journal article·2025-02-07Open access

Criteria for Route Evaluation of Automated Buses

Sönke Beckmann, Hartmut Zadek, Sebastian Trojahn

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 4

Abstract

Automated buses are a component of future mobility concepts. However, these vehicles will only realize their full potential when they are highly automated, without a driver on board, and operate on public roads. In addition to the further development of vehicle technology, the planning of automated bus deployment represents an important field of research. The selection of suitable routes is influenced by various criteria related to infrastructure, road users, and the environment. There is limited literature on the criteria for the route evaluation of automated vehicles, and specifically, no studies exist concerning automated buses. To address this research gap and determine the weighting of these criteria, expert interviews and a case study were conducted. The expert interviews were utilized to identify the criteria that influence the operation of automated buses. Furthermore, the weighting of these criteria was determined, facilitating their prioritization. The case study examined the extent to which these criteria could be derived from publicly available data. With the criteria catalog developed in this work, transport authorities and transport companies will be able to assess entire operational areas regarding the deployment of automated buses and prioritize suitable routes at an early planning stage.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Transportation and Mobility Innovations · Transportation Planning and Optimization · Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute for Engineering of Products and Systems, Otto von Guericke University, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany

Department of Economics, Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, 06406 Bernburg, Germany

Funding

Bundesministerium für Digitales und Verkehr (BMDV)

