journal article·2025-04-23Open access

Experimental Evaluation of an Innovative Tube-in-Tube Buckling Restrained Braces for Seismic Retrofitting of Substandard RC Frames

Evrim Oyguc, Resat Oyguc, Onur Seker, Abdul Hayır, Jay Shen, Bulent Akbas

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 9

Abstract

The process of seismic retrofitting for inadequate RC frames is vital for enhancing structural integrity in areas susceptible to earthquakes. This research investigates a novel tube-in-tube (TnT) buckling restrained brace (BRB) system aimed at improving the seismic performance of these substandard RC frames. By targeting significant weaknesses inherent in older RC constructions, the TnT BRB introduces a lightweight, all-steel configuration that eliminates the need for traditional mortar or concrete infill materials. Experimental shake table testing on two one-third scaled RC frame models was conducted to compare the seismic performance of an unretrofitted control frame and a frame retrofitted with the TnT BRB system. Results indicate significant enhancements in lateral strength, ductility, and energy dissipation capacity in the retrofitted frame, demonstrating stable and symmetrical hysteresis loops and reduced stiffness degradation compared to conventional X-braced systems. Analytical modeling corroborated these experimental findings, confirming the TnT BRB’s superior capability in absorbing seismic energy and preventing premature structural failures. This investigation emphasizes both the practical and financial benefits of integrating the TnT BRB into seismic retrofitting strategies while recommending further research to optimize the system, specifically addressing issues related to local denting, frictional wear, and alignment to bolster its effectiveness in practical applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Disaster Management, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak 34469, Istanbul, Turkey

Civil Engineering Department, Gebze Technical University, Gebze 41400, Kocaeli, Turkey

Civil Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak 34469, Istanbul, Turkey

Construction and Environmental Engineering, Department of Civil, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-2011, USA

