journal article·2025-07-03Open access

Debris Flow Susceptibility Prediction Using Transfer Learning: A Case Study in Western Sichuan, China

Tiezhu Li, Qidi Huang, Qigang Chen

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 13

Abstract

The complex geological environment in western Sichuan, China, leads to frequent debris flow disasters, posing significant threats to the lives and property of local residents. In this study, debris flow susceptibility models were developed using three machine learning algorithms: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). The models were trained with data in Songpan County and used for debris flow susceptibility prediction in Mao County, using small watersheds as assessment units. Seventeen key feature factors based on multi-source remote sensing data encompassing topography and geomorphology, geological structures, environmental elements, and human activities were selected as input parameters after assessment with Pearson correlation analysis. Model performance was rigorously evaluated through ten-fold cross-validation, and hyperparameter optimization was employed to enhance predictive accuracy. To assess the models’ robustness, the trained models were applied to the neighboring Mao County for cross-regional validation. The results consistently indicate that elevation, seismic nucleation density, population density, and distance to roads are the primary controlling factors influencing susceptibility. Comparative analysis between the Songpan and Mao County reveals that the RF model significantly outperforms SVM and XGBoost in accuracy and robustness. Therefore, the RF model is better suited for debris flow susceptibility assessment in western Sichuan. Although the effectiveness of this model may be limited by the relatively small sample size of debris flow events in the dataset and potential variations in environmental conditions across different regions, it still holds promise for providing a scientific basis and decision-making support for disaster mitigation in comparable areas of western Sichuan.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

China Academy of Railway Sciences, Beijing 100080, China

Railway Engineering Research Institute, Beijing 100080, China

China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing 100008, China

National Key Laboratory of High-Speed Railway Track System, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing 100080, China

School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100080, China

Funding

China Railway Chengdu Bureau Group Co., Ltd. Open bidding for selecting the best candidates · China National Railway Group Co., Ltd. science and technology research and development plan contract · The Fund Project of China Academy of Railway Sciences Group Corporation Limited

References (89)

