019). VisualBERT: A simple and performant baseline for vision and language. arXiv.
50. Chen, Y.C., Li, L., Yu, L., Kholy, A.E., Ahmed, F., Gan, Z., Cheng, Y., and Liu, J. (2020, January 23–28). UNITER: Universal image-text representation learning. Proceedings of the ECCV 2020, Glasgow, UK.10.1007/978-3-030-58577-8_7 ↗
51. Zubiaga, A., Liakata, M., Procter, R., Wong Sak Hoi, G., and Tolmie, P. (2016). Analysing how people orient to and spread rumours in social media by looking at conversational threads. PLoS ONE, 11.10.1371/journal.pone.0150989 ↗
52. Hannak, A., Wagner, C., Garcia, D., Mislove, A., Strohmaier, M., and Wilson, C. (March, January 25). Bias in online freelance marketplaces: Evidence from TaskRabbit and Fiverr. Proceedings of the CSCW 2017, Portland, OR, USA.10.1145/2998181.2998327 ↗
53. Kumar, S., West, R., and Leskovec, J. (2016, January 11–15). Disinformation on the web: Impact, characteristics, and detection of wikipedia hoaxes. Proceedings of the WWW 2016, Montreal, QC, Canada.
54. Zhao, Z., Resnick, P., and Mei, Q. (2015, January 18–22). Enquiring minds: Early detection of rumors in social media from enquiry posts. Proceedings of the WWW 2015, Florence, Italy.10.1145/2736277.2741637 ↗
55. Popat, K., Mukherjee, S., Strötgen, J., and Weikum, G. (2017, January 3–7). Where the truth lies: Explaining the credibility of emerging claims on the web and social media. Proceedings of the WWW 2017, Perth, Australia.
56. Enayet, O., and El-Beltagy, S.R. (2017, January 3–4). NileTMRG at SemEval-2017 task 8: Determining rumour and veracity support for rumours on Twitter. Proceedings of the SemEval-2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.18653/v1/S17-2082 ↗
57. Detection and resolution of rumours in social media: A survey
58. Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x ↗
59. Antol, S., Agrawal, A., Lu, J., Mitchell, M., Batra, D., Lawrence Zitnick, C., and Parikh, D. (2015, January 7–13). VQA: Visual question answering. Proceedings of the ICCV 2015, Santiago, Chile.10.1109/ICCV.2015.279 ↗
60. Selvaraju, R.R., Cogswell, M., Das, A., Vedantam, R., Parikh, D., and Batra, D. (2017, January 22–29). Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. Proceedings of the ICCV 2017, Venice, Italy.10.1109/ICCV.2017.74 ↗
61. DARPA’s explainable artificial intelligence program
62. Liao, Q.V., Gruen, D., and Miller, S. (2020, January 25–30). Questioning the AI: Informing design practices for explainable AI user experiences. Proceedings of the CHI 2020, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1145/3313831.3376590 ↗
63. Zhou, X., Mulay, A., Ferrara, E., and Zafarani, R. (2020, January 19–23). ReCOVery: A multimodal repository for COVID-19 news credibility research. Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, Virtual.10.1145/3340531.3412880 ↗
64. Chen, M., Chu, X., and Subbalakshmi, K. (2021, January 8–11). Mmcovar: Multimodal COVID-19 vaccine focused data repository for fake news detection and a baseline architecture for classification. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, Virtual.10.1145/3487351.3488346 ↗
65. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., and Toutanova, K. (2019, January 2–7). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proceedings of the NAACL-HLT, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
66. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
67. Kou, Z., Zhang, D.Y., Shang, L., and Wang, D. (2020, January 10–13). Exfaux: A weakly supervised approach to explainable fauxtography detection. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Atlanta, GA, USA.10.1109/BigData50022.2020.9378019 ↗
68. Zhang, W., Gui, L., and He, Y. (2021, January 1–5). Supervised contrastive learning for multi modal unreliable news detection in COVID-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, Virtual.10.1145/3459637.3482196 ↗
69. Qian, S., Wang, J., Hu, J., Fang, Q., and Xu, C. (2021, January 11–15). Hierarchical multi-modal contextual attention network for fake news detection. Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Virtual.10.1145/3404835.3462871 ↗