journal article·2025-04-28Open access

Cross-Language Transfer-Learning Approach via a Pretrained Preact ResNet-18 Architecture for Improving Kanji Recognition Accuracy and Enhancing a Number of Recognizable Kanji

Vasyl Rusyn, Andrii Boichuk, Lesia Mochurad

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 9

Abstract

Many people admire the Japanese language and culture, but mastering the language’s writing system, particularly handwritten kanji, presents a significant challenge. Furthermore, translating historical manuscripts containing archaic or rare kanji requires specialized expertise. To address this, we designed a new model for handwritten kanji recognition based on the concept of cross-language transfer learning using a Preact ResNet-18 architecture. The model was pretrained in a Chinese dataset and subsequently fine-tuned in a Japanese dataset. We also adapted and evaluated two fine-tuning strategies: unfreezing only the last layer and unfreezing all the layers during fine-tuning. During the implementation of our training algorithms, we trained a model with the CASIA-HWDB dataset with handwritten Chinese characters and used its weights to initialize models that were fine-tuned with a Kuzushiji-Kanji dataset that consists of Japanese handwritten kanji. We investigated the effectiveness of the developed model when solving a multiclass classification task for three subsets with the one hundred fifty, two hundred, and three hundred most-sampled classes and showed an improvement in the recognition accuracy and an enhancement in a number of recognizable kanji with the proposed model compared to those of the existing methods. Our best model achieved 97.94% accuracy for 150 kanji, exceeding the previous SOTA result by 1.51%, while our best model for 300 kanji achieved 97.62% accuracy (exceeding the 150-kanji SOTA accuracy by 1.19% while doubling the class count). This confirms the effectiveness of our proposed model and establishes new benchmarks in handwritten kanji recognition, both in terms of accuracy and the number of recognizable kanji.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Text and Document Classification Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Artificial Intelligence, Lviv Polytechnic National University, 79013 Lviv, Ukraine

