Show source-provided references
1. Dias, H.C., Hölbling, D., and Grohmann, C.H. (2021). Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Brazil: A Review. Geosciences, 11.
10.3390/geosciences11100425 ↗2. A progressive framework combining unsupervised and optimized supervised learning for debris flow susceptibility assessment
10.1016/j.catena.2023.107560 ↗3. Risk assessment of glacial debris flow on alpine highway under climate change: A case study of Aierkuran Gully along Karakoram Highway
10.1007/s11629-021-6689-3 ↗4. Flood susceptibility modelling of the Teesta River Basin through the AHP-MCDA process using GIS and remote sensing
10.1007/s11069-024-06677-z ↗5. Integration of the Statistical Index Method and the Analytic Hierarchy Process technique for the assessment of landslide susceptibility in Huizhou, China
10.1016/j.catena.2016.03.028 ↗6. Debris flow susceptibility zonation using statistical models in parts of Northwest Indian Himalayas—Implementation, validation, and comparative evaluation
10.1007/s11069-021-05128-3 ↗7. Leveraging GIS-based AHP, remote sensing, and machine learning for susceptibility assessment of different flood types in peshawar, Pakistan
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123094 ↗9. Landslide susceptibility maps using different probabilistic and bivariate statistical models and comparison of their performance at Wadi Itwad Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia
10.1007/s10064-015-0734-9 ↗10. Uncertainty pattern in landslide susceptibility prediction modelling: Effects of different landslide boundaries and spatial shape expressions
10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101317 ↗11. Debris flow susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and seed cells, in a portion of a mountain international route, Dry Central Andes of Argentina
10.1016/j.catena.2020.104504 ↗12. Ahmed, B., and Dewan, A. (2017). Application of Bivariate and Multivariate Statistical Techniques in Landslide Susceptibility Modeling in Chittagong City Corporation, Bangladesh. Remote Sens., 9.
10.3390/rs9040304 ↗13. Gully erosion susceptibility maps and influence factor analysis in the Lhasa River Basin on the Tibetan Plateau, based on machine learning algorithms
10.1016/j.catena.2023.107695 ↗14. Application of the borderline-SMOTE method in susceptibility assessments of debris flows in Pinggu District, Beijing, China
10.1007/s11069-020-04409-7 ↗16. Landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning algorithms and comparison of their performance at Abha Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia
10.1016/j.gsf.2020.05.010 ↗17. Swarm-based optimizer for convolutional neural network: An application for flood susceptibility mapping
10.1111/tgis.12715 ↗18. Landslide susceptibility mapping using multiscale sampling strategy and convolutional neural network: A case study in Jiuzhaigou region
10.1016/j.catena.2020.104851 ↗20. Comprehensive application of transfer learning, unsupervised learning and supervised learning in debris flow susceptibility mapping
10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112612 ↗22. Comparison of different sampling strategies for debris flow susceptibility mapping: A case study using the centroids of the scarp area, flowing area and accumulation area of debris flow watersheds
10.1007/s11629-020-6471-y ↗23. Landslide susceptibility mapping in three Upazilas of Rangamati hill district Bangladesh: Application and comparison of GIS-based machine learning methods
10.1080/10106049.2020.1864026 ↗24. Refined landslide inventory and susceptibility of Weining County, China, inferred from machine learning and Sentinel-1 InSAR analysis
10.1111/tgis.13202 ↗25. Urban flood susceptibility mapping using remote sensing, social sensing and an ensemble machine learning model
10.1016/j.scs.2024.105508 ↗26. Zhang, Y., Ge, T., Tian, W., and Liou, Y.-A. (2019). Debris Flow Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine-Learning Techniques in Shigatse Area, China. Remote Sens., 11.
10.3390/rs11232801 ↗27. Improved landslide assessment using support vector machine with bagging, boosting, and stacking ensemble machine learning framework in a mountainous watershed, Japan
10.1007/s10346-019-01286-5 ↗29. Exploring the spatial and temporal evolution of landscape ecological risks under tourism disturbance: A case study of the Min River Basin, China
10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112412 ↗30. Spatial variations in the relationships between road network and landscape ecological risks in the highest forest coverage region of China
10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.09.016 ↗31. Analysis and simulation of the spatiotemporal evolution pattern of tourism lands at the Natural World Heritage Site Jiuzhaigou, China
10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.07.005 ↗33. Assessing landscape eco-risk associated with hilly construction land exploitation in the southwest of China: Trade-off and adaptation
10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.006 ↗36. Weights-of-evidence method based on GIS for assessing susceptibility to debris flows in Kangding County, Sichuan Province, China
10.1007/s12665-015-5033-z ↗37. Debris flow susceptibility assessment by GIS and information value model in a large-scale region, Sichuan Province (China)
10.1007/s11069-012-0414-z ↗38. Di, B., Zhang, H., Liu, Y., Li, J., Chen, N., Stamatopoulos, C.A., Luo, Y., and Zhan, Y. (2019). Assessing Susceptibility of Debris Flow in Southwest China Using Gradient Boosting Machine. Sci. Rep., 9.
