The Influence of the Spillover Punishment Mechanism Under P-MA Theory on the Balance of Perceived Value in the Intelligent Construction of Coal Mines
Source abstract
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to examine the game-theoretic relationship between local governments and coal mining enterprises with regard to the issue of coal mine intelligent construction. Firstly, this paper employs prospect theory to construct the value perception function and the decision weight function, which are then used to optimize the parameters of the traditional income matrix. The equilibrium point is then analyzed for stability under different conditions. Subsequently, Vensim PLE and MATLAB simulation software are employed to substantiate the impact of spillover penalties and associated parameters on the value perception equilibrium of the two parties. The results of the simulation demonstrate that, in addition to the initial strategy selected, the spillover penalty exerts a considerable inhibitory effect on the process of enterprise intelligence construction. Secondly, from the perspective of value perception, the lower the costs to enterprises of carrying out intelligent construction in terms of labor and mental effort, the more enterprises are inclined to engage in this construction. The higher the costs to enterprises of complying with strict government regulation, and the lower the costs to enterprises of deregulation, the more the government can govern by non-interference. Finally, the behavioral trends of local government departments are also correlated with additional revenue they receive from firms and the factor of fines linked to government performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geoscience and Mining Technology · Evaluation and Optimization Models
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Economics and Management, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
The Minerals Industry Safety and Health Centre (MISHC), The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
Funding
Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Sciences Planning Fund Project
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. International Energy Agency (2023). Coal in Net Zero Transitions, OECD Publishing.
2. Research and practice of intelligent coal mine technology systems in China10.1007/s40789-022-00491-3 ↗
3. A deep convolutional neural network model for intelligent discrimination between coal and rocks in coal mining face10.1155/2020/2616510 ↗
4. (2021). Intelligent Mine Construction Standard (Standard No. GB/T 51272-2021).
5. State Council (2023, September 01). Guofa No. 8: Smart Mining Development Guidelines, Available online: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2020-03/04/content_5486720.htm.
6. Gao, J., Yang, W., Shan, X., Yu, K., and Zhang, Y. (2025). An Intervention Study of Employee Safety Behavior in Nuclear Power Plants Under Construction Based on the SEM-SD Model. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15060954 ↗
7. Abegaz, T., Deressa, W., and Moen, B.E. (2025). The Relationship Between Safety Climate and Safety Performance in the Large-Scale Building Construction Industry in Ethiopia: A Structural Equation Model Using the NOSACQ-50 Tool. Safety, 11.10.3390/safety11010028 ↗
8. Ethical VS abusive leadership: How construction project manager influences workers’ safety behavior with the mediating role of alcohol use and moderating role of alcohol climate10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106683 ↗
9. Optimal allocation of safety resources in small and medium construction enterprises10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106680 ↗
10. Kima, O., Urlainis, A., Wang, K.C., and Shohet, I.M. (2024). Safety climate in small and medium construction enterprises. Smart Sustain. Built Environ., Available online: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/sasbe-01-2024-0038/full/html.10.1108/SASBE-01-2024-0038 ↗
11. Zeibak-Shini, R., Malka, H., Kima, O., and Shohet, I.M. (2024). Analytical Hierarchy Process for Construction Safety Management and Resource Allocation. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14209265 ↗
12. Kim, M.J., Ahn, S.P., Shin, S.H., Kang, M.G., and Won, J.H. (2025). Comparison of Influencing Factors on Safety Behavior and Perception Between Contractor Managers and Subcontractor Workers at Korean Construction Sites. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15060963 ↗
13. Construction SMEs safety challenges in water sector in Oman10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105156 ↗
14. Adzivor, E., Emuze, F., Ahiabu, M., and Kusedzi, M. (2024). Scaling up a positive safety culture among construction small and medium-sized enterprises in Ghana. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 21.10.3390/ijerph21070817 ↗
15. Gong, X., Li, B., Yang, Y., Li, M., Li, T., Zhang, B., Zheng, L., Duan, H., Liu, P., and Hu, X. (2025). Construction and application of optimized model for mine water inflow prediction based on neural network and ARIMA model. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-85477-2 ↗
