Accuracy Assessment of 3D-Printed Surgical Guides for Palatal Miniscrew Placement: A Retrospective Study
Source abstract
Abstract
Background: The aim of this retrospective study was to conduct an in vivo evaluation of the accuracy of surgical guides obtained via 3D printing technology that were used to transfer the 3D software-planned position and axis during palatal miniscrew placement. Methods: Twenty-four Caucasian subjects with permanent dentition underwent a CBCT examination to plan palatal skeletal anchorage using two miniscrews in the anterior palatal arch. A specific software function capable of identifying and displaying all CBCT scans passing through the planned miniscrew axis was used to identify the scan showing the maximum discrepancy between the planned and final miniscrew placement. The maximum insertion angle discrepancy and the maximum linear difference between the head and tip of the miniscrew were measured on the overlaid 3D STL models of the planned miniscrew position at CBCT with the final clinical position of the miniscrew. Results: Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed. On average, there was a discrepancy between the planned insertion axis and the final insertion axis of 2.95° (SD ± 1.13°), with a 10 mm miniscrew length. Conclusion: Three-dimensional I.-printed surgical guides for palatal miniscrew placement show a mean deviation of 2.95° from the planned position, indicating good but improvable accuracy in placement.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Cleft Lip and Palate Research · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, Section of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy
Department of Health, University “Magna Graecia” of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, Loc. Germaneto, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
Funding
European Union (NextGeneration EU)
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Stursa, L., Wendl, B., Jakse, N., Pichelmayer, M., Weiland, F., Antipova, V., and Kirnbauer, B. (2023). Accuracy of Palatal Orthodontic Mini-Implants Placed Using Fully Digital Planned Insertion Guides: A Cadaver Study. J. Clin. Med., 12.10.3390/jcm12216782 ↗
2. Santmartí-Oliver, M., Jorba-García, A., Moya-Martínez, T., de-la-Rosa-Gay, C., and Camps-Font, O. (2024). Safety and Accuracy of Guided Interradicular Miniscrew Insertion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med., 13.10.3390/jcm13247697 ↗
3. Transfer accuracy of 3D printed versus CAD/CAM milled surgical guides for temporary orthodontic implants: A preclinical micro CT study10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105060 ↗
4. Effectiveness of orthodontic miniscrew implants in anchorage reinforcement during en-masse retraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.08.029 ↗
5. Insertion torque values and success rates for paramedian insertion of orthodontic mini-implants: A retrospective study10.1007/s00056-018-0120-x ↗
6. Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness and Its Relationship with Palatal Vault Depth for Mini-Implant Insertion Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.20145 ↗
7. Evaluation of palatal bone depth, cortical bone, and mucosa thickness for optimal orthodontic miniscrew placement performed according to the third palatal ruga clinical reference10.1093/ejo/cjac007 ↗
8. Assessment of the bone thickness of the palate on cone-beam computed tomography for placement of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion appliances10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.01.037 ↗
9. Asymmetry index for the photogrammetric assessment of facial asymmetry10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.04.030 ↗
10. Sánchez-Riofrío, D., Viñas, M.J., and Ustrell-Torrent, J.M. (2020). CBCT and CAD-CAM technology to design a minimally invasive maxillary expander. BMC Oral. Health, 20.10.1186/s12903-020-01292-3 ↗
11. A Simplified Digital Approach to the Treatment of a Postpuberty Patient with a Class III Malocclusion and Bilateral Crossbite
12. Burak, K., and Hilmi, B.M. (2024). Evaluating palatal mucosal thickness in orthodontic miniscrew sites using cone-beam computed tomography. BMC Oral. Health, 24.10.1186/s12903-024-04935-x ↗
13. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: A systematic review
14. Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: A review of the literature10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00275.x ↗
15. “Safe zones”: A guide for miniscrew positioning in the maxillary and mandibular arch
16. Accuracy of a simplified 3D-printed implant surgical guide10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.006 ↗
17. Quantitative investigation of palatal bone depth and cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement in adults10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.020 ↗
18. The most distal palatal ruga for placement of orthodontic mini-implants10.1093/ejo/cju056 ↗
19. Evaluation of bone depth, cortical bone, and mucosa thickness of palatal posterior supra-alveolar insertion site for miniscrew placement10.1186/s40510-022-00412-9 ↗
20. A Three-Dimensional Digital Insertion Guide for Palatal Miniscrew Placement
21. Su, L., Song, H., and Huang, X. (2022). Accuracy of two orthodontic mini-implant templates in the infrazygomatic crest zone: A prospective cohort study. BMC Oral. Health, 22.10.1186/s12903-022-02285-0 ↗
22. Accuracy of the digital workflow for guided insertion of orthodontic palatal TADs: A step-by-step 3D analysis10.1186/s40510-022-00423-6 ↗
23. CAD-CAM-fabricated mini-implant insertion guides for the delivery of a distalization appliance in a single appointment10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.12.017 ↗
24. Radiographic and surgical template for placement of orthodontic microimplants in interradicular areas: A technical note
25. Yuan, L., Zhao, R., Liu, J., Tang, R., Bai, S., and Liu, X. (2025). The success rate of infrazygomatic mini-implants placed with and without surgical guides: A historical control study. BMC Oral. Health, 25.10.1186/s12903-025-05472-x ↗
26. A New Methodology for the Digital Planning of Micro-Implant-Supported Maxillary Skeletal Expansion10.2147/MDER.S247751 ↗
27. Accuracy of miniscrew surgical guides assessed from cone-beam computed tomography and digital models10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.018 ↗
28. Accuracy of orthodontic miniscrew implantation guided by stereolithographic surgical stent based on cone-beam CT-derived 3D images10.2319/033111-231.1 ↗
29. Risk factors associated with the failure of miniscrews—A ten-year cross sectional study10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0124 ↗
30. Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: Review and analysis of published clinical trials10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.027 ↗
31. Tandem Skeletal Expander and MAPA Protocol for Palatal Expansion in Adults