Bioinformatics-Based Management of Vitellogenin-like Protein’s Role in Pathogen Defense in Nicotiana tabacum L.
Source abstract
Abstract
The primary objective of this study was to identify and characterize pathogen defense proteins in the Nicotiana tabacum L. proteome, focusing on their structural, functional, and evolutionary properties, as well as their interactions with pathogen-derived molecules. Specifically, we aimed to comprehensively analyze the proteome to pinpoint potential uncharacterized defense-related protein that has emerging roles in immune responses and antioxidant activity across plants and animals. Through integrated computational approaches, we determined evolutionary relationships, and structural modeling of the selected protein was performed using different modeling software, followed by validation through multiple metrics, including stereochemical checks (Ramachandran plot), MolProbity analysis, and Z-scores. We further investigated the functional binding regions or interaction sites. We performed molecular docking to investigate the molecular interactions between selected proteins and pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), specifically β-glucan and peptidoglycan (PGN), to elucidate their defensive mechanisms. Last, normal mode analysis (NMA), molecular dynamics simulation (MDS), and post-simulation analyses were employed to evaluate the stability and mobility of the protein–ligand complexes. Uncharacterized vitellogenin-like protein (VLP: ID A0A1S4CXB2) with the potential defense domain chosen because of its predicted immune-related features, stress response patterns, and unknown pathogen role at new immunity functions. Phylogenetic analysis revealed significant sequence homology with VLPs from other members of the Solanaceae family. Structural modeling showed a high-quality model, with docking studies indicating a stronger affinity for PGN (−10.16 kcal/mol) and β-glucan (−7.19 kcal/mol), highlighting its potential involvement in pathogen defense. NMA, MDS, and post-simulation analyses revealed that PGN exhibits more substantial binding stability and more extensive interactions with VLP than β-glucan. Our findings confirmed that VLPs in N. tabacum may function as pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), capable of recognizing and responding to pathogens by activating immune signaling pathways. Future experimental validation of these interactions could further elucidate the role of VLPs in plant defense and their potential application in biotechnological approaches for sustainable agriculture.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Transgenic Plants and Applications · Plant tissue culture and regeneration · Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Management, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel
References (89)
Show source-provided references
1. Otávio, O.A., dos Santos, M.S., Antunes Filho, S., and Backx, B.P. (2024). Nanotechnology for the Control of Plant Pathogens and Pests. Plant Nano Biol., 8.10.1016/j.plana.2024.100080 ↗
2. War, A.R., Paulraj, M.G., Ahmad, T., Buhroo, A.A., Hussain, B., Ignacimuthu, S., and Sharma, H.C. (2012). Mechanisms of Plant Defense against Insect Herbivores. Plant Signal. Behav., 7.10.4161/psb.21663 ↗
3. Hönig, M., Roeber, V.M., Schmülling, T., and Cortleven, A. (2023). Chemical Priming of Plant Defense Responses to Pathogen Attacks. Front. Plant Sci., 14.10.3389/fpls.2023.1146577 ↗
4. Peng, H., Feng, H., Zhang, T., and Wang, Q. (2023). Editorial: Plant Defense Mechanisms in Plant-Pathogen Interactions, Frontiers Media SA.10.3389/978-2-8325-4075-6 ↗
5. Plant Defense Mechanisms Against Bacterial Pathogens
