Impact of Augmented Reality and Game-Based Learning for Science Teaching: Lessons from Pre-Service Teachers
Source abstract
Abstract
Technological advancement and growing interest in digitalizing education increased Augmented Reality (AR) use in education. However, previous research findings on AR’s potential for knowledge acquisition are inconclusive. Furthermore, computer self-efficacy has seldom been evaluated. AR is frequently combined with game-based approaches (GAME), yet the specific impact of each feature, “AR” and “GAME”, is often not differentiated in the research design. This work analyzed an AR game-based learning environment for science teaching. It was conducted with German pre-service teachers, assessing “Knowledge” and “Computer Self-Efficacy”. These measures were used to analyze the effect of AR and GAME in four intervention groups. The results showed a significant time effect for all groups in both variables, indicating all intervention designs led to knowledge and self-efficacy gains. However, no interaction effect was found, indicating the groups did not significantly differ in their knowledge and self-efficacy gains over time. The results further indicate no clear advantage of either AR or GAME for the design of science teaching. However, AR and GAME also did not hinder learning and both led to successful knowledge and self-efficacy gains. This indicates that AR and game-based learning support the learning process and strengthen learners’ computer self-efficacy. Combining both features aids in easing the transition toward technology-enhanced learning by providing a playful learning experience, using digital as well as analog components.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Augmented Reality Applications · Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts · Educational Games and Gamification
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Independent Researcher, 88074 Meckenbeuren, Germany
Department of Biology, University of Education Weingarten, 88250 Weingarten, Germany
Funding
German Ministry of Science, “ARtiste-Augmented Reality Teaching in Science Technology Education” · University of Education Weingarten
References (73)
Show source-provided references
1. Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A Longitudinal and Cross-Disciplinary Comparison10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9 ↗
2. Das, H. (1995). Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, SPIE.
3. A Survey of Augmented Reality10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355 ↗
4. Peeters, H., Habig, S., and Fechner, S. (2023). Does Augmented Reality Help to Understand Chemical Phenomena during Hands-On Experiments?–Implications for Cognitive Load and Learning. Multimodal Technol. Interact., 7.10.3390/mti7020009 ↗
5. Bio-WTiP: Biology lesson in handheld augmented reality application using tangible interaction10.1088/1757-899X/979/1/012002 ↗
6. MoleculARweb: A Web Site for Chemistry and Structural Biology Education through Interactive Augmented Reality out of the Box in Commodity Devices10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00179 ↗
7. A practical guide to developing virtual and augmented reality exercises for teaching structural biology10.1002/bmb.21188 ↗
8. Destiara, M. (2020). The Practicality of Teaching Material Biology of Islamic-Science based on Augmented Reality. BIO-INOVED J. Biol. Pendidik., 2.10.20527/bino.v2i2.8756 ↗
9. Dinc, F., De, A., Goins, A., Halic, T., Massey, M., and Yarberry, F. (2021, January 4–6). ARChem: Augmented Reality Based Chemistry LAB Simulation for Teaching and Assessment. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), Sydney, Australia.10.1109/ITHET50392.2021.9759587 ↗
10. Development of Augmented Reality Application for Biology Education10.36681/tused.2020.13 ↗
11. Learning anatomy via mobile augmented reality: Effects on achievement and cognitive load10.1002/ase.1603 ↗
12. Applying augmented reality to enhance learning: A study of different teaching materials10.1111/jcal.12173 ↗
13. Learning while exercising for science education in augmented reality among adolescents10.1080/10494820.2010.486682 ↗
14. Tarng, W., Yu, C.-S., Liou, F.-L., and Liou, H.-H. (2013, January 1–5). Development of a virtual butterfly ecological system based on augmented reality and mobile learning technologies. Proceedings of the 9th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), Sardinia, Italy.10.1109/IWCMC.2013.6583638 ↗
