journal article·2025-06-27Open access

Comprehensive Performance Comparison of Signal Processing Features in Machine Learning Classification of Alcohol Intoxication on Small Gait Datasets

Muxi Qi, Samuel Chibuoyim Uche, Emmanuel Agu

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 13

Abstract

Detecting alcohol intoxication is crucial for preventing accidents and enhancing public safety. Traditional intoxication detection methods rely on direct blood alcohol concentration (BAC) measurement via breathalyzers and wearable sensors. These methods require the user to purchase and carry external hardware such as breathalyzers, which is expensive and cumbersome. Convenient, unobtrusive intoxication detection methods using equipment already owned by users are desirable. Recent research has explored machine learning-based approaches using smartphone accelerometers to classify intoxicated gait patterns. While neural network approaches have emerged, due to the significant challenges with collecting intoxicated gait data, gait datasets are often too small to utilize such approaches. To avoid overfitting on such small datasets, traditional machine learning (ML) classification is preferred. A comprehensive set of ML features have been proposed. However, until now, no work has systematically evaluated the performance of various categories of gait features for alcohol intoxication detection task using traditional machine learning algorithms. This study evaluates 27 signal processing features handcrafted from accelerometer gait data across five domains: time, frequency, wavelet, statistical, and information-theoretic. The data were collected from 24 subjects who experienced alcohol stimulation using goggle busters. Correlation-based feature selection (CFS) was employed to rank the features most correlated with alcohol-induced gait changes, revealing that 22 features exhibited statistically significant correlations with BAC levels. These statistically significant features were utilized to train supervised classifiers and assess their impact on alcohol intoxication detection accuracy. Statistical features yielded the highest accuracy (83.89%), followed by time-domain (83.22%) and frequency-domain features (82.21%). Classifying all domain 22 significant features using a random forest model improved classification accuracy to 84.9%. These findings suggest that incorporating a broader set of signal processing features enhances the accuracy of smartphone-based alcohol intoxication detection.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications · Brain Tumor Detection and Classification · Gait Recognition and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Computer Science, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, USA

References (86)

