3D Printed Posterior Connector Dimensions’ Effect on Fracture Properties of Provisional Two-Unit Fixed Dental Prostheses
Source abstract
Abstract
This in vitro study aims to investigate the fracture properties of 3D-printed resin provisional material designed with different connector dimensions for two-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). The master model was digitally designed following Shillingburg’s all-ceramic restoration tooth preparation guidelines and milled from aluminum. Four two-unit FDPs with different connector dimensions were designed: 2 × 3 mm, 3 × 3 mm, 3 × 4 mm, and 4 × 4 mm (width × length) (Groups A, B, C, and D, respectively; n = 10 for each group). These specimens were printed using 3D-printed resin material (Detax FREEPRINT® temp). Forty specimens were subjected to a three-point test using a universal testing machine until fracture. The failure mode was examined under a stereomicroscope. The Kruskal–Wallis test at α = 0.05 revealed non-significant differences in fracture resistance load but significantly different elastic modulus, yield strength, and compressive strength (p = 0.061, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively) among the different groups. The 2 × 3 mm connectors had higher means of modulus, yield strength, and compressive strength compared to the other groups. The study found that the maximum load causing fractures in 3D-printed provisional material connectors was consistent, regardless of connector cross-section variations. The 2 × 3 mm group performed best, while the 4 × 4 mm group performed worst.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of conventional denture, fixed prosthesis and milled bar overdenture for All-on-4 implant rehabilitation. A crossover study10.1111/clr.13524 ↗
2. (2023). The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms 2023: Tenth Edition. J. Prosthet. Dent., 130, e1–e3.10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.03.003 ↗
3. Rosenstiel, S.F., Land, M.F., and Fujimoto, J. (2006). Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics, Mosby/Elsevier.
4. Saeed, F., Muhammad, N., Khan, A.S., Sharif, F., Rahim, A., Ahmad, P., and Irfan, M. (2020). Prosthodontics dental materials: From conventional to unconventional. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl., 106.10.1016/j.msec.2019.110167 ↗
5. Single implant and crown versus fixed partial denture: A cost-benefit, patient-centred analysis
6. Are There Contraindications for Placing Dental Implants?10.1016/j.cden.2019.02.004 ↗
7. Park, S.M., Park, J.M., Kim, S.K., Heo, S.J., and Koak, J.Y. (2020). Flexural Strength of 3D-Printing Resin Materials for Provisional Fixed Dental Prostheses. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13183970 ↗
8. Zafar, M.S. (2020). Prosthodontic Applications of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA): An Update. Polymers, 12.10.3390/polym12102299 ↗
9. 3D printing in dentistry10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.914 ↗
10. Rapid prototyping in dentistry: Technology and application10.1007/s00170-005-2523-2 ↗
11. Additive Technology: Update on Current Materials and Applications in Dentistry10.1111/jopr.12510 ↗
12. A Review of 3D Printing in Dentistry: Technologies, Affecting Factors, and Applications10.1155/2021/9950131 ↗
13. 3D Printing and Digital Processing Techniques in Dentistry: A Review of Literature10.1002/adem.201801013 ↗
14. Additively Manufactured Custom Load-Bearing Implantable Devices10.21767/AMJ.2017.3093 ↗
15. Three-dimensional evaluation of marginal and internal fit of 3D-printed interim restorations fabricated on different finish line designs10.1016/j.jpor.2017.09.002 ↗
16. Fracture strength of yttria-stabilized zirconium-dioxide (Y-TZP) fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with different abutment core thicknesses and connector dimensions10.1111/jopr.12003 ↗
17. Comparative study of interim materials for direct fixed dental prostheses and their fabrication with CAD/CAM technique10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.023 ↗
18. The influence of the loading mode on the stress distribution on the connector region of metal-ceramic and all-ceramic fixed partial denture10.1111/j.1525-1594.2008.00544.x ↗
19. Effect of connector design on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures10.1067/mpr.2002.123850 ↗
20. Astudillo-Rubio, D., Delgado-Gaete, A., Bellot-Arcis, C., Montiel-Company, J.M., Pascual-Moscardo, A., and Almerich-Silla, J.M. (2018). Mechanical properties of provisional dental materials: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 13.10.1371/journal.pone.0196264 ↗
21. (2017). Orthodontic Applications of Biomaterials, Elsevier.
22. Shillingburg, H.T. (1997). Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics, Quintessence Pub. Co.
23. Scheid, R.C., and Woelfel, J.B. (2012). Woelfel’s Dental Anatomy, Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health.
24. Influence of Connector Diameter on Fracture Load of CAD/CAM-Processed Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Fixed Partial Dentures10.11607/ijp.5955 ↗
25. Influence of Connector Width on the Stress Distribution of Posterior Bridges under Loading
26. Fracture strength of four-unit Y-TZP FPD cores designed with varying connector diameter. An in-vitro study10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01770.x ↗
27. Hoaglin, D.C., Mosteller, F., and Tukey, J.W. (1983). Understanding Robust and Exploratory Data Analysis, Wiley.
28. Hoaglin, D.C., Mosteller, F., and Tukey, J.W. (1985). Exploring Data Tables, Trends, and Shapes, Wiley.
29. Tukey, J.W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis, Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
30. Hampel, F.R. (1986). Robust Statistics: The Approach Based on Influence Functions, Wiley.
31. Rousseeuw, P.J., and Leroy, A.M. (1987). Robust Regression and Outlier Detection, Wiley.10.1002/0471725382 ↗
32. Masri, R., and Driscoll, C.F. (2023). Clinical Applications of Digital Dental Technology, Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781119800613 ↗
33. A three-dimension finite element analysis to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit intermediate abutment prosthesis with rigid and nonrigid connector10.4103/1305-7456.156847 ↗
34. Connector design in a long-span-fixed dental prosthesis: A three-dimensional finite element analysis10.4103/0970-9290.116673 ↗
35. Shen, C. (2022). Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials, Elsevier.
36. Strength and reliability of four-unit all-ceramic posterior bridges10.1016/j.dental.2004.11.012 ↗