Seismic Tomography in the Târgu Jiu Region (Romania): Relationships with Seismic Velocity Anomalies and Fault Activity
Source abstract
Abstract
This study presents a seismic tomography analysis of the Târgu Jiu region in southwestern Romania, an area that experienced an unusual earthquake sequence in 2023. Using P- and S-wave arrival times local earthquakes, we applied the LOTOS algorithm to produce high-resolution 3D crustal seismic velocities models. High Vp and Vs values in the northern and northeastern areas suggest the presence of dense, rigid geological formations, likely associated with consolidated magmatic or metamorphic units. In contrast, the central region exhibits low Vs values, coinciding with an active seismic zone and intersecting major fault structures. This suggests the presence of highly fractured and weakly consolidated rocks, potentially saturated with fluids. The Vp/Vs ratio in the central region reached values of ≥1.8–1.9, indicating fluid-filled fractures that may influence fault dynamics and earthquake occurrence. In the southern region, velocity anomalies suggest weakly consolidated sedimentary units with a high degree of fracturing. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the geodynamic behavior of the Târgu Jiu area and its seismic hazard potential.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: earthquake and tectonic studies · High-pressure geophysics and materials · Seismic Waves and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Institute for Earth Physics, Calugareni 12, 077125 Măgurele, Romania
Romanian Academy, 010071 Bucharest, Romania
Academy of Romanian Scientists, 050044 Bucharest, Romania
Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Villvägen 16, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden
Funding
Ministry of Education and Research
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Săndulescu, M. (1984). Geotectonica României, Editura Tehnică.
2. Lacombe, O., Lavé, J., Roure, F., and Vergés, J. (2007). The Geometry of the South Leading Carpathian Thrust Line and the Moesia Boundary: The Role of Inherited Structures in Establishing a Transcurent Contact on the Concave Side of the Carpathians. Thrust Belts and Foreland Basins: From Fold Kinematics to Hydrocarbon Systems, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-69426-7 ↗
3. Kinematic evolution of the Romanian Carpathians10.1016/S0040-1951(98)00166-8 ↗
4. Tarapoanca, M. (2004). Architecture, 3D Geometry and Tectonic Evolution of the Carpathians Foreland Basin. [Ph.D. Thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam]. Available online: https://geo.vu.nl/~bert/files/book_tarapoanca.pdf.
5. Exhumation of the Danubian nappes system (South Carpathians) during the Early Tertiary: Inferences from kinematic and paleostress analysis at the Getic/Danubian nappes contact10.1016/S0040-1951(99)00221-8 ↗
6. Tertiary tectonic and sedimentological evolution of the South Carpathians foredeep: Tectonic vs. eustatic control10.1016/S0264-8172(99)00045-8 ↗
7. Tertiary tectonic evolution of the external South Carpathians and the adjacent Moesian platform (Romania)10.1029/97TC01238 ↗
8. The Cerna-Jiu fault system (South Carpathians, Romania), a major Tertiary transcurent lineament
9. Orogen parallel extension in the Southern Carpathians10.1016/S0040-1951(98)00169-3 ↗
10. Subsidence analysis of the Getic Depression on Totea-Vladimir structure
11. Diaconescu, M. (2017). Sisteme de Fracturi Active Crustale pe Teritoriul României. [Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Geology and Geophysics, University of Bucharest]. Available online: https://gg.unibuc.ro/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/DIACONESCU-Mihail.pdf.
12. Armeanu, I., Chircea, A., Ciobanu, I., Craiu, A., Craiu, G.M., Dinescu, R., Mihai, M., Predoiu, A., Tolea, A., and Vârzaru, L.-C. (2024). [Data set]. Database of the 2023 seismic sequence recorded in Gorj area (Romania). Mendeley Data, V3.
13. Dinescu, R., Borleanu, F., Radulian, M., Popa, M., Chircea, A., Marius, M., Rau, A., Poiata, N., and Munteanu, I. (2023, January 1–9). The 2023 seismic sequence in the South Carpathians (Târgu Jiu area, Romania): Relocation using an improved 1-D velocity model and seismicity characteristics. Proceedings of the 8th Edition of the Geoscience International Symposium, Bucharest, Romania.