15. Animating eco-education: To see, feel, and discover in an augmented reality-based experiential learning environment10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.008 ↗
16. Czok, V., Krug, M., Müller, S., Huwer, J., Kruse, S., Müller, W., and Weitzel, H. (2023). A Framework for Analysis and Development of Augmented Reality applications in Science Teaching. Educ. Sci., 13.10.3390/educsci13090926 ↗
17. Visualisation in Basic Science and Engineering Education of Future Primary School Teachers in Human Biology Education Using Augmented Reality
18. Integration of mobile augmented reality (MAR) applications into biology laboratory: Anatomic structure of the heart10.25304/rlt.v28.2355 ↗
19. Utilising Mobile-Augmented Reality for Learning Human Anatomy10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.054 ↗
20. Qamari, C.N., and Ridwan, M.R. (2017, January 25–26). Implementation of Android-based augmented reality as learning and teaching media of dicotyledonous plants learning materials in biology subject. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech), Bandung, Indonesia.10.1109/ICSITech.2017.8257153 ↗
21. Ready Species One: Exploring the Use of Augmented Reality to Enhance Systematic Biology with a Revision of Fijian Strumigenys (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)10.1093/isd/ixz005 ↗
22. Tangible augmented interfaces for structural molecular biology10.1109/MCG.2005.47 ↗
23. Rapid deployment of smartphone-based augmented reality tools for field and online education in structural biology10.1002/bmb.21396 ↗
24. Facilitating Molecular Biology Teaching by Using Augmented Reality (AR) and Protein Data Bank (PDB)10.1007/s11528-018-0343-0 ↗
25. Using augmented reality to experiment with elements in a chemistry course10.1016/j.chb.2020.106418 ↗
26. Interactive Augmented Reality with Natural Action for Chemistry Experiment Learning
27. Maier, P., and Klinker, G.J. (2013, January 6–8). Evaluation of an Augmented-Reality-based 3D User Interface to Enhance the 3D-Understanding of Molecular Chemistry. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, Aachen, Germany.
28. Gonzalez-Franco, M., Pizarro, R., Cermeron, J., Li, K., Thorn, J., Hutabarat, W., Tiwari, A., and Bermell-Garcia, P. (2017). Immersive Mixed Reality for Manufacturing Training. Front. Robot. AI, 4.10.3389/frobt.2017.00003 ↗
29. Design and Assessment of a Mobile Augmented Reality-Based Information Delivery Tool for Construction and Civil Engineering Curriculum10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000229 ↗
30. Picsar (Physics Augmented Reality) as a Learning Media to Practice Abstract Thinking Skills in Atomic Model10.1088/1742-6596/1491/1/012049 ↗
31. Evaluating the impact of the augmented reality learning environment on electronics laboratory skills of engineering students10.1002/cae.22156 ↗
32. Theodorou, P., Kydonakis, P., Botzori, M., and Skanavis, C. (2018, January 3–6). Augmented reality proves to be a breakthrough in Environmental Education. Proceedings of the Protection and Restoration of the Environment XIV, Thessaloniki, Greece.
33. Rodrigues, R., Pombo, L., Marques, M., Ribeiro, S., Ferreira-Santos, J., and Draghi, J. (2023, January 11–13). Value of a Mobile Game-Based App Towards Education for Sustainability. Proceedings of the International Conferences on E-Society 2023 and Mobile Learning 2023, Lisbon, Portugal.
34. Wang, K., Tekler, Z.D., Cheah, L., Herremans, D., and Blessing, L. (2021). Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Augmented Reality Game Promoting Environmental Action. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su132413912 ↗
35. Design of an Intrinsically Motivating AR Experience for Environmental Awareness10.1017/pds.2022.170 ↗
36. Determining the trends of using augmented reality in education between 2006–201610.1007/s10639-018-9806-3 ↗
37. Exploring the Effectiveness and Moderators of Augmented Reality on Science Learning: A Meta-analysis10.1007/s10956-022-09982-z ↗
38. Nguyen, D., and Meixner, G. (2018, January 9–12). Gamified Augmented Reality Training for An Assembly Task: A Study About User Engagement. Proceedings of the Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, Poznan, Poland.
