Quantitative Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Ceramic Crown Restorations Obtained by Model Scanner, Intraoral Scanner, and Different CBCT Scans
Source abstract
Abstract
(1) Background: This study aimed to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of ceramic crowns produced by various digital methods using microcomputed tomography (MCT) imaging. (2) Methods: The ceramic crown preparation was performed on typodont maxillary first premolar. The crown preparation was scanned with an intraoral scanner and a model scanner, and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were performed with three different voxel sizes (0.075 mm, 0.1 mm, and 0.15 mm). The space between the crown and prepared teeth was measured at nine different points in both coronal and sagittal sections. Three different digital model acquisition techniques, namely, intraoral scanning, model scanning, and CBCT-based standard tessellation language (STL) reconstruction, were compared in terms of marginal and internal fit. (3) Results: Quantitative analyses revealed that model scanners exhibited the lowest marginal and internal gap values, indicating superior fit compared to intraoral scanners and CBCT-based models. The highest gap values were observed in the CBCT group with a voxel size of 0.15 mm. Overall, crowns obtained from model scanners demonstrated the highest success rates in both marginal and internal fit. (4) Conclusions: In conclusion, this study highlights the critical role of digital scanning accuracy in achieving clinically acceptable prosthetic fits and emphasizes the need for continued technological advancement.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental Radiography and Imaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara 06560, Turkey
Department of Basic Medicine Science, Anatomy, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara 06560, Turkey
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara 06560, Turkey
Department of Oral Diagnostics, Faculty of Dentistry, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. The fit of Procera titanium crowns. An in vitro and clinical study10.3109/00016359309041158 ↗
2. Marginal adap tation of ceramic crowns: A systematic review10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.08.003 ↗
3. Marginal fit of por celain-fused-to-metal and two types of ceramic crown10.1016/0022-3913(90)90260-J ↗
4. The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns10.1111/j.1834-7819.1995.tb05607.x ↗
5. The effects of disposable and custom-made impression trays on the accuracy of impressions10.1016/0300-5712(89)90104-8 ↗
6. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: Influence of tray material, impression material, and time10.1053/jopr.2002.125192 ↗
7. The effect of temperature changes on the dimensional stability of polyvinyl siloxane and polyether impression materials10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70068-X ↗
8. Evaluation of the marginal microleakage of CAD CAM compared with conventional interim crowns luted with different types of cement: An in vitro study10.4103/njcp.njcp_374_20 ↗
9. CAD/CAM systems available for the fabrication of crown and bridge restorations10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01300.x ↗
10. Digital dentistry: An overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350 ↗
11. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing10.1007/s00784-012-0795-0 ↗
12. Patients’ preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants10.1111/clr.12234 ↗
13. Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: A cost/time analysis10.1111/clr.12476 ↗
14. Fit of zirconia fixed partial denture: A systematic review10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02113.x ↗
15. Gingival margins for crowns: A review and discussion. Part II: Discrepancies and configurations10.1016/0022-3913(90)90286-L ↗
16. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.002 ↗
17. Evaluation of the marginal fit of a zirconia ceramic computer-aided machined (CAM) crown system10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60128-X ↗
18. Micro-CT evaluation of marginal and internal fit of cemented polymer infiltrated ceramic network material crowns manufactured after conventional and digital impressions10.1016/j.jpor.2018.04.005 ↗
19. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708 ↗
20. Accuracy of ceramic restorations made with two CAD/CAM systems10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60020-7 ↗
21. Accuracy of mechanical digitizing with a CAD/CAM system for fixed restorations
22. Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns10.1067/mpr.2000.109125 ↗
23. Predicting marginalfit of CAD/CAM crowns based on the presence or absence of common preparation errors10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60183-8 ↗
24. CBCT-based bone quality assessment: Are Hounsfield units applicable?10.1259/dmfr.20140238 ↗
25. A comparative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT): Part II. On 3D model accuracy
26. Marginal and internal fit of feldspathic ceramic CAD/CAM crowns fabricated via different extraoral digitization methods: A micro-computed tomography analysis10.1007/s10266-020-00560-6 ↗
27. Comparison of the marginal f it of pressable ceramic to metal ceramic restorations10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00497.x ↗
28. Evaluation of the absolute marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic copings10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60009-7 ↗
29. A review of selected dental literature on contemporary provisional fixed prosthodontic treatment: Report of the committee on research in fixed prosthodontics of the academy of fixed prosthodontics10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00259-2 ↗
30. Comparison and evaluation of marginal and internal gaps in cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated using subtractive and additive manufacturing10.1016/j.jpor.2017.05.008 ↗
31. A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations10.1111/joor.12205 ↗
32. Marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using cone beam computed tomography scans10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.029 ↗
33. Marginal fit of 3-unit CAD-CAM zirconia frameworks fabricated using cone beam computed tomography scans: An experimental study10.1007/s10266-021-00668-3 ↗
34. Influence of scanning and reconstruction parameters on quality of three dimensional surface models of the dental arches from cone beam computed tomography10.1007/s00784-009-0291-3 ↗
35. Evaluation of marginal fit of CAD/CAM restorations fabricated through cone beam computerized tomography and laboratory scanner data10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.006 ↗
36. An in vitro comparison of the marginal fit of provisional crowns using the virtual tooth preparation workflow against the traditional technique10.4103/jips.jips_273_23 ↗
37. Microcomputed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.028 ↗
38. Micro-computed tomography analysis of fit of ceramic inlays produced with different CAD software programs
39. Additive manufacturing technologies used for processing polymers: Current status and potential application in prosthetic dentistry
40. 3D printing in dentistry10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.914 ↗