journal article·2025-03-07Open access

Innovative Approach Integrating Machine Learning Models for Coiled Tubing Fatigue Modeling

Khalil Moulay Brahim, Ahmed Hadjadj, Aissa Abidi Saad, Elfakeur Abidi Saad, Hichem Horra

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 6

Abstract

Coiled tubing (CT) plays a pivotal role in oil and gas well intervention operations due to its advantages, such as flexibility, fast mobilization, safety, low cost, and its wide range of applications, including well intervention, cleaning, stimulation, fluid displacement, cementing, and drilling. However, CT is subject to fatigue and mechanical damage caused by repeated bending cycles, internal pressure, and environmental factors, which can lead to premature failure, high operational costs, and production downtime. With the development of CT properties and modes of application, traditional fatigue life prediction methods based on analytical models integrated in the tracking process showed, in some cases, an underestimate or overestimate of the actual fatigue life of CT, particularly when complex factors like welding type, corrosive environment, and high-pressure variation are involved. This study addresses this limitation by introducing a comprehensive machine learning-based approach to improve the accuracy of CT fatigue life prediction, using a dataset derived from both lab-scale and full-scale fatigue tests. We incorporated the impact of different parameters such as CT grades, wall thickness, CT diameter, internal pressure, and welding types. By using advanced machine learning techniques such as artificial neural networks (ANNs) and Gradient Boosting Regressor, we obtained a more precise estimation of the number of cycles to failure than traditional models. The results from our machine learning analysis demonstrated that CatBoost and XGBoost are the most suitable models for fatigue life prediction. These models exhibited high predictive accuracy, with R2 values exceeding 0.94 on the test set, alongside relatively low error metrics (MSE, MAE and MAPE), indicating strong generalization capability. The results of this study show the importance of the integration of machine learning for CT fatigue life analysis and demonstrate its capacity to enhance prediction accuracy and reduce uncertainty. A detailed machine learning model is presented, emphasizing the capability to handle complex data and improve prediction under diverse operational conditions. This study contributes to more reliable CT management and safer, more cost-efficient well intervention operations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Drilling and Well Engineering · Oil and Gas Production Techniques · Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Drilling, Faculty of Hydrocarbon, University of Ouargla, Ouargle 30000, Algeria

Department of Drilling, Faculty of Hydrocarbon, University of Boumerdes, Boumerdes 35000, Algeria

Department of Integrated Well Services, Baker Hughes KSA, Alkhobar 31952, Saudi Arabia

