journal article·2025-06-20Open access

Machine Learning Ship Classifiers for Signals from Passive Sonars

Allyson A. da Silva, Lisandro Lovisolo, Tadeu N. Ferreira

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 13

Abstract

The accurate automatic classification of underwater acoustic signals from passive SoNaR is vital for naval operational readiness, enabling timely vessel identification and real-time maritime surveillance. This study evaluated seven supervised machine learning algorithms for ship identification using passive SoNaR recordings collected by the Brazilian Navy. The dataset encompassed 12 distinct ship classes and was processed in two ways—full-resolution and downsampled inputs—to assess the impacts of preprocessing on the model accuracy and computational efficiency. The classifiers included standard Support Vector Machines, K-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forests, Neural Networks and two less conventional approaches in this context: Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and the XGBoost ensemble method. Experimental results indicate that data decimation significantly affects classification accuracy. LDA and XGBoost delivered the strongest performance overall, with XGBoost offering particularly robust accuracy and computational efficiency suitable for real-time naval applications. These findings highlight the promise of advanced machine learning techniques for complex multiclass ship classification tasks, enhancing acoustic signal intelligence for military maritime surveillance and contributing to improved naval situational awareness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Underwater Acoustics Research · Maritime Navigation and Safety · Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Applied Technology, Marinha do Brasil, Avenida Brasil 10946, Rio de Janeiro 21012-350, RJ, Brazil

Post-Graduate Program in Electrical and Telecom Engineering, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rua Passo da Patria 156, Niteroi 24210-240, RJ, Brazil

Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering Department, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Sao Francisco Xavier 524, Rio de Janeiro 20550-900, RJ, Brazil

Funding

Brazilian Navy · CNPq

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Class-modular multi-layer perceptron networks for supporting passive sonar signal classification10.1049/iet-rsn.2015.0179 ↗
2. Passive Sonar Target Classification Using Deep Generative beta—VAE10.1109/LSP.2021.3071255 ↗
3. Underwater acoustics: Propagation, devices and systems10.1007/s10832-007-9059-9 ↗
4. Seawater Short-Range Electromagnetic Wave Communication Method Based on OFDM Subcarrier Allocation10.4236/jcc.2019.710006 ↗
5. European Parliament and Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union, Bueger, C., Liebetrau, T., and Franken, J. (2022). Security Threats to Undersea Communications Cables and Infrastructure—Consequences for the EU—In-Depth Analysis, Publications Office of the European Union.
6. Novel feature extraction of underwater targets by encoding hydro-acoustic signatures as image10.1016/j.apor.2023.103627 ↗
7. Using Side-Scan Sonar and N-Mixture Modeling to Estimate Atlantic Sturgeon Spawning Migration Abundance10.1002/nafm.10326 ↗
8. Meng, X., Xu, W., Shen, B., and Guo, X. (2023). A High-Efficiency Side-Scan Sonar Simulator for High-Speed Seabed Mapping. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23063083 ↗
9. Junejo, N.U.R., Sattar, M., Adnan, S., Sun, H., Adam, A.B.M., Hassan, A., and Esmaiel, H. (2023). A Survey on Physical Layer Techniques and Challenges in Underwater Communication Systems. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 11.10.3390/jmse11040885 ↗
10. Recommendations for enhancing the role of the auditory modality for processing sonar data10.1016/j.apacoust.2004.11.010 ↗
11. Passive sonar target classification using multi-layer perceptron trained by salp swarm algorithm10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.04.013 ↗
12. Fernandes, J.d.C.V., de Moura Junior, N.N., and de Seixas, J.M. (2022). Deep Learning Models for Passive Sonar Signal Classification of Military Data. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14112648 ↗
13. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
14. Linear discriminant analysis: A detailed tutorial10.3233/AIC-170729 ↗
15. Devnath, L., Fan, Z., Luo, S., Summons, P., and Wang, D. (2022). Detection and Visualisation of Pneumoconiosis Using an Ensemble of Multi-Dimensional Deep Features Learned from Chest X-rays. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph191811193 ↗
16. Jolliffe, I. (2002). Principal Component Analysis, Springer. [2nd ed.].
17. Tyagi, A.K., and Abraham, A. (2023). Chapter 5—Artificial intelligence and data science in pharmacogenomics-based drug discovery: Future of medicines. Data Science for Genomics, Academic Press.
18. Smith, J.O. (2024). Spectral Audio Signal Processing, W3K Publishing.
19. Waite, A. (2002). Sonar for Practising Engineers, Wiley.
20. Noise normalization technique for beamformed towed array data10.1121/1.411958 ↗
21. de Oliveira e Souza Filho, J.B. (2007). Classificação Neural de Sinais de Sonar Passivo. [Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro].
22. Selection of Wavelet and Thresholding Rule for Denoising the ECG Signals
23. Soares Filho, W. (2001). Classificação do Ruído Irradiado por Navios Usando Redes Neurais. [Ph.D. Thesis, COPPE/UFRJ]. (In Portuguese).
24. Esquef, P.A.A., Biscainho, L.W.P., Valimaki, V., and Karjalainen, M. (2002, January 10–13). Removal of Long Pulses from Audio Signals Using Two-pass Split-window Filtering. Proceedings of the AES Convention, Munich, Germany.
25. POS0474 FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH EROSIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS, A MULTIMARKER PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS (PCA) AND PRINCIPAL COMPONENT REGRESSION (PCR) ANALYSIS10.1136/annrheumdis-2023-eular.3624 ↗
26. Principal Component Analysis10.1038/s43586-022-00184-w ↗
27. Haykin, S. (2009). Neural Networks and Learning Machines, Pearson Prentice Hall. [3rd ed.].
28. Evelyn Fix, J.L., and Hodges, J. (1951). Discriminatory analysis nonparametric Discrimination: Consistency properties. Wright Pattersin Air Force Base-Dayton Ohio, Technical Report; US Air Force.10.1037/e471672008-001 ↗
29. Laufer, B., Docherty, P.D., Murray, R., Krueger-Ziolek, S., Jalal, N.A., Hoeflinger, F., Rupitsch, S.J., Reindl, L., and Moeller, K. (2023). Sensor Selection for Tidal Volume Determination via Linear Regression—Impact of Lasso versus Ridge Regression. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23177407 ↗
30. Approximation by Superpositions of Sigmoid Function10.1007/BF02551274 ↗
31. Does One-Against-All or One-Against-One Improve the Performance of Multiclass Classifications?
32. Bayesian Optimization With Improved Scalability and Derivative Information for Efficient Design of Nanophotonic Structures10.1109/JLT.2020.3023450 ↗
33. Murphy, K.P. (2012). Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective, MIT Press.
34. Christopher, M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer. [1st ed.]. Information Science and Statistics.
35. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G.E. (2012, January 3–6). Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe, NV, USA.
36. Recent advances in convolutional neural networks10.1016/j.patcog.2017.10.013 ↗