Comparison Between Measurements Taken on AI-Generated and Conventional Digital Models: A Retrospective Study

(1) Aim: To compare transverse dimensions measured on AI-generated intra-oral models and conventional digital intra-oral models. (2) Methods: A group of 38 patients treated with clear aligners was selected retrospectively from those whose records featured both AI-generated and conventional digital intra-oral models taken at the same timepoint. Transverse dimensions (inter-canine, inter-premolar, and inter-molar distances) on both upper and lower arches were evaluated and compared. Intra-class correlation index and paired t-test were applied to test the repeatability of measurements and statistically significant differences, respectively. Statistical significance was set at 0.05. (3) Results: Intra-class correlation index showed good repeatability. Paired t-test showed differences in measurements of the distances between the thicket area of gingiva on the palatal side of the upper first molar (p = 0.002), the gingival margin of the lower first molar (p = 0.014), and the mesio-vestibular cusps of the lower first molars (p = 0.019). (4) Conclusions: Transverse measurements were similar on AI-generated and conventional intra-oral .stl renderings. Statistical differences were found on posterior areas of both upper and lower dental arches, but are unlikely to be clinically significant.