journal article·2025-02-18Open access

Terrestrial Storage of Biomass (Biomass Burial): A Natural, Carbon-Efficient, and Low-Cost Method for Removing CO2 from Air

Jeffrey A. Amelse

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 4

Abstract

Terrestrial Storage of Biomass (TSB) is a Negative Emission Technology for removing CO2 already in the atmosphere. TSB is compared to other NETs and is shown to be a natural, carbon-efficient, and low-cost option. Nature performs the work of removal by growing biomass via photosynthesis. The key to permanent sequestration is to bury the biomass in pits designed to minimize the decomposition. The chemistry of biomass formation and decomposition is reviewed to provide best practices for the TSB burial pit design. Methane formation from even a small amount of decomposition has been raised as a concern. This concern is shown to be unfounded due to a great difference in time constants for methane formation and its removal from the air by ozone oxidation. Methane has a short lifetime in air of only about 12 years. Woody biomass decomposition undergoes exponential decay spread over hundreds to thousands of years. It is inherently slow due to the cross-linking and dense packing of cellulose, which means that the attack can only occur at the surface. A model that couples the slow and exponential decay of the rate of methane formation with the fast removal by oxidation shows that methane will peak at a very small fraction of the buried biomass carbon within about 10 years and then rapidly decline towards zero. The implication is that no additional equipment needs to be added to TSB to collect and burn the methane. Certified carbon credits are listed on various exchanges. The US DOE has recently issued grants for TSB development.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Global Energy and Sustainability Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Carbon sequestration via wood burial10.1186/1750-0680-3-1 ↗
2. Permanent Wood Sequestration: The Solution to the Global Carbon Dioxide Problem
3. Carbon sequestration via wood harvest and storage: An assessment of its harvest potential10.1007/s10584-012-0624-0 ↗
4. Wood Vault: Remove atmospheric CO2 with trees, store wood for carbon sequestration for now and as biomass, bioenergy and carbon reserve for the future10.1186/s13021-022-00202-0 ↗
5. Sequestering of atmospheric carbon through permanent disposal of crop residue10.1023/A:1010765013104 ↗
6. Sequestering Biomass for Natural, Carbon Efficient, and Low-Cost Direct Air Capture of Carbon Dioxide10.15344/2456-351X/2022/194 ↗
7. The Decomposition of Forest Products in Landfills10.1016/S0964-8305(97)83389-6 ↗
8. The decomposition of wood products in landfills in Sydney, Australia10.1016/j.wasman.2007.11.006 ↗
9. The decay of wood in landfills in contrasting climates in Australia10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.032 ↗
10. Decomposition and carbon storage of hardwood and softwood branches in laboratory-scale landfills10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.091 ↗
11. Wood waste decomposition in landfills: An assessment of current knowledge and implications for emissions reporting10.1016/j.wasman.2017.12.002 ↗
12. Negative emissions technologies and carbon capture and storage to achieve the Paris Agreement commitments10.1098/rsta.2016.0447 ↗
13. Geologic perspective for carbon sequestration by woody biomass, burial10.2516/stet/2023014 ↗
14. Climeworks (2023, November 24). Direct Air Capture: Our Technology to Capture CO2. Available online: https://climeworks.com/direct-air-capture.
15. Consoli, C. (2024, November 24). Bioenergy and Carbon Capture and Storage. Global CCS Institute. 2019. pp. 1–14. Available online: https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/BECCS-Perspective_FINAL_18-March.pdf.
16. Potential for biochar carbon sequestration from crop residues: A global spatially explicit assessment10.1111/gcbb.13102 ↗
17. Olivine Dissolution in Seawater: Implications for CO2 Sequestration through Enhanced Weathering in Coastal Environments10.1021/acs.est.6b05942 ↗
18. Modelling the process and costs of fuel ethanol production by the corn dry-grind process10.1016/j.indcrop.2005.08.004 ↗
19. A parametric study of CO2 capture from gas-fired power plants using monoethanolamine (MEA)10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.06.001 ↗
20. Herzog, H. (2022). Chapter 6: Direct Air Capture. Greenhouse Gas Technologies, Royal Society of Chemistry.10.1039/9781839165245-00115 ↗
21. Effect of process parameters on production of biochar from biomass waste through pyrolysis: A review10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.122 ↗
22. Collins, H. (2023, November 24). Biochar: Agriculture’s Black Gold, Available online: https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/20951/Biochar_2011.pdf.
23. Holt, J., Yost, M., Creech, E., McAvoy, D., and Allen, N. (2023, November 24). Biochar Impacts on Crop Yield and Soil Water Availability. Available online: https://extension.usu.edu/crops/research/biochar-impacts-on-crop-yield-and-soil-water-availability.
24. Keller, L., Idowu, O.J., Ulery, A., Omer, M., and Brewer, C.E. (2023). Short-Term Biochar Impacts on Crop Performance and Soil Quality in Arid Sandy Loam Soil. Agriculture, 13.10.3390/agriculture13040782 ↗
25. Brassard, P., Godbout, S., Lévesque, V., Palacios, J.H., Raghavan, V., Ahmed, A., Hogue, R., Jeanne, T., and Verma, M. (2019). Biochar for soil amendment. Char and Carbon Materials Derived from Biomass, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-814893-8.00004-3 ↗
