The Application of the SubChain Salp Swarm Algorithm in the Less-Than-Truckload Freight Matching Problem
Source abstract
Abstract
The less-than-truckload (LTL) freight problem is a general pain point in logistics applications. Its challenge resides in the fact that these loads cannot be shipped in a timely manner due to their relatively small volumes. Traditional LTL matching methods are challenged by delays in updating logistic information and higher distribution costs. In order to solve LTL challenges, we developed a novel SubChain Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSSA) by improving the traditional Salp Swarm Algorithm with the utilization of a SubChain operation. Our method aims to find the optimal strategy for maintaining a balance between lower operating costs and customer satisfaction. Our SSSA method combines multiple disconnected SubChain points to separate individual chains to find local optima and obtain better convergence results in the final decision. We have compared our method with mainstream metaheuristic algorithms using logistics datasets from a road freight company in Hangzhou, and the results demonstrate that our method converges faster than other methods and has a lower variance. Our method solves the limitation of local optima observed in other optimization methods and improves customer service in relation to the transportation issue.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods · Vehicle License Plate Recognition · Optimization and Packing Problems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Sciences, Engineering and Technology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
Post Big Data Technology and Application Engineering Research Center of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China
Post Industry Technology Research and Development Center of the State Posts Bureau (Internet of Things Technology), Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China
Funding
Jiangsu Agriculture Science and Technology Innovation Fund (JASTIF)
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Surya, V.J., Muthurajkumar, S., Jitiendran, K., Ajithkumar, K., and Ibrahim, S.M. (2022, January 17–19). A Web Based Application for Optimization of Less than Truckload Problem. Proceedings of the IEEE World Conference on Applied Intelligence and Computing (AIC), Sonbhadra, India.10.1109/AIC55036.2022.9848847 ↗
2. Evolutionary Carrier Selection for Shared Truck Delivery Services10.1109/TVT.2022.3229360 ↗
3. Yang, X., Bian, Y., Bostel, N., and Dejax, P. (2019, January 5–7). A Two-Phase Method for Solving the Hub Location and Routing Problem. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics (Cybconf), Beijing, China.10.1109/Cybconf47073.2019.9436586 ↗
4. Cost Allocation for Less-Than-Truckload Collaboration via Shipper Consortium10.1287/trsc.2021.1066 ↗
5. A multi-round exchange mechanism for carrier collaboration in less than truckload transportation10.1016/j.tre.2019.07.004 ↗
6. Near real-time loadplan adjustments for less-than-truckload carriers10.1016/j.ejor.2021.11.044 ↗
7. Revenue optimization for less-than-truckload carriers in the Physical Internet: Dynamic pricing and request selection10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.010 ↗
8. Dynamic pricing model for less-than-truckload carriers in the Physical Internet10.1007/s10845-016-1289-8 ↗
9. Tang, W., Chen, X., Lang, M., Li, S., Liu, Y., and Li, W. (2024). Optimization of truck–cargo online matching for the less-than-truck-load logistics hub under real-time demand. Mathematics, 12.10.3390/math12050755 ↗
10. Incorporating holding costs in continuous-time service network design: New model, relaxation, and exact algorithm10.1287/trsc.2022.0104 ↗
11. Sun, X., and Xing, D. (2024, January 23–25). Research on vehicle-cargo matching algorithm considering price heterogeneity. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Traffic Systems and Smart City (ITSSC 2024), Xi’an, China.10.1117/12.3051307 ↗
12. Salp swarm algorithm: A comprehensive survey10.1007/s00521-019-04629-4 ↗
13. Grasshopper optimisation algorithm: Theory and applications10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.01.004 ↗
14. Hybridizing salp swarm algorithm with particle swarm optimization algorithm for recent optimization functions10.1007/s12065-020-00486-6 ↗
15. Faris, H., Mirjalili, S., Aljarah, I., Mafarja, M., and Heidari, A.A. (2020). Salp swarm algorithm: Theory, literature review, and application in extreme learning machines. Nature-Inspired Optimizers, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-12127-3_11 ↗
16. Dynamic salp swarm algorithm for feature selection10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113873 ↗
17. Self-adaptive salp swarm algorithm for engineering optimization problems10.1016/j.apm.2020.08.014 ↗
18. Zivkovic, M., Stoean, C., Chhabra, A., Budimirovic, N., Petrovic, A., and Bacanin, N. (2022). Novel improved salp swarm algorithm: An application for feature selection. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22051711 ↗
19. Improved Salp Swarm Algorithm based on opposition based learning and novel local search algorithm for feature selection10.1016/j.eswa.2019.113122 ↗
20. Zhao, F., Yang, S., Liu, J., Wu, B., and Hu, Y. (2023, January 19–21). Chaotic Salp Swarm Algorithm for Inverse Kinematics of a 5-DOF Drill Floor Robot. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Control, Measurement and Signal Processing (ICMSP), Chengdu, China.10.1109/ICMSP58539.2023.10170825 ↗
21. Evolution design methodology of the metamorphic mechanisms inspired by gene deduction
22. Grey wolf optimizer10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007 ↗
23. A survey of artificial hummingbird algorithm and its variants: Statistical analysis, performance evaluation, and structural reviewing10.1007/s11831-024-10135-1 ↗
24. Ikeagwuani, C.C., Nnonyelu, C.J., Oti, M.C., Ude, E.J., and Alexander, T.C. (2025). A posteriori constrained bio-inspired algorithm for enhancing strength and resilient modulus of soft subgrade soil. Road Mater. Pavement Des., 1–32.10.1080/14680629.2025.2479214 ↗
25. Moth-flame optimization algorithm: A novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm10.1016/j.knosys.2015.07.006 ↗
26. Multi-objective quasi-reflection learning and weight strategy-based moth flame optimization algorithm10.1007/s00521-023-09234-0 ↗
27. The whale optimization algorithm10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008 ↗
28. Su, Y., and Liu, Y. (2025). A novel marine predator whale optimization algorithm for global numerical optimization. Eng. Optim., 1–37.10.1080/0305215X.2025.2464862 ↗