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Mondal, S.S., Mandal, N., Singh, K.K., Singh, A., and Izonin, I. (2022). EDLDR: An Ensemble Deep Learning Technique for Detection and Classification of Diabetic Retinopathy. Diagnostics, 13.10.3390/diagnostics13010124 ↗
2. Chinese Character Recognition: History, Status and Prospects10.1007/s11704-007-0012-5 ↗
3. Zhao, Y., Zhang, X., Fu, B., Zhan, Z., Sun, H., Li, L., and Zhang, G. (2022). Evaluation and Recognition of Handwritten Chinese Characters Based on Similarities. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12178521 ↗
4. Grębowiec, M., and Protasiewicz, J. (2018, January 26). A Neural Framework for Online Recognition of Handwritten Kanji Characters. Proceedings of the 018 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, Poznań, Poland.10.15439/2018F140 ↗
5. A Handwritten Chinese Character Recognition Based on Convolutional Neural Network and Median Filtering10.1088/1742-6596/1820/1/012162 ↗
6. Zhang, Q., Lee, K.-C., Bao, H., You, Y., Li, W., and Guo, D. (2018, January 17–20). Large Scale Classification in Deep Neural Network with Label Mapping. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), Singapore.10.1109/ICDMW.2018.00163 ↗
7. New Results on Error Correcting Output Codes of Kernel Machines10.1109/TNN.2003.820841 ↗
8. Model Soups: Averaging Weights of Multiple Fine-Tuned Models Improves Accuracy without Increasing Inference Time
9. 3D-FM GAN: Towards 3D-Controllable Face Manipulation
10. TrOCR: Transformer-Based Optical Character Recognition with Pre-Trained Models
11. Vision Transformer Meets Convolutional Neural Network for Plant Disease Classification10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102245 ↗
12. Solis, A.I., Zarkovacki, J., Ly, J., and Atyabi, A. (2023). Recognition of Handwritten Japanese Characters Using Ensemble of Convolutional Neural Networks. arXiv.
13. Novel Adaptive Sensor Fusion Methodology for Hand Pose Estimation with Multileap Motion10.1109/TIM.2021.3063752 ↗
14. Multi-Sensor Guided Hand Gesture Recognition for a Teleoperated Robot Using a Recurrent Neural Network10.1109/LRA.2021.3089999 ↗
15. (2025, March 11). Understanding ResNet Architectures and Performance on CIFAR-10—33rd Square. Available online: www.33rdsquare.com/understanding-resnet-and-analyzing-various-models-on-the-cifar-10-dataset/.
16. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
17. The Vanishing Gradient Problem During Learning Recurrent Neural Nets and Problem Solutions10.1142/S0218488598000094 ↗
18. Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networks10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_38 ↗
19. Mazumdar, A., and Rawat, A.S. (2019, January 24–27). Learning and Recovery in the ReLU Model. Proceedings of the 2019 57th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), Monticello, IL, USA.10.1109/ALLERTON.2019.8919900 ↗
20. Thakkar, V., Tewary, S., and Chakraborty, C. (2018, January 12–13). Batch Normalization in Convolutional Neural Networks—A Comparative Study with CIFAR-10 Data. Proceedings of the 2018 Fifth International Conference on Emerging Applications of Information Technology (EAIT), Kolkata, India.10.1109/EAIT.2018.8470438 ↗
21. Evaluation of Transfer Learning for Handwritten Character Classification Using Small Training Samples10.18178/joig.11.1.21-25 ↗
22. Active Transfer Learning for Handwriting Recognition10.1007/978-3-031-21648-0_17 ↗
23. Chen, S., and Jin, Z. (2023, January 18–20). A Lightweight Off-Line Handwritten Chinese Character Recognition Algorithm Based on Gradient Feature and Channel Attention. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Sensors, Electronics and Computer Engineering (ICSECE), Jinzhou, China.10.1109/ICSECE58870.2023.10263575 ↗
24. Shen, L., Chen, B., Wei, J., Xu, H., Tang, S.-K., and Mirri, S. (2023). The Challenges of Recognizing Offline Handwritten Chinese: A Technical Review. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13063500 ↗
25. Xu, L., Yin, F., Wang, Q.-F., and Liu, C.-L. (2012, January 18–20). A Touching Character Database from Chinese Handwriting for Assessing Segmentation Algorithms. Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, Bari, Italy.10.1109/ICFHR.2012.173 ↗
26. A Residual-Attention Offline Handwritten Chinese Text Recognition Based on Fully Convolutional Neural Networks10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3115606 ↗
27. Context-Aware Confidence Estimation for Rejection in Handwritten Chinese Text Recognition10.1007/978-3-031-70533-5_9 ↗
28. Handwritten Chinese Text Recognition by Integrating Multiple Contexts10.1109/TPAMI.2011.264 ↗
29. (2025, March 05). CASIA Online and Offline Chinese Handwriting Databases. Available online: https://nlpr.ia.ac.cn/databases/handwriting/Offline_database.html.
30. (2025, March 05). GitHub—Rois-Codh/Kmnist: Repository for Kuzushiji-MNIST, Kuzushiji-49, and Kuzushiji-Kanji. Available online: https://github.com/rois-codh/kmnist.
31. Pokorny, A., and Gudenberg, J.W.V. (2006, January 26–29). Expression Defined Accuracy. Proceedings of the 12th GAMM—IMACS International Symposium on Scientific Computing, Computer Arithmetic and Validated Numerics (SCAN 2006), Duisburg, Germany.10.1109/SCAN.2006.17 ↗
32. Otani, M., Togashi, R., Nakashima, Y., Rahtu, E., Heikkila, J., and Satoh, S. (2022, January 18–24). Optimal Correction Cost for Object Detection Evaluation. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.02043 ↗
33. Michaud, E.J., Liu, Z., and Tegmark, M. (2023). Precision Machine Learning. Entropy, 25.10.3390/e25010175 ↗
34. Kynkäänniemi, T., Karras, T., Laine, S., Lehtinen, J., and Aila, T. (2019). Improved Precision and Recall Metric for Assessing Generative Models. arXiv.
35. Precision-Recall Curve (PRC) Classification Trees10.1007/s12065-021-00565-2 ↗
36. End-to-End Training of Object Class Detectors for Mean Average Precision10.1007/978-3-319-54193-8_13 ↗
37. Approximate Statistical Tests for Comparing Supervised Classification Learning Algorithms10.1162/089976698300017197 ↗
38. Approximate Is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions
39. YOLO-Based Segmented Dataset for Drone vs. Bird Detection for Deep and Machine Learning Algorithms10.1016/j.dib.2023.109355 ↗