Seismic Response Analysis of a Six-Story Building in Sofia Using Accelerograms from the 2012 Mw5.6 Pernik Earthquake
Source abstract
Abstract
On 22 May 2012, a magnitude Mw 5.6 earthquake struck the Pernik region of western Bulgaria, causing structural damage in nearby cities, including Sofia. This study assesses the seismic response of a six-story reinforced concrete building in central Sofia, utilizing real accelerogram data recorded at the basement (SGL1) and sixth floor (SGL2) levels during the earthquake. Using the Kanai–Yoshizawa (KY) model, the study estimates inter-story motion and assesses amplification effects across the structure. Analysis of peak ground acceleration (PGA), velocity (PGV), displacement (PGD), and spectral ratios reveals significant dynamic amplification of peak ground acceleration and displacement on the sixth floor, indicating flexible and dynamic behavior, as well as potential resonance effects. The analysis combines three spectral techniques—Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral Ratio (H/V), Floor Spectral Ratio (FSR), and the Random Decrement Method (RDM)—to determine the building’s dynamic characteristics, including natural frequency and damping ratio. The results indicate a dominant vibration frequency of approximately 2.2 Hz and damping ratios ranging from 3.6% to 6.5%, which is consistent with the typical damping ratios of mid-rise concrete buildings. The findings underscore the significance of soil–structure interaction (SSI), particularly in sedimentary basins like the Sofia Graben, where localized geological effects influence seismic amplification. By integrating accelerometric data with advanced spectral techniques, this research can enhance ongoing site-specific monitoring and seismic design practices, contributing to the refinement of earthquake engineering methodologies for mitigating seismic risk in earthquake-prone urban areas.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Seismic Waves and Analysis · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography—Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
Department of Civil Engineering, European Polytechnical University, 2300 Pernik, Bulgaria
Funding
Bulgarian National Science Fund (BNSF)
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. Christoskov, L., Grigorova, E., and Petkov, P. (1979). Catalogue of Earthquakes in Bulgaria and the Balkan Region, Archives of the Geophysical Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.
2. A method for compilation of seismic zoning prognostic maps for the territory of Bulgaria
3. Panza, G.F., Radulian, M., and Trifu, C.I. (2000). Identification of Future Earthquake Sources in the Carpatho-Balkan Orogenic Belt Using Morphostructural Criteria. Seismic Hazard of the Circum-Pannonian Region, Pageoph Topical Volumes; Birkhäuser.10.1007/978-3-0348-8415-0 ↗
4. Evaluation and analysis of microseismic records on the territory of the Sofia basin
5. Solakov, D.E., Stefanov, D., Simeonova, S., and Raykova-Tsankova, P. (2024). Seismic Risk Assessment for the City of Sofia, Bulgaria. Geosciences, 14.10.3390/geosciences14110307 ↗
6. Grünthal, G. (1998). European Macroseismic Scale 1998 (EMS-98), Conseil de l’Europe, Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie.
7. Hadjiyski, K., Simeonov, S., and Botev, E. (2025, March 15). Seismic Impact of the Earthquake of 22.05.2012 for Sofia. (In Bulgarian).
8. Hadjiyski, K.D., Simeonov, S.M., and Botev, E.A. (2013, January 29–31). The May 22, 2012 Mw = 5.6 Pernik Earthquake—Local Effects and Seismic Impact on Sofia city. Proceedings of the SE-50EEE Conference, Skopje, North Macedonia. Available online: https://www.niggg.bas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/seiz_vazd_en.pdf.
9. Data and Analysis of the Events Recorded by NOTSSI in 2012
10. Paskaleva, I., Dojcinovski, D., and Ivanov, R. (2013, January 29–31). A note on the attenuation for peak ground acceleration and response spectra for the May 22 2012 earthquake (western Bulgaria). Proceedings of the SE-50EEE Conference, Skopje, North Macedonia.