Show source-provided references
1. Gallup (2025, March 24). More Than Six in 10 Americans Drink Alcohol. Available online: https://news.gallup.com/poll/509501/six-americans-drink-alcohol.aspx.
2. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (2025, February 23). 2023 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Table 2.27A—Alcohol Use in Past Month: Among People Aged 12 or Older; By Age Group and Demographic Characteristics, Numbers in Thousands, 2022 and 2023, Available online: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2023-nsduh-detailed-tables.
3. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (2025, February 23). 2023 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Table 2.27B—Alcohol Use in Past Month: Among People Aged 12 or Older; By Age Group and Demographic Characteristics, Percentages, 2022 and 2023, Available online: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2023-nsduh-detailed-tables.
4. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (2025, February 23). 2023 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Table 2.28A—Binge Alcohol Use in Past Month: Among People Aged 12 or Older; By Age Group and Demographic Characteristics, Numbers in Thousands, 2022 and 2023, Available online: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2023-nsduh-detailed-tables.
5. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (2025, February 23). 2023 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Table 2.28B—Binge Alcohol Use in Past Month: Among People Aged 12 or Older; By Age Group and Demographic Characteristics, Percentages, 2022 and 2023, Available online: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2023-nsduh-detailed-tables.
6. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (2025, February 25). 2023 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Table 2.29A—Heavy Alcohol Use in Past Month: Among People Aged 12 or Older; by Age Group and Demographic Characteristics, Numbers in Thousands, 2022 and 2023, Available online: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2023-nsduh-detailed-tables.
7. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (2025, February 25). 2023 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Table 2.29B—Heavy Alcohol Use in Past Month: Among People Aged 12 or Older; By Age Group and Demographic Characteristics, Percentages, 2022 and 2023, Available online: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2023-nsduh-detailed-tables.
8. Wilcockson, T.D.W., and Roy, S. (2024). Could Alcohol-Related Cognitive Decline Be the Result of Iron-Induced Neuroinflammation?. Brain Sci., 14.10.3390/brainsci14060520 ↗
9. Alcohol, Inflammation, and Blood-Brain Barrier Function in Health and Disease Across Development10.1016/bs.irn.2021.06.009 ↗
10. National Cancer Institute (2025, May 20). Alcohol Consumption. Cancer Trends Progress Report, Available online: https://progressreport.cancer.gov/prevention/diet_alcohol/alcohol.
11. Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey (2025, May 20). Liver Cancer, Excessive Alcohol Use, and Other Risks. Available online: https://cinj.org/liver-cancer-excessive-alcohol-use-and-other-risks.
12. World Health Organization (2025, May 20). No Level of Alcohol Consumption Is Safe for Our Health. Available online: https://www.who.int/europe/news/item/04-01-2023-no-level-of-alcohol-consumption-is-safe-for-our-health.
13. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2025, May 20). Alcohol and Cancer Risk. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Available online: https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/oash-alcohol-cancer-risk.pdf.
14. Alcohol consumption and site-specific cancer risk: A comprehensive dose–response meta-analysis10.1038/bjc.2014.579 ↗
15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2025, February 19). Estimated Liver Disease Deaths Include Deaths with Underlying Causes Coded as Alcoholic Liver Disease (K70); Liver Cirrhosis, Unspecified (K74.0–K74.2, K74.6, K76.0, K76.7, and K76.9); Chronic Hepatitis (K73); Portal Hypertension (K76.6); Liver Cancer (C22); or Other Liver Diseases (K71, K72, K74.3–K74.5, K75, K76.1–K76.5, and K76.8), Available online: https://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Datasets/DVS/mortality/mort2023us.zip.
16. (2025, February 19). Number of Deaths from Multiple Cause of Death Public-Use Data File. 2023; lcohol-Attributable Fractions (AAFs) from CDC 51 Alcohol-Related Disease Impact; Prevalence of Alcohol Consumption from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2023, 52 for Estimating Indirect AAFs for Chronic Hepatitis and Liver Cancer, Available online: https://nccd.cdc.gov/DPH_ARDI/Default/Default.aspx.
17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2025, February 19). Alcohol Use and Health, Available online: http://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/fact-sheets/alcohol-use.htm.
18. Legends Recovery (2025, February 06). Economic Effects of Alcohol and Drugs. Available online: https://www.legendsrecovery.com/blog/economic-effects-of-alcohol-and-drugs.
19. Intoxalock (2025, May 19). BAC vs. BrAC: What’s the Difference?, Available online: https://www.intoxalock.com/knowledge-center/bac-vs-brac-whats-the-difference.
