journal article·2025-02-25Open access

Study of Airfoil Deflections for Unsteady Aerodynamics Optimization in Pitching Airfoils

William Refling, Charles Fabijanic, Thomas Sprengeler, Yildirim Bora Suzen, Jordi Estevadeordal

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 5

Abstract

Camber deflection concepts for a VR-12 rotorcraft airfoil were studied for the optimization of unsteady aerodynamics, including dynamic stall conditions and wing–wing interactions during pitching. The designs are based on deflections of the leading edge and trailing edge sections of the airfoil. The deflection parameters were initially established using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). Results from CFD and Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) were generated for various leading and trailing edge deflection combinations for comparison of their performances. The conditions of this study are for a Reynolds number of 250,000 and pitching reduced frequency of 0.04, representing a medium regime of rotorcraft operations. Linear tandem tests were performed to simulate unsteady wing–wing interactions. The effects of the deflections are discussed and compared to the baseline. Significant benefits are observed, notably dynamic stall mitigation from the leading edge (LE) deflected wing for certain angles of attack and decrease in the separation regions. Overall, from the numerical simulations and the experimental data fields, the LE deflection provides about 10% improvement, followed by the combined LE&TE deflections (8%). It is also found that combining various deflections can provide a performance increase over drastically different areas of the range of angle of attack.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics · Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control · Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA

