Show source-provided references
3. Liquefaction mitigation by induced partial saturation: A comprehensive review
4. Liquefaction-induced damage to bridges
5. Turner, B., Brandenberg, S.J., and Stewart, J.P. (2013, January 1–2). Evaluation of collapse and non-collapse of parallel bridges affected by liquefaction and lateral spreading. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, Japan.
6. Shafapourtehrany, M., Batur, M., Shabani, F., Pradhan, B., Kalantar, B., and Özener, H. (2023). A comprehensive review of geospatial technology applications in earthquake preparedness, emergency management, and damage assessment. Remote Sens., 15.
10.3390/rs15071939 ↗7. Learning from past earthquake disasters: The need for knowledge management system to enhance infrastructure resilience in indonesia
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102424 ↗12. Probabilistic framework for regional loss assessment due to earthquake-induced liquefaction including epistemic uncertainty
10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106493 ↗13. Soil liquefaction in seismic events: Pioneering predictive models using machine learning and advanced regression techniques
10.1007/s12665-024-11480-x ↗14. Geospatial data-driven assessment of earthquake-induced liquefaction impact mapping using classifier and cluster ensembles
10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110266 ↗16. Wang, C., Chen, Q., and Arduino, P. (2024). Data-centric seismic soil liquefaction assessment: Approaches, data, and tools. Databases for Data-Centric Geotechnics, CRC Press.
10.1201/9781003441946-14 ↗17. Dieck, R.H. (2007). Measurement Uncertainty: Methods and Applications, ISA.
20. Continuous-discrete hybrid bayesian network models for predicting earthquake-induced liquefaction based on the vs database
10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105231 ↗21. Liquefaction potential assessment of soils using machine learning techniques: A state-of-the-art review from 1994–2021
10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-7788 ↗22. A hyper parameterized artificial neural network approach for prediction of the factor of safety against liquefaction
10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107109 ↗23. Hameed, M.M., Masood, A., Srivastava, A., Abd Rahman, N., Razalid, S.F.M., Salem, A., and Elbeltagi, A. (2024). Investigating a hybrid extreme learning machine coupled with dingo optimization algorithm for modeling liquefaction triggering in sand-silt mixtures. Sci. Rep., 14.
10.1038/s41598-024-61059-6 ↗24. Alobaidi, M.H., Meguid, M.A., and Chebana, F. (2019). Predicting seismic-induced liquefaction through ensemble learning frameworks. Sci. Rep., 9.
10.1038/s41598-019-48044-0 ↗25. Cone penetration test-based assessment of liquefaction potential using machine and hybrid learning approaches
10.1007/s41939-024-00447-x ↗27. Reliability analysis for liquefaction risk assessment for the city of patna, india using hybrid computational modeling
10.1007/s12594-022-2187-7 ↗29. Riedmiller, M., and Lernen, A. (2014). Multi layer perceptron. Machine Learning Lab Special Lecture, University of Freiburg.
30. Xgboost: Extreme Gradient Boosting
31. From hazard to natural risk: Tangier-tetouan region example (Rif, Morocco)
34. Oweiss, K.G. (2010). Statistical Signal Processing for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, Academic Press.
10.1155/2009/105086 ↗36. SESAME (2004). Guidelines for the Implementation of the H/V Spectral Ratio Technique on Ambient Vibrations: Measurements, Processing and Interpretation, Springer. Technical Report, SESAME European Research Project WP12.
39. Gomez, B., and Kadri, U. (2021). Earthquake source characterization by machine learning algorithms applied to acoustic signals. Sci. Rep., 11.
10.1038/s41598-021-02483-w ↗42. Data-driven and machine learning identification of seismic reference stations in europe
10.1093/gji/ggaa199 ↗44. Liu, R., and Misra, S. (2022). Machine learning assisted recovery of subsurface energy: A review. Authorea Prepr., 16.
45. Ioffe, S. (2015). Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. arXiv.
46. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.
10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗48. Sokolova, M., Japkowicz, N., and Szpakowicz, S. (2006). Beyond accuracy, f-score and roc: A family of discriminant measures for performance evaluation. Australasian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Springer.
10.1007/11941439_114 ↗