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Evaluating Seismic Vulnerability of Aging RC Frames with Non-Ductile Detailing
2. Post-Earthquake Assessment of Substandard Concrete Buildings: A Field Investigation and Numerical Study
3. Seismic Performance of RC School Buildings after 2011 Van Earthquakes10.1007/s10518-015-9857-4 ↗
4. Seismic Performance of Buildings during 2011 Van Earthquakes and Rebuilding Efforts10.1007/s11803-016-0346-9 ↗
5. Analytical Versus Observational Fragilities: The Case of Pettino (L’Aquila) Damage Data Database10.1007/s10518-014-9658-1 ↗
6. October 23, 2011 Turkey/Van-Ercis Earthquake: Structural Damages in Residential Buildings10.1007/s11069-012-0478-9 ↗
7. Field Reconnaissance on Seismic Performance of RC Buildings after the January 24, 2020 Elazığ-Sivrice Earthquake10.1007/s11069-020-04340-x ↗
8. Observations of Damage due to the Kashmir Earthquake of October 8, 2005 and Study of Current Seismic Provisions for Buildings in Pakistan10.1007/s10518-009-9118-5 ↗
9. Seismic Resilience and Retrofit Priorities for Older RC Buildings
10. Comparative Review of Retrofitting Strategies for Ductility Enhancement in Deficient RC Members
11. Constructability and Economic Feasibility Studies of Column Jacketing in Dense Urban Environments
12. Assessing Architectural Constraints in Shear Wall and FRP Retrofitting of Occupied Structures
13. Global Hysteretic Damping in Retrofitted Concrete Frames Using Energy Dissipators
14. Development of Lightweight Buckling-Restrained Braces: Experimental Validation in RC Building Frames
15. Seismic Upgrade of Deficient Concrete Frames Using Buckling-Restrained Braces: Large-Scale Testing and Analytical Modeling
16. Innovative Connection Designs for BRB-Retrofitted RC Frames: Minimizing Joint Damage
17. Anchorage Solutions for Gusset Plates in Seismically Deficient Beam-Column Joints
18. Evaluating Gusset Plate Behavior in Non-Ductile RC Frames: Experimental Evidence and Finite-Element Correlation
19. Parametric Study on Mortar-Filled and Partially Filled BRBs under Seismic Loads
20. Tube-in-Tube Steel Bracing: Numerical Investigation on Seismic Performance and Failure Modes
21. Experimental Performance of Tube-in-Tube Braces under High Cyclic Demands
22. Modular Construction Approaches for Hollow Steel Bracing Systems
23. Local Denting in Tube-In-Tube Braces under Large Drifts: Numerical Parametric Assessment
24. Developing an All-Steel Buckling Controlled Brace10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.01.006 ↗
25. Cyclic Behavior of Channel-Encased Braces Incorporating Round HSS10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105072 ↗
26. Investigation of Channel-Encased Braces Incorporating Circular HSS10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111692 ↗
27. Cyclic Behavior of Buckling Controlled Braces10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.01.018 ↗
28. Moncarz, P.D., and Krawinkler, H. (1981). Theory and Application of Experimental Model Analysis in Earthquake Engineering, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University. Technical Report No. 50.
29. Krawinkler, H. (1979, January 22–24). Possibilities and Limitations of Scale-Model Testing in Earthquake Engineering. Proceedings of the 2nd US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Stanford, CA, USA.
30. Evaluation of New Seismic provisions for special concentrically braced frames in AISC 341-2210.1016/j.istruc.2024.106453 ↗
31. Shaking Table Model Test of a Steel–Concrete Composite High-Rise Building10.1080/13632460903193949 ↗
32. Welded End-Slot Connection and Debonding Layers for Buckling-Restrained Braces10.1002/eqe.2423 ↗
33. (2005). Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Carbon-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement (Standard No. ASTM A615/A615M-05a).
34. Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency, Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Turkey (2025, January 27). Preliminary Assessment Report on the 06 February Pazarcık and Elbistan Earthquakes, Available online: https://deprem.afad.gov.tr.
35. Turkish Seismic Design Code (2018). Specifications for Buildings to Be Built in Disaster Zones, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement.
36. (2018). SeismoStruct—A Computer Program for STATIC and Dynamic Nonlinear Analysis of Framed Structures, Seismosoft.
37. Elastoplastic Model for Steel Buckling-Restrained Braces10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.07.017 ↗
38. (2022). Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings (Standard No. AISC 341-22).
39. Priestley, M.J.N., Seible, F., and Calvi, G.M. (1996). Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges, Wiley.10.1002/9780470172858 ↗
40. Park, R., and Paulay, T. (1975). Reinforced Concrete Structures, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470172834 ↗
41. Shear Strength Model for Lightly Reinforced Concrete Columns10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:11(1692) ↗
42. Paulay, T., and Priestley, M.J.N. (1992). Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470172841 ↗
43. Dynamic Collapse Analysis for a Reinforced Concrete Frame Sustaining Shear and Axial Failures10.1002/eqe.787 ↗
44. Sezen, H. (2002). Seismic Behavior and Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Columns. [Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California].
45. State of Research on Seismic Retrofit of Concrete Building Structures in the US
46. Theoretical Stress-Strain Model for Confined Concrete10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804) ↗
47. Priestley, M.J.N., Calvi, G.M., and Kowalsky, M.J. (2007). Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures, IUSS Press.
48. Seismic Performance of High-Strength Concrete Columns10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:3(241) ↗
49. Reinforced Concrete Response to Simulated Earthquakes10.1061/JSDEAG.0002765 ↗
50. Method for Random Vibration of Hysteretic Systems10.1061/JMCEA3.0002106 ↗
51. Clough, R.W., and Johnston, S.B. (1966, January 11–12). Effect of Stiffness Degradation on Earthquake Ductility Requirements. In Proceeding of the Second Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium, Tokyo, Japan.
52. (2018). Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings (Standard No. FEMA-P58-1).
53. Optimal intensity measure for seismic performance assessment of shield tunnels in liquefiable and non-liquefiable soils10.1016/j.undsp.2024.03.008 ↗