Funding

Office of Naval Research

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Joslin, R., and Miller, D. (2009). Fundamentals and Applications of Modern Flow Control, AIAA, Inc.. Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics.10.2514/4.479892 ↗
2. De Hugues, P.P., McAlister, K.W., and Tung, C. (1993). Effect of an Extendable Slat on the Stall Behavior of a VR-12 Airfoil, NASA. NASA Technical Paper 3407.
3. A Review of Morphing Aircraft10.1177/1045389X11414084 ↗
4. Shape morphing of aircraft wing: Status and challenges10.1016/j.matdes.2009.09.011 ↗
5. Martin, P., Mcalister, K., Chandrasekhara, M., and Geissler, W. (2003, January 6–8). Dynamic Stall Measurements and Computations for a VR-12 Airfoil with a Variable Droop Leading Edge. Proceedings of the American Helicopter 59th Annual Forum, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
6. Compressible Dynamic Stall Control using a Variable Droop Leading Edge Airfoil10.2514/1.472 ↗
7. Design, development, and hover testing of a helicopter rotor blade chord extension morphing system10.1088/0964-1726/24/3/035024 ↗
8. Design, Fabrication and Testing of an Active Camber Rotor Blade Tip10.1177/1045389X211063940 ↗
9. Aerodynamic shape optimization for alleviating dynamic stall characteristics of helicopter rotor airfoil10.1016/j.cja.2014.12.033 ↗
10. Rotor aerodynamic shape design for improving performance of an unmanned helicopter10.1016/j.ast.2019.03.006 ↗
11. Aerodynamic characteristics of morphing wing with flexible leading-edge10.1016/j.cja.2020.03.012 ↗
12. Hunsaker, D.F., Phillips, W.F., and Joo, J.J. (2017, January 9–13). Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Morphing Wings at Multiple Flight Conditions. Proceedings of the 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Grapevine, TX, USA. AIAA2017-1420, AIAA SciTech.10.2514/6.2017-1420 ↗
13. Marks, C., Zientarski, L., and Joo, J.J. (2016, January 4–8). Investigation into the Effect of Shape Deviation on Variable Camber Compliant Wing Performance. Proceedings of the 24th AIAA/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference, San Diego, CA, USA. AIAA-2016-1313, AIAA SciTech.10.2514/6.2016-1313 ↗
14. Influence of Unsteady and Kinematic Parameters on Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Pitching Airfoil10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000944 ↗
15. Goecks, V.G., Leal, P.C., White, T.D., Valasek, J., and Hartl, D.J. (2018, January 8–12). Control of Morphing Wing Shapes with Deep Reinforcement Learning. Proceedings of the 2018 AIAA Information Systems-AIAA Infotech @ Aerospace, Kissimmee, FL, USA.10.2514/6.2018-2139 ↗
16. Black-box Online Aerodynamic Performance Optimization for a Seamless Wing with Distributed Morphing10.2514/1.G006573 ↗
17. Sprengeler, T., Refling, W., Suzen, Y.B., and Estevadeordal, J. (2022, January 3–7). Computational Investigation of Effects of Leading and Trailing Edge Deflections on VR-12 Airfoil Aerodynamic Characteristics. Proceedings of the AIAA SciTech 2022 Forum, San Diego, CA, USA & Virtual. AIAA2022-1950.10.2514/6.2022-1950 ↗
18. Numerical Simulation of Continuous Morphing Wing with Leading Edge and Trailing Edge Parabolic Flaps10.1061/JAEEEZ.ASENG-4622 ↗
19. Numerical simulation and wind tunnel tests investigation andvalidation of a morphing wing-tip demonstrator aerodynamic performance10.1016/j.ast.2016.03.014 ↗
20. Patterson, R.P., and Friedmann, P.P. (2020, January 6–10). Computations of Trailing Edge Fluidic Actuation for Active Flow Control at Low Angles of Attack. Proceedings of the AIAA SciTech 2020 Forum, Orlando, FL, USA. AIAA2020-0576.10.2514/6.2020-0576 ↗
21. Refling, W., Sprengeler, T., Suzen, Y.B., and Estevadeordal, J. (2023, January 23–27). Experimental analysis of the effect of active morphing of a VR-12 airfoil for unsteady aerodynamics optimization. Proceedings of the AIAA SciTech 2023 Forum, National Harbor, MD, USA & Online. AIAA2023-2611.10.2514/6.2023-2611 ↗
22. Ullah, A.H., Fabijanic, C., Estevadeordal, J., Montgomery, Z.S., Hunsaker, D.F., Staiger, J.M., and Joo, J. (2019, January 17–21). Experimental Evaluation of the Performance of Parabolic Flaps. Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum, Dallas, TX, USA. AIAA 2019-2916.10.2514/6.2019-2916 ↗
23. Dynamics of a hybrid morphing wing with active open loop vibrating trailing edge by time-resolved PIV and force measures10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2017.06.015 ↗
24. Raffel, M., Willert, C.E., Scarano, F., Kähler, C., Wereley, S.T., and Kompenhans, J. (2018). Particle Image Velocimetry: A Practical Guide, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-68852-7 ↗
25. (2021, June 01). XFLR5 User Manual. Available online: http://www.xflr5.tech/xflr5.htm.
26. Ansys, Inc. (2021, June 01). ANSYS CFX-Solver Theory Guide Release 2020-R1. Available online: https://www.ansys.com/products/fluids/ansys-cfx.
27. Sprengeler, T. (2022). A Numerical Study and Optimization of a Morphing and Pitching Boeing VERTOL VR-12 Rotorcraft Airfoil. [Master’s Thesis, North Dakota State University].
28. Effect of sweep on dynamic stall of a pitching finite-aspect-ratio wing10.2514/1.J058206 ↗
29. Dynamic stall of a finite-aspect-ratio wing10.2514/1.J057457 ↗
30. Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications10.2514/3.12149 ↗
31. A Correlation-Based Transition Model Using Local Variables—Part I: Model Formulation10.1115/1.2184352 ↗
32. A Correlation Based Transition Model Using Local Variables—Part II: Test Cases and Industrial Applications10.1115/1.2184353 ↗
33. Ullah, A.H., Fabijanic, C., Refling, W., and Estevadeordal, J. (19–21, January 11–15). Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Sweep on a Pitching Finite-Aspect-Ratio Wing. Proceedings of the AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, Virtual. AIAA2021-1733.10.2514/6.2021-1733 ↗
34. (2019). DaVis Flow Master Software, LaVision, Inc.
35. Unsteady aerodynamic forces estimation on a square cylinder by TR-PIV10.1007/s00348-006-0228-4 ↗