Safety Assessment of Microwave Breast Imaging: Heating Analysis on Digital Breast Phantoms
Source abstract
Abstract
The impact of breast cancer on public health is serious, and due to risk/benefit assessment, screening programs are usually restricted to women older than 49 years. Microwave imaging devices offer advantages such as non-ionizing radiation, low cost, and the ability to distinguish between cancerous and healthy tissues due to their electrical properties. Ensuring the safety of this technology is vital for its potential clinical application. To estimate the temperature increase in breast tissues from a microwave imaging scanner, cases of healthy, benign, and malignant breast tissues were analyzed using three digital models and adding two healthy breast models with varying densities. Virtual experiments were conducted using the Sim4Life software (version 7.2) with a system consisting of a horn antenna in transmission and a Vivaldi antenna in reception. Temperature increases were estimated based on the Specific Absorption Rate distributions computed for different configurations and frequencies. The highest temperature increase obtained in this analysis is lower than 60 μK in fibroglandular tissue or skin, depending on the frequency and breast density. The presence of a receiving antenna acting as a scatterer modifies the temperature increase, which is almost negligible. Microwave examination can be performed without harmful thermal effects due to electromagnetic field exposure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrared Thermography in Medicine · Microwave Imaging and Scattering Analysis · Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Politecnico di Torino, Department of Electronics and Telecommunications (DET), Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129 Torino, Italy
Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (INRiM), Strada delle Cacce 91, 10135 Torino, Italy
Umbria Bioengineering Technologies, UBT Srl, Via Santa Maria della Spina, 25, 06081 Perugia, Italy
School of Engineering, London South Bank University, 103 Borough Rd, London SE1 0AA, UK
Funding
MammoScreen project
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Current and future burden of breast cancer: Global statistics for 2020 and 204010.1016/j.breast.2022.08.010 ↗
2. Towards consensus on managing high mammographic density in population breast screening?10.1016/j.breast.2023.04.004 ↗
3. Aldhaeebi, M.A., Alzoubi, K., Almoneef, T.S., Bamatraf, S.M., Attia, H., and Ramahi, O.M. (2020). Review of Microwaves techniques for breast cancer detection. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20082390 ↗
4. Dielectric properties for non-invasive detection of normal, benign, and malignant breast tissues using microwave theories10.1111/1759-7714.12605 ↗
5. UWB device for breast microwave imaging: Phantom and clinical validations10.1016/j.measurement.2019.05.109 ↗
6. Solis-Nepote, M., Reimer, T., and Pistorius, S. (2019, January 23–27). An air-operated bistatic system for breast microwave radar imaging: Pre-clinical validation. Proceedings of the 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Berlin, Germany.10.1109/EMBC.2019.8857646 ↗
7. Fontaine, G., and Pistorius, S. (2021, January 8–11). Initial characterization of a portable breast microwave detection device. Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Antenna Technology and Applied Electromagnetics (ANTEM), Winnipeg, MB, Canada.10.1109/ANTEM51107.2021.9518535 ↗
8. Microwave Breast Screening Prototype: System Miniaturization with IC Pulse Radio10.1109/JERM.2020.3029214 ↗
9. CMOS Gaussian Monocycle Pulse Transceiver for Radar-Based Microwave Imaging10.1109/TBCAS.2020.3029282 ↗
10. (2024, October 10). Manufacturers MD. Available online: https://health.ec.europa.eu/medical-devices-topics-interest/reprocessing-devices/manufacturers-md_en.
11. Sani, L., Vispa, A., Loretoni, R., Duranti, M., Ghavami, N., Sánchez-Bayuela, D.A., Caschera, S., Paoli, M., Bigotti, A., and Badia, M. (2021). Breast lesion detection through MammoWave device: Empirical detection capability assessment of microwave images’ parameters. PLoS ONE, 16.10.1371/journal.pone.0250005 ↗
12. MARIA® M5: A multicentre clinical study to evaluate the ability of the Micrima radio-wave radar breast imaging system (MARIA®) to detect lesions in the symptomatic breast10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.04.017 ↗
13. Pathway to Demonstrating Clinical Efficacy of Microwave Breast Imaging: Qualitative and Quantitative Performance Assessment10.1109/JERM.2022.3218756 ↗
14. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) (2020). Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Phys., 118, 483–524.10.1097/HP.0000000000001210 ↗
15. Microwave imaging of breast cancer: Simulation analysis of SAR and temperature in tumors for different age and type10.1016/j.csite.2022.101843 ↗
16. SAR levels in microwave breast imaging: 3-D safety assessment with plane-wave illumination
17. SAR analysis of directive antenna on anatomically real breast phantoms for microwave holography10.1002/mop.32037 ↗
18. Song, H., Sasada, S., Kadoya, T., Okada, M., Arihiro, K., Xiao, X., and Kikkawa, T. (2017). Detectability of Breast Tumor by a Hand-held Impulse-Radar Detector: Performance Evaluation and Pilot Clinical Study. Sci. Rep., 7.10.1038/s41598-017-16617-6 ↗
19. Pelicano, A.C., Gonçalves, M.C.T., Godinho, D.M., Castela, T., Orvalho, M.L., Araújo, N.A.M., Porter, E., and Conceição, R.C. (2021). Development of 3D MRI-based anatomically realistic models of breast tissues and tumors for microwave imaging diagnosis. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21248265 ↗
20. Mammographic breast density: Current assessment methods, clinical implications, and future directions10.1053/j.sult.2022.11.001 ↗
21. Volumetric breast density evaluation using fully automated Volpara software, its comparison with BIRADS density types and correlation with the risk of malignancy10.1186/s43055-022-00796-y ↗
22. Janjic, A., Cayoren, M., Akduman, I., Yilmaz, T., Onemli, E., Bugdayci, O., and Aribal, M.E. (2021). SAFE: A Novel Microwave Imaging System Design for Breast Cancer Screening and Early Detection—Clinical Evaluation. Diagnostics, 11.10.3390/diagnostics11030533 ↗
23. Microwave Imaging in Breast Cancer—Results from the First-In-Human Clinical Investigation of the Wavelia System10.1016/j.acra.2021.06.012 ↗
24. Parametric analysis of transient skin heating induced by terahertz radiation10.1002/bem.21842 ↗
25. Baumgartner, C., Hasgall, P.A., Di Gennaro, F., Neufeld, E., Lloyd, B., Gosselin, M.C., Payne, D., Klingenböck, A., and Kuster, N. (2024). IT’IS Database for Thermal and Electromagnetic Parameters of Biological Tissues, IT’IS Foundatio. v4.2.
26. Strong correlation between specific heat capacity and water content in human tissues suggests preferred heat deposition in malignant tumors upon electromagnetic irradiation10.1080/02656736.2022.2067596 ↗
27. Bottauscio, O., Zanovello, U., Arduino, A., and Zilberti, L. (2024). Polynomial chaos expansion of SAR and temperature increase variability in 3 T MRI due to stochastic input data. Phys. Med. Biol., 69.10.1088/1361-6560/ad5070 ↗
28. Health Canada (2009). Limits of Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields in the Frequency Range from 3 kHz to 300 GHz: Safety Code 6, Health Canada.
29. Comparisons of computer simulations and experimental data for capacitive hyperthermia using different split-phantoms10.1080/02656736.2024.2416999 ↗