journal article·2025-05-19Open access

An Investigation of the Promotion of the Aerodynamic Performance of a Supersonic Compressor Cascade Using a Local Negative-Curvature Ramp

Yongzhen Liu, Zhen Fan, Weiwei Cui, Qiang Zhou, Jianzhong Xu

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 10

Abstract

Shockwaves induce considerable flow separation loss; it is essential to reduce this using the flow control method. In this manuscript, a method for suppressing flow separation in turbomachinery through a constant adverse-pressure gradient was investigated. The first-passage shock was split into a compression wave system of the vane suction surface. The aim of this was to reduce loss from shockwave/boundary layer interactions (SWBLIs). This method promotes the performance parameters of the supersonic compressor cascade. The investigation targets were a baseline cascade and the improved system. Both cascades were numerically studied with the aid of the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) method. The simulation results of the baseline cascade were also validated through experimentation, and a further physical flow analysis of the two cascades was conducted. The results show that the first-passage shockwave was a foot above the initial suction surface, with a weaker incident shock along with a clustering of the compression wave corresponding to the modified cascade. It was also concluded that the first-passage shockwave foot of the baseline cascade was replaced with a weak incident shock, and a series of compression waves emanated from the adopted negative-curvature profile. The shock-induced boundary layer separation bubble disappeared, and much smaller boundary layer shape factors over the SWBLI region were obtained for the improved cascade compared to the baseline cascade. This improvement led to a high level of stability in the boundary layer state. Sensitivity analyses were performed through different simulations on both cascades, unveiling that the loss in total pressure was lower in the case of the updated cascade as compared to the baseline.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research · Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization · Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Engineering, Chaohu University, Hefei 238024, China

School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China

College of Energy Storage Technology, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 256601, China

Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Funding

national natural science foundation of China

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Highly loaded axial flow compressors: History and current developments10.1115/1.2927695 ↗
2. Recent advances in transonic axial compressor aerodynamics10.1016/j.paerosci.2012.05.002 ↗
3. Loss mechanisms in turbomachines10.1115/1.2929299 ↗
4. Saito, S., Furukawa, M., Yamada, K., Watanabe, K., Matsuoka, A., and Niwa, N. (2019, January 17–21). Mechanisms and Quantitative Evaluation of Flow Loss Generation in a Multi-Stage Transonic Axial Compressor. Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2019, Phoenix, AZ, USA. ASME Paper GT2019-90439.10.1115/GT2019-90439 ↗
5. Numerical optimization of turbomachinery bladings10.1115/1.1645869 ↗
6. Correlation of solidity, aspect ratio and compound lean vane in compressor cascade design10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.12.167 ↗
7. Interactions between shock waves and turbulent boundary layers10.1016/0376-0421(70)90018-7 ↗
8. Transonic shock/turbulent boundary-layer interaction on curved surfaces10.2514/3.44911 ↗
9. Interplay of Surface Deformation and Shock-Induced Separation in Shock/Boundary-Layer Interactions10.2514/1.J056030 ↗
10. The effect of concave surface curvature on turbulent boundary layers10.1017/S0022112085002981 ↗
11. The growth and breakdown of streamwise vortices in the presence of a wall10.1017/S0022112087002337 ↗
12. On the linear and nonlinear development of Görtler vortices10.1063/1.2980349 ↗
13. Structural characteristics of the supersonic turbulent boundary layer subjected to concave curvature10.1063/1.4944536 ↗
14. Turbulence structures and statistics of a supersonic turbulent boundary layer subjected to concave surface curvature10.1017/jfm.2019.19 ↗
15. David, W. (1997). Theoretical Aspects of Dromedaryfoil, Report 77-0104, Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center. Technical report.
16. Review of research into shock control bumps10.1007/s00193-014-0533-4 ↗
17. Experimental study into the flow physics of three-dimensional shock control bumps10.2514/1.C031341 ↗
18. Shock control bumps parametric research on supercritical airfoil
19. The application of the gradient-based adjoint multi-point optimization of single and double shock control bumps for transonic airfoils10.1007/s00193-015-0591-2 ↗
20. Optimization and analysis of shock wave/boundary-layer interaction for drag reduction by Shock control bumps10.1016/j.ast.2015.01.007 ↗
21. Pätzold, M., Lutz, T., Krämar, E., and Wagner, S. (2006, January 9–12). Numerical Optimization of Finite Shock Control Bumps. Proceedings of the 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA.10.2514/6.2006-1054 ↗
22. Numerical and experimental validation of three-dimensional shock control bumps10.2514/1.41441 ↗
23. Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction Control Using Three-Dimensional Bumps for Transonic Wings10.2514/1.32049 ↗
24. Control of incident shock/boundary-layer interaction by a two-dimensional bump10.2514/1.J052786 ↗
25. Control of cowl shock/boundary-layer interaction in hypersonic inlets by bump10.2514/1.J053974 ↗
26. Using a Shock control bumps to Improve the Performance of an Axial Compressor vane Section10.1007/s00193-016-0672-x ↗
27. Optimization of bump and blowing to control the flow through a transonic compressor vane cascade10.1007/s00193-017-0729-5 ↗
28. John, A., Shahpar, S., and Qin, N. (2016, January 13–17). Alleviation of shock-wave effects on a highly loaded axial compressor through novel vane shaping. Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2016, Seoul, Republic of Korea. ASME Paper GT2016-57550.10.1115/GT2016-57550 ↗
29. Using shock control bumps to improve transonic fan/compressor vane performance10.1115/1.4042891 ↗
30. Passage shock wave/boundary layer interaction control for transonic compressors using bumps
31. Babinsky, H., and Harvey, J.K. (2011). Shock Wave-Boundary-Layer Interactions, Cambridge University Press. Available online: https://www.cambridge.org/9780521848527.10.1017/CBO9780511842757 ↗
32. Drayna, T., Nompelis, I., and Candler, G. (2006, January 9–12). Hypersonic Inward Turning Inlets: Design and Optimization. Proceedings of the 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA.10.2514/6.2006-297 ↗
33. Kriging-assisted design optimization of S-shape supersonic compressor cascades10.1016/j.ast.2016.08.021 ↗
34. Casoni, M., Magrini, A., and Benini, E. (2019). Supersonic Compressor Cascade Shape Optimization under Multiple Inlet Mach Operating Conditions. Aerospace, 6.10.3390/aerospace6060064 ↗
35. Three-dimensional shock wave/boundary layer interactions10.1007/s00193-011-0322-2 ↗
36. Wilcox, D.C. (2004). Turbulence Modelling for CFD, DCW Industries.
37. Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications10.2514/3.12149 ↗
38. Acquaye, F., Li, J., Wray, T., and Agarwal, R.K. (2016, January 13–17). Validation of the Wray-Agarwal Turbulence Model for Shock-Wave Boundary Layer Interaction Flows. Proceedings of the 46th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, Washington, DC, USA.10.2514/6.2016-3477 ↗
39. Accumulation of errors in numerical simulations of chemically reacting gas dynamics10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.08.013 ↗
40. Greizer, E.M., Tan, C.S., and Graf, M.B. (2004). Internal Flow: Concepts and Applications, Cambridge University Press. Available online: https://www.cambridge.org/9780521343930.10.1017/CBO9780511616709 ↗