journal article·2025-04-06Open access

Benchmarking Anomaly Detection Methods for Extracardiac Findings in Cardiac MRI

Edgar Pinto, Patrícia M. Costa, Catarina Silva, Vitor H. Pereira, Jaime C. Fonseca, Sandro Queirós

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 7

Abstract

In cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, an initial set of sequences is acquired to guide the definition of the subsequent cardiac views. These sequences provide a large field of view, enabling the detection of extracardiac findings (ECFs). Although ECFs may have significant clinical relevance, they are typically overlooked since they fall outside the scope of cardiac examinations. The only prior attempt to automatically detect incidental ECFs employed fully supervised methods but faced substantial limitations due to the impracticality of collecting comprehensive samples given the wide range of possible anomalies across various organs. This study investigates the potential of recent anomaly detection (AD) methods to address this challenge. While AD methods have gained popularity, their application has been largely confined to industrial settings or medical imaging tasks such as brain MR or chest X-ray, which exhibit lower anatomical variability and complexity than cardiac MR anatomical sequences. Hereto, twenty state-of-the-art (SOTA) AD methods, including unsupervised, semi-supervised, and open-set supervised learning methodologies, are compared against two fully supervised baselines for detecting ECFs in anatomical planes of cardiac MR. Results from our in-house dataset reveal suboptimal performance of SOTA AD methods, highlighting the need for further research in this domain.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications · Fault Detection and Control Systems · Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal

ICVS/3B’s—PT Government Associate Laboratory, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal

Algoritmi Center, School of Engineering, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal

Department of Radiology, Hospital CUF Viseu, 3500-612 Viseu, Portugal

Department of Radiology, Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Ave, 4835-044 Guimarães, Portugal