6. Mithöfer, A., and Maffei, M.E. (2017). General Mechanisms of Plant Defense and Plant Toxins. Plant Toxins, Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-6464-4_21 ↗
7. How Do Plants Defend Themselves against Pathogens-Biochemical Mechanisms and Genetic Interventions10.1007/s12298-022-01146-y ↗
8. The Chemotype Core Collection of Genus Nicotiana10.1111/tpj.15745 ↗
9. Screening of Polyphenols in Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) and Determination of Their Antioxidant Activity in Different Tobacco Varieties10.1021/acsomega.1c03275 ↗
10. Zhang, W., Pan, X., Fu, J., Cheng, W., Lin, H., Zhang, W., and Huang, Z. (2024). Phytochemicals Derived from Nicotiana tabacum L. Plant Contribute to Pharmaceutical Development. Front. Pharmacol., 15.10.3389/fphar.2024.1372456 ↗
11. A History of the Medicinal Use of Tobacco 1492–186010.1017/S0025727300012333 ↗
12. Zou, X., BK, A., Abu-Izneid, T., Aziz, A., Devnath, P., Rauf, A., Mitra, S., Emran, T.B., Mujawah, A.A.H., and Lorenzo, J.M. (2021). Current Advances of Functional Phytochemicals in Nicotiana Plant and Related Potential Value of Tobacco Processing Waste: A Review. Biomed. Pharmacother., 143.10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112191 ↗
13. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity of Protein-AgNPs from the Stem of Nicotiana tabacum10.2174/1573407216999200723111743 ↗
14. Antibacterial Activity of Nicotiana tabacum Leaves10.1016/S0367-326X(99)00148-3 ↗
15. Antiparasitic Potential of Plant Natural Products against Protozoans, Nematodes and Cestodes: A Review
16. Prommaban, A., Kheawfu, K., Chittasupho, C., Sirilun, S., Hemsuwimon, K., and Chaiyana, W. (2022). Phytochemical, Antioxidant, Antihyaluronidase, Antityrosinase, and Antimicrobial Properties of Nicotiana tabacum L. Leaf Extracts. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., 2022.10.1155/2022/5761764 ↗
17. Phytochemical Analysis and Antibacterial Activity of Nicotiana tabacum and Nicotiana Rustica10.37962/jbas.v12i1.317 ↗
18. Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)—A Model System for Tissue Culture Interventions and Genetic Engineering
19. Pharmacological and Toxicological Effects of Nicotiana tabacum10.53346/wjapmr.2022.3.1.0034 ↗
20. Manzoor, S., Nabi, S.U., Rather, T.R., Gani, G., Mir, Z.A., Wani, A.W., Ali, S., Tyagi, A., and Manzar, N. (2024). Advancing Crop Disease Resistance through Genome Editing: A Promising Approach for Enhancing Agricultural Production. Front. Genome Ed., 6.10.3389/fgeed.2024.1399051 ↗
21. Yin, Q., Ren, Z., Wu, D., Feng, Z., Zhu, Z., Jaisi, A., Wang, H., and Yang, M. (2025). Comparative Effects of Biocontrol Agent and Pathogen on Nicotiana tabacum: Insights into Fungal-Plant Interactions. Plant Signal Behav., 20.10.1080/15592324.2025.2453562 ↗
22. Ahmad, Z., Niyazi, S., Firdoos, A., Wang, C., Manzoor, M.A., Ramakrishnan, M., Upadhyay, A., and Ding, Y. (2024). Enhancing Plant Resilience: Nanotech Solutions for Sustainable Agriculture. Heliyon, 10.10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40735 ↗
23. Kęska, P., Gustaw, W., and Stadnik, J. (2021). Trends in in Silico Approaches to the Prediction of Biologically Active Peptides in Meat and Meat Products as an Important Factor for Preventing Food-Related Chronic Diseases. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112311236 ↗
24. Bhat, G.R., Sethi, I., Rah, B., Kumar, R., and Afroze, D. (2022). Innovative in Silico Approaches for Characterization of Genes and Proteins. Front. Genet., 13.10.3389/fgene.2022.865182 ↗
25. Structure-Based in Silico Approaches for Drug Discovery against Mycobacterium Tuberculosis10.1016/j.csbj.2021.06.034 ↗
26. Batool, M., Ahmad, B., and Choi, S. (2019). A Structure-Based Drug Discovery Paradigm. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 20.10.3390/ijms20112783 ↗
