Analysis of Surface EMG Parameters in the Overhead Deep Squat Performance
Source abstract
Abstract
Background and Objective: This study aimed to examine the possibility of using surface electromyography (sEMG) to aid in assessing the correctness of overhead deep squat performance. Electromyography signals were recorded for 20 athletes from the lower (rectus femoris (RF), vastus medialis (VM), biceps femoris (BF), and gluteus (GM)) and upper (deltoid (D), latissimus dorsi (L)) muscles. The sEMG signals were categorized into three groups based on physiotherapists’ evaluations of deep squat correctness. Methods: The raw sEMG signals were filtering at 10–250 Hz, and then the mean frequency, median frequency, and kurtosis were calculated. Next, the maximum excitation of the muscles expressed in percentage of maximum voluntary contraction (%MVC) and co-activation index (CAI) were estimated. To determine the muscle excitation level, the pulse interference filter and variance analysis of the sEMG signal derivative were applied. Next, analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests, that is, nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis and post hoc tests, were performed. Results: The parameter that most clearly differentiated the groups considered turned out to be %MVC. The statistically significant difference with a large effect size in the excitation of RF & GM (p = 0.0011) and VM & GM (p = 0.0002) in group 3, where the correctness of deep squat execution was the highest and ranged from 85% to 92%, was pointed out. With the decrease in the correctness of deep squat performance, an additional statistically significant difference appeared in the excitation of RF & BF and VM & BF for both groups 2 and 1, which was not present in group 3. However, in group 2, with the correctness of the deep squat execution at 62–77%, the statistically significant differences in muscle excitation found in group 3 were preserved, in contrast to group 1, with the lowest 23–54% correctness of the deep squat execution, where the statistical significance of these differences was not confirmed. Conclusions: The results indicate that sEMG can differentiate muscle activity and provide additional information for physiotherapists when assessing the correctness of deep squat performance. The proposed analysis can be used to evaluate the correctness of physical exercises when physiotherapist access is limited.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Medical Informatics and Artificial Intelligence, Silesian University of Technology, Roosevelt 40, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland
Funding
the European Funds for Silesia 2021–2027 Program co-financed by the Just Transition Fund—project entitled “Development of the Silesian biomedical engineering potential in the face of the challenges of the digital and green economy (BioMeDiG)” · the project: Silesian University of Technology statutory financial support and BioMeDiG
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Motor unit recruitment strategies investigated by surface EMG variables10.1152/jappl.2002.92.1.235 ↗
2. Excitation–contraction coupling from the 1950s into the new millennium10.1111/j.1440-1681.2006.04441.x ↗
3. Farina, D., Stegeman, D.F., and Merletti, R. (2016). Biophysics of the Generation of EMG Signals. Surface Electromyography: Physiology, Engineering, and Applications, Wiley.10.1002/9781119082934.ch02 ↗
4. Zwarts, M., Stegeman, D., and van Dijk, J. (2004). Surface EMG applications in neurology. Electromyography: Physiology, Engineering, and Noninvasive Applications, IEEE Press Editorial Board.10.1002/0471678384.ch12 ↗
5. Arozi, M., Ariyanto, M., Kristianto, A., and Setiawan, J.D. (2020, January 24–25). EMG Signal Processing of Myo Armband Sensor for Prosthetic Hand Input using RMS and ANFIS. Proceedings of the 2020 7th International Conference on Information Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering (ICITACEE), Semarang, Indonesia.10.1109/ICITACEE50144.2020.9239169 ↗
6. Muscle Activation and Strength in Squat and Bulgarian Squat on Stable and Unstable Surface10.1055/s-0034-1382016 ↗
7. Konrad, P. (2005). The ABC of EMG: A Practical Introduction to Kinesiological Electromyography, Noraxon Inc.. [1st ed.].
