journal article·2025-06-20Open access

IoT Socioenvironmental Assessment Instrument: Validation Process Applying Delphi Method

Adriane Cavalieri, Fabio Bottacci, Jean-Christophe De Coster, Amarildo Fernandes, Francisco Sabbadini, João Reis, Marlene Amorim

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 13

Abstract

Industry 4.0 technologies offer significant opportunities to enhance sustainable production and circular economy practices in the face of challenges arising from climate change. Considering the growing interest in this field, the literature review exposed that, particularly in the case of the Internet of Things (IoT), there is a need for empirical assessments of the impact of this technology on sustainability and circularity. This paper presents the validation process of an original assessment tool that evaluates IoT’s alignment with the socioenvironmental and circular context of manufacturing organizations and their supply chains. Emphasis is placed on the construct titled “IoT Technology Expectations”. After systematically conducting a literature review, this study employed the Delphi method in conjunction with statistical analyses to refine or formulate new indicators or statements based on expert consensus, validating the proposed assessment tool. The findings of this research contribute to management practices by providing an instrument to assess the current stance of top management and other key managers (production, project and supply chain) on IoT use in manufacturing operations or supply chains from a socioenvironmental and circular perspective. The instrument serves as a starting point for exploring IoT’s potential in circular economy practices. Academically, it provides a detailed explanation of the Delphi method and its application and outcomes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Sustainable Supply Chain Management · Environmental Sustainability in Business

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Assessments and Industrial Processes (DIAPI), National Institute of Technology (INT), Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI), Rio de Janeiro 20081-312, Brazil

GOVCOPP, Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism, Aveiro University, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal

VINCI Digital, São Paulo 04558-030, Brazil

Managium Consulting, Rio de Janeiro 22210-030, Brazil

Department of Industrial Engineering, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-909, Brazil

Department of Production Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Rio de Janeiro State University, Resende 27537-000, Brazil

Department of Production Engineering, School of Metallurgical Industrial Engineering of Volta Redonda, Federal Fluminense University, Volta Redonda 27255-125, Brazil

