Comparison of Lower Limb Kinematics Between Increased Hip Flexion Gait and Cycling: Implications for Exercise Prescription in Clinical Populations
Source abstract
Abstract
Exercise is an important component in the treatment and improvement of function in populations with or at risk of lower limb injury. Cycling is the most common exercise modality used by these populations. However, reduced lower limb joint excursion and/or range of motion (ROM) during cycling might limit the optimization of functional improvements. Increased hip flexion gait (HFgait) is a new exercise modality that might result in larger lower limb joint excursions compared to cycling. The purpose of this study was to compare lower limb kinematics between HFgait and cycling. Twelve healthy individuals participated in the study. Each participant performed cycling and HFgait. Hip, knee, and ankle kinematics in the sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes were analyzed with and without phase offset reduction (POR). Discrete and continuous analyses were performed. Discrete analysis indicated differences for at least one of the variables analyzed (maximum, minimum, and ROM) for the hip (p ≤ 0.041), knee (p ≤ 0.008), and ankle (p ≤ 0.040) across all planes. For the continuous analysis, differences between HFgait and cycling kinematics were observed during the cycles for the hip, knee, and ankle sagittal (hip: original: 85%; with POR: 77%; knee: original: 93%; with POR: 76%; ankle: original: 14%; with POR: 14%), frontal (hip: original: 93%; with POR: 98%; knee: original: 41%; with POR: 12%; ankle: original: 4%; with POR: 5%), and transverse (hip: original: 66%; with POR: 0%; knee: original: 14%; with POR: 0%; ankle: original: 3%; with POR: 0%) planes. HFgait resulted in larger hip (+60.2°) and knee (+38.2°) sagittal plane ROM while maintaining the hip in a more neutral position in the frontal plane compared with cycling. These findings can support the development of rehabilitation strategies with the goal of improving function and joint range of motion while also receiving the health benefits of exercise.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies · Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS 39406, USA
Funding
American Heart Association
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Riebe, D., Ehrman, J.K., Liguori, G., and Magal, M. (2017). ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, Wolters Kluwer Health. [10th ed.].
2. Exercise standards for testing and training: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829b5b44 ↗
3. The physical activity guidelines for Americans10.1001/jama.2018.14854 ↗
4. High-Intensity Interval Training for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Study10.1002/acr2.11318 ↗
5. Impact-Related Ground Reaction Forces Are More Strongly Associated With Some Running Injuries Than Others10.1177/0363546520950731 ↗
6. Do runners who suffer injuries have higher vertical ground reaction forces than those who remain injury-free? A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1136/bjsports-2015-094924 ↗
7. Stationary cycling exercise for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1177/0269215520971795 ↗
8. Rewald, S., Mesters, I., Lenssen, A., Emans, P.J., Wijnen, W., and de Bie, R.A. (2016). Effect of aqua-cycling on pain and physical functioning compared with usual care in patients with knee osteoarthritis: Study protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 17.10.1186/s12891-016-0939-5 ↗
9. Sliepen, M., Mauricio, E., Lipperts, M., Grimm, B., and Rosenbaum, D. (2018). Objective assessment of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in knee osteoarthritis patients–beyond daily steps and total sedentary time. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 19.10.1186/s12891-018-1980-3 ↗
10. Acute effects of lateral shoe wedges on joint biomechanics of patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis during stationary cycling10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.06.016 ↗
11. Effects of knee alignments and toe clip on frontal plane knee biomechanics in cycling
12. Øiestad, B.E., Østerås, N., Frobell, R., Grotle, M., Brøgger, H., and Risberg, M.A. (2013). Efficacy of strength and aerobic exercise on patient-reported outcomes and structural changes in patients with knee osteoarthritis: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 14.10.1186/1471-2474-14-266 ↗
13. Increased hip flexion gait as an exercise modality for individuals with obesity10.1007/s00421-023-05227-y ↗
14. Feasibility of a hip flexion feedback system for controlling exercise intensity and tibia axial peak accelerations during treadmill walking
15. Increased Q-Factor increases frontal-plane knee joint loading in stationary cycling10.1016/j.jshs.2019.07.011 ↗
16. Thorsen, T.A., Hester, R.J., and Keating, C.J. (2024). Changes in Lower-Extremity Gait Biomechanics Following High-Cadence Cycling. Sports, 12.10.3390/sports12060159 ↗
17. Authors’ reply regarding “Effect of low pass filtering on joint moments from inverse dynamics: Implications for injury prevention”10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.02.027 ↗
18. Kinematic-based technique for event time determination during gait10.1007/BF02446154 ↗
19. Range of joint motion and disability in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip10.1093/rheumatology/39.9.955 ↗
20. Association of physical performance with muscle strength and hip range of motion in hip osteoarthritis
21. Sagittal plane hip motion reversals during walking are associated with disease severity and poorer function in subjects with hip osteoarthritis10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.03.008 ↗
22. Relationship between body positioning, muscle activity, and spinal kinematics in cyclists with and without low back pain: A systematic review10.1177/1941738116676260 ↗
23. Lower body problems and injury in cycling10.1016/j.jbmt.2005.01.007 ↗
24. American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee10.1002/acr.21596 ↗
25. Immediate effects of hip mobilization with movement in patients with hip osteoarthritis: A randomised controlled trial10.1016/j.math.2015.10.007 ↗
26. Effect of Physical Therapy on Pain and Function in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial10.1001/jama.2014.4591 ↗
27. Potential factors associated with knee pain in cyclists: A systematic review10.2147/OAJSM.S136653 ↗
28. Cycling biomechanics: A literature review10.2519/jospt.1991.14.3.106 ↗
29. Effects of bicycle saddle height on knee injury risk and cycling performance10.2165/11588740-000000000-00000 ↗
30. Normal range of motion of joints in male subjects10.2106/00004623-197961050-00017 ↗
31. Range of motion measurements: Reference values and a database for comparison studies10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02399.x ↗
32. Normal range of motion of the hip, knee and ankle joints in male subjects, 30–40 years of age10.3109/17453678208992202 ↗
33. Yum, H., Kim, H., Lee, T., Park, M.S., and Lee, S.Y. (2021). Cycling kinematics in healthy adults for musculoskeletal rehabilitation guidance. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 22.10.1186/s12891-021-04905-2 ↗