journal article·2025-06-16Open access

Non-Subsampled Contourlet Transform-Based Domain Feedback Information Distillation Network for Suppressing Noise in Seismic Data

Kang Chen, Guangzhi Zhang, Cong Tang, Qi Ran, Long Wen, Song Han, Han Liang, Haiyong Yi

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 12

Abstract

Seismic signal processing often relies on general convolutional neural network (CNN)-based models, which typically focus on features in the time domain while neglecting frequency characteristics. Moreover, down-sampling operations in these models tend to cause the loss of critical high-frequency details. To this end, we propose a feedback information distillation network (FID-N) in the non-subsampled contourlet transform (NSCT) domain to remarkably suppress seismic noise. The method aims to enhance denoising performance by preserving the fine-grained details and frequency characteristics of seismic data. The FID-N mainly consists of a two-path information distillation block used in a recurrent manner to form a feedback mechanism, carrying an output to correct previous states, which fully exploits competitive features from seismic signals and effectively realizes the signal restoration step by step across time. Additionally, the NSCT has an excellent high-frequency response and powerful curve and surface description capabilities. We suggest converting the noise suppression problem into NSCT coefficient prediction, which maintains more detailed high-frequency information and promotes the FID-N to further suppress noise. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real seismic datasets demonstrated that our method significantly outperformed the SOTA methods, particularly in scenarios with low signal-to-noise ratios and in recovering high-frequency components.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Image and Signal Denoising Methods · Advanced Image Fusion Techniques · Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China

Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Chengdu 610094, China

Oil and Gas Resources Division, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Chengdu 610094, China

