journal article·2025-04-21Open access

A Hybrid Model for Designers to Learn from Failures: A Case of a High Potential Fire Incident at an Underground Hard Rock Mine

Tafadzwa Gotora, Ashraf Wasfi Labib

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 8

Abstract

Mining companies are increasingly being motivated to become High Reliability Organisations (HROs) in order to achieve better results in critical areas such as safety, environment management, and loss avoidance despite their complex environments. High Reliability Organisations are recognised by their abilities to effectively anticipate failures and disasters, including use of lessons learnt from previous failures. This paper seeks to demonstrate how designers for systems in the mining industry can learn from failures to anticipate failures and effectively manage them. It also demonstrates the applicability of a hybrid model which incorporates and integrates Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), Reliability Block Diagram (RBD) analysis, Risk Priority Number (RPN) concepts, and Analytical Hierarchy Processes (AHPs) in a case study for a High Potential Incident (HPI) at an underground hard rock mine. It shows how valuable lessons can be extracted and how these lessons can be used in decision making to prevent and manage future failures. The main contribution of this work is the demonstration of incorporating HRO principles with a hybrid modelling framework for learning from failures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Risk and Safety Analysis · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Chemical Safety and Risk Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering (MACE), University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

School of Organisations, Systems and People, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3DE, UK

Funding

The European Union—Next generation EU and Romanian Government

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Mining-related environmental disasters: A High Reliability Organisation (HRO) perspective10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137965 ↗
2. A hybrid model for learning from failures10.1016/j.eswa.2017.10.031 ↗
3. Learning (and unlearning) from failures: 30 years on from Bhopal to Fukushima an analysis through reliability engineering techniques10.1016/j.psep.2015.03.008 ↗
4. Underground mining fire hazards and the optimization of emergency evacuation strategies (EES): The issues, existing methodology and limitations, and way forward10.1016/j.psep.2023.07.012 ↗
5. Stewart, C.M. (2021). Challenges and solutions in the development of the VentFIRE mine network fire simulator. Mine Ventilation, CRC Press.10.1201/9781003188476-31 ↗
6. Disaster prevention through a harmonized framework for high reliability organisations10.1016/j.ssci.2018.09.005 ↗
7. Learning from safety incidents in high-reliability organizations: A systematic review of learning tools that could be adapted and used in healthcare10.1093/intqhc/mzab046 ↗
8. Weick, K.E., and Sutcliffe, K. (2011). Managing the Unexpected: Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty, John Wiley & Sons. [2nd ed.].
9. High reliability organizations (HROs)10.1016/j.bpa.2011.03.001 ↗
10. A hybrid model for learning from failures: The Hurricane Katrina disaster10.1016/j.eswa.2015.06.020 ↗
11. Development of a readiness model for industry 4.0 using Analytical Hierarchy process and fuzzy inference system: Bangladesh perspective10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23664 ↗
12. Cleveland, C.J. (2004). Multicriteria Analysis of Energy. Encyclopedia of Energy, Elsevier.
13. Analytic hierarchy process-based optimal load scheduling framework in an islanded distribution network10.1016/j.egyr.2023.09.103 ↗
14. The analytic hierarchy process—What it is and how it is used10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8 ↗
15. Tang, W., Yuan, L., Bahrami, D., and Rowland, J. (2021). Water spray suppression of leaked oil fires: A numerical study. Mine Ventilation, CRC Press.10.1201/9781003188476-32 ↗
16. McPherson, M.J. (1993). Subsurface fires and explosions. Subsurface Ventilation and Environmental Engineering, Springer.10.1007/978-94-011-1550-6 ↗
17. Fires and explosions10.1016/j.mpaic.2007.09.002 ↗
18. A hybrid approach for an oil and gas company as a representative of a high reliability organization10.1080/09617353.2021.1920299 ↗
19. Quantitative risk assessment of domino effect in Natech scenarios triggered by lightning10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104095 ↗
20. Integrated Risk Assessment of a Dangerous Goods Container Terminal. A Bow-Tie Approach
21. Learning to manage the unexpected: Applying Weick and Sutcliffe’s HRO principles to oil tanker accidents10.1108/DPM-03-2023-0065 ↗
22. Wang, H., Li, D., Sheng, T., Sheng, J., Jing, P., and Zhang, D. (2023). A Modeling of Human Reliability Analysis on Dam Failure Caused by Extreme Weather. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132312968 ↗
23. Empowering software reliability: Leveraging efficient fault detection and removal efficiency10.1080/08982112.2024.2358889 ↗
24. A Bibliometric Analysis on the Safety of Oil and Gas Pipelines: Research Trends and Perspectives10.1061/JPSEA2.PSENG-1797 ↗
25. Zeibak-Shini, R., Malka, H., Kima, O., and Shohet, I.M. (2024). Analytical Hierarchy Process for Construction Safety Management and Resource Allocation. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14209265 ↗
26. Yonat, N., and Shohet, I.M. (2025). Theory of Faults (ToF): Numerical Quality Management in Complex Systems. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15020595 ↗
27. A supplier selection model: A comparison of fuzzy logic and the analytic hierarchy process10.1080/00207543.2010.531776 ↗