journal article·2025-02-04Open access

The Role of Sensory Cues in Collective Dynamics: A Study of Three-Dimensional Vicsek Models

Poorendra Ramlall, Subhradeep Roy

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 3

Abstract

This study presents a three-dimensional collective motion model that integrates auditory and visual sensing modalities, inspired by organisms like bats that rely on these senses for navigation. Most existing models of collective motion consider vision-based sensing, likely reflecting an inherent human bias towards visual perception. However, many organisms utilize multiple sensory modalities, and this study explores how the integration of these distinct sensory inputs influences group behavior. We investigate a generalized scenario of three-dimensional motion, an area not previously explored for combining sensory information. Through numerical simulations, we investigate the combined impact of auditory and visual sensing on group behavior, contrasting these effects with those observed when relying solely on vision or audition. The results demonstrate that composite sensing allows particles to interact with more neighbors, thereby gaining more information. This interaction allows the formation of a single, large, perfectly aligned group using a narrow sensing region, achievable by taking advantage of the mechanics of both auditory and visual sensing. Our findings demonstrate the importance of integrating multiple sensory modalities in shaping emergent group behavior, with potential applications in both biological studies and the development of robotic swarms.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, 1 Aerospace Blvd., Daytona Beach, FL 32114, USA

Funding

National Science Foundation CAREER Award

References (72)