39. Impacts of augmented reality and a digital game on students’ science learning with reflection prompts in multimedia learning10.1007/s11423-020-09834-w ↗
40. Meekaew, N., and Ketpichainarong, W. (2018, January 8–13). An Augmented Reality to Support Mobile Game-Based Learning in Science Museum on Biodiversity. Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI), Yonago, Japan.10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2018.00055 ↗
41. Lampropoulos, G., Keramopoulos, E., Diamantaras, K., and Evangelidis, G. (2022). Augmented Reality and Gamification in Education: A Systematic Literature Review of Research, Applications, and Empirical Studies. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12136809 ↗
42. Lampropoulos, G., Keramopoulos, E., Diamantaras, K., and Evangelidis, G. (2023). Integrating Augmented Reality, Gamification, and Serious Games in Computer Science Education. Educ. Sci., 13.10.3390/educsci13060618 ↗
43. Jiang, H., Zhu, D., Chugh, R., Turnbull, D., and Jin, W. (2025). Virtual reality and augmented reality-supported K-12 STEM learning: Trends, advantages and challenges. Educ. Inf. Technol.10.1007/s10639-024-13210-z ↗
44. What are the influences on teacher mobile technology self-efficacy within secondary school classrooms?10.61468/jofdl.v20i2.279 ↗
45. Krug, M., Thoms, L.-J., and Huwer, J. (2023). Augmented Reality in the Science Classroom—Implementing Pre-Service Teacher Training in the Competency Area of Simulation and Modeling According to the DiKoLAN Framework. Educ. Sci., 13.10.3390/educsci13101016 ↗
46. Vorerfahrungen, Einstellungen und motivationale Orientierungen als mögliche Einflussfaktoren auf den Einsatz digitaler Werkzeuge im naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht10.1007/s40573-019-00095-6 ↗
47. The relationship between self-assessment and performance in learning TPACK: Are self-assessments a good way to support preservice teachers’ learning?10.1111/jcal.12674 ↗
48. Gundel, E.M. (2018). Understanding the Effects of Mixed Reality Simulation on Pre-Service Teacher Self-Efficacy. [Ph.D. Thesis, Western Conneticut State University]. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/docview/2075116364.
49. An Augmented Reality-based Mobile Learning System to Improve Students’ Learning Achievements and Motivations in Natural Science Inquiry Activities
50. Applying Augmented Reality in Engineering Education to Improve Academic Performance & Student Motivation
51. The use of augmented reality to foster conceptual knowledge acquisition in STEM laboratory courses—Theoretical background and empirical results10.1111/bjet.12900 ↗
52. Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: Impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.004 ↗
53. ARBOOK: Development and Assessment of a Tool Based on Augmented Reality for Anatomy10.1007/s10956-014-9526-4 ↗
54. Effects of learning physics using Augmented Reality on students’ self-efficacy and conceptions of learning10.1111/bjet.13020 ↗
55. Applying AR-based infographics to enhance learning of the heart and cardiac cycle in biology class10.1080/10494820.2020.1765394 ↗
56. Enhancing Students’ Biology Learning by Using Augmented Reality as a Learning Supplement10.1177/0735633119884213 ↗
57. Effects of augmented reality on learning and cognitive load in university physics laboratory courses10.1016/j.chb.2020.106316 ↗
58. The Effects of Mobile AR-based Biology Learning Experience on Students’ Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Attitudes in Online Learning10.1007/s10956-023-10030-7 ↗
59. How does technology challenge teacher education?10.1186/s41239-022-00375-1 ↗
60. Keller, S., Rumann, S., and Habig, S. (2021). Cognitive Load Implications for Augmented Reality Supported Chemistry Learning. Information, 12.10.3390/info12030096 ↗
61. Re-Experiencing Chemistry with Augmented Reality: New Possibilities for Individual Support10.12691/wjce-6-5-2 ↗
62. Augmented reality in education: A meta-review and cross-media analysis10.1007/s00779-013-0747-y ↗
63. Revealing the true potential and prospects of augmented reality in education10.1186/s40561-023-00288-0 ↗
64. The impact of augmented reality on cognitive load and performance: A systematic review10.1111/jcal.12617 ↗
65. A bibliometric review of research on simulations and serious games used in educating for sustainability, 1997–201910.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120358 ↗
66. Technostress: Technological Antecedents and Implications10.2307/41409963 ↗
67. Gamification in e-learning: The mitigation role in technostress
68. Reiß, S., and Sarris, V. (2012). Experimentelle Psychologie: Von der Theorie zur Praxis, Pearson Studium Psychologie. [2nd ed.].
69. Understanding the Influence of Perceived Usability and Technology Self-Efficacy on Teachers’ Technology Acceptance10.1080/15391523.2011.10782576 ↗
70. Hayes, A.F. (2022). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, The Guilford Press. [3rd ed.].
71. EcoMOBILE: Integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.018 ↗
72. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 ↗
73. Learner autonomy in team-based learning: A case study of mechanical engineering education