11. The assessment of probabilistic seismic risk using ground-motion simulations via a Monte Carlo approach10.1007/s11069-024-06497-1 ↗
12. Modelling seismic ground motion and its uncertainty in different tectonic contexts: Challenges and application to the 2020 European Seismic Hazard Model (ESHM20)10.5194/nhess-24-1795-2024 ↗
13. Vulnerability Analysis of the Urban Environments to Different Seismic Scenarios: Residential Buildings and Associated Population Distribution Modelling through Integrating Dasymetric Mapping Method and GIS10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.100 ↗
14. Seismic risk assessment at urban scale from 3D physics-based numerical modeling: The case of Thessaloniki10.1007/s10518-017-0287-3 ↗
15. Seismic vulnerability assessment at urban scale using data mining and GIScience technology: Application to Urumqi (China)10.1080/19475705.2018.1524400 ↗
16. Seismic vulnerability and risk assessment at the urban scale using support vector machine and GIScience technology: A case study of the Lixia District in Jinan City, China10.1080/19475705.2023.2173663 ↗
17. Site conditions and earthquake ground motion—A review10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.08.003 ↗
18. Gupta, H.K. (2021). Earthquakes, Strong-Ground Motion. Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-58631-7 ↗
19. Li, X., Li, N., Rong, M., and Dong, Q. (2022). Novel Evaluation Method for Site Effect on Earthquake Ground Motion Based on Modified Horizontal to Vertical Spectral Ratio. Front. Earth Sci., 10.10.3389/feart.2022.938514 ↗
20. Pashova, L., Ivanov, R., and Paskaleva, I. (2024, January 4–6). Analysis of Strong Ground Motions from the Pernik Earthquake, May 22, 2012, Recorded in the Sofia Area. Proceedings of the National Scientific Conference “80 Years of the Union of Scientists in Bulgaria—In Service of Society”, Varna, Bulgaria. (In Bulgarian).
21. Some New Problems of Seismic Vibrations of a Structure. Part 1
22. Prediction of building response at any level from recorded roof response: The Kanai–Yoshizawa formula revisited10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.08.001 ↗
23. Systematic detailed microtremor H/V surveys in urban areas: A tool for reliable microzonation
24. Overview of recent ambient noise measurements in Croatia in free-field and in buildings
25. Cole, H.A. (1973). On-line Failure Detection and Damping Measurements of Aerospace Structures by Random Decrement Signature, NASA. CR-2205.
26. Farsi, M.N., Chatelain, J.L., Guillier, B., and Bouchelouh, A. (September, January 30). Evaluation of the Quality of Repairing and Strengthening of Buildings. Proceedings of the 14th ECEE, Ohrid, Macedonia. Available online: https://www.proceedings.com/11356.html.
27. Irie, Y., and Nakamura, K. (February, January 30). Dynamic characteristics of a r/c building of five stories based on microtremor measurements and earthquake observations. Proceedings of the XII World Conference Earthquake. Engineering, Wellington, New Zealand. Available online: https://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/twelfth_conf_NewZealand/.
28. Mucciarelli, M., Herak, M., and Cassidy, J. (2009). Applications to work heritage site. Increasing Seismic Safety by Combining Engineering Technologies and Seismological Data, Springer—NATO series.10.1007/978-1-4020-9196-4 ↗
29. A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface
30. Microtremor study of site effects and soil-structure resonance in the city of Ljubljana (central Slovenia)10.1007/s10518-009-9113-x ↗
31. Damping in tall buildings—A mechanism and a predictor10.1002/eqe.4290140505 ↗
32. Damping of tall buildings
33. Dynamic characteristics of existing buildings
34. Damping in buildings for wind-resistant design
35. Damping in structures: Its evaluation and treatment of uncertainty10.1016/0167-6105(96)00004-9 ↗
36. Estimation of damping ratio of buildings using ambient vibration records
37. Arakawa, T., and Yamamoto, Y. (2004, January 1–6). A study on identification of damping characteristics using ambient vibration. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (13WCEE), Vancouver, BC, Canada. Available online: https://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/thirteenth_conf_Canada/.
38. Damping evaluation using full-scale data of buildings in Japan10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:4(470) ↗
39. Iiba, M., Watakabe, M., Fujii, A., Koyama, S., Sakai, S., and Morita, K. (2004, January 29–30). A study on dynamic soil structure interaction effect based on microtremor measurements of building and surrounding ground surface. Proceedings of the Third UJNR Workshop on Soil-Structure Interaction, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
40. Paskaleva, I., and Ivanov, R. (2014, January 5–6). An application of generating artificial earthquake accelerograms matched to the May 22 2012 Earthquake (Western Bulgaria). Proceedings of the 14 International Conference VSU’2014, Sofia, Bulgaria.
41. Paskaleva, I., and Ivanov, R. (2017, January 8–9). Comparison between records in Bulgaria and well-known international near-source records. Proceedings of the XVII International Scientific Conference VSU’2017, Sofia, Bulgaria.
