Identification of Complicated Lithology with Machine Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Lithology identification is one of the most important research areas in petroleum engineering, including reservoir characterization, formation evaluation, and reservoir modeling. Due to the complex structural environment, diverse lithofacies types, and differences in logging data and core data recording standards, there is significant overlap in the logging responses between different lithologies in the second member of the Lucaogou Formation in the Santanghu Basin. Machine learning methods have demonstrated powerful nonlinear capabilities that have a strong advantage in addressing complex nonlinear relationships between data. In this paper, based on felsic content, the lithologies in the study area are classified into four categories from high to low: tuff, dolomitic tuff, tuffaceous dolomite, and dolomite. We also study select logging attributes that are sensitive to lithology, such as natural gamma, acoustic travel time, neutron, and compensated density. Using machine learning methods, XGBoost, random forest, and support vector regression were selected to conduct lithology identification and favorable reservoir prediction in the study. The prediction results show that when trained with 80% of the predictors, the prediction performance of all three models has improved to varying degrees. Among them, Random Forest performed best in predicting felsic content, with an MAE of 0.11, an MSE of 0.020, an RMSE of 0.14, and a R2 of 0.43. XGBoost ranked second, with an MAE of 0.12, an MSE of 0.022, an RMSE of 0.15, and an R2 of 0.42. SVR performed the poorest. By comparing the actual core data with the predicted data, it was found that the results are relatively close to the XRD results, indicating that the prediction accuracy is high.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction · Mineral Processing and Grinding · Geophysical Methods and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
China National Logging Corporation, Beijing 102206, China
State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
College of Oil and Gas Engineering, Liaoning Petrochemical University, Fushun 113001, China
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Lithology identification model based on Boosting Tree algorithm
2. Nonlinear inversion of the reservoir prediction
3. Chen, G. (2024). Lithology Identification and Drilling Rate Prediction in Sedimentary Basins Using Machine Learning and Logging Data: A Case Study of the Erlian Basin and Surat Basin. [Ph.D. Thesis, East China University of Technology].
4. Application of Crossplot Technique to the Determination of Lithology Composition and Fracture Identification of Igneous Rock
5. Lithology identification based on fuzzy support vector machine method
6. Lithology identification method based on principal component analysis and least squares support vector machine
7. Lithology identification of tight sandstone reservoirs in Sulige gas field based on BP neural network algorithm
8. Lithology identification of volcanic rocks based on well logging parameters using genetic BP neural network: A case study of Carboniferous volcanic rocks in the Zhongguai uplift, northwestern margin of the Junggar Basin
9. Lithology identification of complex carbonate rocks using decision tree method: A case study of the Sudong 41–33 block in the Sulige gas field
10. Lithology identification of complex carbonate rocks based on SOM and fuzzy recognition
11. Application of principal component analysis and fuzzy recognition in lithology identification
12. Lithology identification method of sandy conglomerate reservoirs in the Lei 64 block
13. Lithology identification of conglomerate reservoirs using decision tree method: A case study of the Klamayi oil field’s Kexia group reservoirs
14. Diagenetic facies analysis and well logging identification of low and ultra-low permeability dolomite reservoirs: A case study of the Ma 5 member on the Yishan slope
15. Well logging identification of complex carbonate lithology based on XGBoost algorithm
16. Application of crossplot method in volcanic lithology identification using well logging data
17. Research on volcanic lithology identification methods using well logging: A case study of volcanic rocks in the Junggar Basin
18. Characteristics and well logging identification of volcanic rocks in the Sihongtu Formation, Chagan Depression
19. Application of neural network technology in volcanic rock identification using crossplots and multivariate statistics
20. Automatic determination of lithology from well logs10.2118/13290-PA ↗
21. Determination of lithology using probability statistics methods
22. Multivariate statistical methods for lithology identification using well logging data
23. Feixue, Y. (2023). Research on Lithology Identification Methods Based on Deep Neural Networks. [Master’s Thesis, China University of Petroleum].
24. Identifying organic-rich Marcellus Shale lithofacies by support vector machine classifier in the Appalachian Basin10.1016/j.cageo.2013.12.002 ↗
25. Baldwin, J.L., Otte, D.N., and Whealtley, C.L. (1989, January 8–11). Computer emulation of human mental processes: Application of neural network simulators to problems in well log interpretation. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX, USA.10.2523/19619-MS ↗
26. Facies classification using machine learning10.1190/tle35100906.1 ↗
27. Lithology identification of complex lithologies using a rough set and Random Forest algorithm
28. Research and application of well logging lithology identification method based on deep learning
29. Lithological facies classification using deep convolutional neural network10.1016/j.petrol.2018.11.023 ↗
30. Application of convolutional neural network in lithology identification
31. Random forest: A classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling10.1021/ci034160g ↗
32. A review of kernel function and hyperparameter selection methods in support vector regression
33. Zhu, Y. (2012). Research on Reservoir Parameter Prediction Method Based on Support Vector Machine. [Master’s Thesis, Southwest Petroleum University].
34. Liao, M. (2011). Research on Several Algorithms of Weighted Support Vector Machines and Their Applications. [Master’s Thesis, Hunan University].
35. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System, ACM.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
36. Li, H. (2012). Statistical Learning Methods, Tsinghua University Press.