20. Chapter Seven—Momentary Assessment of Drinking: Past Methods, Current Approaches Incorporating Biosensors, and Future Directions10.1016/bs.plm.2023.06.002 ↗
21. Wrist-Worn Alcohol Biosensors: Strengths, Limitations, and Future Directions10.1016/j.alcohol.2018.08.013 ↗
22. American Addiction Centers (2025, May 19). Alcohol Moderation Management: Programs and Steps to Control Drinking. Available online: https://americanaddictioncenters.org/blog/alcohol-moderation-management.
23. Acceleration Gait Measures as Proxies for Motor Skill of Walking: A Narrative Review10.1109/TNSRE.2020.3044260 ↗
24. Gundersen Health (2025, May 25). Under the Influence: The Effects of Alcohol on the Body. Gundersen Health System, Available online: https://www.gundersenhealth.org/health-wellness/staying-healthy/under-the-influence-the-effects-of-alcohol-on-the-body.
25. Motor Systems and Postural Instability10.1016/B978-0-444-62619-6.00015-X ↗
26. Gait Ataxia in Alcohol Use Disorder: A Systematic Review10.1037/adb0000958 ↗
27. Profiles of Impaired, Spared, and Recovered Neuropsychologic Processes in Alcoholism10.1016/B978-0-444-62619-6.00012-4 ↗
28. Influence of Moderate Alcohol Ingestion on Gait10.1007/s11332-008-0062-6 ↗
29. Using Virtual Reality to Study Alcohol Intoxication Effects on the Neural Correlates of Simulated Driving10.1007/s10484-005-6384-0 ↗
30. (2025, May 25). Promises Behavioral Health. Alcoholism and Ataxia: What’s the Connection?. Available online: https://www.promises.com/addiction-blog/alcoholism-and-ataxia/.
31. Gimunová, M., Bozděch, M., Novák, J., Svoboda, Z., Zvoníček, J., Bizovská, L., and Janura, M. (2022). Gender Differences in the Effect of a 0.11% Breath Alcohol Concentration on Forward and Backward Gait. Sci. Rep., 12.10.1038/s41598-022-23621-y ↗
32. Mount Sinai Health Library (2025, February 25). Alcoholic Neuropathy. Mount Sinai Health Library., Available online: https://www.mountsinai.org/health-library/diseases-conditions/alcoholic-neuropathy.
33. Meigal, A.Y., Gerasimova-Meigal, L.I., Reginya, S.A., Soloviev, A.V., and Moschevikin, A.P. (2022). Gait Characteristics Analyzed with Smartphone IMU Sensors in Subjects with Parkinsonism under the Conditions of “Dry” Immersion. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22207915 ↗
34. Baek, J.-E., Jung, J.-H., Kim, H.-K., and Cho, H.-Y. (2024). Smartphone Accelerometer for Gait Assessment: Validity and Reliability in Healthy Adults. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142311321 ↗
35. ConsumerAffairs (2025, February 19). Cell Phone Statistics 2024. ConsumerAffairs.com., Available online: https://www.consumeraffairs.com/cell_phones/cell-phone-statistics.html.
36. Test–Retest Reliability of Trunk Accelerometric Gait Analysis10.1016/S0966-6362(03)00069-9 ↗
37. Reliability and Validity of a Smartphone-Based Assessment of Gait Parameters across Walking Speed and Smartphone Locations: Body, Bag, Belt, Hand, and Pocket10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.09.030 ↗
38. Validation of Gait Analysis Using Smartphones: Reliability and Validity
39. Arnold, Z., Larose, D., and Agu, E. (2015, January 21–23). Smartphone Inference of Alcohol Consumption Levels from Gait. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI), Dallas, TX, USA.10.1109/ICHI.2015.59 ↗
40. SCRAM Systems (2025, February 22). SCRAM Continuous Alcohol Monitoring. Available online: http://www.scramsystems.com/index/scram/continuous-alcoholmonitoring.
41. Tokyoflash Japan (2025, February 22). Kisai Intoxicated LCD Watch. Available online: http://www.tokyoflash.com/en/watches/kisai/intoxicated/.
42. Myrecek (2025, February 22). AlcoDroid Alcohol Tracker. Available online: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.M.alcodroid&hl=en.
43. Wichmann, R. (2025, February 22). IntelliDrink PRO—Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) Calculator. Available online: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/intellidrink-pro-blood-alcohol/id440759306?mt=8.
44. Human Gait Analysis in Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Review10.1109/JBHI.2021.3092875 ↗
45. 1D Convolutional Neural Networks and Applications: A Survey10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107398 ↗
46. Ravi, S., and Radhakrishnan, A. (2024). A Hybrid 1D CNN-BiLSTM Model for Epileptic Seizure Detection Using Multichannel EEG Feature Fusion. Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express, 10.10.1088/2057-1976/ad3afd ↗
47. Pouromran, F., Lin, Y., and Kamarthi, S. (2022). Personalized Deep Bi-LSTM RNN-Based Model for Pain Intensity Classification Using EDA Signal. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22218087 ↗
48. Comparison of Two Accelerometer Filter Settings in Individuals with Parkinson’s Disease10.1088/0967-3334/35/11/2287 ↗
49. Gait Assessment in Parkinson’s Disease: Toward an Ambulatory System for Long-Term Monitoring10.1109/TBME.2004.827933 ↗
50. Kao, H.-L.C., Ho, B.-J., Lin, A.C., and Chu, H.-H. (2012, January 5–8). Phone-Based Gait Analysis to Detect Alcohol Usage. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp ’12), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.10.1145/2370216.2370354 ↗
51. Heterogeneous Mechanomyographic Absolute Activation of Paraspinal Muscles Assessed by a Two-Dimensional Array during Short and Sustained Contractions10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.12.011 ↗
