Show source-provided references
6. Arthur, L., Darby, A., Rafoneke, B., Daws, G., MacDonald, D., Innaurato, N., Mancini, R., Rondena, E., Zaninetti, A., and Coutts, A. (1994). Ground movement model validation at the Heathrow Express trial tunnel. Tunnelling’94: Papers Presented at the Seventh International Symposium,‘Tunnelling’ 94’, London, UK, 5–7 July 1994, Springer US.
7. Ho, C.E. (2002, January 14–16). Settlement performance of large diameter friction caissons in bouldery clay. Proceedings of the Deep Foundations 2002: An International Perspective on Theory, Design, Construction, and Performance, Orlando, FL, USA.
10.1061/40601(256)38 ↗11. Centrifugal model test study of caisson sinking resistance
13. Chandler, J., Hinch, L., Fair, R., Hughes, D., Peraino, J., and Rowe, P. (1984). Jamuna river 230 kV crossing, Bangladesh. Part 2: Construction. IEE Proceedings C (Generation, Transmission and Distribution), IET.
10.1049/ip-c.1984.0044 ↗14. Safiullah, A. (2005, January 10). Geotechnical problems of bridge construction in Bangladesh. Proceedings of the Japan-Bangladesh Joint Seminar on Advances in Bridge Engineering, Dacca, Bangladesh.
15. Real-time monitoring of large-diameter caissons
16. Guo, M., Dong, X., and Li, J. (2021). Study on the earth pressure during sinking stage of super large caisson foundation. Appl. Sci., 11.
10.3390/app112110488 ↗17. Wood, D.M. (2017). Geotechnical Modelling, CRC Press.
18. Wood, D.M. (2005). Physical modelling. Prediction and Simulation Methods in Geomechanics: State-of-the-Art Report on Selected Topics by TC-34, Japanese Geotechnical Society.
19. Askarinejad, A., Laue, J., Zweidler, A., Iten, M., Bleiker, E., Buschor, H., and Springman, S.M. (2012, January 23–24). Physical modelling of rainfall induced landslides undercontrolled climatic conditions. Proceedings of the Eurofuge 2012, Delft, The Netherlands.
20. Knothe, S. Observations of surface movements under influence of mining and their theoretical interpretation. Proceedings of the European Congress on Ground Movement, Leeds, UK, 9–12 April 1957.
24. Physical model test and numerical simulation for the stability analysis of deep gas storage cavern group located in bedded rock salt formation
10.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.02.015 ↗25. Physical modeling of land subsidence due to underground cavity and its monitoring by electrical resistivity survey in geotechnical centrifuge
26. Physical modeling of failure process of the excavation in horizontal strata based on IR thermography
27. Sandbox modeling of the shallow tunnel face collapse
29. Model test of interaction between load-caused landslide and double-row anti-slide piles by transparent soil material
10.1007/s13369-020-05256-1 ↗32. White, D., Gaudin, C., and Take, W. (2013, January 2–6). General report for TC104 physical modelling in geotechnics. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering: Challenges and Innovations in Geotechnics, ICSMGE 2013, Paris, France.
33. Green, D. (2014). Modelling geomorphic systems: Scaled physical models. Geomorphological Techniques, British Society for Geomorphology.
35. Introducing advanced topics in geotechnical engineering teaching–tunnel modelling
36. Beguin, R., Fry, J.-J., Picault, C., Courivaud, J.-R., Faure, Y.-H., and Philippe, P. (2012, January 29–31). Control of the risk of dike failure caused by contact erosion. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion, Paris, France.
38. Physical and software modelling for challenging soil structure interaction
39. Houda, M., Jenck, O., Emeriault, F., Briançon, L., and Gotteland, P. (2013, January 2–6). Development of a threedimensional small scale model to simulate soil improvement by rigid piles. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris, France.
40. Sreelakshmi, G., Asha, M., and Suraj, S. Application of the particle image velocimetry to study pile soil interaction. Proceedings of the Indian Geotechnical Conference (IGC), Chennai, India, 15–17 December 2016.
45. Marini, A., Giuriani, E., and Riva, P. (2006, January 6–7). Comportamento Sperimentale di Una Facciata in Muratura su Archi Nell’Ipotesi di Cedimento Differenziale di un Pilastro. Proceedings of the Atti Convegno Nazionale Sperimentazione su Materiali e Strutture, Venice, Italy.
47. Investigating ground movements caused by the construction of multiple tunnels in soft ground using laboratory model tests
10.1139/t07-018 ↗50. Thrust and bending moment of rigid piles subjected to moving soil
10.1139/T09-092 ↗52. Phillips, R. (1986). Ground Deformation in the Vicinity of a Trench Heading, University of Cambridge.
54. Faustin, N.E. (2017). Performance of Circular Shafts and Ground Behaviour During Construction. [PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge].
