Data Leveling of Multi-Map Geochemical Exploration Data Using Compositional Data Analysis: A Case Study from the Baiyinchagan–Maodeng Area, Inner Mongolia, China
Source abstract
Abstract
Exploration geochemical data are typically collected and analyzed according to standard map sheets. Different map sheets may be tested by different companies, at different times, or using different instruments. As a result, “systematic errors” inevitably arise, which are directly reflected in the “shift” effect between different map sheets. This study compares various leveling methods, including contrast return (CR), boundary leveling (BL), and multi-scale correction (MSC), based on compositional data transformation of six map sheets from the Baiyinchagan–Maodeng area. The results show the following features: the raw data from multiple map sheets contain certain errors, and these raw data cannot be directly used to create geochemical maps; the CR method is unsuitable for leveling in areas with small scales or significant geological background differences; the BL method yields more reasonable results when there is a similar geochemical background (geological background) between map sheets, and it is better suited for leveling between map sheets in areas with small scales or significant regional differences in geochemical backgrounds; finally, the MSC method yields results similar to the BL method, but it does not require boundary consistency, thus having fewer limitations, although it requires multi-scale geochemical data. In practical terms, this study provides valuable guidance for selecting appropriate geochemical data leveling methods in exploration projects, thereby improving the accuracy and reliability of geochemical mapping and enhancing the effectiveness of mineral exploration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping · Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis · Heavy metals in environment
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Geomathematics Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
SinoProbe Laboratory, Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
School of Computer and Software Engineering, Anhui Institute of Information Technology, Wuhu 241000, China
Funding
National Key Science and Technology Major Project · National Key R&D Program of China · Geological Survey Fund Project of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. A Decade of Exploration Geochemistry
2. Landmark Events of Exploration Geochemistry in the Past 80 Years
3. China Soil Geochemical Baselines Networks: Data Characteristics
4. Exploration Geochemistry: Past Achievements and Future Challenges
5. The Implementation of the Regional Geochemistry-National Reconnaissance Program (RGNR) in China in the Past Thirty Years
6. Leveling Geochemical Data between Map Sheets10.1016/S0375-6742(98)00015-6 ↗
7. Geochemical Mapping Based on Multiple Geochemical Datasets: A General Method, and Its Application to Wallonia (Southern Belgium)10.1016/j.gexplo.2015.06.016 ↗
8. Statistical Levelling of Multi-Element Geochemical Data10.1016/j.acags.2021.100060 ↗
9. Multiple-Map Step Effect and Optimization of Various Experimental Correction Methods Based on Geochemical Data
10. CNN-Transformers for Mineral Prospectivity Mapping in the Maodeng-Baiyinchagan Area, Southern Great Xing’an Range10.1016/j.oregeorev.2024.106007 ↗
11. Mineralization of the Daolundaba Cu–Sn–W–Ag Deposit in the Southern Great Xing’an Range, China: Constraints from Geochronology, Geochemistry, and Hf Isotope10.1016/j.oregeorev.2021.104117 ↗
12. Test of P-Wave Receiver Functions for a Seismic Velocity and Gravity Model across the Baikal Rift Zone10.1093/gji/ggac335 ↗
13. The Early Cretaceous Weilasituo Zn–Cu–Ag Vein Deposit in the Southern Great Xing’an Range, Northeast China: Fluid Inclusions, H, O, S, Pb Isotope Geochemistry and Genetic Implications10.1016/j.oregeorev.2013.06.015 ↗
14. Principal Component Analysis for Compositional Data with Outliers10.1002/env.966 ↗
15. Tang, R., Sun, L., Ouyang, F., Xiao, K., Li, C., Kong, Y., Xie, M., Wu, Y., and Gao, Y. (2023). CoDA-Based Geo-Electrochemical Prospecting Prediction of Uranium Orebodies in Changjiang Area, Guangdong Province, China. Minerals, 14.10.3390/min14010015 ↗
16. Biplots of Compositional Data10.1111/1467-9876.00275 ↗
17. Analysis and Mapping of Geochemical Anomalies Using Logratio-Transformed Stream Sediment Data with Censored Values10.1016/j.gexplo.2011.05.007 ↗
18. Compositional Data Analysis of Heavy Metal Contamination and Eco-Environmental Risks in Himalayan Agricultural Soils, Northern Pakistan10.1016/j.gexplo.2023.107323 ↗
19. Mapping the Intellectual and Conceptual Structure of Research on CoDa in the ‘Social Sciences’ Scientific Domain. A Bibliometric Overview10.1016/j.gexplo.2023.107273 ↗
20. Mineral Exploration Model for Lhasa Area, Eastern Gangdese Metallogenic Belt: Based on Knowledge-Driven Compositional Data Analysis and Catchment Basin Division10.1016/j.gexplo.2024.107415 ↗
21. Identification of Weak Geochemical Anomalies Using Robust Neighborhood Statistics Coupled with GIS in Covered Areas10.1016/j.gexplo.2013.10.011 ↗
22. Spatial Analysis and Visualization of Exploration Geochemical Data10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.04.006 ↗
23. ArcFractal: An ArcGIS Add-In for Processing Geoscience Data Using Fractal/Multifractal Models10.1007/s11053-019-09513-5 ↗
24. The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data10.1080/00401706.1988.10488337 ↗
25. Vera, P.-G., Juan, J.E., and Raimon, T.-D. (2015). Modeling and Analysis of Compositional Data, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.. Statistics in Practice.
26. Cell-Wise Robust Covariance Estimation for Compositions, with Application to Geochemical Data10.1016/j.gexplo.2023.107299 ↗
27. Exploring Geochemical Data Using Compositional Techniques: A Practical Guide10.1016/j.gexplo.2024.107385 ↗
28. Robust CoDA Balances and the Role of the Variance in Complex Riverine Geochemical Systems10.1016/j.gexplo.2024.107438 ↗
29. A Performance Study of Local Outlier Detection Methods for Mineral Exploration with Geochemical Compositional Data10.1016/j.gexplo.2024.107392 ↗
30. How to Choose a Proper Representation of Compositional Data for Mineral Exploration?10.1016/j.gexplo.2024.107425 ↗
31. Witte, R.S., and Witte, J.S. (2017). Statistics, John Wiley & Sons.