journal article·2025-05-27Open access

A Comprehensive Review of Open Caisson Modeling Technology: Current Practices and Future Prospects

Jianxiu Wang, Naveed Sarwar Abbasi, Weqiang Pan, Weifeng Wu, Sharif Nyanzi Alidekyi, Xiaofei Zhang, Panfeng Guan, Hao Li, Ali Asghar, Bilal Ahmed

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 11

Abstract

The rapid advancement of modern megapolises has led to a dearth of surface space, and, in response, engineers have begun to trial substitutes below ground level. Shafts are generally used to provide temporary access and permanent work to the subsurface for tunnelling, as well as for lifts or ventilation purposes. In urban areas, one important design issue is the prediction of the excavation-induced displacements by open caisson shaft construction. Settlements and ground movements associated with open caisson shafts are influenced by the choice of construction method, soil composition, and excavation geometry. Compared with other geotechnical construction events, for instance, tunnelling, the literature relating to the ground deformations induced from open caisson shafts are comparatively limited. This review offers an evaluation of several case studies that utilize experimental and computational modeling techniques to provide clearer insights into earth pressure distribution and induced surface and subsurface soil displacements, as well as the associated ground deformations during open caisson shaft construction. The modeling test results are compared to the state of the practice ground deformation prediction theories and measured results from field monitoring data. Findings indicate that the lateral earth pressure distribution aligns closely with the theoretical predictions based on Terzaghi’s and Berezantzev’s models, and lateral earth pressure diminishes gradually until the onset of active wall displacement. Current modeling techniques generally fail to properly represent in situ stress states and large-scale complexities, emphasizing the need for hybrid approaches that combine physical and numerical methodologies. In future studies, modern approaches, including artificial intelligence (AI) monitoring (e.g., PINNs, ACPP), multi-field coupling models (e.g., THMC), and transparent soil testing, hold profound potential for real-time prediction, optimization, and visualization of soil deformation. Numerical–physical coupling tests will integrate theory and practice. Improving prediction reliability in complicated soil conditions such as composite and heterogenous strata using different modeling techniques is still unclear, and further investigation is therefore needed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geological Modeling and Analysis · Medical Image Segmentation Techniques · Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200072, China

Shanghai Tunnel Engineering and Rail Transit Design and Research Institute, Shanghai 200235, China