Cardiology Department, Unidade Local de Saúde de Braga, 4710-243 Braga, Portugal

Funding

Portuguese National funds · Norte Portugal Regional Operational Programme

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Clinical role of advanced imaging in cardiology
2. Recent Advances in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Techniques and Applications10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.003951 ↗
3. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update10.1186/s12968-020-00607-1 ↗
4. Prevalence and Clinical Relevance of Extracardiac Findings in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging10.1097/RTI.0000000000000360 ↗
5. Wickremasinghe, D.H., Khenkina, N., Masci, P.G., King, A.P., and Puyol-Antón, E. (2021, January 12–14). Automatic Detection of Extra-Cardiac Findings in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Proceedings of the Medical Image Understanding and Analysis, Oxford, UK.10.1007/978-3-030-80432-9_8 ↗
6. Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental extracardiac findings in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging10.5114/kitp.2018.80921 ↗
7. Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Incidental Extracardiac Findings during Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Retrospective Study
8. Extracardiac Findings on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: A Children’s Hospital Experience10.1007/s00246-023-03190-1 ↗
9. The prevalence and clinical significance of incidental non-cardiac findings on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and unreported rates of these findings in official radiology reports10.5114/pjr.2022.115713 ↗
10. Chalapathy, R., and Chawla, S. (2019). Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Survey. arXiv.10.1145/3394486.3406704 ↗
11. Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Review10.1145/3439950 ↗
12. Autoencoders for unsupervised anomaly segmentation in brain MR images: A comparative study10.1016/j.media.2020.101952 ↗
13. Behrendt, F., Bhattacharya, D., Krüger, J., Opfer, R., and Schlaefer, A. (2024, January 3–5). Patched Diffusion Models for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Brain MRI. Proceedings of the Medical Imaging with Deep Learning, PMLR, Paris, France.
14. Unsupervised lesion detection via image restoration with a normative prior10.1016/j.media.2020.101713 ↗
15. Ghorbel, A., Aldahdooh, A., Albarqouni, S., and Hamidouche, W. (2022, January 18). Transformer based models for unsupervised anomaly segmentation in brain MR images. Proceedings of the International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop, Singapore.10.1007/978-3-031-33842-7_3 ↗
16. Kascenas, A., Pugeault, N., and O’Neil, A.Q. (2022, January 6–8). Denoising autoencoders for unsupervised anomaly detection in brain MRI. Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Imaging with Deep Learning, PMLR, Zurich, Switzerland.
17. The role of noise in denoising models for anomaly detection in medical images10.1016/j.media.2023.102963 ↗
18. Lagogiannis, I., Meissen, F., Kaissis, G., and Rueckert, D. (2023). Unsupervised pathology detection: A deep dive into the state of the art. arXiv.10.1109/TMI.2023.3298093 ↗
19. Meissen, F., Paetzold, J., Kaissis, G., and Rueckert, D. (2022, January 18). Unsupervised anomaly localization with structural feature-autoencoders. Proceedings of the International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop, Singapore.10.1007/978-3-031-33842-7_2 ↗
20. Constrained unsupervised anomaly segmentation10.1016/j.media.2022.102526 ↗
21. Tan, J., Hou, B., Batten, J., Qiu, H., and Kainz, B. (2020). Detecting outliers with foreign patch interpolation. arXiv.
22. Wyatt, J., Leach, A., Schmon, S.M., and Willcocks, C.G. (2022, January 21–24). AnoDDPM: Anomaly Detection with Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models Using Simplex Noise. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/CVPRW56347.2022.00080 ↗
23. Dual-distribution discrepancy with self-supervised refinement for anomaly detection in medical images10.1016/j.media.2023.102794 ↗
24. Tan, J., Hou, B., Day, T., Simpson, J., Rueckert, D., and Kainz, B. (October, January 27). Detecting outliers with poisson image interpolation. Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2021, Strasbourg, France.10.1007/978-3-030-87240-3_56 ↗
25. Defard, T., Setkov, A., Loesch, A., and Audigier, R. (2021, January 20–24). PaDiM: A Patch Distribution Modeling Framework for Anomaly Detection and Localization. Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Montréal, QC, Canada.10.1007/978-3-030-68799-1_35 ↗
26. Deng, H., and Li, X. (2022, January 21–24). Anomaly Detection via Reverse Distillation from One-Class Embedding. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.00951 ↗
27. Ding, C., Pang, G., and Shen, C. (2022, January 21–24). Catching Both Gray and Black Swans: Open-Set Supervised Anomaly Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.00724 ↗
28. Gudovskiy, D., Ishizaka, S., and Kozuka, K. (2022, January 4–8). CFLOW-AD: Real-Time Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Localization via Conditional Normalizing Flows. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, Waikoloa, HI, USA.10.1109/WACV51458.2022.00188 ↗
29. ReContrast: Domain-Specific Anomaly Detection via Contrastive Reconstruction
30. Liu, W., Li, R., Zheng, M., Karanam, S., Wu, Z., Bhanu, B., Radke, R.J., and Camps, O. (2020, January 13–19). Towards Visually Explaining Variational Autoencoders. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00867 ↗
31. Unsupervised anomaly segmentation via deep feature reconstruction10.1016/j.neucom.2020.11.018 ↗
32. Sohn, K., Li, C.L., Yoon, J., and Pfister, T.J. (2024). Self-Supervised Learning for Anomaly Detection and Localization. (11,941,084), US Patent.
33. Yao, X., Li, R., Zhang, J., Sun, J., and Zhang, C. (2023, January 17–24). Explicit Boundary Guided Semi-Push-Pull Contrastive Learning for Supervised Anomaly Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.02346 ↗
34. Tian, Y., Pang, G., Chen, Y., Singh, R., Verjans, J.W., and Carneiro, G. (2021, January 11–17). Weakly-Supervised Video Anomaly Detection with Robust Temporal Feature Magnitude Learning. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00493 ↗
35. Ruff, L., Vandermeulen, R.A., Görnitz, N., Binder, A., Müller, E., Müller, K.R., and Kloft, M. (2019). Deep Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detection. arXiv.
36. Kingma, D.P. (2013). Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes. arXiv.
37. Schlegl, T., Seeböck, P., Waldstein, S.M., Schmidt-Erfurth, U., and Langs, G. (2017, January 25–30). Unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks to guide marker discovery. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging, Boone, NC, USA.10.1007/978-3-319-59050-9_12 ↗
38. f-AnoGAN: Fast unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks10.1016/j.media.2019.01.010 ↗
39. Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models
40. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T. (2015, January 5–9). U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015, Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 ↗
41. Loshchilov, I., and Hutter, F. (2016). SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restarts. arXiv.
42. Metrics reloaded: Recommendations for image analysis validation10.1038/s41592-023-02150-0 ↗
43. García, S., and Herrera, F. (2008, January 24–26). Design of Experiments in Computational Intelligence: On the Use of Statistical Inference. Proceedings of the Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems: Third International Workshop, HAIS 2008, Burgos, Spain.10.1007/978-3-540-87656-4_3 ↗
44. A study of statistical techniques and performance measures for genetics-based machine learning: Accuracy and interpretability10.1007/s00500-008-0392-y ↗
45. Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets