journal article·2025-01-29Open access

Fit for What Purpose? NER Certification of Automatic Captions in English and Spanish

Pablo Romero-Fresco, Yanou Van Gauwbergen

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 3

Abstract

As human and fully automatic live captioning methods coexist and compete against one another, quality analyses and certification become essential. A case in point is LiRICS, the Live Respeaking International Certification Standard created by the Galician Observatory for Media Accessibility (GALMA) to help maintain high international standards in the live captioning profession. Until now, this certification had only been used to assess human captioners. In this paper, it is applied for the first time to automatic captioning (more specifically to Lexi, the automatic software used by the leading captioning company AI-Media) in order to ascertain whether automatic captions have reached an accuracy level that can match that of human captions. After presenting the materials and the methods (NER model), the paper reports on the results of the analysis of Lexi’s English and Spanish automatic captions. With average accuracy rates of 98.56% in English and 98.26% in Spanish, these captions often manage to reach human levels of quality, except when applied to colloquial content featuring several speakers. A final discussion is devoted to a reflection on how automatic and human live captions can coexist as long as the different purposes they serve are considered, namely the access in bulk provided by automatic captions and the curated access offered by human captions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Language Processing Techniques · Text Readability and Simplification · Translation Studies and Practices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Facultade de Filoloxía e Tradución, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain

Department of Translators and Interpreters, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium

Funding

the Spanish government-funded project NewsMAS

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. The artificial intelligence revolution in new-product development10.1109/EMR.2023.3336834 ↗
2. The impact of Machine Translation in the Audiovisual Translation environment: Professional and academic perspectives
3. International Telecommunication Union (ITU) (2005). Accessibility Terms and Definitions: Series F: Non-Telephone Telecommunication Services, Audiovisual Services; ITU.
4. Bogucki, Ł., and Deckert, M. (2020). Live subtitling through respeaking. Handbook of Audiovisual Translation and Media Accessibility, Palgrave.10.1007/978-3-030-42105-2 ↗
5. Live TV subtitling through respeaking with remote cutting-edge technology10.1007/s11042-019-08235-3 ↗
6. Romero-Fresco, P. (2011). Subtitling Through Speech Recognition: Respeaking, Routledge.
7. The accuracy of automatic and human live captions in English
8. AVTE (Audiovisual Translators Europe) (2021). Machine Translation Manifesto., AVTE (Audiovisual Translators Europe).
9. Respeaking certification bringing together training, research and practice
10. Eugeni, C. (2009). La sottotitolazione in diretta TV. Analisi strategica del rispeakeraggio verbatim di BBC News (Live Subtitling for TV. Strategic Analysis of Live Subtitling for BBC News). [Ph.D. Thesis, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II].
11. Closed-captioned television presentation speed and vocabulary10.1353/aad.2012.0377 ↗
12. Live subtitling with speech recognition. Causes and consequences of text reduction10.1556/Acr.14.2013.1.2 ↗
13. More haste less speed: Edited versus verbatim respoken subtitles
14. Apone, T., Brooks, M., and O’Connell, T. (2010). Subtitle Accuracy Metrics Project. Subtitle Viewer Survey: Error Ranking of Real-time Subtitles in Live Television News Programmes, NCAM.
15. EBG (2014). Report on Efforts to Improve the Quality of Closed Captioning, EBG.
16. Ofcom (2015). Measuring the Quality of Live Subtitling.
17. A strategic model for the analysis of respoken tv subtitles
18. Şerban, A., Matamala, A., and Lavaur, J.-M. (2011). Measures for quality of closed captioning. Audiovisual Translation in Closeup: Practical and Theoretical Approaches, Peter Lang.
19. Díaz-Cintas, J., and Baños, R. (2015). Accuracy rate in live subtitling: The NER model. Audiovisual Translation in a Global Context: Mapping an Ever-changing Landscape, Palgrave MacMillan.
20. Accessing communication: The quality of live subtitles in the UK10.1016/j.langcom.2016.06.001 ↗
21. Dutka, L. (2024). The Quality of Live Subtitling: Technology, User Expectations and Quality Metrics, Peter Lang.
22. Rico Vázquez, M. (2024). Live Subtitling in Spain: A Quality Assessment of Respoken and Automatic Subtitles on Spanish TV. [Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade de Vigo].
23. AI-Media (2024). LEXI AI-Powered Live Automatic Captions.
24. CRTCb (2024, June 25). Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC 2019-308. Available online: https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2019/2019-308.htm.
25. UNE (2024, May 01). Subtitulado Para Personas Sordas y Personas con Discapacidad Auditiva. Available online: https://www.une.org/encuentra-tu-norma/busca-tu-norma/norma?c=N0049426.
26. Romero-Fresco, P. (2015). The Reception of Subtitles for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing in Europe, Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-0351-0888-0 ↗
27. CRTCa (2024, June 25). Broadcasting Notice of Consultation CRTC 2019-9. Available online: https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2019/2019-9.htm.
28. Negotiating quality assessment in media accessibility: The case of live subtitling10.1007/s10209-020-00735-6 ↗
29. Of bad hombres and nasty women; The quality of the live closed captioning in the 2016 US final presidential debate10.1080/0907676X.2018.1526960 ↗
30. Access intimacy in Media Accessibility: The audio description of Where Memory Ends