Funding

Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd. · Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Rail Transit Design and Research Institute · Research Project of Shanghai Housing and Urban Rural Development Management Committee · Shanghai Shallow Geothermal Energy Engineering Technology Research Center · Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Project · Guangzhou Metro Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd. · Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of Research and Development Program of the People’s Republic of China · Suzhou Rail Transit Line 1 Co., Ltd. · Shanghai Institute of Geological Survey · Key Laboratory of Land Settlement Monitoring and Prevention, Ministry of Natural Resources of the People’s Republic of China · China Railway 15 Bureau Group Co., Ltd.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Prediction of microtunnelling jacking forces using a probabilistic observational approach10.1016/j.tust.2020.103749 ↗
2. Monitoring the construction of a large-diameter caisson in sand10.1680/jgeen.19.00266 ↗
3. Undrained bearing capacity of the cutting face for an open caisson10.1680/jgeot.20.P.210 ↗
4. Overview of underpinning and caisson shaft-sinking techniques10.1680/geng.13.00117 ↗
5. Examples of open caisson sinking in Scotland10.1680/geng.2009.162.1.59 ↗
6. Arthur, L., Darby, A., Rafoneke, B., Daws, G., MacDonald, D., Innaurato, N., Mancini, R., Rondena, E., Zaninetti, A., and Coutts, A. (1994). Ground movement model validation at the Heathrow Express trial tunnel. Tunnelling’94: Papers Presented at the Seventh International Symposium,‘Tunnelling’ 94’, London, UK, 5–7 July 1994, Springer US.
7. Ho, C.E. (2002, January 14–16). Settlement performance of large diameter friction caissons in bouldery clay. Proceedings of the Deep Foundations 2002: An International Perspective on Theory, Design, Construction, and Performance, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1061/40601(256)38 ↗
8. Prediction of lateral displacement of soil behind the reaction wall caused by pipe jacking operation10.1016/j.tust.2013.10.010 ↗
9. Settlement analysis of the giant open caisson during the construction of the Changtai Yangtze River Bridge10.3389/feart.2022.1056695 ↗
10. Experimental study on the migration regularity of sand outside a large, deep-water, open caisson during sinking10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106601 ↗
11. Centrifugal model test study of caisson sinking resistance
12. Cutting shoe design for open caissons in sand: Influence on vertical bearing capacity10.1680/jgeen.20.00218 ↗
13. Chandler, J., Hinch, L., Fair, R., Hughes, D., Peraino, J., and Rowe, P. (1984). Jamuna river 230 kV crossing, Bangladesh. Part 2: Construction. IEE Proceedings C (Generation, Transmission and Distribution), IET.10.1049/ip-c.1984.0044 ↗
14. Safiullah, A. (2005, January 10). Geotechnical problems of bridge construction in Bangladesh. Proceedings of the Japan-Bangladesh Joint Seminar on Advances in Bridge Engineering, Dacca, Bangladesh.
15. Real-time monitoring of large-diameter caissons
16. Guo, M., Dong, X., and Li, J. (2021). Study on the earth pressure during sinking stage of super large caisson foundation. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112110488 ↗
17. Wood, D.M. (2017). Geotechnical Modelling, CRC Press.
18. Wood, D.M. (2005). Physical modelling. Prediction and Simulation Methods in Geomechanics: State-of-the-Art Report on Selected Topics by TC-34, Japanese Geotechnical Society.
19. Askarinejad, A., Laue, J., Zweidler, A., Iten, M., Bleiker, E., Buschor, H., and Springman, S.M. (2012, January 23–24). Physical modelling of rainfall induced landslides undercontrolled climatic conditions. Proceedings of the Eurofuge 2012, Delft, The Netherlands.
20. Knothe, S. Observations of surface movements under influence of mining and their theoretical interpretation. Proceedings of the European Congress on Ground Movement, Leeds, UK, 9–12 April 1957.
21. Analysis of physical testing of rainfall-induced soil slope failures10.1007/s12665-014-4009-8 ↗
22. Centrifuge model test on the retrogressive landslide subjected to reservoir water level fluctuation10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.08.016 ↗
23. Experimental tests of slope failure due to rainfalls using 1g physical slope models10.1016/j.sandf.2018.02.003 ↗
24. Physical model test and numerical simulation for the stability analysis of deep gas storage cavern group located in bedded rock salt formation10.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.02.015 ↗
25. Physical modeling of land subsidence due to underground cavity and its monitoring by electrical resistivity survey in geotechnical centrifuge
26. Physical modeling of failure process of the excavation in horizontal strata based on IR thermography
27. Sandbox modeling of the shallow tunnel face collapse
28. Plasmon modes of spherical nanoparticles: The effects of quantum nonlocality10.1016/j.susc.2015.03.005 ↗
29. Model test of interaction between load-caused landslide and double-row anti-slide piles by transparent soil material10.1007/s13369-020-05256-1 ↗
30. Physical model tests and numerical simulation for assessing the stability of brick-lined tunnels10.1016/j.tust.2016.01.016 ↗
31. Physical modeling of tunnels in soft ground: A review10.1016/j.tust.2007.02.003 ↗