55. New, B. (2017). Settlements due to shaft construction. Tunn. Tunn. Int., 16–17.
56. Catalogue of scaling laws and similitude questions in geotechnical centrifuge modelling
57. Taylor, R. (2018). Centrifuges in modelling: Principles and scale effects. Geotechnical Centrifuge Technology, CRC Press.
10.1201/9781482269321-2 ↗58. Bhattacharya, S., Demirci, H.E., Nikitas, G., Prakhya, G.K.V., Lombardi, D., Alexander, N.A., Aleem, M., Amani, S., and Mylonakis, G. (2021). Physical modeling of interaction problems in geotechnical engineering. Modeling in Geotechnical Engineering, Elsevier.
10.1016/B978-0-12-821205-9.00017-4 ↗59. Application of the generalised scaling law to saturated ground
62. Gibson, A.D. (1997). Physical Scale Modeling of Geotechnical Structures at One-G, California Institute of Technology.
63. Meguid, M., and Tobar, T. (2025, January 05). Distribution of Active Earth Pressure on Vertical Shafts. Available online: https://www.geogroup.mcgill.ca/Research/Conferences/13-Distribution%20of%20Active%20Earth%20Pressure%20on%20Vertical%20Shafts_Tobar_Meguid_CGC_2009.pdf.
65. Experimental studies on a circular open caisson
66. Pioneers of centrifuge modelling
68. Faustin, N., Mair, R., and Elshafie, M. (2021). Development of a new excavation technique for centrifuge testing in sand. Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, CRC Press.
10.1201/9780429321559-35 ↗69. Imamura, S., Nomoto, T., Fujii, T., Hagiwara, T., and Kusakabe, O. (1996, January 19–21). Earth pressures acting on a deep shaft and the movements of adjacent ground in sand. Proceedings of the Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction on Soft Ground, Tokyo, Japan.
71. 3D and 2D model tests and numerical analyses of settlements and earth pressures due to tunnel excavation
10.3208/sandf.37.3_31 ↗72. Pang, P. (2008). Physical and numerical modelling. Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, CRC Press.
10.1201/9780203879986.ch9 ↗74. Physical model test of transparent soil on coupling effect of cut-off wall and pumping wells during foundation pit dewatering
10.1007/s11440-018-0649-2 ↗75. Numerical simulation of retaining wall in deep foundation based on COMSOL Multiphysics
77. Jiang, B.-n., Ma, J.-l., and Chu, J.-l. (2018, January 10–13). The influence of soil surrounding the caisson cutting edge to excavation and sinking. Proceedings of the International Conference on Geotechnical and Earthquake Engineering 2018, Austin, TX, USA.
10.1061/9780784482049.043 ↗78. Experimental study and simulation on deformation characteristics of caissons in sand under horizontal loads
81. Dong, X., Tu, J., Xu, J., Cai, L., Wu, B., and Cai, L. (2023, January 29–30). Based on Abaqus finite element analysis software to assist the construction of super large caisson. Proceedings of the 2023 International Seminar on Computer Science and Engineering Technology (SCSET), New York, NY, USA.
10.1109/SCSET58950.2023.00142 ↗82. Kumar, M., and Chatterjee, K. (2020). A numerical study on lateral load response of caissons in static conditions. Geo-Congress 2020, American Society of Civil Engineers.
10.1061/9780784482780.002 ↗83. De Falco, N., Bilotta, E., Divall, S., and Goodey, R. (2023, January 1–5). Numerical analysis of deep ground movements induced by circular shaft construction. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Sydney, Australia.
84. Zhou, J., Liu, C., Xu, J., Zhang, Z., and Li, Z. (2023). Deformation Mechanism and Control of In-Situ Assembling Caisson Technology in Soft Soil Area under Field Measurement and Numerical Simulation. Materials, 16.
10.3390/ma16031125 ↗85. Ground movements induced by installation of twin large diameter deeply-buried caissons: 3D numerical modeling
10.1007/s11440-021-01165-1 ↗86. Analysis of a vertical segmental shaft using 2D & 3D finite element codes
88. Numerical analysis of soil deformation behind the reaction wall of an open caisson induced by horizontal parallel pipe-jacking construction
10.1139/cgj-2015-0024 ↗90. Physical and numerical modelling of a geogrid-reinforced incremental concrete panel retaining wall
10.1139/cgj-2016-0207 ↗91. Simulation study on foundation pit excavation in soft soil considering effect of creep and seepage
92. Shah, R., Zhao, C., Lavasan, A.A., Peila, D., Schanz, T., and Lucarelli, A. (2017, January 18–20). Influencing factors affecting the numerical simulation of the mechanized tunnel excavation using FEM and FDM techniques. Proceedings of the EUROTUN, Innsbruck, Austria.