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Verkehrswende, A. (2023, July 31). Transforming Transport to Ensure Tomorrow’s Mobility. Available online: https://www.agora-verkehrswende.de/fileadmin/Projekte/2017/12_Thesen/Agora-Verkehrswende-12-Insights_EN_WEB.pdf.
2. Future Trends and Current State of Smart City Concepts: A Survey10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2992441 ↗
3. Knie, A., Canzler, W., and Ruhrort, L. (2022, March 31). Autonomes Fahren im Öffentlichen Verkehr–Chancen, Risiken und Politischer Handlungsbedarf. Available online: https://www.gruene-hamburg.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Autonomes_Fahren_Gutachten_030419.pdf.
4. Beiker, S., and Meyer, G. (2018). Shared Automated Mobility and Public Transport. Road Vehicle Automation 4, Springer. [1st ed.].
5. Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003 ↗
6. On the potential for one-way electric vehicle car-sharing in future mobility systems10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.003 ↗
7. Ainsalu, J., Arffman, V., Bellone, M., Ellner, M., Haapamäki, T., Haavisto, N., Josefson, E., Ismailogullari, A., Lee, B., and Madland, O. (2018). State of the Art of Automated Buses. Sustainability, 10.10.20944/preprints201807.0218.v1 ↗
8. Waymo LLC (2024, August 25). Largest Autonomous Ride-Hail Territory in US Now Even Larger. Available online: https://waymo.com/blog/2024/06/largest-autonomous-ride-hail-territory-in-us-now-even-larger/.
9. Waymo LLC (2024, August 25). Waymo. Available online: https://waymo.com/.
10. Waymo LLC (2024, August 25). Waymo Driver. Available online: https://waymo.com/waymo-driver/.
11. SAE International (2024, August 23). SAE J3016—Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles. Available online: https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_202104/.
12. Comparative safety performance of autonomous- and human drivers: A real-world case study of the Waymo Driver10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34379 ↗
13. PTV Group, Karlsruher Institut Für Technologie, and Rödl & Partner (2024, January 30). Erforschung der Voraussetzungen und Einsatzmöglichkeiten von Automatisiert und Elektrisch Fahrenden (Klein-)Bussen im ÖPNV: Teil 2 Projektsteckbriefe Testbetriebe im Ausland. Available online: https://www.fast.kit.edu/download/DownloadsFahrzeugtechnik/BMVI_70.941_LEA-(Klein-)Bus_Anlage_2.pdf.
14. Bloomberg IP Holdings LLC, and The Aspen Institute (2025, January 16). Global Atlas of Autonomous Vehicles in Cities. Available online: https://d1zwuo9w5ygmxm.cloudfront.net/.
15. EasyMile (2024, August 26). Fully Driverless Shuttle Service on Medical Campus. Available online: https://easymile.com/success-stories/oncopole.
16. (2024). Applying a multidimensional system approach to automated shuttle assessment: The case of KIS’M in Berlin. 2024 Smart City Symposium Prague (SCSP), Proceedings of the 2024 Smart City Symposium Prague (SCSP), Prague, Czech Republic, 23–24 May 2024, IEEE.
17. Serial launch of autonomous trucks is possible by the end of this decade
18. vhh.mobility (2025, January 16). Autonomous Driving with Ahoi in Hamburg. Available online: https://vhh-mobility.de/hop/ahoi/en/.
19. ERTRAC (2024, August 26). Connected, Cooperative and Automated Mobility Roadmap. Available online: https://www.ertrac.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Draft-ERTRAC-CCAM-Roadmap-V9-30-09-2021.pdf.
20. Fully Autonomous Buses: A Literature Review and Future Research Directions10.1155/2019/4603548 ↗
21. ERTRAC (2024, August 26). Connected, Cooperative and Automated Mobility Roadmap: Update of Chapter 2 “Agenda 2030” on Innovation Use Cases. Available online: https://www.ertrac.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/ERTRAC-CCAM-Roadmap-Chapter-2-Update-2024.pdf.
22. Beckmann, S., Biletska, O., and Zadek, H. (2020). Requirements for Pilot Routes and Infrastructure for the Introduction of Automated Shuttle Buses in Public Areas. Logist. J. Proc., 2020.
23. PTV Group, Karlsruher Institut Für Technologie, and Rödl & Partner (2023, July 31). Voraussetzungen & Einsatzmöglichkeiten von Automatisiert und Elektrisch Fahrenden (Klein-) Bussen im ÖPNV: Ergebnisse aus Dem Forschungsvorhaben LEA (Klein-) Bus. Available online: https://fops.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/70.941_Schlussbericht.pdf.
24. ERTRAC (2023, July 31). Connected, Cooperative and Automated Mobility Roadmap. Available online: https://www.ertrac.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/ERTRAC-CCAM-Roadmap-V10.pdf.
25. Yen, R., Braun Binder, N., Pitzen, C., and Schippl, J. (2024). Herausforderung der Planung der Integration automatisierten Fahrens angesichts fehlender Normen. Automatisierter ÖPNV, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-66998-3 ↗
26. Beckmann, S., Trojahn, S., and Zadek, H. (2023). Process Model for the Introduction of Automated Buses. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151914245 ↗
27. (2020). Operational Design Domain (ODD) Taxonomy for an Automated Driving System (ADS)—Specification (Standard No. PAS 1883:2020). Available online: https://www.bsigroup.com/globalassets/localfiles/en-gb/cav/pas1883.pdf.
28. Is it Safe to Drive? An Overview of Factors, Metrics, and Datasets for Driveability Assessment in Autonomous Driving10.1109/TITS.2019.2926042 ↗
29. Automated drivability: Toward an assessment of the spatial deployment of level 4 automated vehicles10.1016/j.tra.2020.03.024 ↗
30. Optimizing Road Networks for Automated Vehicles with Dedicated Links, Dedicated Lanes, and Mixed-Traffic Subnetworks10.1155/2021/8853583 ↗
31. Favarò, F.M., Nader, N., Eurich, S.O., Tripp, M., and Varadaraju, N. (2017). Examining accident reports involving autonomous vehicles in California. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0184952 ↗
32. Autonomous vehicles’ disengagements: Trends, triggers, and regulatory limitations10.1016/j.aap.2017.11.001 ↗
33. (2023). Road Vehicles—Test Scenarios for Automated Driving Systems—Specification for Operational Design Domain (Standard No. ISO 34503:2023). Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/78952.html.
34. Brosius, H.-B., Haas, A., and Koschel, F. (2016). Methoden der Empirischen Kommunikationsforschung, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.10.1007/978-3-531-19996-2 ↗
35. Boyle, M., and Schmierbach, M. (2023). Applied Communication Research Methods, Routledge.10.4324/9781003316831 ↗
36. Conceptions of scientific progress in scientific practice: An empirical study10.1007/s11229-020-02889-5 ↗
37. Bairagi, V., and Munot, M.V. (2019). Introduction to Research. Research Methodology: A Practical and Scientific Approach, CRC Press.10.1201/9781351013277 ↗
38. Hömberg, K., Jodin, D., and Leppin, M. (2005). Methoden der Informations-und Datenerhebung, Universität Dortmund.
39. Karunarathna, I., Gunasena, P., Hapuarachchi, T., Ekanayake, U., Gunawardana, K., Aluthge, P., Bandara, S., Jayawardana, A., Alvis, K., and Gunathilake, S. (2024). Data Collection in Research: Methods, Challenges, and Ethical Considerations. Uva Clin. Res., 1–24.
40. Methods of Data Collection: A Fundamental Tool of Research10.24321/2319.9113.202101 ↗
41. Data collection techniques10.1097/00004583-200108000-00020 ↗
42. Design: Selection of Data Collection Methods10.4300/JGME-D-16-00098.1 ↗
43. Factors to consider when choosing data collection methods
44. Kaiser, R. (2021). Qualitative Experteninterviews: Konzeptionelle Grundlagen und praktische Durchführung, Springer VS. 2., aktualisierte Auflage.10.1007/978-3-658-30255-9 ↗
45. Bogner, A., Littig, B., and Menz, W. (2009). How to Interview Managers? Methodical and Methodological Aspects of Expert Interviews as a Qualitative Method in Empirical Social Research. Interviewing Experts, Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230244276 ↗
46. Building Theories from Case Study Research10.2307/258557 ↗
47. Stadt Köthen (2024, November 20). Zahlen + Fakten über Köthen. Available online: https://www.koethen-anhalt.de/de/ueber-die-stadt.html.
48. Smart and sustainable scheduling of charging events for electric buses10.1007/s11750-023-00657-5 ↗
49. Ceder, A., and Wilson, N.H.M. (1986). Bus Network Design. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 331–344.10.1016/0191-2615(86)90047-0 ↗
50. Laporte, G., and Barnhart, C. (2007). Public Transit. Transportation, Elsevier.
51. The case of public involvement in transportation planning using social media10.1016/j.cstp.2016.11.002 ↗
52. McCoy, K., Andrew, J., Glynn, R., and Lyons, W. (2023, August 31). Integrating Shared Mobility into Multimodal Transportation Planning: Improving Regional Performance to Meet Public Goals, Available online: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/34689.
53. Autonomous and conventional bus fleet optimization for fixed-route operations considering demand uncertainty10.1007/s11116-020-10146-4 ↗