Show source-provided references
6. Influence of mesoscopic defects on the mechanical behaviour of granites based on a three-dimensional multilevel force chain network
10.1007/s00603-024-04011-4 ↗7. Chen, Y.-L., Pan, Y.-G., Du, X., Chen, Q.-J., Liao, S.-M., Zhang, N., Wang, S.-R., and Peng, B. (2022). A quantitative study of micro and macro mechanical parameters based on the PFC3D flat-joint model. Materials, 15.
10.3390/ma15196790 ↗8. An integrated parameter calibration method and sensitivity analysis of microparameters on mechanical behavior of transversely isotropic rocks
10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104573 ↗11. Microparameter prediction for a triaxial compression PFC3D model of rock using full factorial designs and artificial neural networks
10.1007/s10706-013-9647-1 ↗12. Hutter, F., Kotthoff, L., and Vanschoren, J. (2019). Automated Machine Learning: Methods, Systems, Challenges, Springer.
10.1007/978-3-030-05318-5 ↗13. Jin, H., Song, Q., and Hu, X. (2019, January 4–8). Auto-keras: An efficient neural architecture search system. Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, New York, NY, USA.
10.1145/3292500.3330648 ↗14. Xu, W., Hao, S., and Zhang, Z. (2024). Experimental investigation and AutoML prediction of the resilient behaviour of coarse-grained waste rocks. Road Mater. Pavement Des., 1–25.
10.1080/14680629.2024.2430371 ↗15. Bhanja, S., and Das, A. (2018). Impact of data normalization on deep neural network for time series forecasting. arXiv.
16. de Amorim, L.B.V., Cavalcanti, G.D.C., and Cruz, R.M.O. (2022). The choice of scaling technique matters for classification performance. arXiv.
10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109924 ↗17. Burdack, J., Horst, F., Giesselbach, S., Hassan, I., Daffner, S., and Schöllhorn, W.I. (2019). Systematic comparison of the influence of different data preprocessing methods on the performance of gait classifications using machine learning. arXiv.
10.3389/fbioe.2020.00260 ↗18. Ahsan, M.M., Mahmud, M.A.P., Saha, P.K., Gupta, K.D., and Siddique, Z. (2021). Effect of data scaling methods on machine learning algorithms and model performance. Technologies, 9.
10.3390/technologies9030052 ↗19. Nakamura, K., Soatto, S., and Hong, B.-W. (2020). Stochastic batch size for adaptive regularization in deep network optimization. arXiv.
20. Scikit-Learn Developers (2025, July 20). RobustScaler. Scikit-Learn Documentation. Available online: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.preprocessing.RobustScaler.html.
21. Effect of varying training epochs of a faster region-based convolutional neural network on the accuracy of an automatic weed classification scheme
10.1016/j.atech.2022.100128 ↗22. Kohavi, R. (1995, January 20–25). A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’95), San Francisco, CA, USA.
23. Wager, S., Wang, S.I., and Liang, P. (2013). Dropout training as adaptive regularization. arXiv.
25. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning, MIT Press. Available online: https://www.deeplearningbook.org/.
28. Predicting the effective mechanical property of heterogeneous materials by image-based modeling and deep learning
30. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations
10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗31. Physics-informed neural networks for modeling fluid dynamics
34. Prediction of stratified ground consolidation via a physics-informed neural network utilizing short-term excess pore water pressure monitoring data
10.1111/mice.13326 ↗35. PINN-CHK: Physics-informed neural network for high-fidelity prediction of early-age cement hydration kinetics
10.1007/s00521-024-09791-y ↗38. Hyperparameter optimization for machine learning models based on Bayesian optimization