52. Montgomery, E.B.U.S. (2006). Neuron signal analysis system and method. (7,136,696), U.S. Patent.
53. A Comprehensive Assessment of Gait Accelerometry Signals in Time, Frequency and Time-Frequency Domains10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2265887 ↗
54. Klucken, J., Barth, J., Kugler, P., Schlachetzki, J., Henze, T., Marxreiter, F., Kohl, Z., Steidl, R., Hornegger, J., and Eskofier, B. (2013). Unbiased and Mobile Gait Analysis Detects Motor Impairment in Parkinson’s Disease. PLoS ONE, 8.10.1371/journal.pone.0056956 ↗
55. Measuring Regularity by Means of a Corrected Conditional Entropy in Sympathetic Outflow10.1007/s004220050414 ↗
56. Entropy, Entropy Rate, and Pattern Classification as Tools to Typify Complexity in Short Heart Period Variability Series10.1109/10.959324 ↗
57. Noninvasive Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease Using a Neural Network Algorithm10.1007/BF02414891 ↗
58. Lee, J., Sejdić, E., Steele, C.M., and Chau, T. (2010). Effects of Liquid Stimuli on Dual-Axis Swallowing Accelerometry Signals in a Healthy Population. Biomed. Eng. Online, 9.10.1186/1475-925X-9-7 ↗
59. Wavelet Entropy: A New Tool for Analysis of Short Duration Brain Electrical Signals10.1016/S0165-0270(00)00356-3 ↗
60. Comparison of Entropy and Complexity Measures for the Assessment of Depth of Sedation10.1109/TBME.2006.873543 ↗
61. Lu, H., Huang, J., Saha, T., and Nachman, L. (2014, January 13–17). Unobtrusive Gait Verification for Mobile Phones. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC’14), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1145/2634317.2642868 ↗
62. Validation of a Measure of Smoothness of Walking10.1093/gerona/glq170 ↗
63. Interpretation of the Lempel-Ziv Complexity Measure in the Context of Biomedical Signal Analysis10.1109/TBME.2006.883696 ↗
64. On the Complexity of Finite Sequences10.1109/TIT.1976.1055501 ↗
65. Aiello, C., and Agu, E. (2016, January 25–27). Investigating postural sway features, normalization and personalization in detecting blood alcohol levels of smartphone users. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Wireless Health (WH), Bethesda, MD, USA.10.1109/WH.2016.7764559 ↗
66. Random Forest Based Classification of Alcohol Dependence Patients and Healthy Controls Using Resting State MRI10.1016/j.neulet.2018.04.007 ↗
67. Random Forest–Based Feature Selection and Detection Method for Drunk Driving Recognition10.1177/1550147720905234 ↗
68. Gait Recognition Using J48-Based Identification with Knee Joint Movements
69. Herrera-Alcántara, O., Barrera-Animas, A.Y., González-Mendoza, M., and Castro-Espinoza, F. (2019). Monitoring Student Activities with Smartwatches: On the Academic Performance Enhancement. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19071605 ↗
70. Human Activity Recognition Using Gaussian Naïve Bayes Algorithm in Smart Home10.1088/1742-6596/1631/1/012059 ↗
71. Window Selection Impact in Human Activity Recognition
72. Ho, T.K. (1995, January 14–16). Random Decision Forests. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), Montreal, QC, Canada.
73. Friedman, J., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R. (2008). The Elements of Statistical Learning, Springer. [2nd ed.].
74. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning by J. Ross Quinlan. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., 199310.1007/BF00993309 ↗
75. Russell, S., and Norvig, P. (2003). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Prentice-Hall. [2nd ed.].
76. Umd.edu (2025, March 04). Top 10 Algorithms in Data Mining. Available online: http://www.cs.umd.edu/~samir/498/10Algorithms-08.pdf.
77. Prieditis, A., and Russell, S. (1995). Fast Effective Rule Induction. Machine Learning Proceedings 1995, Morgan Kaufmann.
78. Singh, A. (2025, May 25). Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) Estimation. Lecture Notes for 10-315: Introduction to Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Available online: https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~aarti/Class/10315_Spring22/lecs/MAP.pdf.
79. Vapnik, V. (2000). The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4757-3264-1 ↗
80. Support Vector Machines for Automated Gait Classification10.1109/TBME.2005.845241 ↗
81. Bremner, J., Cheung, N., Ho Lam, Q., and Huang, S. (2025). IntoxiGait: Investigating Deep Learning to Predict Intoxication Levels Using Smartphones and Smartwatches. Major Qualifying Project, Computer Science, Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Available online: https://digital.wpi.edu/concern/parent/1544bq57j/file_sets/1v53jz50f.
82. McAfee, A., Watson, J., Bianchi, B., Aiello, C., and Agu, E. (2017, January 4–8). AlcoWear: Detecting Blood Alcohol Levels from Wearables. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI), San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/UIC-ATC.2017.8397486 ↗
83. Feature Engineering for Human Activity Recognition
84. Physical Activity Recognition by Utilising Smartphone Sensor Signals
85. Effects of Alcohol Intoxication Goggles (Fatal Vision Goggles) with a Concurrent Cognitive Task on Simulated Driving Performance10.1080/15389588.2019.1669023 ↗
86. Drivers Ed Guru (2025, May 25). How Alcohol Impacts Your Ability to Drive. Available online: https://drunkbusters.com/content/drivers-ed-guru.pdf.