Funding

Governance, Competitiveness, and Public Policy

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Sustainable Manufacturing: Trends and Research Challenges10.1080/09537287.2011.591619 ↗
2. Malek, J., and Desai, T.N. (2020). A Systematic Literature Review to Map Literature Focus of Sustainable Manufacturing. J. Clean. Prod., 256.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120345 ↗
3. Shortcomings in Reporting Contributions towards the Sustainable Development Goals10.1002/csr.2129 ↗
4. Organizations’ Engagement with Sustainable Development Goals: From cherry-picking to SDG-washing?10.1002/csr.2202 ↗
5. The Efforts of Manufacturing Enterprises toward Sustainable Development under Voluntary Environmental Policy: The Roles of External Pressure, Attraction, and Internal Attributes10.1002/csr.2486 ↗
6. United Nations General Assembly (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
7. Accounting for the Triple Bottom Line10.1108/eb025539 ↗
8. Abubakr, M., Abbas, A., Tomaz, I., Soliman, M., Luqman, M., and Hegab, H. (2020). Sustainable and Smart Manufacturing: An Integrated Approach. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12062280 ↗
9. OECD (2011). The OECD Sustainable Manufacturing Toolkit.
10. Smart Manufacturing as a Strategic Tool to Mitigate Sustainable Manufacturing Challenges: A Case Approach10.1007/s10479-023-05472-6 ↗
11. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2015). Delivering the Circular Economy: A Toolkit for Policymakers, Ellen MacArthur Foundation.
12. The Current Sustainability Scenario of Industry 4.0 Enabling Technologies in Indian Manufacturing Industries10.1108/IJPPM-04-2020-0196 ↗
13. Laskurain-Iturbe, I., Arana-Landín, G., Landeta-Manzano, B., and Uriarte-Gallastegi, N. (2021). Exploring the Influence of Industry 4.0 Technologies on the Circular Economy. J. Clean. Prod., 321.10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128944 ↗
14. Li, Y., Dai, J., and Cui, L. (2020). The Impact of Digital Technologies on Economic and Environmental Performance in the Context of Industry 4.0: A Moderated Mediation Model. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 229.10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107777 ↗
15. Digital Supplier Selection Reinforcing Supply Chain Quality Management Systems to Enhance Firm’s Performance10.1108/TQM-07-2020-0160 ↗
16. Digitalization for Circular Economy and Operational Excellence Practices: A Paradox Theory Perspective on Performance Improvement in Manufacturing Firms10.1002/bse.4031 ↗
17. Taddei, E., Sassanelli, C., Rosa, P., and Terzi, S. (2022). Circular Supply Chains in the Era of Industry 4.0: A Systematic Literature Review. Comput. Ind. Eng., 170.10.1016/j.cie.2022.108268 ↗
18. Nižetić, S., Šolić, P., López-de-Ipiña González-de-Artaza, D., and Patrono, L. (2020). Internet of Things (IoT): Opportunities, Issues and Challenges towards a Smart and Sustainable Future. J. Clean. Prod., 274.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122877 ↗
19. Bavaresco, R., Arruda, H., Rocha, E., Barbosa, J., and Li, G.-P. (2021). Internet of Things and Occupational Well-Being in Industry 4.0: A Systematic Mapping Study and Taxonomy. Comput. Ind. Eng., 161.10.1016/j.cie.2021.107670 ↗
20. Bag, S., Gupta, S., and Kumar, S. (2021). Industry 4.0 Adoption and 10R Advance Manufacturing Capabilities for Sustainable Development. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 231.10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107844 ↗
21. Strategies for Integrating Stakeholders into Sustainability Innovation: A Configurational Perspective10.1111/jpim.12481 ↗
22. Internet of Things and Supply Chain Management: A Literature Review10.1080/00207543.2017.1402140 ↗
23. De Schoenmakere, M., and Gillabel, J. (2017). Circular by Design: Products in the Circular Economy.
24. Piscicelli, L. (2023). The Sustainability Impact of a Digital Circular Economy. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 61.10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101251 ↗
25. Cavalieri, A., Reis, J., and Amorim, M. (2024). Socioenvironmental Assessment and Application Process for IOT: A Comprehensive Approach. J. Clean. Prod., 436.10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140348 ↗
26. Cavalieri, A., Reis, J., and Amorim, M. (2022). A Conceptual Model Proposal to Assess the Effectiveness of IoT in Sustainability Orientation in Manufacturing Industry: An Environmental and Social Focus. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12115661 ↗
27. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., and Altman, D.G. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. BMJ, 339.10.1136/bmj.b2535 ↗
28. Building a Conceptual Framework: Philosophy, Definitions, and Procedure10.1177/160940690900800406 ↗
29. The Content Validity Index: Are You Sure You Know What’s Being Reported? Critique and Recommendations10.1002/nur.20147 ↗
30. Caldarelli, G. (2024). Expert Perspectives on Blockchain in the Circular Economy: A Delphi Study with Industry Specialists. J. Clean. Prod., 465.10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142781 ↗
31. Delphi Study on Supply Chain Flexibility10.1080/00207540500056102 ↗
32. Is There a Consensus on Consensus Methodology? Descriptions and Recommendations for Future Consensus Research10.1097/ACM.0000000000001092 ↗
33. The Delphi Method as a Research Tool: An Example, Design Considerations and Applications10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002 ↗
34. A Systematic Assessment of Rigor in Information Systems Ranking-Type Delphi Studies10.1016/j.im.2013.03.003 ↗
35. Miller, L. (2006). Determining What Could/Should Be: The Delphi Technique and Its Application, Western Educational Research Association.
36. Reis, J., Rosado, D., Cohen, Y., Pousa, C., and Cavalieri, A. (2022). Green Defense Industries in the European Union: The Case of the Battle Dress Uniform for Circular Economy. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su142013018 ↗
37. A Comparison of Psychometric Properties and Normality in 4-, 5-, 6-, and 11-Point Likert Scales10.1080/01488376.2011.580697 ↗
38. Feroz, A.K., Zo, H., and Chiravuri, A. (2021). Digital Transformation and Environmental Sustainability: A Review and Research Agenda. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13031530 ↗
39. Chang, S.-I., Chang, L.-M., and Liao, J.-C. (2020). Risk Factors of Enterprise Internal Control under the Internet of Things Governance: A Qualitative Research Approach. Inf. Manag., 57.10.1016/j.im.2020.103335 ↗
40. Questionnaires Mentioned in Academic Research 1996–2019: Rapid Increase but Declining Citation Impact10.1002/leap.1417 ↗
41. Ball, H.L. (2019). Conducting Online Surveys. J. Hum. Lact., 35.10.1177/0890334419848734 ↗
42. An Assessment of Survey Research in POM: From Constructs to Theory10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00021-7 ↗
43. Eco-Innovation Pathways to a Circular Economy: Envisioning Priorities through a Delphi Approach10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.049 ↗