Pore Pressure Prediction and Fluid Contact Determination: A Case Study of the Cretaceous Sediments in the Bredasdorp Basin, South Africa
Source abstract
Abstract
Pore pressure prediction gives drillers an early warning of potential oil and gas kicks, enabling them to adjust mud weight pre-emptively. A kick causes a delay in drilling practices, blowouts, and jeopardization of the wells. Changes in pore pressure affect the type of fluid contact in the reservoir. This study predicted the pore pressure and determined fluid contacts within the Lower Cretaceous and early Upper Cretaceous (Barremian to early Cenomanian) sandstone reservoirs of the Bredasdorp Basin using well logs and repeat formation test (RFT) data from three wells: E-BK1, E-AJ1, and E-CB1. Eaton’s method of developing a depth-dependent Normal Compact Trend (NCT), using resistivity and sonic wireline logs, as well as other methods including the Mathews and Kelly, Baker and Wood, and Modified Eaton and Bowers methods, were employed for pore pressure prediction. Eaton’s method provided reliable pore pressure results in all the wells when compared to alternative methods in this study. Overburden gradient and predicted pore pressures ranged from 1.84 gm/cc to 2.07 gm/cc and from 3563.74 psi to 4310.06 psi, respectively. Eaton’s resistivity and density/neutron log method results indicated normal pressure in E-BK1 and E-AJ1, as well as overpressured zones in E-AJ1. However, in E-CB1, the results showed only overpressured zones. The E-AJ1 significant overpressures were from 2685 m to 2716 m and from 2716 m to 2735 m in the pores exceeding 7991.54 psi. Gas–water contact (GOC) was encountered at 2967.5 m in E-BK1, while oil–gas contact (OGC) was at 2523 m in E-CB1, and gas–oil and oil–water contacts (GOC and OWC) were at 2699 m and 2723 m, respectively, in E-AJ1. In E-CB1, oil–water contact (OWC) was at 2528.5 m. Fluid contacts observed from the well logs and RFT data were in close agreement in E-AJ1, whereas there was no agreement in E-CB1 because the well log observations showed a shallower depth compared to RFT data with a difference of 5.5 m. This study illustrated the significance of an integrated approach to predicting fluid contacts and pore pressure within the reservoirs by showing that fluid contacts associated with overpressures were gas–water and oil–water contacts. In contrast, gas–oil contact was associated with normal pressure and under pressure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Drilling and Well Engineering · Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical and Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science and Agriculture, University of Fort Hare, Alice 5700, South Africa
Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of the Western Cape, Bellville 7535, South Africa
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. Acho, C.B. (2015). Assessing Hydrocarbon Potential in Cretaceous Sediments in the Western Bredasdorp Sub-Basin in the Outeniqua Basin South Africa. [Master’s Thesis, University of the Western Cape].
2. Baiyegunhi, T.L., Liu, K., Gwavava, O., Wagner, N., and Baiyegunhi, C. (2020). Geochemical evaluation of the cretaceous mudrocks and sandstones (Wackes) in the Southern Bredasdorp Basin, Offshore South Africa: Implications for hydrocarbon potential. Minerals, 10.10.3390/min10070595 ↗
3. Magoba, M., Opuwari, M., and Liu, K. (2024). The effect of diagenetic minerals on the petrophysical properties of sandstone reservoir: A case study of the upper shallow marine sandstones in the central Bredasdorp basin, offshore South Africa. Minerals, 14.10.3390/min14040396 ↗
4. Modeling pore pressure and fracture pressure using integrated well logging, drilling based interpretations and reservoir data in the Giant El Morgan oil Field, Gulf of Suez, Egypt10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2021.104165 ↗
5. Uchechukwu, E.E. (2014). Pore Pressure Prediction: A Case Study of Sandstone Reservoirs, Bredasdorp Basin, South Africa. [Master’s Thesis, University of the Western Cape].
6. Tang, H., Luo, J., Qiu, K., Chen, Y., and Tan, C.P. (2011, January 20–22). Worldwide pore pressure prediction: Case studies and methods. Proceedings of the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia.10.2118/140954-MS ↗
7. The role of pore pressure and its prediction in deep geothermal energy drilling–examples from the North Alpine Foreland Basin, SE Germany10.1144/petgeo2021-060 ↗
8. Pore pressure prediction of some selected wells from the Southern Pletmos Basin, offshore South Africa10.2113/gssajg.119.1.203 ↗
9. United Nations (2024, August 28). The Sustainable Development Goals Report. Available online: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2022.pdf.