32. White, D., Gaudin, C., and Take, W. (2013, January 2–6). General report for TC104 physical modelling in geotechnics. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering: Challenges and Innovations in Geotechnics, ICSMGE 2013, Paris, France.
33. Green, D. (2014). Modelling geomorphic systems: Scaled physical models. Geomorphological Techniques, British Society for Geomorphology.
34. Modèles physiques en géotechnique-I–Évolution des techniques expérimentales et des domaines d’application10.1051/geotech/2001097003 ↗
35. Introducing advanced topics in geotechnical engineering teaching–tunnel modelling
36. Beguin, R., Fry, J.-J., Picault, C., Courivaud, J.-R., Faure, Y.-H., and Philippe, P. (2012, January 29–31). Control of the risk of dike failure caused by contact erosion. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion, Paris, France.
37. On the use of 1g physical models for ground movements and soil-structure interaction problems10.1016/j.jrmge.2019.07.006 ↗
38. Physical and software modelling for challenging soil structure interaction
39. Houda, M., Jenck, O., Emeriault, F., Briançon, L., and Gotteland, P. (2013, January 2–6). Development of a threedimensional small scale model to simulate soil improvement by rigid piles. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris, France.
40. Sreelakshmi, G., Asha, M., and Suraj, S. Application of the particle image velocimetry to study pile soil interaction. Proceedings of the Indian Geotechnical Conference (IGC), Chennai, India, 15–17 December 2016.
41. Experimental analysis of a masonry façade subject to tunnelling-induced settlement10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.042 ↗
42. Experimental study of soil arching effect under seepage condition10.1007/s11440-019-00769-y ↗
43. Estimation of building damage due to excavation-induced ground movements10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:2(162) ↗
44. Manufacturing, assembly, and testing of scaled, historic masonry for one-gravity, pseudo-static, soil-structure experiments10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.066 ↗
45. Marini, A., Giuriani, E., and Riva, P. (2006, January 6–7). Comportamento Sperimentale di Una Facciata in Muratura su Archi Nell’Ipotesi di Cedimento Differenziale di un Pilastro. Proceedings of the Atti Convegno Nazionale Sperimentazione su Materiali e Strutture, Venice, Italy.
46. Physical modeling of tunnel induced displacement in sandy grounds10.1016/j.tust.2019.04.022 ↗
47. Investigating ground movements caused by the construction of multiple tunnels in soft ground using laboratory model tests10.1139/t07-018 ↗
48. A novel approach for determining landslide pushing force based on landslide-pile interactions10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.07.024 ↗
49. Model testing of the response of stabilizing piles in landslides with upper hard and lower weak bedrock10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.02.002 ↗
50. Thrust and bending moment of rigid piles subjected to moving soil10.1139/T09-092 ↗
51. 1-g physical modeling in engineering geology and its application of pile-reinforced reservoir landslides10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107450 ↗
52. Phillips, R. (1986). Ground Deformation in the Vicinity of a Trench Heading, University of Cambridge.
53. Stability of axisymmetric excavations in clays10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1983)109:5(666) ↗
54. Faustin, N.E. (2017). Performance of Circular Shafts and Ground Behaviour During Construction. [PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge].
55. New, B. (2017). Settlements due to shaft construction. Tunn. Tunn. Int., 16–17.
56. Catalogue of scaling laws and similitude questions in geotechnical centrifuge modelling
57. Taylor, R. (2018). Centrifuges in modelling: Principles and scale effects. Geotechnical Centrifuge Technology, CRC Press.10.1201/9781482269321-2 ↗
58. Bhattacharya, S., Demirci, H.E., Nikitas, G., Prakhya, G.K.V., Lombardi, D., Alexander, N.A., Aleem, M., Amani, S., and Mylonakis, G. (2021). Physical modeling of interaction problems in geotechnical engineering. Modeling in Geotechnical Engineering, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-821205-9.00017-4 ↗
59. Application of the generalised scaling law to saturated ground
60. Centrifuge modelling with transparent soil and laser aided imaging10.1520/GTJ20140231 ↗
61. Scaling considerations for 1-g model horizontal plate anchor tests in sand10.1520/GTJ20160042 ↗
62. Gibson, A.D. (1997). Physical Scale Modeling of Geotechnical Structures at One-G, California Institute of Technology.
63. Meguid, M., and Tobar, T. (2025, January 05). Distribution of Active Earth Pressure on Vertical Shafts. Available online: https://www.geogroup.mcgill.ca/Research/Conferences/13-Distribution%20of%20Active%20Earth%20Pressure%20on%20Vertical%20Shafts_Tobar_Meguid_CGC_2009.pdf.
64. Laboratory Testing of Construction-Induced Ground Displacements for Open Caisson Shafts in Sand10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11419 ↗
65. Experimental studies on a circular open caisson
66. Pioneers of centrifuge modelling
67. The effect of arching pressure on a vertical circular shaft10.1016/j.tust.2013.03.001 ↗
68. Faustin, N., Mair, R., and Elshafie, M. (2021). Development of a new excavation technique for centrifuge testing in sand. Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, CRC Press.10.1201/9780429321559-35 ↗