Show source-provided references
1. Self-organized lane formation and optimized traffic flow in army ants10.1098/rspb.2002.2210 ↗
2. Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study10.1073/pnas.0711437105 ↗
3. Self-organized fish schools: An examination of emergent properties10.2307/1543482 ↗
4. Fish in a ring: Spatio-Temporal pattern formation in one-dimensional animal groups10.1098/rsif.2010.0175 ↗
5. Collective motions of fish originate from balanced local perceptual interactions and individual stochastics10.1103/PhysRevE.107.024411 ↗
6. The dance of male Anopheles gambiae in wild mating swarms10.1603/ME12251 ↗
7. Fish in larger shoals find food faster10.1007/BF00300175 ↗
8. Predatory fish select for coordinated collective motion in virtual prey10.1126/science.1218919 ↗
9. Cowan, D.P. (1987). Group living in the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus): Mutual benefit or resource localization?. J. Anim. Ecol., 779–795.10.2307/4948 ↗
10. Topaz, C.M., Bertozzi, A.L., and Lewis, M.A. (2006). A nonlocal continuum model for biological aggregation. Bull. Math. Biol., 68.10.1007/s11538-006-9088-6 ↗
11. Collective Memory and Spatial Sorting in Animal Groups10.1006/jtbi.2002.3065 ↗
12. Coordination of self-propelled particles through external leadership10.1209/0295-5075/92/40004 ↗
14. Discrete and continuous models of the dynamics of pelagic fish: Application to the capelin10.1016/j.matcom.2008.11.018 ↗
15. Collective motion with anticipation Flocking, spinning, and swarming10.1103/PhysRevE.91.012134 ↗
16. Wang, X., Zhao, H., and Li, L. (2023). An Improved Vicsek Model of Swarms Based on a New Neighbor Strategy Considering View and Distance. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132011513 ↗
17. Zhao, Q., Luan, Y., Li, S., Wang, G., Xu, M., Wang, C., and Xie, G. (2023). The Influences of Self-Introspection and Credit Evaluation on Self-Organized Flocking. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app131810361 ↗
18. A survey of mathematical modeling based on flocking system10.21595/vp.2017.18839 ↗
19. Novel Type of Phase Transition in a System of Self-Driven Particles10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1226 ↗
20. On the emergence of collective order in swarming systems: A recent debate10.1142/S0217979209053552 ↗
21. The Combined Effect of Repulsion Zone and Initial Velocity on Vicsek Model10.1166/sl.2018.3923 ↗
22. Modeling collective motion: Variations on the Vicsek model10.1140/epjb/e2008-00275-9 ↗
23. Collective motion of organisms in three dimensions10.1016/S0378-4371(98)00468-3 ↗
24. Optimal view angle in collective dynamics of self-propelled agents10.1103/PhysRevE.79.052102 ↗
25. Optimal view angle in the three-dimensional self-propelled particle model10.1209/0295-5075/93/68003 ↗
26. First-order phase transition in a model of self-propelled particles with variable angular range of interaction10.1103/PhysRevE.93.052115 ↗
27. A modified Vicsek model for self-propelled agents with exponential neighbor weight and restricted visual field10.1016/j.physa.2013.01.022 ↗
28. Thomas, J.A., Moss, C.F., and Vater, M. (2004). Echolocation in Bats and Dolphins, University of Chicago Press.
29. Long-range acoustic interactions in insect swarms: An adaptive gravity model10.1088/1367-2630/18/7/073042 ↗
30. Collective behavior in groups of self-propelled particles with active and passive sensing inspired by animal echolocation10.1103/PhysRevE.98.042404 ↗
31. Effect of visual and auditory sensing cues on collective behavior in Vicsek models10.1103/PhysRevE.100.062415 ↗
32. Yovel, Y., and Greif, S. (2018). Bats-using sound to reveal cognition. Field and Laboratory Methods in Animal Cognition: A Comparative Guide, Cambridge University Press.
33. Kong, Z., Fuller, N., Wang, S., Ozcimder, K., Gillam, E., Theriault, D., Betke, M., and Baillieul, J. (2016). Perceptual modalities guiding bat flight in a native habitat. Sci. Rep., 6.10.1038/srep27252 ↗
34. Multisensory Integration of Echolocation and Vision in Mammals
35. Roy, S., Howes, K., Muller, R., Butail, S., and Abaid, N. (2019). Extracting Interactions between Flying Bat Pairs Using Model-Free Methods. Entropy, 21.10.3390/e21010042 ↗
36. Multisensory integration: Current issues from the perspective of the single neuron10.1038/nrn2331 ↗
37. Orbach, D.N., and Fenton, B. (2010). Vision impairs the abilities of bats to avoid colliding with stationary obstacles. PLoS ONE, 5.10.1371/journal.pone.0013912 ↗
38. Northern bats, Eptesicus nilssonii, use vision but not flutter?detection when searching for prey in clutter10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.990216.x ↗
39. Vision complements echolocation in an aerial-hawking bat10.1007/s00114-003-0464-x ↗
40. Boonman, A., Bar-On, Y., and Yovel, Y. (2013). It’s not black or white—On the range of vision and echolocation in echolocating bats. Front. Physiol., 4.10.3389/fphys.2013.00248 ↗
41. Bats regulate biosonar based on the availability of visual information10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.003 ↗
42. Danilovich, S., and Yovel, Y. (2019). Integrating vision and echolocation for navigation and perception in bats. Sci. Adv., 5.10.1126/sciadv.aaw6503 ↗
43. Yu, J.H., Napoli, J.L., and Lovett-Barron, M. (2024). Understanding collective behavior through neurobiology. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 86.10.1016/j.conb.2024.102866 ↗
44. Roy, S., and Abaid, N. (2015, January 28–30). Consensus of conspecific agents via collaborative and antagonistic interactions. Proceedings of the Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Columbus, OH, USA.10.1115/DSCC2015-9655 ↗
45. On the Effect of Collaborative and Antagonistic Interactions on Synchronization and Consensus in Networks of Conspecific Agents10.1109/TAC.2016.2538999 ↗
46. Roy, S., and Lemus, J. (2021). How does the fusion of sensory information from audition and vision impact collective behavior?. Front. Appl. Math. Stat., 7.10.3389/fams.2021.758711 ↗
47. Lemus, J., and Roy, S. (2020, January 5–7). The Effect of Simultaneous Auditory and Visual Sensing Cues in a Two-Dimensional Vicsek Model. Proceedings of the Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Virtual.10.1115/DSCC2020-3277 ↗
48. Statistical mechanics for natural flocks of birds10.1073/pnas.1118633109 ↗
49. Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish10.1073/pnas.1107583108 ↗
50. Collective motion of mammalian cell cohorts in 3D
51. Inferring the rules of interaction of shoaling fish10.1073/pnas.1109355108 ↗
52. Reconstructing the flight kinematics of swarming and mating in wild mosquitoes10.1098/rsif.2012.0150 ↗
53. Automated 3D trajectory measuring of large numbers of moving particles10.1364/OE.19.007646 ↗
54. Collective motion in animal groups from a neurobiological perspective: The adaptive benefits of dynamic sensory loads and selective attention10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.08.013 ↗
55. A model of collective behavior based purely on vision10.1126/sciadv.aay0792 ↗
56. Key behavioural factors in a self-organised fish school model10.5735/086.045.0505 ↗
57. Schools of fish and flocks of birds: Their shape and internal structure by self-organization10.1098/rsfs.2012.0025 ↗
58. A numerical study of attraction/repulsion collective behavior models: 3D particle analyses and 1D kinetic simulations10.1016/j.physd.2012.12.010 ↗
59. Modeling three-dimensional bait ball collective motion10.1103/PhysRevE.107.014606 ↗
60. Nishimori, H., and Ortiz, G. (2010). Elements of Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577224.001.0001 ↗
61. Romanczuk, P., and Daniels, B.C. (2022). Phase Transitions and Criticality in the Collective Behavior of Animals Self organization and biological function. Order, Disorder and Criticality, World Scientific. Chapter 4.10.1142/9789811260438_0004 ↗
62. Phase Transition Model between Swarm Behavior and Territorial Behavior
63. Collective States, Multistability and Transitional Behavior in Schooling Fish10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002915 ↗
64. Experimental evidences of a structural and dynamical transition in fish school10.1016/j.physa.2005.11.041 ↗
65. Swarming, schooling, milling: Phase diagram of a data-driven fish school model10.1088/1367-2630/16/1/015026 ↗
66. Papadopoulou, M., Hildenbrandt, H., Sankey, D.W.E., Portugal, S.J., and Hemelrijk, C.K. (2022). Self-organization of collective escape in pigeon flocks. PLoS Comput. Biol., 18.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009772 ↗
67. Wu, Y., Yan, J., Xu, B., Zheng, Y., and Chen, D. (2024). Pattern phase transition of spin particle lattice system. Front. Phys., 12.10.3389/fphy.2024.1472564 ↗
68. Salahshour, M., and Rouhani, S. (2021). Collective Movement and Collective Information Acquisition with Signaling. Front. Phys., 9.10.3389/fphy.2021.668283 ↗
69. Sensory collectives in natural systems10.7554/eLife.88028 ↗
70. Collective sensing in electric fish10.1038/s41586-024-07157-x ↗
71. Krongauz, D.L., and Lazebnik, T. (2023). Collective evolution learning model for vision-based collective motion with collision avoidance. PLoS ONE, 18.10.1371/journal.pone.0270318 ↗
72. The evolution of distributed sensing and collective computation in animal populations10.7554/eLife.10955 ↗