journal article·2025-07-10Open access

Application of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) in Predicting Box Compression Strength (BCS)

Juan Gu, Euihark Lee

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 14

Abstract

Box compression strength (BCS) is a critical parameter for assessing the performance of shipping containers during transportation. Traditionally, BCS evaluation relies heavily on physical testing, which is both time-consuming and costly. These limitations have prompted industry to seek more efficient and cost-effective alternatives. This study explores the application of artificial neural networks (ANNs) to estimate BCS at an industry-applicable level. A real-world dataset—covering approximately 90% of the box dimensions commonly used in the industry—was utilized to train a generalized ANN model for BCS prediction. The model achieved a prediction error of approximately 10%. When validated against experimentally measured data from laboratory testing, with single-wall B-flute as a representative, the prediction error was at a much lower level, further demonstrating the model’s reliability. This study offers a novel approach to BCS prediction, providing a cost-effective and scalable alternative to traditional physical testing methods in the packaging industry.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Processing · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements · Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Packaging, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Corrugated Box Compression—A Literature Survey10.1002/pts.2019 ↗
2. A comparative analysis of artificial neural network (ANN) architectures for box compression strength estimation10.20909/kopast.2023.29.3.163 ↗
3. Compression strength formula for corrugated boxes
4. Garbowski, T., Gajewski, T., and Grabski, J.K. (2021). Estimation of the compressive strength of corrugated cardboard boxes with various perforations. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14041095 ↗
5. Fehér, L., Pidl, R., and Böröcz, P. (2023). Compression strength estimation of corrugated board boxes for a reduction in sidewall surface cutouts—Experimental and numerical approaches. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16020597 ↗
6. Garbowski, T., Gajewski, T., and Grabski, J.K. (2020). The role of buckling in the estimation of compressive strength of corrugated cardboard boxes. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13204578 ↗
7. Numerical Simulation for Compressive Strength of Corrugated Fiberboard Box10.2524/jtappij.73.793 ↗
8. Finite element-based simulation for edgewise compression behavior of corrugated paperboard for packaging of agricultural products10.3390/app10196716 ↗
9. Experimental and finite element simulated box compression tests on paperboard packages at different moisture levels10.1002/pts.2554 ↗
10. The efficacy of finite element analysis (FEA) as a design tool for food packaging: A review10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.06.015 ↗
11. Alper, M.M., Sezen, B., and Balcıoğlu, Y.S. (2025). Machine Learning Applications in Packaging Industry Optimization: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Directions. International Newyork Congress Conference, BZT TURAN Publishing House.
12. On the use of artificial intelligence in predicting the compressive strength of various cardboard packaging10.1002/pts.2783 ↗
13. Predicting corrugated box compression strength using an artificial neural network
14. Kunal, P., Samit, A., Arindam, B., and Saugat, B. (2023). Feature Engineering Methods. Advanced Methods in Biomedical Signal Processing and Analysis Book, Academic Press.
15. Evaluating Packaging Design Relative Feature Importance Using an Artificial Neural Network (ANN)10.3390/app15063261 ↗
16. Edge crush testing methods and box compression modeling10.32964/TJ21.8.418 ↗
17. Box compression analysis of world-wide data spanning 46 years
18. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A., and Bengio, Y. (2016). Deep Learning, MIT Press.
19. Kubat, M., and Kubat, M. (2021). Artificial neural networks. An Introduction to Machine Learning, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-81935-4 ↗
20. A new approach for the vanishing gradient problem on sigmoid activation10.1007/s13748-020-00218-y ↗
21. Iwata, Y., and Wakamatsu, H. (2024, January 8–11). Simplifying Hyperparameter Derivation for Integration Neural Networks Using Information Criterion. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), Ha Long, Vietnam.10.1109/SII58957.2024.10417243 ↗
22. (2024, December 20). Hebbian Theory. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebbian_theory.
23. Liu, C., Zhang, Z., and Wang, D. (2014, January 14–18). Pruning deep neural networks by optimal brain damage. Proceedings of the Interspeech, Singapore.10.21437/Interspeech.2014-281 ↗
24. Lecun, Y., Denker, J., and Solla, S. Optimal brain damage. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.
25. Frazier, P.I. (2018). A tutorial on Bayesian optimization. arXiv.10.1287/educ.2018.0188 ↗
26. Automatic tuning of hyperparameters using Bayesian optimization10.1007/s12530-020-09345-2 ↗
27. (2021). Standard Conditioning and Testing Atmospheres for Paper, Board, Pulp Handsheets, and Related Products (Standard No. TAPPI T 402).
28. Koval, S.I. (February, January 29). Data preparation for neural network data analysis. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EIConRus), Moscow and St. Petersburg, Russia.10.1109/EIConRus.2018.8317233 ↗
29. Reducing prediction error by transforming input data for neural networks10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2000)14:2(109) ↗
30. Data augmentation can improve robustness
31. Data augmentation to improve performance of neural networks for failure management in optical networks10.1364/JOCN.472605 ↗
32. A simple weight decay can improve generalization
33. Adaptive weight decay for deep neural networks10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2937139 ↗
34. Srivastava, N. (2013). Improving Neural Networks with Dropout, University of Toronto.
35. Ko, B., Kim, H.G., Oh, K.J., and Choi, H.J. (2017, January 13–16). Controlled dropout: A different approach to using dropout on deep neural network. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp), Jeju, Republic of Korea.