69. Imamura, S., Nomoto, T., Fujii, T., Hagiwara, T., and Kusakabe, O. (1996, January 19–21). Earth pressures acting on a deep shaft and the movements of adjacent ground in sand. Proceedings of the Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction on Soft Ground, Tokyo, Japan.
70. Subsurface ground movements due to circular shaft construction10.1016/j.sandf.2019.03.013 ↗
71. 3D and 2D model tests and numerical analyses of settlements and earth pressures due to tunnel excavation10.3208/sandf.37.3_31 ↗
72. Pang, P. (2008). Physical and numerical modelling. Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, CRC Press.10.1201/9780203879986.ch9 ↗
73. Response and stability of underground structures in rock mass during earthquakes10.1007/s00603-010-0105-6 ↗
74. Physical model test of transparent soil on coupling effect of cut-off wall and pumping wells during foundation pit dewatering10.1007/s11440-018-0649-2 ↗
75. Numerical simulation of retaining wall in deep foundation based on COMSOL Multiphysics
76. Initial sinking method for large open caisson in a highway bridge project10.1007/978-3-319-97115-5_172 ↗
77. Jiang, B.-n., Ma, J.-l., and Chu, J.-l. (2018, January 10–13). The influence of soil surrounding the caisson cutting edge to excavation and sinking. Proceedings of the International Conference on Geotechnical and Earthquake Engineering 2018, Austin, TX, USA.10.1061/9780784482049.043 ↗
78. Experimental study and simulation on deformation characteristics of caissons in sand under horizontal loads
79. Numerical investigations of the installation process of giant deep-buried circular open caissons in undrained clay10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103322 ↗
80. Influence of a flexible retaining wall on performance of an adjacent deep excavation10.1007/s12205-021-0762-x ↗
81. Dong, X., Tu, J., Xu, J., Cai, L., Wu, B., and Cai, L. (2023, January 29–30). Based on Abaqus finite element analysis software to assist the construction of super large caisson. Proceedings of the 2023 International Seminar on Computer Science and Engineering Technology (SCSET), New York, NY, USA.10.1109/SCSET58950.2023.00142 ↗
82. Kumar, M., and Chatterjee, K. (2020). A numerical study on lateral load response of caissons in static conditions. Geo-Congress 2020, American Society of Civil Engineers.10.1061/9780784482780.002 ↗
83. De Falco, N., Bilotta, E., Divall, S., and Goodey, R. (2023, January 1–5). Numerical analysis of deep ground movements induced by circular shaft construction. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Sydney, Australia.
84. Zhou, J., Liu, C., Xu, J., Zhang, Z., and Li, Z. (2023). Deformation Mechanism and Control of In-Situ Assembling Caisson Technology in Soft Soil Area under Field Measurement and Numerical Simulation. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16031125 ↗
85. Ground movements induced by installation of twin large diameter deeply-buried caissons: 3D numerical modeling10.1007/s11440-021-01165-1 ↗
86. Analysis of a vertical segmental shaft using 2D & 3D finite element codes
87. Field measurements and finite-element method simulation of a tunnel shaft constructed by pneumatic caisson method in Shanghai soft ground10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000460 ↗
88. Numerical analysis of soil deformation behind the reaction wall of an open caisson induced by horizontal parallel pipe-jacking construction10.1139/cgj-2015-0024 ↗
89. Artificial neural networks for predicting the maximum surface settlement caused by EPB shield tunneling10.1016/j.tust.2005.06.007 ↗
90. Physical and numerical modelling of a geogrid-reinforced incremental concrete panel retaining wall10.1139/cgj-2016-0207 ↗
91. Simulation study on foundation pit excavation in soft soil considering effect of creep and seepage
92. Shah, R., Zhao, C., Lavasan, A.A., Peila, D., Schanz, T., and Lucarelli, A. (2017, January 18–20). Influencing factors affecting the numerical simulation of the mechanized tunnel excavation using FEM and FDM techniques. Proceedings of the EUROTUN, Innsbruck, Austria.
93. Three-dimensional numerical modelling of progressive failure of caisson foundation in sand using a coupled FDM–DEM method10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111332 ↗
94. Application of a Coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian approach on pile installation problems under partially drained conditions10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.10.006 ↗
95. Large deformation FE analysis of driven steel pipe piles with soil plugging10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.08.005 ↗
96. Coupled deformation–seepage analysis of dynamic capacity tests on open-ended piles in saturated sand10.1007/s11440-016-0442-z ↗
97. Large deformation finite element analyses in geotechnical engineering10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.12.005 ↗
98. Enhanced static simulation process of caisson sinking using the coupled Euler-Lagrange method10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115453 ↗
99. Deformation characteristics and failure evolution process of the existing metro station under unilateral deep excavation10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105870 ↗
100. Excavation influence of triangular-distribution tunnels for wind pavilion group of a metro station10.1007/s11771-020-4468-x ↗