journal article·2025-04-22Open access

Station Maintenance for Low-Orbit Large-Scale Constellations Based on Absolute and Relative Control Strategies

Min Hu, Feifei Li, Wen Xue, Chenhu Liu, Wen Guo, Yongjing Ruan

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 9

Abstract

With the development of commercial space technology and the proposal of concepts such as “Black Jack”, the Space Transport Layer (STL), and the commercial space-based Internet, large-scale low-orbit satellite constellations have become a research hotspot in the aerospace field. Large-scale low-orbit satellite constellations consist of a huge number of satellites, which makes the networking control and operation management of the constellations more complicated. It also increases the difficulty of achieving the economical and efficient networking of the constellations as well as ensuring their safe and stable operation. In this study, aiming at the problem of large-scale constellation phase control in low orbit, strategies for constellation station holding were examined. First, aiming at the problem of station keeping of large-scale constellations in low orbit, the characteristics of satellite phase drift and phase keeping were analyzed, and absolute and relative station-keeping strategies were proposed. Second, a phase-holding loop control method combining semi-major axis overshoot control and passive control was proposed, and a relative phase-maintenance scheme based on a dynamic reference satellite was designed. Then, the absolute and relative station controls of different low-orbit constellations were simulated. The simulation results showed that in order for all satellites in the constellation to maintain a phase angle deviation within ±0.1° in a low-solar-activity year, about 13 days were required on average to adjust the semi-major axis of the satellites by about 71 m. The relative position control of small-scale constellations was simulated, and only four orbital maneuvers were needed to achieve the phase angle maintenance within the threshold of ±5° for all satellites in the constellation within 300 days. Finally, it was concluded that absolute control was suitable for large-scale constellation phase preservation, and relative control was more suitable for small-scale constellation phase preservation. This paper can provide a reference and suggestions for future large-scale constellation deployment and maintenance control strategies of low-orbit constellations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Space Satellite Systems and Control · Spacecraft Dynamics and Control · Astro and Planetary Science

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Aerospace Science and Technology, Space Engineering University, Beijing 101416, China

Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Techniques for leo constellation deployment and phasing utilizing differential aerodynamic drag
2. Constellation phasing with differential drag on planet labs satellites10.2514/1.A33927 ↗
3. High-precision repeat-groundtrack orbit design and maintenance for Earth observation missions10.1007/s10569-017-9753-0 ↗
4. Long-term formation keeping of satellite constellation using linear-quadratic controller10.2514/2.4204 ↗
5. Li, L., Zhang, J., Gkolias, I., and Colombo, C. (2019, January 22–25). Constellation Design and Low-Thrust Station-Keeping Strategy for Satellites in Inclined Geosynchronous Orbits. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 10th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (ICMAE), Brussels, Belgium.10.1109/ICMAE.2019.8881038 ↗
6. Analytical long-term evolution and perturbation compensation models for BeiDou MEO satellites10.1016/j.cja.2017.10.010 ↗
7. Analyzing Perturbation Motion and Studying Configuration Maintenance Strategy for Compass-M Navigation Constellation
8. Selection of Perturbation Model for Earth Satellite Dynamic Orbit Determination
9. The Structure Evolution of Satellite Constellation
10. Liu, L. (2000). Orbit Theory of Spacecraft, National Defense Industry Press.
11. Mapping orbits with low station keeping costs for constellations of satellites based on the integral over the time of the perturbing forces10.1016/j.actaastro.2014.06.035 ↗
12. Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Huang, H., and Zhou, J. (2014). Autonomous orbit maintenance strategy for relative phase of MEO satellite. Flight Dyn., 32.
13. On Perturbation and Orbital Maintenance Control Strategy for Walker Constellation
14. Evolution Analysis and Maintenance Control Strategy Study on LEO Mega-Constellation Configuration
15. Adaptive absolute station-keeping method for leo mega-constellation
16. The control of mega-constellation at low earth orbit based on tle
17. Control method of constellation relative-configuration maintenance based on inter-satellite links
18. Long-Term Stable and High-Precision Relative Navigation Method for Satellites Formation Based on Reduced Relative Orbit Elements
19. Analysis of configuration offsetting maintenance method for LEO Walker constellation
20. A Novel Design Method for the Constellation Configuration Stability Considering the Perturbation Influence
21. Analysis of Configuration and Maintenance Strategy of LEO Walker Constellation
22. A Relative Phase-Keeping Strategy of Walker Constellation Based on Reference orbit
23. A High Precision Phase Keeping Method for LEO Constellation
24. Autonomous Maintenance Strategy for Constellation Configuration by Satellite Using GNSS Data Fitting
25. Relative and absolute station-keeping for two-dimensional–lattice flower constellations10.2514/1.G000358 ↗
26. Some circular orbit patterns providing continuous whole Earth coverage