26. Characterization and prediction of biomass pyrolysis products10.1016/j.pecs.2011.01.001 ↗
27. Pontecorvo, E. (2023, November 24). Meet the Startup Producing Oil to Fight Climate Change. Available online: https://grist.org/climate-energy/lucky-charm/.
28. Sturm, B. (2023, November 24). Water Chemistry: Acids, Bases, and Buffering, Part 1, YouTube Video. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVhR1wAj1Dg.
29. Floor, A.J. (2024, November 24). The Chemical Composition of Seawater. 2000, 2006. Available online: https://www.seafriends.org.nz/oceano/seawater.htm.
30. Vink, J.P., and Knops, P. (2023). Size-Fractionated Weathering of Olivine, Its CO2-Sequestration Rate, and Ecotoxicological Risk Assessment of Nickel Release. Minerals, 13.10.3390/min13020235 ↗
31. Rolling stones; fast weathering of olivine in shallow seas for cost-effective CO2 capture and mitigation of global warming and ocean acidification
32. Fin, L. (2024, November 24). Plans For 1st ‘Carbon-Negative’ Beach Unveiled In Hamptons, Patch. 13 July 2022. Available online: https://patch.com/new-york/southampton/plans-1st-carbon-negative-beach-unveiled-hamptons.
33. Hettinger, C., and Lisi, T. (2024, November 24). $208 Million Project Stores ADM’s Carbon Deep Beneath Decatur, Herald&Review. Available online: https://herald-review.com/news/local/208-million-project-stores-adms-carbon-deep-beneath-decatur/article_b0c2fea2-4929-5190-b833-46dddd909e02.html#tncms-source=login.
34. Businesswire (2024, November 24). Valero and BlackRock Partner with Navigator to Announce Large-Scale Carbon Capture and Storage Project. Available online: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210316005599/en/Valero-and-BlackRock-Partner-with-Navigator-to-Announce-Large-Scale-Carbon-Capture-and-Storage-Project.
35. Gibson, L. (2024, November 24). Carbon Connector, Ethanol Producer Magazine. 24 July 2021. Available online: https://ethanolproducer.com/articles/carbon-connector-18396.
36. Associated Press (2024, November 24). Navigator Cancels Proposed Midwestern CO2 Pipeline, Citing ‘Unpredictable’ Regulatory Processes. 20 October 2023. Available online: https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/north-dakota/articles/2023-10-20/navigator-cancels-proposed-midwestern-co2-pipeline-citing-unpredictable-regulatory-processes.
37. Katzen, R., Moon, G.D., and Kumana, J.D. (2024, November 24). Distillation System for Motor Fuel Grade Anhydrous Ethanol. US Patent No. 4217178. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4217178A/en?oq=US+4217178.
38. EIA (2024, November 24). U.S. Energy Information Authority, Petroleum and Other Liquids–Supply and Disposition, Available online: https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_sum_snd_a_epooxe_mbbl_m_cur.htm.
39. USDA (2024, November 24). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Feed Grains Database, Available online: https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/feed-grains-database.
40. USDA (2024, November 24). U.S. Department of Agriculture, US Bioenergy Statistics, Available online: https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/u-s-bioenergy-statistics/.
41. RFA (2024, November 24). Renewable Fuels Association, Ethanol Tax Policy. Available online: https://ethanolrfa.org/policy/tax-policy.
42. Puro (2024, November 24). Earth, Standard “Terrestrial Storage of Biomass Methodology for CO2 Removal Edition 2023”. June 2023. Available online: https://connect.puro.earth/terrestrial-storage-of-biomass.
43. IPCC (2024, November 24). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/2019-refinement-to-the-2006-ipcc-guidelines-for-national-greenhouse-gas-inventories/.
44. EPA (2024, November 24). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, LFG Energy Project Development Handbook, Chapter 2. Landfill Gas Modeling, Available online: https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2021-07/pdh_chapter2.pdf#:~:text=LandGEM%20is%20the%20most%20widely%20used%20LFG%20model,3.03%29%20was%20released%20by%20EPA%20in%20June%202020.
45. Lambers, H., and Bassam, J.A. (2024, November 24). Photosynthesis, Encyclopdeia Britannica. Available online: https://www.britannica.com/science/photosynthesis.
46. Emcon Associates (2024, November 24). Methane Generation and Recovery from Landfills, Ann Arbor Science, 1982. ISBN-0-250-40360-9. Available online: https://archive.org/details/methanegeneratio0000emco/page/146/mode/2up.
47. Britannica (2024, November 24). Catabolism. Available online: https://www.britannica.com/science/catabolism.
48. (2024, November 24). Carbon Sequestration, Inc. Available online: https://www.carbonsequestration-inc.com.
49. Knop, C. (2023, January 19). The Opportunity in Biomass Burial. Proceedings of the World Symposium on Climate Change Policies: Science and Technology in Support of Policy-Making in Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation, Online.
50. (2024, November 24). Woodcache. Available online: https://woodcache.org/.
51. Quantification of landfill gas generation and renewable energy potential in arid countries: Case study of Bahrain10.1177/0734242X20933338 ↗
52. IEA (2024, November 24). International Energy Agency, Global Methane Tracker 2022–Methane and Climate Change. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-methane-tracker-2022/methane-and-climate-change.
53. Smith, S.M., Geden, O., Gidden, M.J., Lamb, W.F., Nemet, G.F., Minx, J.C., Buck, H., Burke, J., Cox, E., and Edwards, M.R. (2024). The State of Carbon Dioxide Removal 2024, University of Oxford. [2nd ed.].