14. Stress field in Târgu Jiu seismotectonic area (Romania): Insights from the inversion of earthquake focal mechanisms10.5593/sgem2023/1.1/s05.72 ↗
15. Stagnant slabs in the upper and lower mantle transition region10.1029/1999RG000068 ↗
16. Whole-mantle tomography beneath eastern Mediterranean and adjacent regions10.1093/gji/ggaf086 ↗
17. Tomographic evidence for a narrow whole-mantle plume below Iceland10.1016/S0012-821X(99)00004-7 ↗
18. A lower mantle source for central European volcanism10.1126/science.286.5446.1928 ↗
19. Superplumes from the core–mantle boundary to the lithosphere: Implications for heat flux10.1126/science.1069404 ↗
20. Finite-frequency tomography reveals a variety of plumes in the mantle10.1126/science.1092485 ↗
21. TOPO-EUROPE: The geoscience of coupled deep Earth–surface processes10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.02.008 ↗
22. High-resolution teleseismic body-wave tomography beneath SE Romania—I. Implications for three-dimensional versus one-dimensional crustal correction strategies with a new crustal velocity model10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02661.x ↗
23. High-resolution teleseismic body-wave tomography beneath SE Romania—II. Imaging of a slab detachment scenario10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02884.x ↗
24. Upper mantle structures beneath the Carpathian–Pannonian region: Implications for the geodynamics of continental collision10.1016/j.epsl.2012.06.037 ↗
25. Crustal structure of the Carpathian–Pannonian region from ambient noise tomography10.1093/gji/ggt316 ↗
26. Seismic structure of the Eastern European crust and upper mantle from probabilistic ambient noise tomography10.1016/j.gr.2023.08.022 ↗
27. Delamination or slab detachment beneath Vrancea? New arguments from local earthquake tomography10.1029/2009GC002811 ↗
28. Locating events with a sparse network of regional arrays
29. (2025, March 25). Antelope Seismic Software, 1996. Available online: https://brtt.com/.
30. National Institute for Earth Physics (NIEP Romania) (2025, May 21). Romanian Seismic Network [Data Set]. International Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks, 1994. Available online: https://www.fdsn.org/networks/detail/RO/.
31. From national to transnational seismic monitoring products and services in the Republic of Bulgaria, Republic of Moldova, Romania, and Ukraine10.1785/0220200393 ↗
32. Neagoe, C. (2025, May 21). AdriaArray Temporary Network: Bulgaria, Moldova, Poland, Romania, Ukraine [Data Set]. International Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks, 2022. Available online: https://www.fdsn.org/networks/detail/Y8_2022/.
33. Wenzel, F., and Lungu, D. (1999). The Romanian earthquakes catalogue between 984–1997. Vrancea Earthquakes: Tectonics, Hazard and Risk Mitigation, Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-011-4748-4 ↗
34. Popa, M., Chircea, A., Dinescu, R., Neagoe, C., Grecu, B., and Borleanu, F. (2022). Romanian Earthquake Catalogue (ROMPLUS) [Data set]. Mendeley Data, V2.
35. LOTOS code for local earthquake tomographic inversion. Benchmarks for testing tomographic algorithms10.1785/0120080013 ↗
36. Crustal structure in the western part of Romania from local seismic tomography10.1088/1755-1315/95/3/032019 ↗
37. Determination of the lithospheric structure from the Carpathian arc bend using local data
38. Tomographic images of magma chambers beneath the Avacha and Koryaksky volcanoes in Kamchatka10.1029/2019JB017952 ↗
39. Seismic tomography model reveals mantle magma sources of recent volcanic activity at El Hierro Island (Canary Islands, Spain)10.1093/gji/ggu339 ↗
40. Mantle and crustal sources of magmatic activity of Klyuchevskoy and surrounding volcanoes in Kamchatka inferred from earthquake tomography10.1029/2020JB020097 ↗
41. Magma-fluid interactions beneath Akutan volcano in the Aleutian Arc based on the results of local earthquake tomography10.1029/2020JB021192 ↗
42. Seismic evidence for a weakened thick crust at the Beaufort Sea continental margin10.1029/2022GL100158 ↗
43. A fast algorithm for two-point seismic ray tracing10.1785/BSSA0770030972 ↗
44. Nolet, G. (1987). Seismic Tomography with Applications in Global Seismology and Exploration Geophysics, Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-3899-1 ↗
45. LSQR: An algorithm for sparse linear equations and sparse least squares10.1145/355984.355989 ↗
46. Oros, E. (2022). Cercetări Privind Hazardul Seismic Pentru Banat, Editura Sfântul Nicolae.
47. Traveltimes for global earthquake location and phase identification10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb06724.x ↗
48. Initial reference models in local earthquake tomography10.1029/93JB03138 ↗
49. Dinescu, R. (2024). Seismotectonic Framework of the South-West Carpathian Bend Zone. [Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Geology and Geophysics, University of Bucharest].
50. A new method to determine the P-wave velocity structure of the crust and the uppermost mantle from refracted seismic waves
51. P and S velocity structure of the crust and the upper mantle beneath central Java from local tomography inversion10.1029/2006JB004712 ↗
52. Structural inheritance and style within the Getic Depression, South Carpathians, Romania10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2022.106068 ↗
53. Sedimentary basins investigation using teleseismic P-wave time delays10.1111/1365-2478.12747 ↗
54. The effect of sedimentary basins on surface waves that pass through them10.1093/gji/ggx313 ↗
55. Indication of fluid-driven seismicity in the Palghar region, India, from local earthquake tomography10.1785/0120240071 ↗
56. Location improvements for the twin crustal earthquakes recorded on February 2023 in Gorj County, Romania10.5593/sgem2023/1.1/s01.08 ↗