42. Radulov, A., Yaneva, M., Nikolov, N., Kiselinov, H., Donkova, Y., and Nikolov, G. (2014, January 24–26). Geological data on the source of the 2012 Mw 5.6 Pernik Earthquake, SW Bulgaria. Proceedings of XX CBGA Congress, Tirana, Albania.
43. Variable slip mode in the past 3300 years on the fault ruptured in the 2012 M 5.6 Pernik slow earthquake in Bulgaria10.1007/s11069-024-06426-2 ↗
44. The effective duration of earthquake strong motion10.1080/13632469909350343 ↗
45. Castellaro, S., Raykova, R.B., and Tsekov, M. (October, January 29). Resonance Frequencies of Soil and Buildings Some Measurements in Sofia and Its Vicinity. Proceedings of the 3rd National Congress on Physical Sciences, Sofia Section: Physics of Earth, Atmosphere and Space, Sofia, Bulgaria. Available online: https://upb.phys.uni-sofia.bg/conference/3kongres/disk/html/pdf/S0621.pdf.
46. Radulov, A., Yaneva, M., Shanov, S., Nikolov, V., Kostov, K., Nikolov, N., Hristov, V., Dobrev, N., and Mitev, A. Coseismic geological effects related to the May 22, 2012 Pernik earthquake, Western Bulgaria. Report on Field Survey After May 22, 2012 Pernik Earthquake, Geological Institute, BAS. Available online: https://www.earthquakegeology.com/materials/reports/Coseismic_Geological_Effects_Pernik_Bulgaria_Mw_5.6_Earthquake.pdf.
47. (2012). Bulgarian Eurocode 8. Design of Structures for Seismic Actions, Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, National Annex BDS (Standard No. EN 1998-1/NA ICS 91.120.95). (In Bulgarian).
48. Antoniou, S., and Pinho, R. (2025, January 24). SeismoSignal: A Computer Program for Signal Processing of Strong-Motion Data. SeismoSoft, Italy. Available online: https://seismosoft.com/.
49. Ground-Motion Characteristics Estimated from Spectral Ratio between Horizontal and Vertical Components of Microtremor10.1785/BSSA0880010228 ↗
50. Site Effects and Soil-Structure Resonance Study in the Kobarid Basin (NW Slovenia) Using Microtremors10.5194/nhess-10-761-2010 ↗
51. Evaluation of buildings strength from microtremor analyses
52. Brincker, R., and Møller, N. Application of the Random Decrement Technique in Operational Modal Analysis. Proceedings of the 1st International Operational Modal Analysis Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 26–27 April 2005.
53. Geopsy: A User-Friendly Open-Source Tool Set for Ambient Vibration Processing10.1785/0220190360 ↗
54. Ghanat, S.T., and Kavazanjian, E.J. (2011, January 9–14). Site-specific response analysis at non-standard sites. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Santiago, Chile. Available online: https://www.issmge.org/uploads/publications/59/67/4.19.SSRGH.pdf.
55. Davoodi, M., and Sadjadi, M. (2015, January 15–21). Evaluation of the Effect of PGV/PGA Ratio of Strong Ground Motions on Responses of Soil Structure SDOF Systems. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, Tehran, Iran. Available online: https://www.iiees.ac.ir/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/00160-SE.pdf.
56. (2018). FEMA P-58. Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings, Volume 1-Methodology, Applied Technology Council. [2nd ed.]. Available online: https://femap58.atcouncil.org/documents/fema-p-58/24-fema-p-58-volume-1-methodology-second-edition.
57. Strong ground motion characteristics observed in the February 6, 2023 Mw7.7 Türkiye earthquake10.1016/j.eqs.2024.03.005 ↗
58. Checking the site categorization criteria and amplification factors of the 2021 draft of Eurocode 8 Part 1–110.1007/s10518-021-01118-9 ↗
59. (2017). Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-16). Standard No. ASCE 7-16.
60. Comprehensive Review on Seismic Pounding Between Adjacent Buildings and Available Mitigation Measures
61. A New Pulse Indicator for the Classification of Ground Motions10.1785/0120160301 ↗
62. A simple and intuitive procedure to identify pulse-like ground motions10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.01.020 ↗
63. Orientation-Independent, Nongeometric-Mean Measures of Seismic Intensity from Two Horizontal Components of Motion10.1785/0120090400 ↗
64. Tuned mass dampers for improving the sustainability and resilience of seven reinforced concrete chimneys under environmental loads10.1007/s10668-024-04603-8 ↗