journal article·2025-03-05Open access

The Impact of the Human Factor on Communication During a Collision Situation in Maritime Navigation

Leszek Misztal, Paulina Hatlas-Sowinska

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 5

Abstract

In this paper, the authors draw attention to the significant impact of the human factor during collision situations in maritime navigation. The problems in the communication process between navigators are so excessive that the authors propose automatic communication. This is an alternative method to the current one. The presented system comprehensively performs communication tasks during a sea voyage. To reach the mentioned goal, AI methods of natural language processing and additional properties of metaontology (ontology supplemented with objective functions) are applied. Dedicated to maritime transport applications, the model for translating a natural language into an ontology consists of multiple steps and uses AI methods of classification for the recognition of a message from the ship’s bridge. The reverse model is also multi-stage and uses a created rule-based knowledge base to create natural-language sentences built on the basis of the ontology. Validation of the model’s accuracy results was conducted through accuracy assessment coefficients for information classification, commonly used in science. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves represent the results in the datasets. The presented solution of the designed architecture of the system as well as algorithms developed in the software prototype confirmed the correctness of the assumptions in the described study. The authors demonstrated that it is feasible to successfully apply metaontology and machine learning methods in the proposed prototype software for ship-to-ship communication.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Maritime Navigation and Safety · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · AI-based Problem Solving and Planning

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Computer Science and Telecommunication, Maritime University of Szczecin, 70-500 Szczecin, Poland

Department of Mathematics, The Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry, Maritime University of Szczecin, 70-500 Szczecin, Poland

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education for statutory activities of the Maritime University of Szczecin

