A Supervised Approach for Land Use Identification in Trento Using Mobile Phone Data as an Alternative to Unsupervised Clustering Techniques
Source abstract
Abstract
This study explores land use classification in Trento using supervised learning techniques combined with call detail records (CDRs) as a proxy for human activity. Located in an alpine environment, Trento presents unique geographic challenges, including varied terrain and sparse network coverage, making it an ideal case for testing the robustness of supervised learning approaches. By analyzing spatiotemporal patterns in CDRs, we trained and evaluated several classification algorithms, including k-nearest neighbors (kNN), support vector machines (SVM), and random forests (RF), to map land use categories, such as home, work, and forest. A comparative analysis highlights the performance of each method, emphasizing the strengths of RF in capturing complex patterns, its good generalization ability, and the usage of kNN with different distance measures. Our supervised machine-learning approach outperforms unsupervised clustering techniques by capturing complex patterns and achieving higher accuracy. Results demonstrate the potential of CDRs for urban planning, offering a cost-effective approach for fine-grained land use monitoring with the particularities of Trento, as its landscape combines urban areas, agricultural fields, and forested regions, reflecting its alpine setting, in contrast with other metropolitan regions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis · Data-Driven Disease Surveillance · Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Computer and Numerical Analysis, Campus de Rabanales, Albert Einstein Building, University of Cordoba, 14071 Cordoba, Spain
Funding
Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation · University of Cordoba
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Maji, G., and Sen, S. (2016, January 7–9). Data warehouse based analysis on CDR to retain and acquire customers by targeted marketing. Proceedings of the 2016 5th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO), Noida, India.10.1109/ICRITO.2016.7784955 ↗
2. Zwirowicz-Rutkowska, A., and Michalik, A. (2024). Spatial Data Infrastructure and Mobile Big Data for Urban Planning Based on the Example of Mikolajki Town in Poland. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14199117 ↗
3. Sultan, K., Ali, H., Ahmad, A., and Zhang, Z. (2019). Call Details Record Analysis: A Spatiotemporal Exploration toward Mobile Traffic Classification and Optimization. Information, 10.10.3390/info10060192 ↗
4. Predicting traffic intensity in the urban area of Madrid: Integrating route network topology into a machine-learning model10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109154 ↗
5. The Relationship between Social Networks and Spatial Mobility: A Mobile-Phone-Based Study in Estonia10.1080/10630732.2017.1406253 ↗
6. Unveiling urban traffic accessibility patterns and phase diagrams of traffic direction through real-time navigation data in Beijing10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103660 ↗
7. Analyzing travel mobility patterns in city destinations: Implications for destination design10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104718 ↗
8. Sánchez, I., Vallejo, F., Játiva, P.P., and Dehghan Firoozabadi, A. (2024). An Analysis of WiFi Coverage Modeling for a Hotspot in the Parish of Checa Employing Deterministic and Empirical Propagation Models. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142311120 ↗
9. Wisual: Indoor Crowd Density Estimation and Distribution Visualization Using Wi-Fi10.1109/JIOT.2021.3119542 ↗
10. Using Mobile Positioning Data to Model Locations Meaningful to Users of Mobile Phones10.1080/10630731003597306 ↗
11. Frias-Martinez, V., Virseda, J., Rubio, A., and Frias-Martinez, E. (2010, January 13–16). Towards Large Scale Technology Impact Analyses: Automatic Residential Localization from Mobile Phone-Call Data. Proceedings of the ICTD’10, 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, London, UK.10.1145/2369220.2369230 ↗
12. Duan, Z., Liu, L., and Wang, S. (2011, January 24–26). MobilePulse: Dynamic profiling of land use pattern and OD matrix estimation from 10 million individual cell phone records in Shanghai. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Geoinformatics, Shanghai, China.10.1109/GeoInformatics.2011.5980928 ↗
13. Lyons, K., Hightower, J., and Huang, E.M. (2011). Identifying Important Places in People’s Lives from Cellular Network Data. Pervasive Computing, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, 12–15 June 2011, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-21726-5 ↗
14. Reconstructing human activities via coupling mobile phone data with location-based social networks10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100606 ↗
15. Ferreira, G., Alves, A., Veloso, M., and Bento, C. (2022). Identification and Classification of Routine Locations Using Anonymized Mobile Communication Data. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 11.10.3390/ijgi11040228 ↗
16. Mendoza-Hurtado, M., Romero-Del-Castillo, J., and Ortiz-Boyer, D. (2024). SAMPLID: A New Supervised Approach for Meaningful Place Identification Using Call Detail Records as an Alternative to Classical Unsupervised Clustering Techniques. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 13.10.3390/ijgi13080289 ↗
17. Analysis and Study of K-Means Clustering Algorithm
18. Nurmi, P., and Koolwaaij, J. (2006, January 17–21). Identifying meaningful locations. Proceedings of the 2006 Third Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking & Services, San Jose, CA, USA.10.1109/MOBIQ.2006.340429 ↗
19. Exploring the mobility of mobile phone users10.1016/j.physa.2012.11.040 ↗
20. Towards pervasive geospatial affect perception10.1007/s10707-017-0294-1 ↗
21. Extracting Places from Traces of Locations10.1145/1094549.1094558 ↗
22. Kononenko, I., and Kukar, M. (2007). Chapter 12—Cluster Analysis. Machine Learning and Data Mining, Woodhead Publishing.10.1533/9780857099440 ↗
23. Identifying up-to-date urban land-use patterns with visual and semantic features based on multisource geospatial data10.1016/j.scs.2024.105184 ↗
24. Joint Deep Learning for land cover and land use classification10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.014 ↗
25. An empirical study of binary classifier fusion methods for multiclass classification10.1016/j.inffus.2010.06.010 ↗
26. Experimental Comparisons of Multi-class Classifiers
27. A multi-source dataset of urban life in the city of Milan and the Province of Trentino10.1038/sdata.2015.55 ↗
28. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines10.1145/1961189.1961199 ↗
29. Nearest neighbor pattern classification10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964 ↗
30. Linear programming-based scenario reduction using transportation distance10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.02.005 ↗
31. CID: An efficient complexity-invariant distance for time series10.1007/s10618-013-0312-3 ↗
32. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
33. Blondel, V.D., Esch, M., Chan, C., Clerot, F., Deville, P., Huens, E., Morlot, F., Smoreda, Z., and Ziemlicki, C. (2013). Data for Development: The D4D Challenge on Mobile Phone Data. arXiv.
34. de Montjoye, Y.A., Smoreda, Z., Trinquart, R., Ziemlicki, C., and Blondel, V.D. (2014). D4D-Senegal: The Second Mobile Phone Data for Development Challenge. arXiv.
35. Juszczak, P., Tax, D.M.J., and Duin, R.P.W. (2002, January 19–21). Feature scaling in support vector data description. Proceedings of the ASCI, Delft, The Netherlands. Available online: http://rduin.nl/papers/asci_02_occ.pdf.
36. Butler, H., Daly, M., Doyle, A., Gillies, S., Schaub, T., and Schaub, T. (2016). The GeoJSON Format, RFC Production Center. RFC 7946.10.17487/RFC7946 ↗
37. A simple and fast algorithm for K-medoids clustering10.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.039 ↗
38. Santafé, G., Inza, I., and Lozano, J. (2015). Dealing with the evaluation of supervised classification algorithms. Artif. Intell. Rev., 44.10.1007/s10462-015-9433-y ↗
39. Local-based k values for multi-label k-nearest neighbors rule10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105487 ↗