Funding

Major Science and Technology Project of PetroChina Company Limited

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Canales, L.L. (1984, January 2). Random noise reduction. Proceedings of the 54th Annual International Meeting, Atlanta, GA, USA.10.1190/1.1894168 ↗
2. Application of wavelet transform in removing noise and improving resolution of seismic data
3. Coherent and random noise attenuation using the curvelet transform10.1190/1.2840373 ↗
4. Random noise attenuation by f-x empirical mode decomposition predictive filtering10.1190/geo2013-0080.1 ↗
5. Simultaneous seismic data interpolation and denoising with a new adaptive method based on treamlet transform10.1093/gji/ggv072 ↗
6. Chen, Y., and Fomel, S. (2015, January 18–23). EMD-seislet transform. Proceedings of the 85th SEG Annual International Meeting, New Orleans, LA, USA.
7. An effective approach to attenuate random noise based on compressive sensing and curvelet transform10.1088/1742-2132/13/2/135 ↗
8. Liu, W., Cao, S., and Chen, Y. (June, January 30). Application of variational mode decomposition in random noise attenuation and time frequency analysis of seismic data. Proceedings of the EAGE 78th Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria.
9. Simultaneous dictionary learning and denoising for seismic data10.1190/geo2013-0382.1 ↗
10. Fast dictionary learning based on data-driven tight frame for 3-D seismic data denoising
11. Denoising seismic data using the nonlocal means algorithm10.1190/geo2011-0235.1 ↗
12. Non-dyadic curvelet transform and its application in seismic noise elimination
13. Adaptive variable time fractional anisotropic diffusion filtering for seismic data noise attenuation10.1109/TGRS.2015.2490158 ↗
14. Suppression of random noise in seismic data based on 3D Steerable Pyramid decomposition
15. Wavelet-based generation of fully non-stationary random processes with application to seismic ground motions10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111833 ↗
16. Kim, J., Lee, J.K., and Lee, K.M. (2016, January 26–30). Accurate image super-resolution using very deep convolutional networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.182 ↗
17. Li, J.C., Fang, F.M., Mei, K.F., and Zhang, G. (2018, January 8–14). Multi-scale residual network for image super-resolution. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-030-01237-3_32 ↗
18. Hui, Z., Wang, X.M., and Gao, X.B. (2018, January 18–23). Fast and accurate single image super-resolution via information distillation network. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00082 ↗
19. Wang, L., Li, D., Zhu, Y.S., Tian, L., and Shan, Y. (2020, January 13–19). Dual Super-Resolution Learning for Semantic Segmentation. Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00383 ↗
20. and Kwon, S. (2020). CLSTM: Deep feature-based speech emotion recognition using the hierarchical ConvLSTM network. Mathematics, 8.10.3390/math8122133 ↗
21. Clustering-based speech emotion recognition by incorporating learned features and deep BiLSTM10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990405 ↗
22. Zhang, K., Gool, V., and Timofte, R. (2020, January 13–19). Deep unfolding network for image superresolution. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00328 ↗
23. Marco, P., Marco, V., and Adrian, H. (2021, January 10–17). Attention-Based Multi-Reference Learning for Image Super-Resolution. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, QC, Canada.
24. Xie, W.B., Song, D.H., Xu, C., Xu, C.J., Zhang, H., and Wang, Y. (2021, January 10–17). Learning frequency-aware dynamic network for efficient super-resolution. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00427 ↗
25. A two stage attentive network for single image super-resolution10.1109/TCSVT.2021.3071191 ↗
26. NS2NS: Self-learning for seismic image denoising
27. Zhang, C., Frogner, C., and Araya-Polo, M. (2014, January 19). Machine-learning based automated fault detection in seismic traces. Proceedings of the Conference of 76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, NL, USA.10.3997/2214-4609.20141500 ↗
28. Cao, J., Wu, S., and He, X. (2016, January 12–16). Gas reservoir identification basing on deep learning of seismic-print characteristics. Proceedings of the AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA.
29. A scalable deep learning platform for identifying geologic features from seismic attributes10.1190/tle36030249.1 ↗
30. Using supervised machine learning to improve active source signal retrieval10.1785/0220170239 ↗
31. Intelligent interpolation by Monte Carlo machine learning10.1190/geo2017-0294.1 ↗
32. Study of seismic data denoising based on U-Net deep neural network
33. Mai, H. (2019). Research on Seismic Data Denoising Based on Deep Residual Network, China University of Petroleum.
34. Random noise attenuation in seismic data based on dual residual networks
35. Yu, K. (2020). Research on Seismic Data Denoising Method Based on Symmetric Dilated Convolution Neural Network, Chengdu University of Technology.
36. Seismic random noise attenuation based on PCC classification in transform domain10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2959024 ↗
37. Noise attenuation of seismic data via deep multiscale fusion network10.1155/2021/6612346 ↗
38. Sang, Y., Yu, B.W., Wang, Q.J., and Yin, S.S. (2021, January 1). Suppressing seismic coherent and incoherent noise via deep neural network. Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart Internet of Things, Jeju, Republic of Korea.10.1109/SmartIoT52359.2021.00059 ↗
39. Deep learning for simultaneous seismic image super-resolution and denoising
40. Deep learning using synthetic seismic data by Fourier domain adaptation in seismic structure interpretation10.1109/LGRS.2022.3218911 ↗
41. D2UNet: Dual decoder U-Net for seismic image super-resolution reconstruction10.1109/TGRS.2023.3264459 ↗
42. Swin transformer for seismic denoising
43. Efficient seismic data denoising via deep learning with improved MCA-SCUNet
44. An Adaptive Time-Frequency Denoising Method for Suppressing Source-Related Seismic Strong Noise
45. Zamir, A.R., Wu, T.L., Sun, L., Shen, W.B., Shi, B.E., Malik, J., and Savarese, S. (2017, January 21). Feedback networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.196 ↗
46. Glorot, X., Bordes, A., and Bengio, Y. (2011, January 11–13). Deep sparse rectifier neural networks. Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), Fort Lauderdale, FL USA.
47. Mallat, S. (2008). A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing: The Sparse Way, Academic Press.
48. Labate, D., Lim, W.Q., Kutyniok, G., and Weiss, G. (2005, January 17). Sparse multidimensional representation using shearlets. Proceedings of the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE), Wavelets XI, Bellingham, WA, USA.10.1117/12.613494 ↗
49. The nonsubsampled contourlet transform: Theory, design, and applications10.1109/TIP.2006.877507 ↗
50. Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity10.1109/TIP.2003.819861 ↗