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Reason, J. (1990). Human Error, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139062367 ↗
2. Using system simulation to model the impact of human error in a maritime system10.1016/S0925-7535(98)00048-4 ↗
3. Gucma, L. (2009). Wytyczne do Zarządzania Ryzykiem Morskim, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii Morskiej w Szczecinie.
4. Haugen, S. (1991). Probabilistic Evaluation of Frequency of Collision Between Ships and Offshore Platforms, University of w Trondheim.
5. Technica (1986). The Risk of Ship/Platform Collision in the Area of United Kingdom Continental Shelf, World Maritime University. Report No.: Raport OTH 86 217.
6. (2018, November 13). GUS. stat.gov.pl. Rocznik Statystyczny Gospodarki Morskiej, Available online: https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/roczniki-statystyczne/roczniki-statystyczne/rocznik-statystyczny-gospodarki-morskiej-2015,11,8.html.
7. Webmaster (2024, December 10). Accident Investigation Publications. Available online: https://www.emsa.europa.eu/accident-investigation-publications/annual-overview.html.
8. (2024, December 10). III. Available online: https://www.iii.org/.
9. Webmaster (2024, December 10). European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA)-Quality Shipping, Safer Seas, Cleaner Oceans. Available online: https://www.emsa.europa.eu/.
10. Hatłas-Sowińska, P., and Misztal, L. (2024). Application of a text mining method in navigation and communication for enhancing maritime safety. PLoS ONE, 19.10.1371/journal.pone.0299582 ↗
11. PKBWM (2024, December 12). Roczna Analiza 2024: Wypadki i Incydenty Morskie, Available online: https://www.gov.pl/web/pkbwm/uchwaly-pkbwm-z-20-grudnia-2024-r.10.1542/pcco_book247_document004 ↗
12. Indurkhya, N., and Damerau, F.J. (2010). Handbook of Natural Language Processing, Morgan and Claypool. [2nd ed.].10.1201/9781420085938 ↗
13. Manning, C., and Schutze, H. (1999). Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing, MIT Press.
14. Olson, D., and Delen, D. (2008). Advanced Data Mining Techniques, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-74759-0_108 ↗
15. Triantaphyllou, E., and Felici, G. (2006). Data Mining & Knowledge Discovery based in Rule Induction, Springer.10.1007/0-387-34296-6 ↗
16. Géron, A. (2018). Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and Tensorflow: Concepts, Tools, and Techniques to Build Intelligent Systems, O’Reilly.
17. Inuiguchi, M. (2005). Generalizations of Rough Sets and Rule Extraction, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-27794-1_4 ↗
18. Pawlak, Z. (1991). Rough Sets–Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data, Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-011-3534-4 ↗
19. Duntsch, I., and Gediga, G. (2000). Rough Set Data Analysis, Methodos Publisher.
20. Bazan, J., Synak, P., and Wrobleski, J. (2000). Rough Set Algorithms in Classification Problem, Springer.10.1007/978-3-7908-1840-6_3 ↗
21. Drzymala-Busse, J. (2006). Rough Set Strategies to Data with Missing Attribute Values, Springer.10.1007/11795131_10 ↗
22. Maimon, O., and Rokach, L. (2005). Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook, Springer Science Business Media.10.1007/b107408 ↗
23. Berto, F., and Plebani, M. (2015). Ontology and Metaontology: A Contemporary Guide, Bloomsbury Publishing.
24. Vasilecas, O., Eder, J., and Caplinskas, A. (2007). Databases and Information Systems IV: Selected Papers from the Seventh International Baltic Conference, DB&IS’2006, IOS Press. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications.
25. Hofweber, T. (2016). Ontology and Metaphysics. Ontology and the Ambitions of Metaphysics, Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198769835.001.0001 ↗
26. Ontology based approach in solving collision situations at sea10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111941 ↗
27. SciSpace-Paper (2013). Natural Language Processing Future, IEEE. Available online: https://typeset.io/papers/natural-language-processing-future-3pcnn7ffka.
28. The Mathematical Theory of Communication10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x ↗
29. Bryson, L. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. The Communication of Ideas, Harper and Row.
30. An approach to the study of communicative acts10.1037/h0063098 ↗
31. Han, J., and Kamber, M. (2006). Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. [2nd ed.].
32. Vercellis, C. (2009). Business Intelligence–Data Mining and Optimization for Decision Making, Wiley.10.1002/9780470753866 ↗
33. Lewis, D., and Gale, W. (1994, January 3–6). Training Text Classifiers by Uncertainty Sampling. Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference, Dublin, Ireland.10.1007/978-1-4471-2099-5_1 ↗
34. Lutz, M., and Ascher, D. (2003). Learning Python, O’Reilly. [2nd ed.].
35. Lutz, M. (2006). Programming Python, O’Reilly. [3rd ed.].
36. Bird, S., Klein, E., and Loper, E. (2009). Natural Language Processing with Python, O’Reilly.
37. Surana, H., Majumder, B., Gupta, A., and Vajjala, S. (2020). Practical Natural Language Processing, O’Reilly.
38. Bengfort, B., Bilbro, R., and Ojeda, T. (2018). Applied Text Analysis with Python, O’Reilly.
39. Alan, D.M. (2018). Python GUI Programming with Tkinter, O’Reilly.
40. Berry, M.W., and Castellanos, M. (2008). Survey of Text Mining II Clustering, Classification and Retrival, Springer.10.1007/978-1-84800-046-9 ↗
41. Deneault, A., Dumais, A., Désilets, M., and Hudon, A. (2024). Natural Language Processing and Schizophrenia: A Scoping Review of Uses and Challenges. J. Pers. Med., 14.10.3390/jpm14070744 ↗
42. Li, Y., and Wang, Z. (2024). biSAMNet: A Novel Approach in Maritime Data Completion Using Deep Learning and NLP Techniques. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 12.10.20944/preprints202404.1011.v1 ↗
43. Orellana, M., García, P.S., Ramon, G.D., Zambrano-Martinez, J.L., Patiño-León, A., Serrano, M.V., and Cedillo, P. (2024). Semantic Similarity of Common Verbal Expressions in Older Adults through a Pre-Trained Model. Big Data Cogn. Comput., 8.10.3390/bdcc8010003 ↗
44. Yang, C., and Huang, C. (2023). Natural Language Processing (NLP) in Aviation Safety: Systematic Review of Research and Outlook into the Future. Aerospace, 10.10.3390/aerospace10070600 ↗
45. Mohammad, R., Alkhnbashi, O.S., and Hammoudeh, M. (2024). Optimizing Large Language Models for Arabic Healthcare Communication: A Focus on Patient-Centered NLP Applications. Big Data Cogn. Comput., 8.10.3390/bdcc8110157 ↗
46. SciSpace-Paper (2024, December 10). A Research-Oriented Survey and Current Status on Feature Extraction, Ontology Construction Towards Natural Language Processing. Available online: https://typeset.io/papers/a-research-oriented-survey-and-current-status-on-feature-24vbgzp5h5.
47. SciSpace-Paper (2017). Natural Language Ontology, Routledge. Available online: https://typeset.io/papers/natural-language-ontology-25fq8n6l3g.