10. Pore pressure and fracture pressure forecast in Niger Delta
11. Geological characteristics and abnormal pore pressure prediction in shale oil formations of the Dongying depression, China10.1002/ese3.641 ↗
12. The root cause analysis of an oilwell blowout and explosion in the Middle East
13. Dutta, N.C., Bachrach, R., and Mukerji, T. (2021). Quantitative Analysis of Geopressure for Geoscientists and Engineers, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108151726 ↗
14. Predictive pore pressure modeling using well-log data in the West Baram Delta, offshore Sarawak Basin, Malaysia10.1007/s40948-024-00903-5 ↗
15. Pore pressure prediction and modeling using well-logging data in one of the gas fields in south of Iran10.1016/j.petrol.2015.02.022 ↗
16. Predicating of Formation Pore Pressures in Tertiary Reservoirs Using Geophysical Wireline Log Data10.46717/igj.57.1C.6ms-2024-3-18 ↗
17. Effect of hydrodynamic tilting at fluid contacts to reservoir production performance10.1016/j.rineng.2020.100184 ↗
18. Niculescu, B.M., and Ciupercă, C.L. (July, January 30). Identification of fluid contacts by using formation pressure data and geophysical well logs. Proceedings of the 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference, Albena, Bulgaria.
19. An integrated approach of fluid contact determination of the Albian age sandstone reservoirs of the Orange Basin Offshore South Africa10.1080/1064119X.2020.1776432 ↗
20. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level
21. Pressure analysis and fluid contact prediction for alpha reservoir (a partially appraised field) onshore niger delta10.4314/njt.v36i3.20 ↗
22. Pore pressure prediction based on conventional well logs and seismic data using an advanced machine learning approach10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.09.049 ↗
23. Combining porosity and resistivity logs for pore pressure prediction10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108819 ↗
24. Pore pressure prediction in Niger Delta high pressure, high temperature (HP/HT) domains using well logs and 3D seismic data: A case study of X-field, onshore Niger Delta10.1007/s13202-021-01264-5 ↗
25. Predicting formation pore-pressure from well-log data with hybrid machine-learning optimization algorithms10.1007/s11053-021-09852-2 ↗
26. Integration of mud logging and wireline logging to detect overpressure zones: A case study of middle Miocene Kareem Formation in Ashrafi oil field, Gulf of Suez, Egypt10.1007/s13202-019-00781-8 ↗
27. Blinov, V., Weinheber, P., Vasilyev, D., Ivashin, M., Shtun, S., Samoylenko, A., Ganichev, D., Tereschuk, A., and Alexeev, I. (2015, January 26–28). Contact Determination, Fluid Typing and Deliverability Estimation in North Caspian Appraisal Wells. Proceedings of the SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference, Moscow, Russia.10.2118/176598-MS ↗
28. Proett, M.A., Chin, W.C., Manohar, M., Sigal, R., and Wu, J. (October, January 30). Multiple factors that influence wireline formation tester pressure measurements and fluid contacts estimates. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition?, New Orleans, LA, USA.
29. (2012). Petroleum Exploration in South Africa: Information and Opportunities Brochure, Brochures–Petroleum Agency SA. Available online: https://www.petroleumagencysa.com/brochures/.
30. Van Bloemenstein, C.B. (2006). Petrographic Characterization of Sandstones in Borehole E-BA1, Block 9, Bredasdorp Basin, Offshore South Africa. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of the Western Cape].
31. Hussien, T.M.H. (2014). Formation Evaluation of Deep-Water Reservoirs in the 13A and 14A Sequences of the Central Bredasdorp Basin, Offshore South Africa. [Master’s Thesis, University of the Western Cape].
32. Magoba, M. (2014). Petrophysical Evaluation of Sandstone Reservoir of Well E-AH1, E-BW1 and E-L1 Central Bredasdorp Basin, Offshore South Africa, Offshore South Africa. [Master’s Thesis, University of the Western Cape].
33. Geological modelling of the Aptian and Albian sequences within Block 9, the Bredasdorp basin, Offshore South Africa
34. Sandstone reservoir zonation of the North-Western Bredasdorp Basin South Africa using core data10.1016/j.jappgeo.2021.104425 ↗
35. Linking source and sink: Evaluating the balance between onshore erosion and offshore sediment accumulation since Gondwana break-up, South Africa10.1016/j.tecto.2007.11.040 ↗
36. Late Mesozoic sedimentary basins off the south coast of South Africa10.1016/S1874-5997(97)80016-0 ↗
37. Unusual biomarker maturation ratio changes through the oil window, a consequence of varied thermal history10.1016/S0146-6380(97)00059-4 ↗
38. Reconstruction and break-out model for the Falkland Islands within Gondwana10.1016/S0899-5362(99)00086-X ↗
39. Schalkwyk, H.J.M. (2006). Assessment Controls on Reservoir Performance and the Effects of Granulation Seam Mechanics in the Bredasdorp Basin, South Africa. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of the Western Cape].