Show source-provided references
1. Dias, H.C., Hölbling, D., and Grohmann, C.H. (2021). Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Brazil: A Review. Geosciences, 11.10.3390/geosciences11100425 ↗
2. A progressive framework combining unsupervised and optimized supervised learning for debris flow susceptibility assessment10.1016/j.catena.2023.107560 ↗
3. Risk assessment of glacial debris flow on alpine highway under climate change: A case study of Aierkuran Gully along Karakoram Highway10.1007/s11629-021-6689-3 ↗
4. Flood susceptibility modelling of the Teesta River Basin through the AHP-MCDA process using GIS and remote sensing10.1007/s11069-024-06677-z ↗
5. Integration of the Statistical Index Method and the Analytic Hierarchy Process technique for the assessment of landslide susceptibility in Huizhou, China10.1016/j.catena.2016.03.028 ↗
6. Debris flow susceptibility zonation using statistical models in parts of Northwest Indian Himalayas—Implementation, validation, and comparative evaluation10.1007/s11069-021-05128-3 ↗
7. Leveraging GIS-based AHP, remote sensing, and machine learning for susceptibility assessment of different flood types in peshawar, Pakistan10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123094 ↗
8. Applying population-based evolutionary algorithms and a neuro-fuzzy system for modeling landslide susceptibility10.1016/j.catena.2018.08.025 ↗
9. Landslide susceptibility maps using different probabilistic and bivariate statistical models and comparison of their performance at Wadi Itwad Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia10.1007/s10064-015-0734-9 ↗
10. Uncertainty pattern in landslide susceptibility prediction modelling: Effects of different landslide boundaries and spatial shape expressions10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101317 ↗
11. Debris flow susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and seed cells, in a portion of a mountain international route, Dry Central Andes of Argentina10.1016/j.catena.2020.104504 ↗
12. Ahmed, B., and Dewan, A. (2017). Application of Bivariate and Multivariate Statistical Techniques in Landslide Susceptibility Modeling in Chittagong City Corporation, Bangladesh. Remote Sens., 9.10.3390/rs9040304 ↗
13. Gully erosion susceptibility maps and influence factor analysis in the Lhasa River Basin on the Tibetan Plateau, based on machine learning algorithms10.1016/j.catena.2023.107695 ↗
14. Application of the borderline-SMOTE method in susceptibility assessments of debris flows in Pinggu District, Beijing, China10.1007/s11069-020-04409-7 ↗
15. Prediction of the landslide susceptibility: Which algorithm, which precision?10.1016/j.catena.2017.11.022 ↗
16. Landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning algorithms and comparison of their performance at Abha Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia10.1016/j.gsf.2020.05.010 ↗
17. Swarm-based optimizer for convolutional neural network: An application for flood susceptibility mapping10.1111/tgis.12715 ↗
18. Landslide susceptibility mapping using multiscale sampling strategy and convolutional neural network: A case study in Jiuzhaigou region10.1016/j.catena.2020.104851 ↗
19. High resolution landslide susceptibility mapping using ensemble machine learning and geospatial big data10.1016/j.catena.2023.107653 ↗
20. Comprehensive application of transfer learning, unsupervised learning and supervised learning in debris flow susceptibility mapping10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112612 ↗
21. How do machine learning techniques help in increasing accuracy of landslide susceptibility maps?10.1016/j.gsf.2019.10.001 ↗
22. Comparison of different sampling strategies for debris flow susceptibility mapping: A case study using the centroids of the scarp area, flowing area and accumulation area of debris flow watersheds10.1007/s11629-020-6471-y ↗
23. Landslide susceptibility mapping in three Upazilas of Rangamati hill district Bangladesh: Application and comparison of GIS-based machine learning methods10.1080/10106049.2020.1864026 ↗
24. Refined landslide inventory and susceptibility of Weining County, China, inferred from machine learning and Sentinel-1 InSAR analysis10.1111/tgis.13202 ↗
25. Urban flood susceptibility mapping using remote sensing, social sensing and an ensemble machine learning model10.1016/j.scs.2024.105508 ↗
26. Zhang, Y., Ge, T., Tian, W., and Liou, Y.-A. (2019). Debris Flow Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine-Learning Techniques in Shigatse Area, China. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11232801 ↗
27. Improved landslide assessment using support vector machine with bagging, boosting, and stacking ensemble machine learning framework in a mountainous watershed, Japan10.1007/s10346-019-01286-5 ↗
28. A comparative study between popular statistical and machine learning methods for simulating volume of landslides10.1016/j.catena.2017.05.016 ↗
29. Exploring the spatial and temporal evolution of landscape ecological risks under tourism disturbance: A case study of the Min River Basin, China10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112412 ↗
30. Spatial variations in the relationships between road network and landscape ecological risks in the highest forest coverage region of China10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.09.016 ↗
31. Analysis and simulation of the spatiotemporal evolution pattern of tourism lands at the Natural World Heritage Site Jiuzhaigou, China10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.07.005 ↗
32. Risk assessment of mountain tourism on the Western Sichuan Plateau, China10.1007/s11629-022-7884-6 ↗
33. Assessing landscape eco-risk associated with hilly construction land exploitation in the southwest of China: Trade-off and adaptation10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.006 ↗
34. Multi-geohazards susceptibility mapping based on machine learning—A case study in Jiuzhaigou, China10.1007/s11069-020-03927-8 ↗
35. Debris Flow Susceptibility Evaluation in Meizoseismal Region: A Case Study in Jiuzhaigou, China10.1007/s12583-022-1803-1 ↗
36. Weights-of-evidence method based on GIS for assessing susceptibility to debris flows in Kangding County, Sichuan Province, China10.1007/s12665-015-5033-z ↗
37. Debris flow susceptibility assessment by GIS and information value model in a large-scale region, Sichuan Province (China)10.1007/s11069-012-0414-z ↗
38. Di, B., Zhang, H., Liu, Y., Li, J., Chen, N., Stamatopoulos, C.A., Luo, Y., and Zhan, Y. (2019). Assessing Susceptibility of Debris Flow in Southwest China Using Gradient Boosting Machine. Sci. Rep., 9.10.1038/s41598-019-48986-5 ↗
39. Xiong, K., Adhikari, B.R., Stamatopoulos, C.A., Zhan, Y., Wu, S., Dong, Z., and Di, B. (2020). Comparison of Different Machine Learning Methods for Debris Flow Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study in the Sichuan Province, China. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12020295 ↗
40. Probabilistic identification of debris flow source areas in the Wenchuan earthquake-affected region of China based on Bayesian geomorphology10.1007/s12665-024-11833-6 ↗
41. Mapping landslide susceptibility using data-driven methods10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.188 ↗
42. Optimal slope units partitioning in landslide susceptibility mapping10.1080/17445647.2020.1805807 ↗
43. Ma, S., Shao, X., and Xu, C. (2024). Potential Controlling Factors and Landslide Susceptibility Features of the 2022 Ms 6.8 Luding Earthquake. Remote Sens., 16.10.3390/rs16152861 ↗
44. Debris-flow susceptibility assessment at regional scale: Validation on an alpine environment10.1007/s10346-014-0493-x ↗
45. Zhao, Z., Liu, Z.y., and Xu, C. (2021). Slope Unit-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Certainty Factor, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, CF-SVM and CF-RF Models. Front. Earth Sci., 9.10.3389/feart.2021.589630 ↗
46. Advanced integration of ensemble learning and MT-InSAR for enhanced slow-moving landslide susceptibility zoning10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107436 ↗
47. Exploring the uncertainty of landslide susceptibility assessment caused by the number of non–landslides10.1016/j.catena.2023.107109 ↗
48. Exploring the effects of the design and quantity of absence data on the performance of random forest-based landslide susceptibility mapping10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.035 ↗
49. Landslide susceptibility mapping of mountain roads based on machine learning combined model10.1007/s11629-022-7657-2 ↗
50. Overcoming the data limitations in landslide susceptibility modeling10.1126/sciadv.adt1541 ↗
51. Least squares quantization in PCM10.1109/TIT.1982.1056489 ↗
52. Brenning, A. (2012, January 22–27). Spatial cross-validation and bootstrap for the assessment of prediction rules in remote sensing: The R package sperrorest. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Munich, Germany.10.1109/IGARSS.2012.6352393 ↗
53. Reclassifying historical disasters: From single to multi-hazards10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169120 ↗
54. Javidan, N., Kavian, A., Pourghasemi, H.R., Conoscenti, C., Jafarian, Z., and Rodrigo-Comino, J. (2021). Evaluation of multi-hazard map produced using MaxEnt machine learning technique. Sci. Rep., 11.10.1038/s41598-021-85862-7 ↗
55. Multi-hazard assessment using machine learning and remote sensing in the North Central region of Vietnam10.1111/tgis.13091 ↗
56. Evaluation of potential changes in landslide susceptibility and landslide occurrence frequency in China under climate change10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158049 ↗
57. Flood vulnerability assessment using the triangular fuzzy number-based analytic hierarchy process and support vector machine model for the Belt and Road region10.1007/s11069-021-04946-9 ↗
58. Flood susceptibility modeling based on new hybrid intelligence model: Optimization of XGboost model using GA metaheuristic algorithm10.1016/j.asr.2022.02.027 ↗
59. Li, Y., Lei, Y., Chen, B., and Chen, J. (2025). Evaluation of geological hazard susceptibility based on the multi-kernel density information method. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-91713-6 ↗
60. Evaluating the influence of road construction on landslide susceptibility in Saudi Arabia’s mountainous terrain: A Bayesian-optimised deep learning approach with attention mechanism and sensitivity analysis10.1007/s11356-023-31352-4 ↗
61. Spatial clustering and modelling for landslide susceptibility mapping in the north of the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal10.1007/s10346-020-01558-5 ↗
62. Deciphering the effect of climate change on landslide activity: A review10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.04.009 ↗
63. Machine-learning based landslide susceptibility modelling with emphasis on uncertainty analysis10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101657 ↗
64. Assessing the imperative of conditioning factor grading in machine learning-based landslide susceptibility modeling: A critical inquiry10.1016/j.catena.2023.107732 ↗
65. Optimizing landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning and geospatial techniques10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102583 ↗
66. Landslide susceptibility prediction using slope unit-based machine learning models considering the heterogeneity of conditioning factors10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.07.009 ↗
67. Machine learning-based landslide susceptibility assessment with optimized ratio of landslide to non-landslide samples10.1016/j.gr.2022.05.012 ↗
68. Hussain, M.A., Chen, Z., Zheng, Y., Zhou, Y., and Daud, H. (2023). Deep Learning and Machine Learning Models for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping with Remote Sensing Data. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15194703 ↗
69. Flood susceptibility prediction using tree-based machine learning models in the GBA10.1016/j.scs.2023.104744 ↗
70. Identifying the essential flood conditioning factors for flood prone area mapping using machine learning techniques10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.011 ↗
71. Debris Flow Susceptibility Evaluation—A Review. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology
72. Optimization-Based Stacked Machine-Learning Method for Seismic Probability and Risk Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124897 ↗
73. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
74. Bagging predictors10.1007/BF00058655 ↗
75. Support-vector networks10.1007/BF00994018 ↗
76. Machine Learning Feature Selection Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping10.1007/s11004-013-9511-0 ↗
77. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
78. Landslide detection and susceptibility mapping using LiDAR and an artificial neural network approach: A case study in the Cuyahoga Valley National Park, Ohio10.1007/s10346-015-0587-0 ↗
79. Machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility studies: A comparative overview of algorithm performance10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103225 ↗
80. Model performance analysis for landslide susceptibility in cold regions using accuracy rate and fluctuation characteristics10.1007/s11069-021-04719-4 ↗
81. Optimization of causative factors using logistic regression and artificial neural network models for landslide susceptibility assessment in Ujung Loe Watershed, South Sulawesi Indonesia10.1007/s11629-018-4884-7 ↗
82. Susceptibility assessment of geological hazards in Guangdong Province based on CF and Logistic regression models
83. Empirical comparison of cross-validation and internal metrics for tuning SVM hyperparameters10.1016/j.patrec.2017.01.007 ↗
84. Hyperparameter tuning and performance assessment of statistical and machine-learning algorithms using spatial data10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.06.002 ↗
85. Susceptibility assessment of landslides triggered by earthquakes in the Western Sichuan Plateau10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.013 ↗
86. Debris flows dynamic risk assessment and interpretable Shapley method-based driving mechanisms exploring—A case study of the upper reach of the Min River10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113400 ↗
87. Indispensable factors in landslide susceptibility modeling: The critical role of slope unit quantity-sensitivity10.1007/s12145-025-01766-4 ↗
88. An interpretable attention-based deep learning method for landslide prediction based on multi-temporal InSAR time series: A case study of Xinpu landslide in the TGRA10.1016/j.rse.2024.114580 ↗
89. A comparative study of an expert knowledge-based model and two data-driven models for landslide susceptibility mapping10.1016/j.catena.2018.04.003 ↗