27. Dhiman, V., Biswas, S., Shekhawat, R.S., Sadhukhan, A., and Yadav, P. (2023). In Silico Characterization of Five Novel Disease-Resistance Proteins in Oryza sativa Sp. Japonica against Bacterial Leaf Blight and Rice Blast Diseases. bioRxiv.10.1101/2023.06.05.543715 ↗
28. Hasan, R., Rony, M.N.H., and Ahmed, R. (2021). In Silico Characterization and Structural Modeling of Bacterial Metalloprotease of Family M4. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol., 19.10.1186/s43141-020-00105-y ↗
29. Agnihotry, S., Pathak, R.K., Singh, D.B., Tiwari, A., and Hussain, I. (2021). Protein Structure Prediction. Bioinformatics: Methods and Applications, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-323-89775-4.00023-7 ↗
30. InterPro in 202210.1093/nar/gkac993 ↗
31. Gasteiger, E., Hoogland, C., Gattiker, A., Duvaud, S., Wilkins, M.R., Appel, R.D., and Bairoch, A. (2005). Protein Identification and Analysis Tools on the ExPASy Server. The Proteomics Protocols Handbook, Humana Press.10.1385/1-59259-890-0:571 ↗
32. The EMBL-EBI Job Dispatcher Sequence Analysis Tools Framework in 202410.1093/nar/gkae241 ↗
33. Protein Database Searches Using Compositionally Adjusted Substitution Matrices10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04945.x ↗
34. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A New Generation of Protein Database Search Programs10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 ↗
35. MMseqs2 Enables Sensitive Protein Sequence Searching for the Analysis of Massive Data Sets10.1038/nbt.3988 ↗
36. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 1110.1093/molbev/msab120 ↗
37. Uddin, M.B., Sajib, E.H., Hoque, S.F., Bappy, M.N.I., Elahi, F., Ghosh, A., Muhit, S., Hassan, M.M., Hasan, M., and Chelliah, R. (2022). Genomic Diversity and Molecular Dynamics Interaction on Mutational Variances among RB Domains of SARS-CoV-2 Interplay Drug Inactivation. Infect. Genet. Evol., 97.10.1016/j.meegid.2021.105128 ↗
38. Zhang, Y.B., Yuan, Y., Pang, Y.X., Yu, F.L., Yuan, C., Hu, X., and Wang, D. (2019). Phylogenetic Reconstruction and Divergence Time Estimation of Blumea Dc. (Asteraceae: Inuleae) in China Based on Nrdna Its and Cpdna Trnl-f Sequences. Plants, 8.10.3390/plants8070210 ↗
39. MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods10.1093/molbev/msr121 ↗
40. Keane, T.M., Creevey, C.J., Pentony, M.M., Naughton, T.J., and McInerney, J.O. (2006). Assessment of Methods for Amino Acid Matrix Selection and Their Use on Empirical Data Shows That Ad Hoc Assumptions for Choice of Matrix Are Not Justified. BMC Evol. Biol., 6.10.1186/1471-2148-6-29 ↗
41. Sopma: Significant Improvements in Protein Secondary Structure Prediction by Consensus Prediction from Multiple Alignments10.1093/bioinformatics/11.6.681 ↗
42. The PSIPRED Protein Structure Prediction Server10.1093/bioinformatics/16.4.404 ↗
43. SWISS-MODEL: Homology Modelling of Protein Structures and Complexes10.1093/nar/gky427 ↗
44. I-TASSER Server: New Development for Protein Structure and Function Predictions10.1093/nar/gkv342 ↗
45. I-TASSER-MTD: A Deep-Learning-Based Platform for Multi-Domain Protein Structure and Function Prediction10.1038/s41596-022-00728-0 ↗
46. Zheng, W., Zhang, C., Li, Y., Pearce, R., Bell, E.W., and Zhang, Y. (2021). Folding Non-Homologous Proteins by Coupling Deep-Learning Contact Maps with I-TASSER Assembly Simulations. Cell Rep. Methods, 1.10.1016/j.crmeth.2021.100014 ↗
47. Kim, D.E., Chivian, D., and Baker, D. (2004). Protein Structure Prediction and Analysis Using the Robetta Server. Nucleic Acids Res., 32.10.1093/nar/gkh468 ↗
48. Homology Modeling, Model and Software Evaluation: Three Related Resources10.1093/bioinformatics/14.6.523 ↗
49. PROCHECK: A Program to Check the Stereochemical Quality of Protein Structures10.1107/S0021889892009944 ↗