40. Van Rensburg, T. (2016). Identification of the Physical Controls on the Deposition of Aptian and Albian Deep Water Sands in the Bredasdorp Basin, South Africa. [Master’s Thesis, University of Cape Town].
41. (2022, July 20). Petroleum Exploration Information and Opportunities: Petroleum Agency, South Africa Brochure. Available online: https://www.petroleumagencysa.com/images/pdfs/Pet_expl_opp_broch_2017bw1.pdf.
42. Opuwari, M., Afolayan, B., Mohammed, S., Amaechi, P.O., Bareja, Y., and Chatterjee, T. (2022). Petrophysical core-based zonation of OW oilfield in the Bredasdorp Basin South Africa. Sci. Rep., 12.10.1038/s41598-021-04447-6 ↗
43. Fadipe, O.A. (2009). Facies, Depositional Environments and Reservoir Properties of the Albian Age Gas Bearing Sandstone of the Ibhubesi Oil Field, Orange Basin, South Africa. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of the Western Cape].
44. Soekor, partners explore possibilities in Bredasdorp Basin off South Africa
45. The natural gas resources of southern Africa
46. Jungslager, E.H.A. (1996). Geological Evaluation of the Remaining Prospectivity for Oil and Gas of the Pre-1At1 “Synrift” Succession in Block 9, Republic of South Africa, SOE-EXP-RPT-0380.
47. Delineation of Sandstone Reservoir Flow Zones in the Central Bredasdorp Basin, South Africa, Using Core Samples10.1007/s11053-021-09885-7 ↗
48. Broad, D.S., Jungslager, E.H.A., McLachlan, I.R., and Roux, J. (2012). Offshore Mesozoic basins. S. Afr. J. Geol., 534–564.10.1016/B978-0-444-56357-6.00014-7 ↗
49. Yoshida, C., Ikeda, S., and Eaton, B.A. (1996, January 9). An investigative study of recent technologies used for prediction, detection, and evaluation of abnormal formation pressure and fracture pressure in North and South America. Proceedings of the IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, North and South America, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.10.2118/36381-MS ↗
50. Lasisi, A.O. (2014). Pore Pressure Prediction and Direct Hydrocarbon Indicator: Insight from the Southern Pletmos Basin, Offshore South Africa. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of the Western Cape].
51. Eaton, B.A. (1975, January 28). The equation for geopressure prediction from well logs. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX, USA.10.2118/5544-MS ↗
52. Predrill pore-pressure prediction using seismic data10.1190/1.1500391 ↗
53. On seismic computation with applications10.1190/1.1437084 ↗
54. Estimating pore pressure in the Cooper Basin, South Australia: Sonic log method in an uplifted basin10.1071/EG00441 ↗
55. Origin of overpressure and pore-pressure prediction in the Baram province, Brunei10.1306/08080808016 ↗
56. Matthews, M.D. (2004, January 5–10). Uncertainty-shale pore pressure from borehole resistivity. Proceedings of the ARMA North America Rock Mechanics Symposium Conference, Houston, TX, USA.
57. Pore pressure Prediction from Well logs: Methods, Modification, and New Approaches10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.06.001 ↗
58. Bateman, R. (1985). Open-Hole Log Analysis and Formation Evaluation, International Human Resources Development Corporation, University of California.
59. How to prepare formation pressure and fracture gradient
60. Comparison between conventional and NMR approaches for formation evaluation of presalt interval in the Buzios Field, Santos Basin, Brazil
61. Hossain, S., and Rahman, N. (2025). An integrated petrophysical and rock physics characterization of the Mangahewa Formation in the Pohokura field, Taranaki Basin. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-88639-4 ↗
62. Simulation of gas-water identification in sandstone hydrogen reservoirs based on pulsed neutron logging10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.03.039 ↗
63. Integrated petrophysical evaluation of Sarvak, Gadvan, and Fahliyan formations in the Zagros Area: Insights into reservoir characterization and hydrocarbon potential10.1007/s13202-025-01953-5 ↗
64. Beaumont, E.A., and Fiedler, F. (1999). Formation fluid pressure and its application. Treatise of Petroleum Geology/Handbook of Petroleum Geology: Exploring for Oil and Gas Traps, GeoScienceWorld.10.1306/TrHbk624C5 ↗
65. Tyhutyhani, N., Magoba, M., and Gwavava, O. (2025). Integration of Routine Core Data and Petrographic Analyses to Determine the Sandstone Reservoir Flow Units in the Bredasdorp Basin, Offshore South Africa. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 13.10.3390/jmse13030493 ↗
66. Smithson, T. (2016). HPHT wells. Oilfield Rev., 2016, Available online: https://oilproduction.net/files/HP-HT-Schlumberger.pdf.