The Use of Mixed Reality in Training Trainers—A Single-Centre Study
Source abstract
Abstract
There has been an exponential increase in the utility of mixed-reality (MR) software as a tool for medical education and training due to its immersive and interactive capabilities. Whilst it has been progressively used in surgical training or in simulation training, there is a significant lack of using it to train the “trainers”. In this single-centre prospective study, MR technology was used to deliver a dedicated 2-h tutorial in surgical training to two cohorts of postgraduate students attending a course on clinical research and education. The Microsoft HoloLens 2 was used to run mixed-reality software capable of rendering CT scan images of a normal brain, an MRI of a large meningioma, an abdominal–pelvic CT scan, and a 3D-printed cranioplasty scan. The participants were then asked to complete a post-usage questionnaire in an anonymous manner. Fourteen participants attended the teaching session and completed the post-usage questionnaire. Scores obtained on the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) revealed that MR technology is rated “Excellent” on quality aspects for Attractiveness, Stimulation and Novelty. This prospective study provides insight into incorporating MR in training the trainers, allowing them to be equipped with the technology to imparting education to the next generation across various disciplines.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Augmented Reality Applications · Surgical Simulation and Training · Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
Division of Neurosurgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074, Singapore
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, E.D. Adrian Building, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 2PY, UK
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Virtual Reality Simulation in Nontechnical Skills Training for Healthcare Professionals
2. Dey, A., Billinghurst, M., Lindeman, R.W., and Swan, J.E. (2018). A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014. Front. Robot. AI, 5.10.3389/frobt.2018.00037 ↗
3. Students’ perspectives regarding needs for and opportunities with mixed-reality education in neurosurgery at German medical schools10.3171/2023.10.FOCUS23628 ↗
4. Augmented reality in medical education: Students’ experiences and learning outcomes10.1080/10872981.2021.1953953 ↗
5. Augmented, Mixed and Virtual Reality-based Head-Mounted Devices for Medical Education: A Systematic Review (Preprint)10.2196/29080 ↗
6. The Utility of Augmented Reality in Spinal Decompression Surgery Using CT/MRI Fusion Image
7. Examining the benefits of extended reality in neurosurgery: A systematic review10.1016/j.jocn.2021.09.037 ↗
8. Use of Mixed Reality in Neurosurgery Training: A Single Centre Experience10.1016/j.wneu.2023.04.107 ↗
9. Extended reality anatomy undergraduate teaching: A literature review on an alternative method of learning10.1016/j.aanat.2021.151817 ↗
10. Feasibility of using a low-cost head-mounted augmented reality device in the operating room10.4103/sni.sni_228_18 ↗
11. The role of augmented reality in surgical training: A systematic review10.1177/15533506221140506 ↗
12. Can an Augmented Reality Headset Improve Accuracy of Acetabular Cup Orientation in Simulated THA? A Randomized Trial10.1097/CORR.0000000000000542 ↗
13. Application of Virtual and Augmented Reality Technology in Hip Surgery: Systematic Review10.2196/37599 ↗
14. Bui, T., Ruiz-Cardozo, M.A., Dave, H.S., Barot, K., Kann, M.R., Joseph, K., Lopez-Alviar, S., Trevino, G., Brehm, S., and Yahanda, A.T. (2024). Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality Applications for Surgical Rehearsal, Operative Execution, and Patient Education in Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review. Medicina, 60.10.3390/medicina60020332 ↗
15. Learning Retention of Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement Using a High-Resolution Augmented Reality Simulator with Haptic Feedback10.1227/NEU.0b013e31821954ed ↗
16. Augmented and virtual reality in spine surgery, current applications and future potentials10.1016/j.spinee.2021.03.018 ↗
17. Li, W., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Liu, K., Jiao, Y., Zhang, X., Chen, J., and Zhang, T. (2023). Educational value of mixed reality combined with a three-dimensional printed model of aortic disease for vascular surgery in the standardized residency training of surgical residents in China: A case control study. BMC Med. Educ., 23.10.1186/s12909-023-04610-9 ↗
18. Ayoub, A., and Pulijala, Y. (2019). The application of virtual reality and augmented reality in Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. BMC Oral Health, 19.10.1186/s12903-019-0937-8 ↗
19. Mishra, R., Narayanan, M.D.K., Umana, G.E., Montemurro, N., Chaurasia, B., and Deora, H. (2022). Virtual Reality in Neurosurgery: Beyond Neurosurgical Planning. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19031719 ↗
20. HoloMentor: A Novel Mixed Reality Surgical Anatomy Curriculum for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy10.1159/000520386 ↗
21. Perceptions toward adopting virtual reality as a teaching aid in information technology10.1007/s10639-018-9734-2 ↗
22. UEQ (2025, January 02). User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) [Internet]. Ueq-online.org., Available online: https://www.ueq-online.org/.
23. Is cadaveric dissection essential in medical education? A qualitative survey comparing pre-and post-COVID-19 anatomy courses10.1515/jom-2022-0016 ↗
24. Silvero-Isidre, A., Friederichs, H., Müther, M., Gallus, M., Stummer, W., and Holling, M. (2023). Mixed Reality as a Teaching Tool for Medical Students in Neurosurgery. Medicina, 59.10.3390/medicina59101720 ↗
25. Hey, G., Guyot, M., Carter, A., and Lucke-Wold, B. (2023). Augmented Reality in Neurosurgery: A New Paradigm for Training. Medicina, 59.10.3390/medicina59101721 ↗
26. Utility of Optical See-Through Head Mounted Displays in Augmented Reality-Assisted Surgery: A systematic review10.1016/j.media.2022.102361 ↗
27. Cannizzaro, D., Zaed, I., Safa, A., Jelmoni, A.J.M., Composto, A., Bisoglio, A., Schmeizer, K., Becker, A.C., Pizzi, A., and Cardia, A. (2022). State of Art and Future Projections. A Systematic Review. Front. Surg., 9.10.3389/fsurg.2022.864792 ↗