50. GalaxyWEB Server for Protein Structure Prediction and Refinement10.1093/nar/gks493 ↗
51. ProSA-Web: Interactive Web Service for the Recognition of Errors in Three-Dimensional Structures of Proteins10.1093/nar/gkm290 ↗
52. MolProbity: More and Better Reference Data for Improved All-Atom Structure Validation10.1002/pro.3330 ↗
53. Ménard, R., Alban, S., De Ruffray, P., Jamois, F., Franz, G., Fritig, B., Yvin, J.C., and Kauffmann, S. (2004). β-1,3 Glucan Sulfate, but Not β-1,3 Glucan, Induces the Salicylic Acid Signaling Pathway in Tobacco and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 16.10.1105/tpc.104.024968 ↗
54. Beta-Glucan Recognition by the Innate Immune System10.1111/j.1600-065X.2009.00793.x ↗
55. β-Glucan: Crucial Component of the Fungal Cell Wall and Elusive MAMP in Plants10.1016/j.fgb.2015.12.004 ↗
56. In Silico Molecular Docking Analysis of Limonene with The Fat Mass and Obesity-Associated Protein by Using Autodock Vina
57. CASTp 3.0: Computed Atlas of Surface Topography of Proteins10.1093/nar/gky473 ↗
58. Katuwal, S., Upadhyaya, S.R., Marahatha, R., Shrestha, A., Regmi, B.P., Khadayat, K., Basnet, S., Basnyat, R.C., and Parajuli, N. (2023). In Silico Study of Coumarins: Wedelolactone as a Potential Inhibitor of the Spike Protein of the SARS-CoV-2 Variants. J. Trop. Med., 2023.10.1155/2023/4771745 ↗
59. Shah, M., Yamin, R., Ahmad, I., Wu, G., Jahangir, Z., Shamim, A., Nawaz, H., Nishan, U., Ullah, R., and Ali, E.A. (2024). In-Silico Evaluation of Natural Alkaloids against the Main Protease and Spike Glycoprotein as Potential Therapeutic Agents for SARS-CoV-2. PLoS ONE, 19.10.1371/journal.pone.0294769 ↗
60. IMODS: Internal Coordinates Normal Mode Analysis Server10.1093/nar/gku339 ↗
61. Molecular Docking, Drug-Likeness and ADMET Analysis, Application of Density Functional Theory (DFT) and Molecular Dynamics (MD) Simulation to the Phytochemicals from Withania Somnifera as Potential Antagonists of Estrogen Receptor Alpha (ER-α)10.2174/1573409916999200730181611 ↗
62. Singh, S., and Singh, V.K. (2020). Molecular Dynamics Simulation: Methods and Application. Frontiers in Protein Structure, Function, and Dynamics, Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-5530-5_9 ↗
63. Sequence-Dependent DNA Deformability Studied Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations10.1093/nar/gkm627 ↗
64. Petrov, D., Margreitter, C., Grandits, M., Oostenbrink, C., and Zagrovic, B. (2013). A Systematic Framework for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Protein Post-Translational Modifications. PLoS Comput. Biol., 9.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003154 ↗
65. IMod: Multipurpose Normal Mode Analysis in Internal Coordinates10.1093/bioinformatics/btr497 ↗
66. Bowers, K.J., Chow, E., Xu, H., Dror, R.O., Eastwood, M.P., Gregersen, B.A., Klepeis, J.L., Kolossvary, I., Moraes, M.A., and Sacerdoti, F.D. (2006, January 11–17). Scalable Algorithms for Molecular Dynamics Simulations on Commodity Clusters. Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, SC’06, Tampa, FL, USA.10.1109/SC.2006.54 ↗
67. Target-Based Molecular Modeling Strategies for Schistosomiasis Drug Discovery10.4155/fmc.15.21 ↗
68. Ferreira, L.G., Dos Santos, R.N., Oliva, G., and Andricopulo, A.D. (2015). Molecular Docking and Structure-Based Drug Design Strategies. Molecules, 20.10.3390/molecules200713384 ↗
69. Computational analysis of action mechanism and evolutionary insight of chitin degrading enzymes in Bacillus cereus
70. Hildebrand, P.W., Rose, A.S., and Tiemann, J.K.S. (2019). Bringing Molecular Dynamics Simulation Data into View, Elsevier Current Trends.10.1016/j.tibs.2019.06.004 ↗