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Neog, D., Sarmah, A., and Baruah, M.I.S. (2023). Computational analysis of coiled tubing concerns during oil well intervention in the upper Assam basin, India. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-022-26670-5 ↗
2. Li, Y., Gao, X.-L., Ni, L., Hu, Q., and Xin, Y. (2016, January 11–17). Fatigue of coiled tubing and its influencing factors: A comparative study. Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Phoenix, AZ, USA.10.1115/IMECE2016-65972 ↗
3. Theoretical and experimental research of bearing capacity and fatigue life for coiled tubing under internal pressure10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.06.062 ↗
4. Combining elastic and plastic fatigue damage in steel pipelines, risers, and coiled tubing10.2118/142427-PA ↗
5. Simulation of ultra-low cycle fatigue cracking of coiled tubing steel based on cohesive zone model10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107201 ↗
6. Fatigue modeling using neural networks: A comprehensive review10.1111/ffe.13640 ↗
7. Tipton, S.M. (1996). Multiaxial plasticity and fatigue life prediction in coiled tubing. Advances in Fatigue Lifetime Predictive Techniques: 3rd Volume, ASTM International.10.1520/STP16143S ↗
8. Newman, K.R. (2013, January 26–27). Development of a new CT life tracking process. Proceedings of the SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, TX, USA.10.2118/163884-MS ↗
9. Milella, P.P. (2024). Strain-Based Fatigue Analysis—Low Cycle Fatigue. Fatigue and Corrosion in Metals, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-51350-3 ↗
10. Newman, K., and Kelleher, P. (2016, January 22–23). CT Fatigue Modeling Update. Proceedings of the SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX, USA.10.2118/179049-MS ↗
11. Wu, J. (1995, January 2–4). Coiled tubing working life prediction. Proceedings of the SPE Oklahoma City Oil and Gas Symposium/Production and Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.10.2118/29461-MS ↗
12. Tipton, S.M. (1999). The Achilles Fatigue Model, CTES. CTES LP User Technical Note.
13. Avakov, V.A., and Martin, J. (1997, January 5–8). Large Coiled Tubing Fatigue Life. Proceedings of the SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX, USA.10.2118/38407-MS ↗
14. Tian, X., Zhang, H., Duan, Q., and Ji, Y. (2015, January 19–23). Establishment and application of fatigue life prediction models for coiled tubing. Proceedings of the Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Boston, MA, USA.10.1115/PVP2015-45130 ↗
15. Liu, B., Li, T., Xu, L., Han, B., Zhuang, H., and Li, S. (2018, January 18–21). Effect of surface defects and internal pressure on fatigue life of coiled tubing. Proceedings of the 9th China-Russia Symposium “Coal in the 21st Century: Mining, Intelligent Equipment and Environment Protection” (COAL 2018), Qingdao, China.10.2991/coal-18.2018.34 ↗
16. Experimental and Numerical Study on LCF Crack Propagation of Coiled Tubing Steel10.5755/j02.mech.31056 ↗
17. Bunge, J.M., Coloschi, M., Cravero, S., Valdez, M., Reichert, B., and Grimaldo, C. (2022, January 22–23). Coiled Tubing Premature Failure–The Effects of Pressure and Strain. Proceedings of the SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, TX, USA.10.2118/208996-MS ↗
18. Padron, T., and Aitken, B. (2016, January 22–23). CT100+ Bias Weld Fatigue Life Estimations-Are Adjustments Required?. Proceedings of the SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX, USA.10.2118/179045-MS ↗
19. Ishak, J., Santos, M.A., and Tipton, S.M. (2017, January 21–22). Numerical and Experimental Analysis of Cyclic Strains in Coiled Tubing Surface Defects for Fatigue Life Assessment. Proceedings of the SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX, USA.10.2118/184761-MS ↗
20. Sherman, S., Majko, S.M., and Otto, J. (2020, January 24). High Strength Coiled Tubing-How is Fatigue Life Affected by Slip Damage?. Proceedings of the SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, TX, USA.10.2118/199859-MS ↗
21. Faszold, J., Rosine, R., and Spoering, R. (2012, January 27–28). Full-Scale Fatigue Testing With 130K Yield Tubing. Proceedings of the SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, TX, USA.10.2118/153945-MS ↗
22. Tipton, S.M., Smalley, E., and VanArnam, D. (2012, January 27–28). Influence of a straightener on coiled tubing fatigue. Proceedings of the SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, TX, USA.10.2118/154057-MS ↗
23. Headrick, D., and Rosine, R. (1999, January 25–26). Full-scale coiled tubing fatigue tests with tubing pressures to 15,000 psi. Proceedings of the SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX, USA.10.2118/54482-MS ↗
24. Reichert, B., Nguyen, T., Rolovic, R., and Newman, K. (2016, January 22–23). Advancements in Fatigue Testing and Analysis. Proceedings of the SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX, USA.10.2118/179064-MS ↗
25. Association, D.E. (1996). Underbalanced Drilling and Completion Manual, DEA, Maurer Engineering Inc.
26. Soft computing techniques in structural and earthquake engineering: A literature review10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110269 ↗
27. Yang, D., Jin, A., and Li, Y. (2024). A Novel Physics-Guided Neural Network for Predicting Fatigue Life of Materials. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14062502 ↗
28. Peng, S., Xiao, J.-Q., Tian, Y., Zhang, Y., Feng, J., and Hu, Z.-J. (2012, January 9–11). Coiled tubing working life prediction based on BP algorithm of artificial neural network. Proceedings of the IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition?, Tianjin, China.10.2118/155878-MS ↗
29. Newman, K., and Brown, P. (1993, January 3–6). Development of a standard coiled-tubing fatigue test. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition?, Houston, TX, USA.10.2118/26539-MS ↗
30. The prediction of the low cycle fatigue life about the coiled tubing with ovality and wall thickness10.1007/s11668-017-0370-8 ↗
31. Rispler, K., McNichol, J., Matiasz, K., and Rheinlander, M. (2001, January 7–8). Using an artificial neural network to develop a wall-loss model for coiled tubing fracturing operations. Proceedings of the SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX, USA.10.2118/68420-MS ↗
32. Sisak, W., and Crawford, D. (1994, January 15–18). The fatigue life of coiled tubing. Proceedings of the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX, USA.10.2118/27437-MS ↗
33. Elliott, K., Graham-Wright, T., Williams, C., Hampson, R., Portillo, B., and Cuaron, A. (2017, January 21–22). Development and Compatibility Testing of Coiled Tubing with 140-ksi Specified Minimum Yield Strength. Proceedings of the SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX, USA.10.2118/184806-MS ↗
34. Chitwood, G., Lewis, P., Fowler, S., and Zernick, W. (1992, January 24). High-Strength Coiled Tubing Expands Service Capabilities. Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, USA.10.4043/7032-MS ↗
35. VanArnam, W.D., and Hargis, C. (2011, January 5–6). New Higher-Strength Coiled Tubing Developed To Extend Coiled Tubing Operating Envelopes. Proceedings of the SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, TX, USA.10.2118/143152-MS ↗
36. Brown, P.A., and Arnam, D.V. (2025, March 01). Coiled Tubing Weld Cycle Life. Available online: https://www.athenaeng.com/publications/1995_10_DEA_97_CT_Weld_Cycle_Life_Report.pdf.
37. A new theoretical model of low cycle fatigue life for coiled tubing under coupling load10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105365 ↗
38. Padron, T., and Datahan, G. (April, January 31). Effect of external mechanical damage on the fatigue life of coiled tubing exposed to sour environments: Criteria for CT100 grade. Proceedings of the SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, TX, USA.
39. Valdez, M., Morales, C., Rolovic, R., and Reichert, B. (2015, January 24–25). The development of high-strength coiled tubing with improved fatigue performance and H2S resistance. Proceedings of the SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, TX, USA.10.2118/173639-MS ↗