Fragility Analysis of Overturning Resistance of Hybrid Base-Isolated Structures in Diesel Engine Buildings of Nuclear Power Plants
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper validates the effectiveness of the modeling approach based on the finite element analysis of shaking table tests, establishing finite element models for both a base-isolated structure and a hybrid base-isolated structure designed to address overturning issues in the diesel engine building of a nuclear power plant. By using the Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) method, a fragility analysis of the overturning resistance was conducted for both isolation systems. This study demonstrates that the hybrid base isolation scheme, which incorporates additional dampers, effectively enhances the structure’s overturning resistance and reduces the probability of failure. When evaluating the seismic fragility of the structure by using the TP value, which is related to the tensile stress of the isolation bearings, as a damage index, the results are more conservative compared with those obtained by using shear strain (γ). This highlights the importance of improving the tensile capacity of the isolation bearings in structural design. Furthermore, fragility assessment using γ as a damage index can provide design references for the collision limit of the isolation moat in the base-isolated structure of the diesel engine building in nuclear power plants.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Fire effects on concrete materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
Funding
Beijing University of Technology
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. SemiActive versus Passive or Active Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Control10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1983)109:3(691) ↗
2. FEM considering local bending effects for flat sliding isolators10.1016/0045-7949(96)00186-1 ↗
3. Base-isolation design practice in Japan: Introduction to the post-kobe approach10.1080/13632460509350537 ↗
4. Recent advances in nonlinear passive vibration isolators10.1016/j.jsv.2008.01.014 ↗
5. A Review of Seismic Isolation for Buildings: Historical Development and Research Needs10.3390/buildings2030300 ↗
6. State of art in the worldwide evolution of base isolation design10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105722 ↗
7. Towards standardized advanced nuclear reactors: Seismic isolation and the impact of the earthquake load case10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111487 ↗
8. Seismic isolation: A pathway to standardized advanced nuclear reactors10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111445 ↗
9. A smart mechatronic base isolation system using earthquake early warning10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.01.019 ↗
10. Shaking table tests on the multi-dimensional seismic response of long-span grid structure with base-isolation10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109802 ↗
11. Seismic isolation retrofitting of the Salt Lake City and County Building10.1016/0029-5493(91)90060-U ↗
12. Seismic analysis and evaluation of the base isolation system in AP1000 NI under SSE loading10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.07.030 ↗
13. Seismic Isolation of Nuclear Power Plants10.5516/NET.09.2014.715 ↗
14. Seismic response of base isolated nuclear power plants considering impact to moat walls10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.12.021 ↗
15. Study on the dynamic behavior of isolated AP1000 NIB under mainshock-aftershock sequences10.1016/j.pnucene.2019.103144 ↗
16. Structural and non-structural numerical blind prediction of shaking table experimental tests on fixed-base and base-isolated hospitals10.1002/eqe.4146 ↗
17. Bound of aspect ratio of base-isolated buildings considering nonlinear tensile behavior of rubber bearing10.12989/sem.2008.30.3.351 ↗
18. Seismic response of asymmetric steel isolated structures considering vertical component of earthquakes10.1007/s12205-013-0115-5 ↗
19. Investigation of the seismic response of high-rise buildings supported on tension-resistant elastomeric isolation bearings10.1002/eqe.2755 ↗
20. A roller type base isolation device with tensile strength10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111003 ↗
21. Passive seismic response controlled high-rise building with high damping device10.1002/eqe.4290240504 ↗
22. Passive hybrid systems for earthquake protection of cable-stayed bridge10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.03.034 ↗
23. Spring-viscous damper systems for combined seismic and vibration isolation10.1002/eqe.4290210801 ↗
24. Seismic control of single-degree-of-freedom structure using tuned viscous mass damper10.1002/eqe.1138 ↗
25. Choice between series and parallel connections of hysteretic system and viscous damper for seismic protection of structures10.1002/eqe.2938 ↗
26. Potentiality of Using Vertical and Three-Dimensional Isolation Systems in Nuclear Structures10.1016/j.net.2016.03.005 ↗
27. Seismic resilient design with base isolation device using friction pendulum bearing and viscous damper10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107073 ↗
28. The disaster at Japan’s Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear power plant after the March 11, 2011 earthquake and tsunami, and the resulting spread of radioisotope contamination10.1667/RR2830.1 ↗
29. On the modal incremental dynamic analysis10.1002/tal.271 ↗
30. Strength and deformation capacities of buildings under extreme environments
31. Incremental dynamic analysis10.1002/eqe.141 ↗
32. Comerio, M.C., Stallmeyer, J.C., Smith, R., Makris, N., and Somerville, P. (2005). PEER Testbed Study on a Laboratory Building: Exercising Seismic Performance Assessment, Department of Architenture University of Califonia.
33. Incremental modified pushover analysis10.1002/tal.465 ↗
34. Seismic fragility and reliability of structures isolated by friction pendulum devices: Seismic reliability-based design (SRBD)10.1002/eqe.2798 ↗
35. Fragility analysis of prestressed concrete containment under severe accident condition10.1016/j.anucene.2019.03.034 ↗
36. Seismic fragility analysis of seismically isolated nuclear power plants piping system10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.12.012 ↗
37. Probabilistic seismic fragility assessment of isolated nuclear power plant structure using IDA and MSA methods10.1016/j.istruc.2021.08.034 ↗
38. Seismic Fragility Assessment of Base-Isolated Nuclear Power Plant Structures10.48084/etasr.9404 ↗
39. (2001). Technical Specification for Seismic-Isolation with Laminated Rubber Bearing Isolators (Standard No. CECS 126-2001).
40. (2009). Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors (Standard No. FEMA P-695).
41. Seismic fragility analysis of nuclear power plant structure under far-field ground motions10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110890 ↗
42. (2016). Seismic Design Standards for Buildings (Standard No. GB/T50011-2010).
43. (2014). Regulatory Guide 1.60—Design Response Spectra for Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants (Standard No. RG 1.60).
44. Study on earthquake intensities for seismic analysis of structures
45. Vulnerability assessment of AP1000 NPP under mainshock-aftershock sequences10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110348 ↗
46. Statistical analysis of fragility curves10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1224) ↗
47. Vanvatsikos, D. (2002). Seismic Performance, Capacity and Reliability of Structures as Seen Through Incremental Dynamics Analysis. [Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University]. (In English).
48. Seismic fragility analysis of AP1000 SB considering fluid-structure interaction effects10.1016/j.istruc.2019.11.003 ↗
49. Seismic fragility assessment of traditional air-cooled support structure and air-cooled support energy dissipation structure based on IDA method10.1016/j.istruc.2022.03.082 ↗
50. (1996). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings (Standard No. ATC-40).
51. (2009). Classification of Earthquake Damage to Buildings and Special Structures (Standard No. GB/T 24335-2009).
52. (1996). Seismic Design and Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant (Standard No. HAD102/02-1996).
53. (1997). Code for Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants (Standard No. GB 50267-97).
54. (2021). Standard for Seismic Isolation Design of Buildings (Standard No. GB/T 51408-2021).
55. A hybrid seismic isolation system toward more resilient structures: Shaking table experiment and fragility analysis10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102194 ↗
56. (1999). Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology: User’s Manual (Standard No. HAZUS99).
57. (2012). Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings Volume 1-Methodology (Standard No. FEMA P58).