10.1038/s41598-019-48986-5 ↗39. Xiong, K., Adhikari, B.R., Stamatopoulos, C.A., Zhan, Y., Wu, S., Dong, Z., and Di, B. (2020). Comparison of Different Machine Learning Methods for Debris Flow Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study in the Sichuan Province, China. Remote Sens., 12.
10.3390/rs12020295 ↗40. Probabilistic identification of debris flow source areas in the Wenchuan earthquake-affected region of China based on Bayesian geomorphology
10.1007/s12665-024-11833-6 ↗43. Ma, S., Shao, X., and Xu, C. (2024). Potential Controlling Factors and Landslide Susceptibility Features of the 2022 Ms 6.8 Luding Earthquake. Remote Sens., 16.
10.3390/rs16152861 ↗45. Zhao, Z., Liu, Z.y., and Xu, C. (2021). Slope Unit-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Certainty Factor, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, CF-SVM and CF-RF Models. Front. Earth Sci., 9.
10.3389/feart.2021.589630 ↗48. Exploring the effects of the design and quantity of absence data on the performance of random forest-based landslide susceptibility mapping
10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.035 ↗52. Brenning, A. (2012, January 22–27). Spatial cross-validation and bootstrap for the assessment of prediction rules in remote sensing: The R package sperrorest. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Munich, Germany.
10.1109/IGARSS.2012.6352393 ↗54. Javidan, N., Kavian, A., Pourghasemi, H.R., Conoscenti, C., Jafarian, Z., and Rodrigo-Comino, J. (2021). Evaluation of multi-hazard map produced using MaxEnt machine learning technique. Sci. Rep., 11.
10.1038/s41598-021-85862-7 ↗55. Multi-hazard assessment using machine learning and remote sensing in the North Central region of Vietnam
10.1111/tgis.13091 ↗57. Flood vulnerability assessment using the triangular fuzzy number-based analytic hierarchy process and support vector machine model for the Belt and Road region
10.1007/s11069-021-04946-9 ↗58. Flood susceptibility modeling based on new hybrid intelligence model: Optimization of XGboost model using GA metaheuristic algorithm
10.1016/j.asr.2022.02.027 ↗59. Li, Y., Lei, Y., Chen, B., and Chen, J. (2025). Evaluation of geological hazard susceptibility based on the multi-kernel density information method. Sci. Rep., 15.
10.1038/s41598-025-91713-6 ↗60. Evaluating the influence of road construction on landslide susceptibility in Saudi Arabia’s mountainous terrain: A Bayesian-optimised deep learning approach with attention mechanism and sensitivity analysis
10.1007/s11356-023-31352-4 ↗61. Spatial clustering and modelling for landslide susceptibility mapping in the north of the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal
10.1007/s10346-020-01558-5 ↗64. Assessing the imperative of conditioning factor grading in machine learning-based landslide susceptibility modeling: A critical inquiry
10.1016/j.catena.2023.107732 ↗66. Landslide susceptibility prediction using slope unit-based machine learning models considering the heterogeneity of conditioning factors
10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.07.009 ↗67. Machine learning-based landslide susceptibility assessment with optimized ratio of landslide to non-landslide samples
10.1016/j.gr.2022.05.012 ↗68. Hussain, M.A., Chen, Z., Zheng, Y., Zhou, Y., and Daud, H. (2023). Deep Learning and Machine Learning Models for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping with Remote Sensing Data. Remote Sens., 15.
10.3390/rs15194703 ↗71. Debris Flow Susceptibility Evaluation—A Review. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology
72. Optimization-Based Stacked Machine-Learning Method for Seismic Probability and Risk Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls
10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124897 ↗77. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.
10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗78. Landslide detection and susceptibility mapping using LiDAR and an artificial neural network approach: A case study in the Cuyahoga Valley National Park, Ohio
10.1007/s10346-015-0587-0 ↗80. Model performance analysis for landslide susceptibility in cold regions using accuracy rate and fluctuation characteristics
10.1007/s11069-021-04719-4 ↗81. Optimization of causative factors using logistic regression and artificial neural network models for landslide susceptibility assessment in Ujung Loe Watershed, South Sulawesi Indonesia
10.1007/s11629-018-4884-7 ↗82. Susceptibility assessment of geological hazards in Guangdong Province based on CF and Logistic regression models
86. Debris flows dynamic risk assessment and interpretable Shapley method-based driving mechanisms exploring—A case study of the upper reach of the Min River
10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113400 ↗87. Indispensable factors in landslide susceptibility modeling: The critical role of slope unit quantity-sensitivity
10.1007/s12145-025-01766-4 ↗88. An interpretable attention-based deep learning method for landslide prediction based on multi-temporal InSAR time series: A case study of Xinpu landslide in the TGRA
10.1016/j.rse.2024.114580 ↗89. A comparative study of an expert knowledge-based model and two data-driven models for landslide susceptibility mapping
10.1016/j.catena.2018.04.003 ↗