71. Rasheed, M.A., Iqbal, M.N., Saddick, S., Ali, I., Khan, F.S., Kanwal, S., Ahmed, D., Ibrahim, M., Afzal, U., and Awais, M. (2021). Identification of Lead Compounds against Scm (Fms10) in Enterococcus Faecium Using Computer Aided Drug Designing. Life, 11.10.3390/life11020077 ↗
72. Prediction of Absolute Solvation Free Energies Using Molecular Dynamics Free Energy Perturbation and the Opls Force Field10.1021/ct900587b ↗
73. Molecular Docking: A Powerful Approach for Structure-Based Drug Discovery10.2174/157340911795677602 ↗
74. N-Acetyldopamine Dimers from Oxya Chinensis Sinuosa Attenuates Lipopolysaccharides Induced Inflammation and Inhibits Cathepsin C Activity10.1016/j.csbj.2022.02.011 ↗
75. SARS-CoV-2 Mpro Inhibitors: Identification of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Mpro Compounds from FDA Approved Drugs10.1080/07391102.2020.1842807 ↗
76. Adelusi, T.I., Bolaji, O.Q., Ojo, T.O., Adegun, I.P., and Adebodun, S. (2023). Molecular Mechanics with Generalized Born Surface Area (MMGBSA) Calculations and Docking Studies Unravel Some Antimalarial Compounds Using Heme O Synthase as Therapeutic Target. ChemistrySelect, 8.10.1002/slct.202303686 ↗
77. A Novel Multi-Epitopic Peptide Vaccine Candidate Against Helicobacter Pylori: In-Silico Identification, Design, Cloning and Validation Through Molecular Dynamics10.1007/s10989-020-10157-w ↗
78. Mirzadeh, A., Kobakhidze, G., Vuillemot, R., Jonic, S., and Rouiller, I. (2022). In Silico Prediction, Characterization, Docking Studies and Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Human P97 in Complex with P37 Cofactor. BMC Mol. Cell Biol., 23.10.1186/s12860-022-00437-2 ↗
79. Al-Karmalawy, A.A., Dahab, M.A., Metwaly, A.M., Elhady, S.S., Elkaeed, E.B., Eissa, I.H., and Darwish, K.M. (2021). Molecular Docking and Dynamics Simulation Revealed the Potential Inhibitory Activity of ACEIs Against SARS-CoV-2 Targeting the HACE2 Receptor. Front. Chem., 9.10.3389/fchem.2021.661230 ↗
80. Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, and ADMET Analysis of Levamisole Derivatives against the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease (MPro)
81. Molecular Docking, Validation, Dynamics Simulations, and Pharmacokinetic Prediction of Natural Compounds against the SARS-CoV-2 Main-Protease10.1080/07391102.2020.1815584 ↗
82. Sparling, D.W. (2016). Bioindicators of Contaminant Exposure. Ecotoxicology Essentials, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-801947-4.00003-2 ↗
83. Vitellogenin, a Multivalent Sensor and an Antimicrobial Effector10.1016/j.biocel.2010.11.003 ↗
84. Sun, C., and Zhang, S. (2015). Immune-Relevant and Antioxidant Activities of Vitellogenin and Yolk Proteins in Fish. Nutrients, 7.10.3390/nu7105432 ↗
85. Sheng, Y., Chen, J., Jiang, H., Lu, Y., Dong, Z., Pang, L., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Chen, X., and Huang, J. (2023). The Vitellogenin Receptor Gene Contributes to Mating and Host-Searching Behaviors in Parasitoid Wasps. iScience, 26.10.1016/j.isci.2023.106298 ↗
86. Vitellogenin Regulates Antimicrobial Responses in Chinese Mitten Crab, Eriocheir Sinensis10.1016/j.fsi.2017.08.002 ↗
87. Upadhyay, S.K., Singh, H., Dixit, S., Mendu, V., and Verma, P.C. (2016). Molecular Characterization of Vitellogenin and Vitellogenin Receptor of Bemisia Tabaci. PLoS ONE, 11.10.1371/journal.pone.0155306 ↗
88. Huo, Y., Yu, Y., Chen, L., Li, Q., Zhang, M., Song, Z., Chen, X., Fang, R., and Zhang, L. (2018). Insect Tissue-Specific Vitellogenin Facilitates Transmission of Plant Virus. PLoS Pathog., 14.10.1371/journal.ppat.1006909 ↗
89. He, Y.-Z., Wang, Y.-M., Yin, T.-Y., Cuellar, W.J., Liu, S.-S., and Wang, X.-W. (2021). Gut-Expressed Vitellogenin Facilitates the Movement of a Plant Virus across the Midgut Wall in Its Insect Vector. mSystems, 6.10.1128/mSystems.00581-21 ↗