16. Kaewunruen, S., O’Nell, C., and Sengsri, P. (2025). Digital twin-driven strategic demolition plan for circular asset management of bridge infrastructures. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-94117-8 ↗
17. Historical evolution and benefit–cost explanation of periodical fluctuation in coal mine safety supervision: An evolutionary game analysis framework10.1016/j.ejor.2014.12.046 ↗
18. Evolutionary game analysis of coal-mine enterprise internal safety inspection system in China based on system dynamics10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101673 ↗
19. Effectiveness research on the multi-player evolutionary game of coal-mine safety regulation in China based on system dynamics10.1016/j.ssci.2018.07.014 ↗
20. Yu, K., Zhou, L.J., Cao, Q.G., and Li, Z. (2019). Evolutionary game research on symmetry of workers’ behavior in coal mine enterprises. Symmetry, 11.10.3390/sym11020156 ↗
21. Evolutionary game analysis and stability control scenarios of coal mine safety inspection system in China based on system dynamics10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.005 ↗
22. Intelligent and ecological coal mining as well as clean utilization technology in China: Review and prospects10.1016/j.ijmst.2018.06.005 ↗
23. Multiparty evolutionary game model in coal mine safety management and its application10.1155/2018/9620142 ↗
24. Tripartite evolutionary game and simulation analysis of coal mining safe production supervision under the Chinese central government’s reward and punishment mechanism10.1155/2021/5298890 ↗
25. Evolutionary game analysis of coal enterprise resource integration under government regulation10.1007/s11356-021-15503-z ↗
26. Evolutionary game research on the impact of environmental regulation on overcapacity in coal industry10.1155/2021/5558112 ↗
27. Qin, Y.B., and Wang, W.P. (2022). Research on ecological compensation mechanism for energy economy sustainable based on evolutionary game model. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15082895 ↗
28. Evolutionary game analysis of the stress effect of cross-regional transfer of resource-exhausted enterprises10.1155/2019/7652430 ↗
29. Zhang, L. (2017). Research on the processing and identification of joint and several liabilities in the civil and commercial law of China. International Conference on Education, Sports, Arts and Management Engineering, Atlantis Press.10.2991/icesame-17.2017.163 ↗
30. Observed punishment spillover effects: A laboratory investigation of behavior in a social dilemma10.1007/s10683-014-9399-7 ↗
31. Autonomous rectification behavior of coal mine safety hazards under a gambling mind: From an evolutionary game perspective10.1016/j.psep.2022.11.064 ↗
32. Prospect theory: A literature review10.1016/S1057-5219(96)90004-6 ↗
33. Thirty years of prospect theory in economics: A review and assessment10.1257/jep.27.1.173 ↗
34. Health values and prospect theory10.1177/0272989X9901900313 ↗
35. Mental accounting and categorization10.1016/0749-5978(92)90006-S ↗
36. Mental accounting and consumer choice10.1287/mksc.1070.0330 ↗
37. Heterogeneity in evolutionary games: An analysis of the risk perception10.1098/rspa.2020.0116 ↗
38. Zhao, H., Liu, X., and Wang, Y.T. (2022). Evolutionary game analysis of opportunistic behavior of Sponge City PPP projects: A perceived value perspective. Sci. Rep., 12.10.1038/s41598-022-12830-0 ↗
39. Original and cumulative prospect theory: A discussion of empirical differences10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199703)10:1<53::AID-BDM245>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
40. Director interlocks and spillover effects of reputational penalties from financial reporting fraud10.5465/amj.2008.32626007 ↗
41. Support theory: A non-extensional representation of subjective probability10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.547 ↗
42. On the psychology of ‘if only’: Regret and the comparison between factual and counterfactual outcomes10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.04.001 ↗
43. Yuan, X., Wu, Y., Sun, L., and Wang, X. (2023). Game analysis of the influence of the miner under carbon emotion on the intelligent development strategies of the SMEE in coal mines. Processes., 11.10.3390/pr11020550 ↗
44. An introduction to prospect theory
45. Li, M.-Q., Tu, J., and Su, C. (2020, January 22–24). Evolutionary Game Analysis on Safety Supervision and Regulation of Coal Mine. Proceedings of the 2020 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, Hefei, China.
46. Compliance spillovers across taxes: The role of penalties and detection10.1016/j.jebo.2019.06.015 ↗
47. Unifying dynamical and structural stability of equilibria
48. Decision-making under uncertainty—A field study of cumulative prospect theory10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.12.017 ↗
49. Development of safety psychological capital scale for coal miners