Show source-provided references
3. Kirby, M., Pelivanov, I., Song, S., Ambrozinski, L., Yoon, S.J., Gao, L., Li, D., Shen, T., Wang, R., and O’Donnell, M. (2017). Optical Coherence Elastography in Ophthalmology. J. Biomed. Opt., 22.
10.1117/1.JBO.22.12.121720 ↗7. Assessment of Corneal Dynamics with High-Speed Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Combined with an Air Puff System
10.1364/OE.19.014188 ↗8. Dynamic Oct Measurement of Corneal Deformation by an Air Puff in Normal and Cross-Linked Corneas
10.1364/BOE.3.000473 ↗9. Delineating Corneal Elastic Anisotropy in a Porcine Model Using Noncontact Oct Elastography and Ex vivo Mechanical Tests
10.1016/j.xops.2021.100058 ↗10. Static Compression Optical Coherence Elastography for the Measurement of Porcine Corneal Mechanical Properties Ex-Vivo
10.1016/j.bbe.2024.08.006 ↗11. High-Speed Oct-Based Ocular Biometer Combined with an Air-Puff System for Determination of Induced Retraction-Free Eye Dynamics
10.1364/BOE.10.003663 ↗12. Multi-Meridian Corneal Imaging of Air-Puff Induced Deformation for Improved Detection of Biomechanical Abnormalities
10.1364/BOE.402402 ↗14. An Ultra-High-Speed Scheimpflug Camera for Evaluation of Corneal Deformation Response and Its Impact on Iop Measurement
10.1167/iovs.12-11563 ↗15. Introduction of Two Novel Stiffness Parameters and Interpretation of Air Puff–Induced Biomechanical Deformation Parameters with a Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer
10.3928/1081597X-20161221-03 ↗16. Jędzierowska, M., and Koprowski, R. (2019). Novel Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters in a Practice Use: A Critical Review. BioMed. Eng. OnLine, 18.
10.1186/s12938-019-0636-3 ↗18. Corneal Biomechanical Assessment with Ultra-High-Speed Scheimpflug Imaging During Non-Contact Tonometry: A Prospective Review
10.2147/OPTH.S301179 ↗19. Kling, S., Bekesi, N., Dorronsoro, C., Pascual, D., and Marcos, S. (2014). Corneal Viscoelastic Properties from Finite-Element Analysis of in Vivo Air-Puff Deformation. PLoS ONE, 9.
10.1371/journal.pone.0104904 ↗21. Estimation of Scleral Mechanical Properties from Air-Puff Optical Coherence Tomography
10.1364/BOE.437981 ↗22. Desouky, N.A., Saafan, M.M., Mansour, M.H., and Maklad, O.M. (2023). Patient-Specific Air Puff-Induced Loading Using Machine Learning. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 11.
10.3389/fbioe.2023.1277970 ↗23. Interaction between Diurnal Variations of Intraocular Pressure, Pachymetry, and Corneal Response to an Air Puff: Preliminary Evidence
10.1016/j.jcro.2015.01.002 ↗24. Maczynska, E., Karnowski, K., Szulzycki, K., Malinowska, M., Dolezyczek, H., Cichanski, A., Wojtkowski, M., Kaluzny, B., and Grulkowski, I. (2019). Assessment of the Influence of Viscoelasticity of Cornea in Animal Ex Vivo Model Using Air-Puff Optical Coherence Tomography and Corneal Hysteresis. J. Biophotonics, 12.
10.1002/jbio.201800154 ↗25. Eye Retraction and Rotation During Corvis St ‘Air Puff’ Intraocular Pressure Measurement and Its Quantitative Analysis
10.1111/opo.12383 ↗26. Simultaneous Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography of the Anterior Segment and Retina Using Coherence Revival
10.1364/OL.37.001883 ↗28. Swept Source/Fourier Domain Polarization Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography with a Passive Polarization Delay Unit
10.1364/OE.20.010229 ↗31. Lombardo, G., Serrao, S., Rosati, M., and Lombardo, M. (2014). Analysis of the Viscoelastic Properties of the Human Cornea Using Scheimpflug Imaging in Inflation Experiment of Eye Globes. PLoS ONE, 9.
10.1371/journal.pone.0112169 ↗32. Bekesi, N., Dorronsoro, C., de la Hoz, A., and Marcos, S. (2016). Material Properties from Air Puff Corneal Deformation by Numerical Simulations on Model Corneas. PLoS ONE, 11.
10.1371/journal.pone.0165669 ↗34. Maklad, O., Eliasy, A., Chen, K.-J., Wang, J., Abass, A., Lopes, B.T., Theofilis, V., and Elsheikh, A. (2020). Fluid-Structure Interaction Based Algorithms for Iop and Corneal Material Behavior. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 8.
10.3389/fbioe.2020.00970 ↗