8. Interpreting Signal Amplitudes in Surface Electromyography Studies in Sport and Rehabilitation Sciences10.3389/fphys.2017.00985 ↗
9. Park, J.H., Lee, S.J., Shin, H.J., and Cho, H.Y. (2022). Influence of Loads and Loading Position on the Muscle Activity of the Trunk and Lower Extremity during Squat Exercise. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph192013480 ↗
10. A Biomechanical Review of the Squat Exercise: Implications for Clinical Practice10.26603/001c.94600 ↗
11. A literature review of studies evaluating gluteus maximus and gluteus medius activation during rehabilitation exercises10.3109/09593985.2011.604981 ↗
12. Electromyographical Analysis of Lower Extremity Muscle Activation During Variations of the Loaded Step-Up Exercise10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182472fad ↗
13. The Effect of Back Squat Depth on the EMG Activity of 4 Superficial Hip and Thigh Muscles
14. Electromyographic activity in four superficial muscles of the thigh and hip during performance of the back squat to three different depths with relative loading
15. Electromyographic Comparison of Barbell Deadlift, Hex Bar Deadlift, and Hip Thrust Exercises: A Cross-Over Study10.1519/JSC.0000000000001826 ↗
16. A Comparison of Gluteus Maximus, Biceps Femoris, and Vastus Lateralis Electromyographic Activity in the Back Squat and Barbell Hip Thrust Exercises10.1123/jab.2014-0301 ↗
17. Electromyographic activity in the gluteus medius, gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, vastus lateralis, vastus medialis and rectus femoris during the Monopodal Squat, Forward Lunge and Lateral Step-Up exercises10.1371/journal.pone.0230841 ↗
18. Solan, M. (2024, October 20). Try This: Get Low with Deep Squats. Available online: https://www.health.harvard.edu/exercise-and-fitness/try-this-get-low-with-deep-squats.
19. Muscle Activation Patterns During Different Squat Techniques10.1519/JSC.0000000000001323 ↗
20. Standards for surface electromyography: The European project Surface EMG for non-invasive assessment of muscles (SENIAM)
21. Interrater Reliability of the Functional Movement Screen10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c09c04 ↗
22. Cook, G., Burton, L., Kiesel, K., Bryant, M., and Rose, G. (2010). Movement: Functional Movement Systems: Screening, Assessment, and Corrective Strategies, On Target Publications.
23. The effect of manipulating root mean square window length and overlap on reliability, inter-individual variability, statistical significance and clinical relevance of electromyograms10.1016/j.math.2014.06.003 ↗
24. Interpretation of EMG integral or RMS and estimates of “neuromuscular efficiency” can be misleading in fatiguing contraction10.1016/j.jelekin.2009.01.008 ↗
25. Emg Signal Analysis of Healthy and Neuropathic Individuals10.1088/1757-899X/225/1/012128 ↗
26. Comparative evaluation of EMG signal features for myoelectric controlled human arm prosthetics10.1016/j.bbe.2017.03.001 ↗
27. A new approach to preprocessing of EMG signal to assess the correctness of muscle condition
28. Gzik, M., Paszenda, Z., Piętka, E., Tkacz, E., Milewski, K., and Jurkojć, J. (2024). Assessment of Muscle Excitation During Physical Activity Based on Surface Electromyography. Innovations in Biomedical Engineering 2023, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-031-52382-3 ↗
29. Smith, S.W. (2025, July 01). The Scientist and Engineer’s Guide to Digital Signal Processing,1997–1998. Available online: www.DSPguide.com.
30. Kabe, A.M., and Sako, B.H. (2020). Chapter 5—Analysis of continuous and discrete time signals. Structural Dynamics Fundamentals and Advanced Applications, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-821615-6.00005-8 ↗
31. Electromyography-signal-based muscle fatigue assessment for knee rehabilitation monitoring systems10.1007/s13534-018-0078-z ↗
32. Florimond, V. (2009). Basics of Surface Electromyography Applied to Physical Rehabilitation and Biomechanics, Thought Technology Ltd.. Document Number MAR908-03.
33. Naik, G.R. (2012). Computational Intelligence in Electromyography Analysis, IntechOpen.
34. Independent component analysis: Algorithms and applications10.1016/S0893-6080(00)00026-5 ↗
35. A simple test of muscle coactivation estimation using electromyography10.1590/S0100-879X2012007500092 ↗
36. Surface Electromyography Normalization Affects the Interpretation of Muscle Activity and Coactivation in Children With Cerebral Palsy During Walking10.3389/fneur.2020.00202 ↗
37. The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size
38. The effect size in scientific publication
39. Muscular coactivation: The role of the antagonist musculature in maintaining knee stability10.1177/036354658801600205 ↗
40. Antagonist muscle coactivation during isokinetic knee extension10.1034/j.1600-0838.2000.010002058.x ↗
41. The Effect of Squat Depth on Multiarticular Muscle Activation in Collegiate Cross-Country Runners10.1519/JSC.0b013e31828055d5 ↗
42. Knee biomechanics of the dynamic squat exercise10.1097/00005768-200101000-00020 ↗
43. Kinematic, kinetic and EMG patterns during downward squatting10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.07.010 ↗
44. Muscle coactivation: Definitions, mechanisms, and functions10.1152/jn.00084.2018 ↗
45. Gluteus medius muscle activity in patellofemoral pain syndrome during squats: A Systematic Review10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.03.007 ↗